Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You were up at 2 am waiting for one of us to post?
> That is even more pathetic than posting at 2 am.
> Pathetic even for you. s-)

Aw, you getting annoyed that I keep making fun of the 2am post? Don't blame me that you didn't have the fortitude to do it more than once. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You were up at 2 am waiting for one of us to
> post?
> > That is even more pathetic than posting at 2
> am.
> > Pathetic even for you. s-)
>
> Aw, you getting annoyed that I keep making fun of
> the 2am post? Don't blame me that you didn't have
> the fortitude to do it more than once. :-)

First, this Marvin didn't make a 4 am post. Second, why would anyone be annoyed by the fact you keep bringing it up? All it shows is that you are pretty much incapable of coming up with new material. Pretty sad, not that we haven't come to expect that from you. At least try harder next time. »-)

Finally, it must be safe to assume you were pissed about people making fun of your dawn hour posting. Otherwise you wouldn't assume someone to be upset about you calling out a 2 am post. You reveal much about your insecurities in your last few posts. ¡-)

Wow, longer post than usual! Excellent. Means I've once again succeeded at hitting a nerve or two. :-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Second, why would anyone be annoyed by the fact
> you keep bringing it up?

You'll have to answer that one. Your long response is even more evidence that you are.

> Finally, it must be safe to assume you were pissed
> about people making fun of your dawn hour posting.
> Otherwise you wouldn't assume someone to be upset
> about you calling out a 2 am post. You reveal
> much about your insecurities in your last few
> posts. ¡-)

I love your attempts at logic! Your bush league attempt at calling me out for being an early riser (LOL) went nowhere fast. As did your 2am post, for that matter. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow, longer post than usual! Excellent. Means I've
> once again succeeded at hitting a nerve or two.
> :-)
>
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Second, why would anyone be annoyed by the fact
> > you keep bringing it up?
>
> You'll have to answer that one. Your long response
> is even more evidence that you are.
>
> > Finally, it must be safe to assume you were
> pissed
> > about people making fun of your dawn hour
> posting.
> > Otherwise you wouldn't assume someone to be
> upset
> > about you calling out a 2 am post. You reveal
> > much about your insecurities in your last few
> > posts. ¡-)
>
> I love your attempts at logic! Your bush league
> attempt at calling me out for being an early riser
> (LOL) went nowhere fast. As did your 2am post, for
> that matter. :-)


Aw, see I did hit a nerve. It is readily apparent every time you make that claim of yours. You act like I care what some nutty fool that has a compulsive need to get the last word in here says. Particularly since it is 99% inaccurate. p-)

I could leave here right now and never post again and be pleased with the sadistic fact that I manipulated a complete fool and unbalanced man to post here for numerous days. Hell you would even respond to one word posts from people. I can take pleasure in the fact that I know others have joined in your torture. But, see, I won't stop. Call me a bully if you will, but I am deriving great pleasure knowing you cannot stop yourself from posting. f-)

I can probably do this for years and your mental compulsion will allow me to do so. u-)

Was this post long enough for you to come back with, "see I hit a nerve"? Your psychosis was apparent on day one. a-)

BTW, your next response is predictible. It will contain "bush league." It will deny the existance of multiple posters, even tough you know it to be true. It will have some sort of victory claimed by you. etc. etc.

Woo, he's fired up now! I love when you're in the mood to try to go toe-to-toe with me. :-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> some nutty fool that has a compulsive need to get the last word in

Hey, don't talk bad about yourself like that. It's really uncalled for. Just because you started this back-and-forth with me thinking you'd teach me some kind of goofy lesson doesn't mean you're a bad person. :-)

> But, see, I won't stop.
> Call me a bully if you will

LOL, who's calling you a bully? Great insight into how you see yourself. I love it when you get emotional and slip like this.

> I can probably do this for years and your mental
> compulsion will allow me to do so. u-)

Aw, another transparent attempt to get me to stop posting. "Kilton, look at me!!! I can do this for years!!! You'd better quit now!!!"

The sad reality for you is that you started this and now you can't finish it. Now you're in it for the long haul, even losing sleep over it as your 2am post showed. :-)

> predictible
> existance

The only thing that's predictable is your spelling going down the toilet when you're upset. It's like my very own Marvin blood pressure monitor. So adorable. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Woo, he's fired up now! I love when you're in the
> mood to try to go toe-to-toe with me. :-)
>
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > some nutty fool that has a compulsive need to
> get the last word in
>
> Hey, don't talk bad about yourself like that. It's
> really uncalled for. Just because you started this
> back-and-forth with me thinking you'd teach me
> some kind of goofy lesson doesn't mean you're a
> bad person. :-)
>
> > But, see, I won't stop.
> > Call me a bully if you will
>
> LOL, who's calling you a bully? Great insight into
> how you see yourself. I love it when you get
> emotional and slip like this.
>
> > I can probably do this for years and your
> mental
> > compulsion will allow me to do so. u-)
>
> Aw, another transparent attempt to get me to stop
> posting. "Kilton, look at me!!! I can do this for
> years!!! You'd better quit now!!!"
>
> The sad reality for you is that you started this
> and now you can't finish it. Now you're in it for
> the long haul, even losing sleep over it as your
> 2am post showed. :-)
>
> > predictible
> > existance
>
> The only thing that's predictable is your spelling
> going down the toilet when you're upset. It's like
> my very own Marvin blood pressure monitor. So
> adorable. :-)


Last my doc checed, my bp was 112/70. He said it was pretty good. A good workout gets it up, but a back and forth with a mental patient certainly won't. Why do you mention it so often? Do your psychiatric issues come with associated hypertension? I bet they do don't they? Look how worked up you get on a message board. There is no effort to get you to stop posting. h-)

Klinton reminds me of Vince. Both of you need to stfu and end this thread. Move on..... Losers.

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Look how worked up you get on a message board.

LOL, one of your best comments yet. It's clearly you who are angry, which is why you started this in the first place. My posts were upsetting you, so you came after me.

At this point, every word I type annoys you -- which I think is just wonderful. :-)

> There is no effort to get you to stop posting. h-)

Well we both know that's false, but of course you'll deny it. What's great about it though is how transparent your attempts are. Tell me more about how long you can "probably do this for". :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Look how worked up you get on a message board.
>
>
> LOL, one of your best comments yet. It's clearly
> you who are angry, which is why you started this
> in the first place. My posts were upsetting you,
> so you came after me.
>
> At this point, every word I type annoys you --
> which I think is just wonderful. :-)

Up to and past the point of you being agitated. Oh wait, we passed that long ago. s-)
>
> > There is no effort to get you to stop posting.
> h-)
>
> Well we both know that's false, but of course
> you'll deny it. What's great about it though is
> how transparent your attempts are. Tell me more
> about how long you can "probably do this for". :-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Up to and past the point of you being agitated.
> Oh wait, we passed that long ago. s-)

I know you're hoping that persistence alone will agitate (since that's all you bring to the table), but you will continue to be disappointed. :-)

I guess you're done being fired up for today. As usual you gave up quickly. I look forward to your next outburst. The "Call me a bully if you will" line was absolutely priceless. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Up to and past the point of you being agitated.
>
> > Oh wait, we passed that long ago. s-)
>
> I know you're hoping that persistence alone will
> agitate (since that's all you bring to the table),
> but you will continue to be disappointed. :-)
>
> I guess you're done being fired up for today. As
> usual you gave up quickly. I look forward to your
> next outburst. The "Call me a bully if you will"
> line was absolutely priceless. :-)

See you in the 6 am hour. k-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You were up at 2 am waiting for one of us to
> post?
> > That is even more pathetic than posting at 2
> am.
> > Pathetic even for you. s-)
>
> Aw, you getting annoyed that I keep making fun of
> the 2am post? Don't blame me that you didn't have
> the fortitude to do it more than once. :-)


Banana daquari. How do you say it in cuban? 6-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Harry Potter. k-)
>
> You're a Harry Potter fan? LOL. That certainly
> explains some things. :-)

Enjoy the show? j-)

Ready for the next? y-)

I think you two can masturbate each other at least another 400 posts. Go for it - be cool!

A Minor Threat

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Enjoy the show? j-)
>
> Ready for the next? y-)

There it is! LOL. I knew if I made fun of it enough you'd make another special appearance.

It's amazing how my words have the power to cause you to lose sleep. Pretty cool. You're in sorry shape. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Enjoy the show? j-)
> >
> > Ready for the next? y-)
>
> There it is! LOL. I knew if I made fun of it
> enough you'd make another special appearance.
>
> It's amazing how my words have the power to cause
> you to lose sleep. Pretty cool. You're in sorry
> shape. :-)


Aww, you almost made 7 am. B-)

I bet you tried really hard too. B-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aww, you almost made 7 am. B-)
>
> I bet you tried really hard too. B-)

LOL, I know I'm doing something right when you completely ignore my response.

Don't be ashamed that you're losing sleep over an Internet thread. It's just karma working its magic. Who's calling you a bully, again? :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Aww, you almost made 7 am. B-)
> >
> > I bet you tried really hard too. B-)
>
> LOL, I know I'm doing something right when you
> completely ignore my response.


LOL. Says the king of ignoring responses. f-)

Can you not afford a mirror, lardo? 6-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL. Says the king of ignoring responses. f-)
>
> Can you not afford a mirror, lardo? 6-)

The king? Wow! Hey, while we're making stuff up, how's my wannabe bully doing?

Oh, wait. That's not made-up. Nevermind. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOL. Says the king of ignoring responses. f-)
> >
> > Can you not afford a mirror, lardo? 6-)
>
> The king? Wow! Hey, while we're making stuff up,
> how's my wannabe bully doing?
>
> Oh, wait. That's not made-up. Nevermind. :-)


First evasion, now denial. Clearly that one hit a little too close to home. j-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First evasion, now denial. Clearly that one hit a
> little too close to home. j-)

Can you show me exactly where the evasion was?

It's cute when you try to play my game, but you just don't have the intellect to pull it off. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > First evasion, now denial. Clearly that one hit
> a
> > little too close to home. j-)
>
> Can you show me exactly where the evasion was?

You mean like all places you refuse to respond to an assertion made by a Marvin?

> It's cute when you try to play my game, but you
> just don't have the intellect to pull it off. :-)

Is that the game of repeating the same line over and over again or selectively removing certain contentions to respond to? You certainly excel at both. y-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You mean like all places you refuse to respond to
> an assertion made by a Marvin?

Excellent evasion. And you even threw in your daily reference to your fantasy of multiple posters to boot. I love when you do that. :-)

> Is that the game of repeating the same line over
> and over again

Which line have I repeated over and over again? This should be good. :-)

(Subsequent contention selectively removed, just to annoy you!)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You mean like all places you refuse to respond
> to
> > an assertion made by a Marvin?
>
> Excellent evasion. And you even threw in your
> daily reference to your fantasy of multiple
> posters to boot. I love when you do that. :-)

How do you account for at least 7 different IP addresses being associated with the name Marvin Monroe? 6-)

Let's hear it. This should be good. h-)


> > Is that the game of repeating the same line
> over
> > and over again
>
> Which line have I repeated over and over again?
> This should be good. :-)

You seriously don't know? LOL. There is a tired one not too far up. It seems to be one of your favorites. n-)

> (Subsequent contention selectively removed, just
> to annoy you!)


Doesn't annoy me, just proves my point (again). +-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do you account for at least 7 different IP
> addresses being associated with the name Marvin
> Monroe? 6-)

Aw, the guy who doesn't know what computer science means is pretending he hacked into FFU and retrieved the logs to determine which IP addresses are being used. You're the best!

So just in the last two days we've added "wannabe bully" and "wannabe hacker" to your resume. Very impressive. :-)

> You seriously don't know? LOL. There is a tired
> one not too far up. It seems to be one of your
> favorites. n-)

Evasion alert!

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How do you account for at least 7 different IP
> > addresses being associated with the name Marvin
> > Monroe? 6-)
>
> Aw, the guy who doesn't know what computer science
> means is pretending he hacked into FFU and
> retrieved the logs to determine which IP addresses
> are being used. You're the best!
>
> So just in the last two days we've added "wannabe
> bully" and "wannabe hacker" to your resume. Very
> impressive. :-)

You don't need to hack into ffxu to get the IP addresses. Each IP is logged on each post. A simple script can tell you each one. Sure you know computers? 6-)

> > You seriously don't know? LOL. There is a
> tired
> > one not too far up. It seems to be one of your
> > favorites. n-)
>
> Evasion alert!


At least you are admitting it now. h-)

Ho ho's are good, just ask Kilton the fatty. f -)

How is a script going to show you an IP address that doesn't exist within the source code of the page?



Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kilton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > How do you account for at least 7 different
> IP
> > > addresses being associated with the name
> Marvin
> > > Monroe? 6-)
> >
> > Aw, the guy who doesn't know what computer
> science
> > means is pretending he hacked into FFU and
> > retrieved the logs to determine which IP
> addresses
> > are being used. You're the best!
> >
> > So just in the last two days we've added
> "wannabe
> > bully" and "wannabe hacker" to your resume.
> Very
> > impressive. :-)
>
> You don't need to hack into ffxu to get the IP
> addresses. Each IP is logged on each post. A
> simple script can tell you each one. Sure you
> know computers? 6-)
>
> > > You seriously don't know? LOL. There is a
> > tired
> > > one not too far up. It seems to be one of
> your
> > > favorites. n-)
> >
> > Evasion alert!
>
>
> At least you are admitting it now. h-)

Tyrone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How is a script going to show you an IP address
> that doesn't exist within the source code of the
> page?

Haha. You are, of course, absolutely correct. But it's enjoyable watching Marvin pretend like he knows something about computers. He clearly doesn't even know what a script is. It's very cute. :-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ho ho's are good, just ask Kilton the fatty. f -)

Only 12:44am? LOL. What happened to 2am? Poor thing -- you getting sleepy-sleepy already?

BTW, my body fat percentage is about as close to 0% as you can get. But you get credit for the attempt, since statistically you had a 2-out-of-3 chance of being correct. Which is as good as it's going to get for you. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tyrone Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How is a script going to show you an IP address
> > that doesn't exist within the source code of
> the
> > page?
>
> Haha. You are, of course, absolutely correct. But
> it's enjoyable watching Marvin pretend like he
> knows something about computers. He clearly
> doesn't even know what a script is. It's very
> cute. :-)


Once again, you let others wonder if you actually know a damn thing about computers. It has gotten so bad you have resorted to posting as tyrone in the wee hours of the morning.


> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ho ho's are good, just ask Kilton the fatty. f
> -)
>
> Only 12:44am? LOL. What happened to 2am? Poor
> thing -- you getting sleepy-sleepy already?
>
> BTW, my body fat percentage is about as close to
> 0% as you can get. But you get credit for the
> attempt, since statistically you had a 2-out-of-3
> chance of being correct. Which is as good as it's
> going to get for you. :-)


Sure it is, tubby.

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again, you let others wonder if you actually
> know a damn thing about computers. It has gotten
> so bad you have resorted to posting as tyrone in
> the wee hours of the morning.

I think what's great about how this thread has progressed is that, at this point, even you don't believe what you're saying. You say things that you know aren't true for two reasons:

1) Hoping I'll believe that you believe what you're saying, and get frustrated at the idea that anyone could possibly be so stupid.

2) Still fantasizing that other people are following this thread to any significant degree, and that you're "ruining" my reputation by continuing to post.

As usual you're as transparent as the day is long. And I wouldn't have it any other way -- it makes things so easy. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again, you let others wonder if you
> actually
> > know a damn thing about computers. It has
> gotten
> > so bad you have resorted to posting as tyrone
> in
> > the wee hours of the morning.
>
> I think what's great about how this thread has
> progressed is that, at this point, even you don't
> believe what you're saying. You say things that
> you know aren't true for two reasons:
>
> 1) Hoping I'll believe that you believe what
> you're saying, and get frustrated at the idea that
> anyone could possibly be so stupid.
>
> 2) Still fantasizing that other people are
> following this thread to any significant degree,
> and that you're "ruining" my reputation by
> continuing to post.

So, you are admitting you are Tyrone? 9-)

> As usual you're as transparent as the day is long.
> And I wouldn't have it any other way -- it makes
> things so easy. :-)

Yeah, like scripts have NEVER been used on this forum to reveal IP addresses.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/38523/38523.html#msg-38523

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/258885/261410.html

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/257906/258573.html

School is definitely in session, right Tyrone, I mean Kilton? o-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, you are admitting you are Tyrone? 9-)

Can you show me where I said that? English hard. :-)

> Yeah, like scripts have NEVER been used on this
> forum to reveal IP addresses.

Actually, they haven't. You aren't capable of understanding what those threads are discussing. They have nothing to do with scripting. Doh! :-)

But what's great is that you just revealed where you got the word "script" from. You spent time searching FFU to see if IP addresses could be revealed. LOL. You went back years and years, desperately searching the archives to see if anyone had ever claimed to do it.

Then you found someone and misread how he used the word "script" in his message. Back to this thread you came, all excited that you had learned a new word that would hopefully convince Kilton you actually know something. But alas, all you did was out yourself via a totally inaccurate explanation. Another big fail. :-)

> School is definitely in session

It most certainly is. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So, you are admitting you are Tyrone? 9-)
>
> Can you show me where I said that? English hard.
> :-)

I am sorry English is difficult for you. You said it when you posted as Tyrone. See what I mean? k-)

> > Yeah, like scripts have NEVER been used on this
> > forum to reveal IP addresses.
>
> Actually, they haven't. You aren't capable of
> understanding what those threads are discussing.
> They have nothing to do with scripting. Doh! :-)
>
> But what's great is that you just revealed where
> you got the word "script" from. You spent time
> searching FFU to see if IP addresses could be
> revealed. LOL. You went back years and years,
> desperately searching the archives to see if
> anyone had ever claimed to do it.
>
> Then you found someone and misread how he used the
> word "script" in his message. Back to this thread
> you came, all excited that you had learned a new
> word that would hopefully convince Kilton you
> actually know something. But alas, all you did was
> out yourself via a totally inaccurate explanation.
> Another big fail. :-)
>
> > School is definitely in session
>
> It most certainly is. :-)

So, still think there is just one IP address associated with Marvin Monroe? Seriously? l-)

Your long winded, yet flawed post indicates your frustration. s-)

At least you didn't repeat "bush league" or talk about "intellect" in this post. That would have made what? Nine or ten times you had to go back to those unoriginal assertions? Right? m-)


http://youtu.be/oHg5SJYRHA0

Marv must be a glutten for punishment, or too stupid to know he is beaten like a rented mule.

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, still think there is just one IP address
> associated with Marvin Monroe? Seriously? l-)

Where did I say that?

You post from home, you post from work, and you post from your phone. That's at least three IPs right there. IPs also change from time to time, which you seem unaware of. :-)

What I've said is that there's only one person posting under your name. You know it and I know it. You can repeat your claim to the contrary every day for as long as you'd like. All it does is reassure me how desperate you are to get me to stop posting. :-)

> Your long winded, yet flawed post indicates your
> frustration. s-)

Your lack of ability to explain why I'm wrong confirms your complete & total lack of understanding about the subject at hand.

Do a few more hours of Googling and then let me know what you have. But try reading carefully this time. (I know it's difficult for you. :-)

Hog Tied Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marv must be a glutten for punishment, or too
> stupid to know he is beaten like a rented mule.

Uh oh, here comes the "Kilton posted that!!!" accusation from Marv. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So, still think there is just one IP address
> > associated with Marvin Monroe? Seriously? l-)
>
> Where did I say that?
>
> You post from home, you post from work, and you
> post from your phone. That's at least three IPs
> right there. IPs also change from time to time,
> which you seem unaware of. :-)
>
> What I've said is that there's only one person
> posting under your name. You know it and I know
> it. You can repeat your claim to the contrary
> every day for as long as you'd like. All it does
> is reassure me how desperate you are to get me to
> stop posting. :-)

Keep telling yourself that. Maybe you'll be able to convince yourself. g-)

> > Your long winded, yet flawed post indicates
> your
> > frustration. s-)
>
> Your lack of ability to explain why I'm wrong
> confirms your complete & total lack of
> understanding about the subject at hand.
>
> Do a few more hours of Googling and then let me
> know what you have. But try reading carefully this
> time. (I know it's difficult for you. :-)

You seem to be getting testy. Problems at home? Problems at work? k-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hog Tied Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Marv must be a glutten for punishment, or too
> > stupid to know he is beaten like a rented mule.
>
> Uh oh, here comes the "Kilton posted that!!!"
> accusation from Marv. :-)

Nice cover there. I am sure there are so many interested people in this thread that a complete random poster felt the need to put his two cents in. Nice try. f-)

You seem to be getting more and more desperate with each passing post. What gives? d-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Keep telling yourself that. Maybe you'll be able
> to convince yourself. g-)

You've convinced me by being such a bad liar. :-)

> You seem to be getting testy. Problems at home?
> Problems at work? k-)

LOL. That's code for "Shit, you really smacked me down on this script issue. I better find a way to change the subject. I know!!! I'll say you're testy! Take that!"

> Nice cover there. I am sure there are so many
> interested people in this thread that a complete
> random poster felt the need to put his two cents
> in

It's weird that you don't feel this way when an anti-Kilton poster shows up. Oops!

Hey, this reminds me. Why haven't you told me what my IP is yet? Get your "script" out and make it happen, rookie. :-)

Yo, Kilton. As an observer I watch you get pwn'd in multiple posts and threads here daily. Do you enjoy looking like a fool, or are you simply too stupid to understand that you're continuously getting beat down?

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You've convinced me by being such a bad liar. :-)

Are we referring to your inability to ascertain truthfulness again? s-)

> LOL. That's code for "Shit, you really smacked me
> down on this script issue. I better find a way to
> change the subject. I know!!! I'll say you're
> testy! Take that!"

I love how you are never afraid to presume too much. It is entertaining to watch you try and eek out some inference about what I am thinking. You aren't afraid to get out far on that branch, hear it snap, and fall hard on your face and pop up with a shit eating grin. It's what makes you so fun to watch. Your imagination knows no bounds. f-)

> It's weird that you don't feel this way when an
> anti-Kilton poster shows up. Oops!

Like the one above? I bet you think that is a Marvin, don't you? And, it may very well be one, just not this one. j-)

Lulz Wut?!? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yo, Kilton. As an observer I watch you get pwn'd
> in multiple posts and threads here daily. Do you
> enjoy looking like a fool, or are you simply too
> stupid to understand that you're continuously
> getting beat down?

If you are a Marvin, please use the Marvin Monroe handle as the rest of us do. If you are not, feel free to join in.

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I love how you are never afraid to presume too
> much.

There's no presuming necessary. The evidence is all in your posts. I smack you down on a given topic ("scripts", LOL), and you change the subject. You don't need to be ashamed -- I'm just better at this, that's all. No shame in 2nd place. :-)

> Like the one above?

Thank you for proving my point. Took less than an hour. :-)

I can't help but notice that you accidentally ignored my request for you to post my IP address. What are you waiting for? Does your "script" take a long time to run? Since you'll once again be losing some sleep tonight (Today sure hasn't gone well for you!), you should have plenty of time to complete it, right?. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm just better at this, that's all.

Thanks for reminding me of another one of your overused terms. What's that? Seventh time you've pulled that one of of the failbag? k-)

> Thank you for proving my point. Took less than an
> hour. :-)
>
> I can't help but notice that you accidentally
> ignored my request for you to post my IP address.
> What are you waiting for? Does your "script" take
> a long time to run? Since you'll once again be
> losing some sleep tonight (Today sure hasn't gone
> well for you!), you should have plenty of time to
> complete it, right?. :-)

You mean like ignoring at least one third of my posts? Yeah, I know those ones sting the most and you cannot bear to even see them again. d-)

Today has gone swimmingly for me. You've all but admitted here that I have gotten you completely frustrated and frazzled. Your exasperation is evident with every keystroke you make. s-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hog Tied Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Marv must be a glutten for punishment, or too
> > stupid to know he is beaten like a rented mule.
>
> Uh oh, here comes the "Kilton posted that!!!"
> accusation from Marv. :-)

Actually, I posted that comment. l-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aw, you getting annoyed that I keep making fun of
> the 2am post?

Is this grammatically correct?

Discuss.

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for reminding me of another one of your
> overused terms.

Term? Doh! Looks like someone needs to consult Mr. Dictionary. :-)

> You mean like ignoring at least one third of my
> posts? Yeah, I know those ones sting the most and
> you cannot bear to even see them again. d-)

LOL. I love watching you try your hardest to distract from what has happened today. You completely botched this whole IP thing. You spent time researching it, and couldn't even understand what you were reading. I couldn't have "scripted" it any better. :-)

> Your exasperation is evident with every keystroke you make. s-)

Spoken like someone who is incapable of providing my IP address. As usual, I was right. :-)

> Is this grammatically correct?

Yes, let's discuss. Please summon Suz!

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL. I love watching you try your hardest to
> distract from what has happened today. You
> completely botched this whole IP thing. You spent
> time researching it, and couldn't even understand
> what you were reading. I couldn't have "scripted"
> it any better. :-)

Botched? LOL. Time researching it? LOL. It took less time than you took to type your last response. How many times have you hit refresh since you got up this morning? More than a few I bet. d-)

I think I might start calling you Fiddle. How'd that suit you? s-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Botched? LOL. Time researching it? LOL. It
> took less time than you took to type your last
> response.

Nonsense. You gave it your all, and failed -- as usual. Once again you thought you had me. But all the while you didn't even understand what you were reading. Pretty darn funny. :-)

> How many times have you hit refresh
> since you got up this morning? More than a few I
> bet. d-)

Ah, the king of refresh is calling the kettle black. I can't believe one of the other Marvins didn't show up in your absence!

> I think I might start calling you Fiddle. How'd
> that suit you? s-)

I think you should definitely come up with some nicknames for me to distract from your complete IP failure yesterday. Then maybe I'll stop mentioning it. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Botched? LOL. Time researching it? LOL. It
> > took less time than you took to type your last
> > response.
>
> Nonsense. You gave it your all, and failed -- as
> usual. Once again you thought you had me. But all
> the while you didn't even understand what you were
> reading. Pretty darn funny. :-)

I've "had" you since day one. It is obvious to all. Even to the point of others partaking in the endeavor.

> > How many times have you hit refresh
> > since you got up this morning? More than a few
> I
> > bet. d-)
>
> Ah, the king of refresh is calling the kettle
> black. I can't believe one of the other Marvins
> didn't show up in your absence!

A few did yesterday. You conveniently ignored those posts. Why? Probably because they don't mesh with your warped view. o-)

> > I think I might start calling you Fiddle.
> How'd
> > that suit you? s-)
>
> I think you should definitely come up with some
> nicknames for me to distract from your complete IP
> failure yesterday. Then maybe I'll stop mentioning
> it. :-)

Sure thing, Fiddle. a-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've "had" you since day one. It is obvious to
> all. Even to the point of others partaking in the
> endeavor.

LOL, see my comment the other day about you saying things that even you know aren't true. It's great entertainment though. It's like listening to a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.

> A few did yesterday. You conveniently ignored
> those posts. Why? Probably because they don't
> mesh with your warped view. o-)

A great try, but sadly for you there was gigantic 15-hour gap in there. Truly amazing that none of you were around for such a long period of time. :-)

I guess when you made up this multiple poster stuff it never occurred to you that there would occasionally be extended time periods when you wouldn't be able to post, and that these gaps are pretty hard to explain under any kind of multiple poster fantasy. Just another example of you not thinking things through. That brain of yours continues to lag behind. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I've "had" you since day one. It is obvious to
> > all. Even to the point of others partaking in
> the
> > endeavor.
>
> LOL, see my comment the other day about you saying
> things that even you know aren't true. It's great
> entertainment though. It's like listening to a
> 9/11 conspiracy theorist.

LOL, see my comment the other day about your incessant need to claim victory because you need some sort of validation online that you lack in real life. Ot the comment I made about you repeating yourself. It's great entertainment though. It is like watching your favorite rerun. a-)

PS - you are slipping, you left out a smiley. Again, you seem to distracted. Problems at home? At work? s-)

> A great try, but sadly for you there was gigantic
> 15-hour gap in there. Truly amazing that none of
> you were around for such a long period of time.
> :-)

There have been longer ones that were filled in by others. s-)

I bet you know that though. #-)

Like the ones you don't respond to. Those seem to baffle you the most. I can obviously spot the Marvin posts that aren't mine. Based on which ones you aren't responding to, something tells me you can to. s-)


> I guess when you made up this multiple poster
> stuff it never occurred to you that there would
> occasionally be extended time periods when you
> wouldn't be able to post, and that these gaps are
> pretty hard to explain under any kind of multiple
> poster fantasy. Just another example of you not
> thinking things through. That brain of yours
> continues to lag behind. :-)

Hey, I know for a fact based on conversations with others that there are multiple posters. You have the ability to confirm or deny it with a minimal amount of investigation, yet you can't/won't. Seems strange.... d-)

Pretty long post! I know you're aggravated after yesterday's IP debacle, so I like to see you picking things up a notch. :-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL, see my comment the other day about your
> incessant need to claim victory because you need
> some sort of validation online that you lack in
> real life.

Can you show me where I declared victory in my last post? I look forward to it. :-)

> Again, you seem to distracted.

LOL. There's that patented Marv grammar again. BTW, did you research what "term" means yet?

> There have been longer ones that were filled in by
> others. s-)

Leave it to you to criticize me for repetition, and then immediately make another one of your "There are multiple posters, I swear!!!" claims. Just another indication that you're annoyed -- you can't go two sentences without doing exactly what you accuse me of. :-)

> Like the ones you don't respond to. Those seem to
> baffle you the most.

Here's some more classic Marv psychology -- trying to get me to respond to multiple sequential posts when you're talking to yourself. Yesterday's posts were simply an attempt to distract from your proven IP cluelessness. As usual I'm a step ahead. :-)

> Hey, I know

I'm still waiting for your "script" to run and tell me what my IP is. Then we'll have confirmation that you do indeed know something. It'll never happen. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pretty long post! I know you're aggravated after
> yesterday's IP debacle, so I like to see you
> picking things up a notch. :-)

It is sort of neat how you keep saying you aggravated me. It is your way of telling me that I am really annoying you. I really can't see how anyone would be "aggravated" by an anonymous user on a message board. The fact that you keep bringing it up must mean it applies to you. You need to simmer down, friend. Stress and anger will take years off your life. q-)

> Can you show me where I declared victory in my
> last post? I look forward to it. :-)

Can you show me where I said you declared victory in your last post? I look forward to it. z-)

Marvin Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is sort of neat how you keep saying you
> aggravated me. It is your way of telling me that
> I am really annoying you. I really can't see how
> anyone would be "aggravated" by an anonymous user
> on a message board. The fact that you keep
> bringing it up must mean it applies to you.

LOL. So by that logic, that fact that you've made repeated references to me often refreshing the thread during your absences means that you're the one refreshing the thread. I love Marv psychology!

I just call it like it is -- and it's very obvious when you're annoyed. You may think you're able to hide it, but I'm afraid you aren't. Just one of your many non-skills. :-)

> Can you show me where I said you declared victory
> in your last post? I look forward to it. z-)

Sure. You quoted something I said, and the first thing in your response was a reference to my supposed need to claim victory. I know you have trouble with English, but unless you want to claim that you were responding to something I didn't say, you'll have a hard time weaseling out of this one. Another Marv mistake! Could it be because you're upset? :-)

what a pair of losers.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Could it be because you're upset? :-)

I don't get upset. I don't get even. I get you to post again. d-)

Have a good night. d-)

Will a Marvin post again? u-)

Maybe. s-)

Maybe not. i-)

I bet you'll check though. a-)

You'll even check when you first get up. s-)

Right now, you need this thread. z-)

PS - The fact you restistered the name is enough validation to prove I've upset you. f-)

Dr. Marvin Monroe. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't get upset. I don't get even. I get you
> to post again. d-)

Did you just post again to tell me that you got me to post again? Pretty ironic. :-)

> PS - The fact you restistered the name is enough
> validation to prove I've upset you. f-)

Aw, did you register the name so that you could accuse me of registering it? So cute! I love watching you come up with new ideas as your aggravation increases.

How about a 2am post tonight? Or are you a one trick pony? :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aw, did you register the name so that you could
> accuse me of registering it? So cute! I love
> watching you come up with new ideas as your
> aggravation increases.

Given how frustrated you have been today, I think we all know who registered it. It was clearly an act of desperation on your part. Too bad it failed. f-)

Doctor Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Given how frustrated you have been today, I think
> we all know who registered it. It was clearly an
> act of desperation on your part. Too bad it
> failed. f-)

Failed at what? What exactly would have been the goal? Please provide a detailed explanation. And try making some sense for once. :-)

Any idea when your "script" will be done running?

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any idea when your "script" will be done running?


Any idea when you will start running? w-)

Marvin Monroe, PhD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any idea when you will start running? w-)

Nothing past 10:15? Wow. What a sorry performance these last couple days. Must be amateur hour!

Anyone seen Suz lately? I sure hope he's not still in his bedroom depressed after the last beat down I gave him. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Failed at what?

1) you failed in this thread;
2) you failed in life;
3) you admitted as much when you registered Marvin Monroe. x-)

PS- you do realize phd is a distinct poster? You do, but you will not admit it. +-)

Uh oh -- bad capitalization. Marv is on his phone again! LOL. I know you're obsessed with me -- no reason to be ashamed.

Doc Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1) you failed in this thread;
> 2) you failed in life;
> 3) you admitted as much when you registered Marvin
> Monroe. x-)
>
> PS- you do realize phd is a distinct poster? You
> do, but you will not admit it. +-)

Ah, this explains why you registered your name -- it gives you an excuse to use other variants and then claim they're different posters. You're so clever. And by "clever", I mean the opposite of clever. :-)

Time for my look at the p3wn Kilton thread.

yup, he's still getting smacked down.

laterz.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh oh -- bad capitalization. Marv is on his phone
> again! LOL. I know you're obsessed with me -- no
> reason to be ashamed.
>
> Doc Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 1) you failed in this thread;
> > 2) you failed in life;
> > 3) you admitted as much when you registered
> Marvin
> > Monroe. x-)
> >
> > PS- you do realize phd is a distinct poster?
> You
> > do, but you will not admit it. +-)
>
> Ah, this explains why you registered your name --
> it gives you an excuse to use other variants and
> then claim they're different posters. You're so
> clever. And by "clever", I mean the opposite of
> clever. :-)


I'll get back to you in a bit.... s-)

Marv Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll get back to you in a bit.... s-)

Yes, please stop exposing your obsession & desperation by posting from your phone. Come back when you return to your computer. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marv Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'll get back to you in a bit.... s-)
>
> Yes, please stop exposing your obsession &
> desperation by posting from your phone. Come back
> when you return to your computer. :-)


Bwahahahaha. You think these posts are from a phone. j-)

Again, get back to you in a bit. *-)

In the meantime, see how many more variations of Marvin Monroe you can register. k-)

Marv Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bwahahahaha. You think these posts are from a
> phone. j-)

Funny how you didn't deny it the first time. This means I was absolutely correct about your first post today being from a phone. And since there have been many other such posts over the weeks, it's pretty safe to say that you're obsessed. :-)

> Again, get back to you in a bit. *-)

Take your time. You're clearly swamped given your 7-minute response time. So I can understand the delay. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marv Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bwahahahaha. You think these posts are from a
> > phone. j-)
>
> Funny how you didn't deny it the first time. This
> means I was absolutely correct about your first
> post today being from a phone. And since there
> have been many other such posts over the weeks,
> it's pretty safe to say that you're obsessed. :-)
>
> > Again, get back to you in a bit. *-)
>
> Take your time. You're clearly swamped given your
> 7-minute response time. So I can understand the
> delay. :-)



That is about the 20th wrong assumption you have made. Your fantasyland must be a wonderful place in your mind. g-)

Tell me about my supposed wife again. LOL y-)

Dr. Marv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your fantasyland must be a wonderful place
> in your mind. g-)

LOL. n1 Marv. (-)

Dr. Marv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is about the 20th wrong assumption you have
> made.

Another post from your phone! LOL. So you just posted from your phone to tell me that I'm wrong about you posting from your phone. Great work. :-)

> Your fantasyland must be a wonderful place
> in your mind. g-)

Wow, that almost made sense. English chalks up another point against good ol' Marv. :-)

BrianShoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Marv Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Your fantasyland must be a wonderful place
> > in your mind. g-)
>
> LOL. n1 Marv. (-)

Thx, Brian. Although I did have to look up "n1" to be sure. &-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Marv Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That is about the 20th wrong assumption you
> have
> > made.
>
> Another post from your phone! LOL. So you just
> posted from your phone to tell me that I'm wrong
> about you posting from your phone. Great work.
> :-)

21st wrong assumption. s-)

Do you think anyone else believe you or are you simply writing nonsense in a lame effort to convince yourself? ^-)

> > Your fantasyland must be a wonderful place
> > in your mind. g-)
>
> Wow, that almost made sense. English chalks up
> another point against good ol' Marv. :-)

LOL. No surprise you don't get it. $-)

Your pain is evident. a-)

Marvin,Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 21st wrong assumption. s-)

Are you assuming that I'm assuming? Seems weird. That would be like posting from your phone to say you're not posting from your phone. Oh, wait. :-)

> Do you think anyone else believe you or are you
> simply writing nonsense in a lame effort to
> convince yourself? ^-)

LOL, you're still acting like other people are reading this?

> Your pain is evident. a-)

You track the thread from your phone, and lately you've been responding within minutes. That kind of obsession must be what's painful. Tell me how it feels. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvin,Monroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 21st wrong assumption. s-)
>
> Are you assuming that I'm assuming? Seems weird.
> That would be like posting from your phone to say
> you're not posting from your phone. Oh, wait. :-)
>
> > Do you think anyone else believe you or are you
> > simply writing nonsense in a lame effort to
> > convince yourself? ^-)
>
> LOL, you're still acting like other people are
> reading this?

According to the page "views" it is more than just you and a couple of Marvins. o-)

> > Your pain is evident. a-)
>
> You track the thread from your phone, and lately
> you've been responding within minutes. That kind
> of obsession must be what's painful. Tell me how
> it feels. :-)


AgAiN with the phone thing? If only it were true. To bad for you. j-)

Think "wifey" will take it away when she sees me because I ran up the data plan? LOL. Talk about way the hell off base. It shows how desperate you really are. s-)

PS - Speaking of obsession, posting about Marvin Monroe in other threads really does speak volumes about your psychosis. h-)

Marv*Monroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> AgAiN with the phone thing? If only it were true.
> To bad for you. j-)

The great thing is, you know I'm right -- but you'll continue to deny it because you're not sure if I'm sure. Like I said -- you don't have to be ashamed of being obsessed with me. I know I get under your skin, but that's life. :-)

> Think "wifey" will take it away when she sees me
> because I ran up the data plan? LOL. Talk about
> way the hell off base. It shows how desperate you
> really are. s-)

LOL, you don't have an unlimited data plan? What a loser!

The funny thing about the wifey thing is that -- regardless of whether or not she exists -- my mere mentioning of her changed your behavior. You weren't posting in the evenings until I made fun of wifey not letting you on the computer from home. You got annoyed, and you've been a regular evening poster ever since. So I'd say the joke is on you. :-)

> PS - Speaking of obsession, posting about Marvin
> Monroe in other threads really does speak volumes
> about your psychosis. h-)

That was a test to see if you track my posts (which I figured you do, due to your obsession). You passed with flying colors. :-)

> That was a test to see if you track my posts
> (which I figured you do, due to your obsession).
> You passed with flying colors. :-)


Or it was another inducator your compulsion has taken you over. h-)

SHUT THE FUCK UP. Get back on topic you goddamn wankers. Fucking PM each other if you wanna sniff each others' asses so badly.

Marv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or it was another inducator your compulsion has
> taken you over. h-)

Wow, short response. Must have been another post from your phone! LOL.

It's hard to imagine what it must be like for you to be so obsessed with me that you follow this thread from your phone, and also track my posts in other threads. Can you offer some insight? I won't judge, I promise. We'll make this the "Help Marv with his obsession" thread. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marv Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or it was another inducator your compulsion has
> > taken you over. h-)
>
> Wow, short response. Must have been another post
> from your phone! LOL.
>
> It's hard to imagine what it must be like for you
> to be so obsessed with me that you follow this
> thread from your phone, and also track my posts in
> other threads. Can you offer some insight? I won't
> judge, I promise. We'll make this the "Help Marv
> with his obsession" thread. :-)

No, no, we can only help Kilton in this one. From the phone again? Not so much. Maybe just an indicator of how interested I was at that time. Notice your posts in other threads having been getting many responses lately. People not really taking you seriously? Wonder why? o-)

Marvoe Monrin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, no, we can only help Kilton in this one. From
> the phone again? Not so much. Maybe just an
> indicator of how interested I was at that time.

Actually it's the opposite. Tracking the thread from your phone is an indication of how obsessed you are. And since there's an easy "tell" when you're doing it which you seem totally unaware of, I expect to continue to be able to know when you're on your phone. And you'll continue to be absolutely mystified as to how it could be possible. I love it. :-)

> Notice your posts in other threads having been
> getting many responses lately. People not really
> taking you seriously? Wonder why? o-)

LOL, thank you for the admission that you're tracking my posts. It really is amazing how you consistently out yourself.

This is definitely the Help Marv thread at this point. What can I do to reduce your obsession with me? I'm just here to help. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Marvoe Monrin Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No, no, we can only help Kilton in this one.
> From
> > the phone again? Not so much. Maybe just an
> > indicator of how interested I was at that time.
>
>
> Actually it's the opposite. Tracking the thread
> from your phone is an indication of how obsessed
> you are. And since there's an easy "tell" when
> you're doing it which you seem totally unaware of,
> I expect to continue to be able to know when
> you're on your phone. And you'll continue to be
> absolutely mystified as to how it could be
> possible. I love it. :-)

If I were using a phone you might be right. I love how I can change my style and mislead you (again). Say baaaaa, my sheep. d-)

> Notice your posts in other threads having been
> > getting many responses lately. People not
> really
> > taking you seriously? Wonder why? o-)
>
> LOL, thank you for the admission that you're
> tracking my posts. It really is amazing how you
> consistently out yourself.

No smiley? Another mistake made in haste. You are officially unhinged. s-)

> This is definitely the Help Marv thread at this
> point. What can I do to reduce your obsession with
> me? I'm just here to help. :-)

You mean like when I go on other threads and refer to you? Oh wait, that isn't me, it is the truly obsessed one. @-)

Toodles, my poodle. j-)

Mervin Minroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I were using a phone you might be right. I
> love how I can change my style and mislead you
> (again). Say baaaaa, my sheep. d-)

Nothing to do with style. Nice try though. Don't worry -- the next time you post from your phone (which won't be long, LOL) I'll once again point it out, and you'll be stunned. :-)

> No smiley? Another mistake made in haste. You
> are officially unhinged. s-)

If only I put a smiley after every sentence, this would actually make some sense. But alas, it's just another fail. Grasping at straws to try and distract from your obsession with me. :-)

> You mean like when I go on other threads and refer
> to you? Oh wait, that isn't me, it is the truly
> obsessed one. @-)

Why is "threads" plural in the above sentence? Please explain in detail. Can't wait. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mervin Minroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I were using a phone you might be right. I
> > love how I can change my style and mislead you
> > (again). Say baaaaa, my sheep. d-)
>
> Nothing to do with style. Nice try though. Don't
> worry -- the next time you post from your phone
> (which won't be long, LOL) I'll once again point
> it out, and you'll be stunned. :-)

c if u can! s-)

Mervin Menroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> c if u can! s-)

I'll let you know when it happens. Then you can deny it even though we'll both know I'm right. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mervin Menroe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > c if u can! s-)
>
> I'll let you know when it happens. Then you can
> deny it even though we'll both know I'm right. :-)


r u sure? G-)

Marvin Munroe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> r u sure? G-)

There it is! Another phone post.

I knew you wouldn't be able to hold out very long. Curiosity got the best of you, did it? :-)

omg u two!

pls stop!

it's getting old!

are you guys 11 years old?



.. so immature...

get over urselfs, really...









we r adults here.

-- besides u both need to get back to work.

that is very clear...
























VERY CLEAR!!!

Wat are your jobs?










Anyway?

kilton is computer graphics...













how about u monroe?

monrue u sound like





















maybe ur an arcade game technician....?

I am pretty good at guessing things









so































let me kno if i am right.