https://michaelsavage.com/32-injured-american-flagged-strategic-tanker-burns-off-englands-east-coast-after-collision/

Foul play “not been ruled out” by the White House after jet fuel-carrying tanker ship, indirectly contracted to the U.S. Department of Defence as part of its “times of need” emergency reserve, burns off the east coast of the United Kingdom after it struck broadside.

the Portuguese ship struck perpandicular in the center of the ship - it was not a "small" mistake accident

* recently the EU decided to de-friend USA by "dis-allowing certain military ships to re-fuel where they had re-fueled"

* the number of motives are endless - USA retracting from UN - USA tired of Rob Russia politics - USA tired of BBC lies - USA tired of Unity Gaming "hoard much stolen from USA becoming proprietary" - EU's media continually cheerleading CHINA as a friendly nation - EU (german org) debt printing euros (control of one country to "print money", esp. germany, should never have happened). there is 0 doubt that EU would join china in a war against USA - but then after - china would consume them as an after-dinner drink

for stupid millenials

both large tankers:

* have no traffic lanes at sea - they communicate by sight, various radio channels, and flags if necessary

* have radar

There is no such thing as "a tanker running full steam that collides because the radar is down"

* there would be visual contact

* there would be communication - not dis-including PLAIN FLAGS

* there are various right-of-way rules concerning ships and directions they are traveling even in the case no contact is made

* these are large slow moving ships with plenty of visual

* the LAW IS that without communication you must choose to GO AROUND - there is no sense, also no law, allowing a large ship to continue on a crash course. NO SUCH THING EXISTS.

THAT IS WHY THE INVESTIGATION. ALL THE ILL WIND FROM EU/UN AND THE FACT A BROADSIDE HIT IS NEVER "allowed" BY ANY NAVIGATION RULES AND HAS TO BE A DECISION


In other words - the Portuguese better have one good damn excuse and apology - or it will be considered yet another foreign strike on usa mil ships*


the pacific has seen many of these strikes recently

little redr riding hood

this view - from another totally untrusted source shows something like what the description said

however one has to ask how this other ship happened to be nearby AT THE TIME OF STRIKE - it may well be that ship taking the photo is involved in a planned "accident" (radio controlled ship?)

32 casualties - news did not say whether or not dead, whether or not portuguese

Another factor that some may not think of is:

* a jet re-fueling tanker does NOT travel alone. they are part of a FLEET - which would be well within communication and radar distance - so there would be more than one USA ship capable of SIGNALING BY ANY OF MANY MEANS "telling the Portuguese ship it was on a crash course"

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/03/10/32-injured-american-flagged-strategic-tanker-burns-off-englands-east-coast-after-collision/

.

the tanker was anchored in the North Sea, on the eastern coast of England - so it was not moving

this greatly increases speculation the "portuguese ship" intentionally created the GIGANTIC CRASH AND OIL SPILL

32 removed from ships to rescuing vesseles

1 hospitalized

1 missing

The incident occurred at approximately 10 a.m. Grenwich (England) time.

roughly 200,000 barrels of jet fuel in segregated cargo holds - it's unclear how many holds were breached and leaked

Port of Grimsby East CEO Martyn Boyers FARTED IN NEWS WITH COMMENT "there might have been fog"

which is just a british asswipe thing to say - being that he's clueless of the weather and DOES NOT KNOW

(navigating a ship in fog so deep you cannot see other ships where ships are anchored of course - IS NOT ALLOWED - never was - that's a second lie the british asshole tried to submit without saying so - that navigating without vision might be legal)

The british report "evacuating the crew" AND MAY PLANT TO ROB USA OF THE SHIP CLAIMING SALVAGE

IT MAY BE THE WAY THEY PLAN TO GET OUT OF PAYING RUSSIA FOR FUEL

"If pollution spillage enters the Humber, this could potentially be devasting for the wildlife of the estuary

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT CRAP FOR A SECOND. I WOULD BET THE BRITISH WERE IN WITH THE PLAN TO HIT THE SHIP.

it's important to know jet fuel does not easily catch fire. a mere collision would spill HEAVY JET OIL but not light it

THERE'S STILL A QUESTION OF WHAT SET THE FIRE

a fuel ship doesn't keep "electrical outlets inside the fuel tanks" - it's not like a home where penetration may cause a fire easily

IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO KNOW THE BRITISH WERE NEAR THE SHIP AND DIDN'T RELEASE A WEATHER VISIBILITY REPORT IN THE NEWS

THE REASON WHY IS THEY ARE LIARS AND PROBABLY ARE PART OF THIS ATTACK ON THE USA

https://en.mehrnews.com/news/229468/US-oil-tanker-and-Portuguese-cargo-ship-crash

THIS LOVEDLY INTERNET IRANIAN JERK posted, thank you, a video of the fire

there are other photos from a distant ship (ONE IS ABOVE)

THESE SHOW SLIGHT FOG BUT NOT ENOUGH

AGAIN THE BRITISH LIED - A SHIP OF THOSE SIZES IN FOG ALWAYS HAVE RADAR - NO SUCH THING AS ONE THAT DOESN'T

SHIPS OF THOSE SIZES TAKE 1/4 MILE TO 1 MILE TO TURN AND OR STOP

BECAUSE OF THAT - they either have to stop or see further than that. there is no wiggle room it's the law it's in every navigation book also.

THERE BEING PHOTO RELEASE - MORE AND MORE

AND THE BRITISH LYING SAYING THEY DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS FOG

JUST SHOWS THEIR DEDICATION TO DECEPTION AND LYING

Kate says she wasn't there at the time. But due to Green laws and oil cleanup the ship "might have to be seized"

A "London Fog" is most commonly associated with the early morning hours, particularly around sunrise, when the air is coldest and most likely to produce fog conditions; this means you'd typically see the densest fog between dawn and mid-morning in London

THIS MEANS WE NEED PHOTOS FROM ABOUT 9AM TO 10AM ON THAT DAY - since there was light fog in the photos later in that day (perhaps every day)

HOWEVER - they know ahead of time of the for EVERY DAY. again fog is no excuse. the weather was quite predicted not unusual that morning.

Most prevalent in winter:
Due to colder temperatures, London is more likely to experience fog during the colder months, particularly December.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THERE ARE $$$$$ PARTIES INTERESTED IN ALTERING MEDIA FOR LAWSUIT PURPOSES

THE CNN PHOTOS AND MOVIES SHOW "MORE FOG" THAN OTHER - AND ARE DUBBED OVER WITH CNN TEXTING

it's very probable some parties have added or removed fog from the photos

PACIFIC HAS SEEN MANY "old but large rusty ASIAN SHIPS: CRIPPLE USA'S NAVAL VESSELS

while it's true Portugal will probably claim "human error", the asians have been playing this GAME with usa for a LONG TIME

despite this - it's a large deficit and "a definite rat chase to recover funds of the lost ship"

which is WHY USA MAY HAVE TO CHANGE IT'S "pre-accident and post accident policies"