Re: Big O and Dukes coming back?
Date: June 05, 2014 10:34AM
wasteland Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On June 04, 2014 (10:44 PM), LOLscar wrote,
> "Please, show me where I called Chad a narcissist?
> Go ahead, look it up. I'll wait." After I
> successfully did this, he wrote, "So instead of
> admitting that you're wrong and the post you
> quoted from me never mentioned Chad being a
> narcissist, you searched for a post made by me to
> prove your point?" (June 05, 2014 12:30 AM). Don't
> ask me to look up something that you wrote and
> then complain that I looked up something that you
> wrote.
>
> Similarly, on June 04, 2014 (05:49 PM), you
> challenged me to reference other poets: "No other
> poets you want to reference to make yourself seem
> smarter? TS Eliot was all you had?" In response, I
> suggested that you check out the recent work of
> Brenda Shaughnessy, but then you incomprehensibly
> complained that I was being pretentious by
> referencing contemporary poetry. Dude, if I wanted
> to be pretentious, I wouldn't cite Shaughnessy,
> whose poetry is so easy to understand that even
> you could read it.
>
> Given your inability to think clearly, I'm not
> surprised that you enjoy the work of Lee Smolin. I
> thought Alexander Vilenkin's critique back in 2006
> pretty much destroyed Smolin's hypothesis, but you
> probably couldn't understand the nuances.
>
> At this point, I actually believe that the Big O
> is smarter than you, LOLscar, which is sad because
> I previously thought Oscar was the dumbest human
> being in the Americas.
This will be the last time I respond to you since you simply don't read what I write, you infer a bunch of bullshit and ignore what was actually meant.
I'm still waiting for you to show a post I made calling Chad a narcissist. Again, I might have, but the post you quoted from me did not paint Chad as a narcissist. So you failed and, yet again, refuse to admit it.
I asked you to mention other poets sarcastically because it was insanely douchey bringing TS Eliot into a simple remark that nobody posts here anymore (another mistake that you fail to admit to). I wasn't actually challenging you to name another poet. You knew that but seized the opportunity to discuss another poet to show how scary smart you are. Again, I don't enjoy poetry. For some reason, in your mind that makes me inferior. You thought me calling you pretentious was incomprehensible? You sound like a year 1 contemporary poetry student. Nobody is impressed.
How long did it take you to find information on Lee Smolin? Or do you know everything about physics too?! You are so smart! I'm impressed and bow to your superiority. Smolin gets shit on a lot and called a crackpot, however I think it's important to keep an open mind since most great thinkers of their time were labelled as crackpots or heretics. I'm not surprised that you don't share this view. He also researches at an institute around the corner from me, so I have a bit of a soft spot for him. Please, when you respond (and I know you will) can you give me your thoughts on the holographic principle? Also, how do I restore a piece of reclaimed wood? What are the fashion trends for fall 2014? Do I need to spike my insulin post-workout to ensure proper protein uptake? Is real estate a safe investment again? I'm sure you're an expert on all those things too.
Since this is my last response to you I'll point out that you picked a fight with me originally over something you misunderstood. Remember the whole wasteland thing? You still haven't admitted you were wrong. You got pissed off because you were wrong and then went on to argue about every little thing (including minor typing errors). Do you really not see this? I know it hurts, but you. Were. Wrong. Have a nice life.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/05/2014 10:42AM by LOLscar.