SL Football fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Having attended one of the eponymous Ivy League schools as well as my brother who attended H, I generally deal with references and facts. The NY Times had written an excellent 5 part installment series on athletic scholarships, well researched, and backed by great statistical analysis --
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/sports/10scholar ships.html?emc=eta1. The articles analyze ALL athletic scholarships, whether football or any other, and break the scholarships down to sports. Interestingly, the largest scholarships go out for hockey. Football was ranked fourth. Track, swimming,etc. programs received fractional amounts. I suggest that the readers of this blog review the New York Times 2008 in-depth studies on athletic scholarships before presenting specious arguments, as I rely on those numbers more than I rely on other sources. And unless the bloggers have better numbers and studies than the NY Times, I will rely on that source.<
The NYT story verified most of my prior posts, though claiming to do a "survey" that consisted of only 2 universities of the hundreds in D-IA, D-IAA and D-II is deceptive and pretentious. Using UDel was especially dumb because, as a state school with a small in-state population, its AD doesn't expect its coaches to fill out their rosters with only in-state players. Athletic departments budgets at state schools are charged for the scholarship based on whether the student is in-state or out of state. Thus, the NYT reporters ignored a dynamic that dominates most coaches recruiting strategies. Rutgers might have demonstrated this dynamic for these dopes.
Hockey scholarships would average higher in dollar value than football and basketball because a disproportionate number of hockey schools are private. Thus, a half scholarship to play hockey at the University of Denver (private) would be worth more in average dollar value than a full ride to an in-state football or basketball player at UNC. Further, the large number of Canadian hockey players would cause their public programs to be charged out of state tuition. Mixing scholarships for in-state, out of state, private colleges in D-IA, D-IAA and D-II and averaging them is a completely useless exercise.
Of the 120 D-IA universities playing football, only 17 are private universities. Thus, skewing the dollar value of the "full ride" football scholarship lower. Given the budgetary pressure on coaches at state schools to fill their rosters with in-state players, most football and basketball players at D-I schools are in-state kids, driving the average dollar value of those "full rides" even lower.
Lazy, smug NYT reporters headlining irrelevant analysis, demonstrating a lack of familiarity with the subject matter of which they write. Wow, what a surprise! Keep relying of those nitwits and not the NCAA website or those of us who've actually dealt with these issue for more than a decade.
Which brings up another insight, as one of the NYT stories referenced, given that most college athletic teams demand 2,000 hours or more per year from their players, even a "full ride" for an in-state D-IA football player or a D-I basketball player works out to less than minimum wage. The mom of the Villanova player getting $10k is dead wrong. Lots of jobs offer better than the $5/hour her scholarship equals. Better to work at the Mickey D's nearest campus.
Full rides at private schools, however, are true prizes.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/28/2010 01:40AM by Thomas More.