How crazy do these people have to get? Are they trolling?

Jesus Fucking Christ!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/09/11/birth-certificates-have-always-been-weapon-white-supremacists/?utm_term=.7a3e31be6ab6
Attachments:

The article simply recounts some of the ways in which repulsive white supremacists once 'protected' the rest of us from 'racial impurities.' Such as by writing anti-miscegenation laws. I guess you don't like having your nose rubbed in that shit? Well, too bad. You deplorable goober pukes deserve every bit of that and more.

This is the LEFTstream media's and academia's promotion of guilty white liberalism at its worst.

The writer of the article is hung up on something that has passed and was thrown out by the Supreme Court almost fifty years past.

She needs to stay on topic. She needs to focus on how the practice of denying passports to someone born in the U.S.A. is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.


The author of this article fails to understand that guilty white liberalism is a major contributor to the race problem in this country.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is the LEFTstream media's and academia's promotion
> of guilty white liberalism at its worst.

No, it's merely a tour of what many of all races rightly recognize as accruals of white guilt. That you are unable to 'fess up to the documented crimes of your forefathers marks you as a 'denier' of the worst sort. It all happened, and it was white people who did it.

The Post...kicking in the teeth of the white supremacists. Fuck 'em!

Nature is non existent, in the crazed minds now of libtards

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Im The Dixie Wigger half white man one half N _ _ _ _ _ !

Dont forget the crazies aka conservatives wanted to see Barrack Obama's birth certificate. Common sense morally responsible ppl felt that was white supremacy at it highest level

Editorials were where opinions once were. Now newspapers are written by losers who lack talent and are beyond biased.

The post used to be a great newspaper, now its toilet paper.

What newspaper do assholes read instead? Lol!

Build asylums. Lock up the MAD media.

Goober check... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What newspaper do assholes read instead? Lol!


Baltimore Sun isn't terrible

In the real world... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This is the LEFTstream media's and academia's
> promotion
> > of guilty white liberalism at its worst.
>
> No, it's merely a tour of what many of all races
> rightly recognize as accruals of white guilt.
> That you are unable to 'fess up to the documented
> crimes of your forefathers marks you as a 'denier'
> of the worst sort. It all happened, and it was
> white people who did it.


^ HATES that he's a white male.

Brown Onion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Goober check... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What newspaper do assholes read instead? Lol!
>
>
> Baltimore Sun isn't terrible

The Sun is every bit as fucked up as the Post.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The author of this article fails to understand
> that guilty white liberalism is a major
> contributor to the race problem in this country.

lol, who feels guilty? most liberals i know think white supremacists are scumbags who should be taken and out and shot. total white trash.

I didn't know the Post had turned into The Onion.
Interesting.....

SuzieQ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brown Onion Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Goober check... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > What newspaper do assholes read instead?
> Lol!
> >
> >
> > Baltimore Sun isn't terrible
>
> The Sun is every bit as fucked up as the Post.

Not quite as niggardly.

I love how all you dumbfuck bugman soy boy normies are just catching on to the fact that the jews want and are actively genociding you. Those of us who have been paying attention to things other than niggers playing sports, "binge watching," and comic book movies made for children figured this out last century. Is there ANY question that the wrong side lost WWII?

I can trace my root back to early 20th-century migration, and some liberal thinks I somehow owe someone something for some perceived injustice done to someone by my forefathers. Irony would be my forefathers would also be considered to have had monitory status at that time.

Fast forward to 2018. I don't owe anyone shit, and feel no guilt or give a shit about what happened to a group of people in the past.

In the real world... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> No, it's merely a tour of what many of all races
> rightly recognize as accruals of white guilt.
> That you are unable to 'fess up to the documented
> crimes of your forefathers marks you as a 'denier'
> of the worst sort. It all happened, and it was
> white people who did it.



When you consider that I did not do any of the things that the article describes, there is no reason that I should feel any guilt.

Kill yourself, it's the only way Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In the real world... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Scholar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > of the worst sort. It all happened, and it was
> > white people who did it.
>
>
> ^ HATES that he's a white male.


+1

guilt? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> lol, who feels guilty?



...........the person who wrote the article, for one..............

Who reads the Washington Post anyway?

they are planning on Venezuela mexico

they are planning to burn through every free government dollar then to start shooting people to "free up welfare funds" for more of la familia: like mexico is doing today

washington post's plan is to insure hispanics are on top and whites are dead

guilt? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> lol, who feels guilty? most liberals i know think
> white supremacists are scumbags who should be
> taken and out and shot. total white trash.


Stick to what you know best, Gerry, fucking goats and sheep and getting butt reamed by the BBC.

guilt?Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I CRAVE the BBC.

Washington Post is a weapon of illegal aliens in Maryland and they are using my senile old man's money to run their game.

Payback is hell.

Hey, dummy... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The article simply recounts some of the ways in
> which repulsive white supremacists once
> 'protected' the rest of us from 'racial
> impurities.' Such as by writing
> anti-miscegenation laws. I guess you don't like
> having your nose rubbed in that shit? Well, too
> bad. You deplorable goober pukes deserve every
> bit of that and more.

However, you can't discount the deliberate effort by the Post to raise the ire of white America (its majority audience) to sell more copies via sensationalist headlines and with forethought that an increasing number of the vacuous will not read the narrative. Charles Foster Kane would be proud. His successor is Jeff Bezos.

The once great Washington Post now sucks.

It's a shame.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is the LEFTstream media's and academia's
> promotion of guilty white liberalism at its
> worst.
>
> The writer of the article is hung up on something
> that has passed and was thrown out by the Supreme
> Court almost fifty years past.
>
> She needs to stay on topic. She needs to focus on
> how the practice of denying passports to someone
> born in the U.S.A. is a violation of the
> Fourteenth Amendment.
>
>
> The author of this article fails to understand
> that guilty white liberalism is a major
> contributor to the race problem in this country.


The story is factually correct. Conservatives in some states, Virginia among them, did use basic government record keeping documents such as birth certificates to promote policies of white supremacy and white exclusivity. If that historical fact makes you uncomfortable, that is your problem, not the author's fault.

Where the author has failed is in her effort to carry forward her argument and apply it to the passport violations in south Texas. The author ASSUMES the motive underlying the policy is the white supremacy and white exclusivity embraced by certain Trump supporters. Yet she mentions the problem predates Trump which undercuts the argument. The author assumes this is a policy decision, and that the policy is only directed against Hispanics, or against Hispanics of primarily non-European racial origin. Whether this is factually correct and whether the evidence is available elsewhere is beside the point. The author needs to tie the two together, not rely on the readers to do so.

I suspect if someone presented a similar argument in the author's class, she would have given them a C- for just those reasons. It is a sloppily presented argument.

Sloppy according to the people quite properly impugned by it.

More Scholarly Wrote:
---
>
>
> The story is factually correct. Conservatives in
> some states, Virginia among them, did use basic
> government record keeping documents such as birth
> certificates to promote policies of white
> supremacy and white exclusivity. If that
> historical fact makes you uncomfortable, that is
> your problem, not the author's fault.
>
> Where the author has failed is in her effort to
> carry forward her argument and apply it to the
> passport violations in south Texas. The author
> ASSUMES the motive underlying the policy is the
> white supremacy and white exclusivity embraced by
> certain Trump supporters. Yet she mentions the
> problem predates Trump which undercuts the
> argument. The author assumes this is a policy
> decision, and that the policy is only directed
> against Hispanics, or against Hispanics of
> primarily non-European racial origin. Whether
> this is factually correct and whether the evidence
> is available elsewhere is beside the point. The
> author needs to tie the two together, not rely on
> the readers to do so.
>
> I suspect if someone presented a similar argument
> in the author's class, she would have given them a
> C- for just those reasons. It is a sloppily
> presented argument.




I never disputed the facts of her argument. What I disputed were the relevancy of said facts to her argument, which you dispute, as well.

It is a common mistake of the Left when it presents "arguments". The left-wing presenter assumes that everyone thinks as he does, thus there is no need to connect his facts to his case. While it is not the only reason, it is part of the reason why anyone who disagrees with the Left onn even the smallest point is automatically assumed to be racist, sexist, Nazi, fascist, phalangist, homophobic, illiterate, fundie-con, religious whack-0, rapist or ___________________(fill in superlative here).

Well, so many of you dipshit FOX-slugs actually are racist, sexist, Nazi, fascist, phalangist, homophobic, illiterate, fundie-con, religious whack-0, rapist or ___________________(fill in superlative here).

By the way, superlatives tend to end in -est, not -ist. Not much of a scholar to have stumbled over that one.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I never disputed the facts of her argument. What
> I disputed were the relevancy of said facts to her
> argument, which you dispute, as well.

I don't dispute the relevancy of her facts. I take her to task for failing to SHOW the relevancy of her facts.

> It is a common mistake of the Left when it
> presents "arguments".

It is by no means restricted to the left. The right is just as guilty. Racists do it, so do reverse racists and so do anti-racists. Not everything in this world is a god damn tweet or sound bite. If you have several paragraphs or a few minutes to work with, you don't have an excuse. Tie the whole thing together.

The Washington Post has completed its rapid decline into the sewer, and is now only good to use as a rag to clean your toilet.

i would say "in other words they want what you have without working", however, it's fake news

the fact is democrats have BEEN TAKING taxes to get what americans have for a long time to the extent of deserving prison time

hillary for prison 2016