Man Charged After Making Coffee Naked

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/1019...d_faces_charges
SPRINGFIELD, Va. - A Springfield, Virginia man is facing an indecent exposure charge after a passerby spotted the man naked in his kitchen and reported it to police.

Eric Williamson, 29, is a commercial diver who grew up in Hawaii and rents home with several co-workers. Williamson told FOX 5's Will Thomas his roommates were not home and he walked into the kitchen to make coffee about 5:30 a.m. Monday.

"Yes, I wasn't wearing any clothes but I was alone, in my own home and just got out of bed. It was dark and I had no idea anyone was outside looking in at me," Williamson said.

The complaint came from an unidentified woman who was walking with a 7-year-old boy. A Fairfax County Police spokesman said officers arrested Williamson for indecent exposure because they believe he wanted to be seen naked by the public.

Officer Bud Walker said officers also consulted the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and they were given the green light to proceed with the charge.

Williamson, who is father of a 5-year old girl, said he feels like the victim.

"I am a loving dad. Any of my friends and anyone knows that and there is not a chance on this planet I would ever, ever, ever do anything like that to a kid," he said.

Williamson is meeting with a lawyer to fight the charge and may attempt to seek damages from Fairfax County Police. If convicted on the misdemeanor charge, he would face up to one year in jail and a $2,000 fine.

Was this the brand of coffee he was using?




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Just wait until Cucinnelli becomes Attorney General...what the police "believe" will be grounds for a search warrant if you shower naked in your own home.

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

maybe if she wasnt so nosey!

Charlie Schmidt's "cool cat" Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> maybe if she wasnt so nosey!

Yeah. It sounds like, if anything, she should be charged as a peeping tom.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

At 5:30 in the morning now it is very dark out... what mother would have her 7-year-old kid walking around with her at that hour? I think the police were questioning the wrong person.

I tend to believe the guy on this one, if you can't walk around your house to make coffee, especially at an hour that 99.5% of the area population is still sleeping, then we might as well start reporting the the Queen again as we're turning into a nanny state like the UK.

I can see the defense now questioning the lady, asking if he waved his cock in a threatening manner, or gave any reason at all to believe he knew they were peeping on him. He probably didn't know... next time it is dark out, turn on a light and step away from the window a few feet and look out of it, you don't see anything but the reflection of the room.

heaven forbid someone was seen naked - arrest them.

This society is really fucked up.

next they are going after censoring real life.




"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
Attachments:

omg, HAHAHAAAA!! I think this dude lives across the street from me!!

There were a bunch of cops talking to someone out in front of the house yesterday-i don't know how long they'd been there, just that were still there when I left for class at about 11:30 AM.


Only reason I'm positive is because I actually looked through the arrest/ticket search last night to see if anybody from that house had ever been arrested for anything before... i searched my street and found that an Erick Williamson had a couple of arrests to his name, including one for being drunk/profane in public.

I (and the people I am referring to) live on Arley drive, and there's always about 6 cars parked in the driveway and on the street in front of this guys house.




I wasn't aware this dude liked to walk around naked...but then again, there seems to be a lot of shady people living over there.

This whole story totally made my day :D

Who ISN'T suprpised Will Thomas is reporting this story? How fast do you think he volunteered to "cover" this story?


.

I heard he was planning on making his own cream.

The only crime here is the person who reported it peeping into his home.

Brandon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The only crime here is the person who reported it
> peeping into his home.

Seriously, how close to the window was the person who reported it? Ever heard of minding your own business?

what's really sad is If he does not win his case, he will probably have to register as a sexual offender due to some nosey neighbor..

if he was dancing in front of the window naked i could see how this would be a problem. but since he was just walking around his house naked i think this is ridiculous.

Considering its not a massive crime, he should go on the defensive and tell the police to drop the charges or he'll file a multi-million dollar lawsuit for malicious prosecution. That and he'll go on news stations and grant interviews to anybody who is willing to listen. Go on the offensive and make them learn that its not worth the pain to deal with a guy who is standing up for his rights.

Why didn't they charge that nosy meddlesome little bitch with peeping?

InvisibleBox Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wasn't aware this dude liked to walk around
> naked...but then again, there seems to be a lot of
> shady people living over there.

how the hell is walking around in your own house at 530 am shady?

Bert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why didn't they charge that nosy meddlesome little
> bitch with peeping?


No shit. Plus, I highly doubt that at 5:30am on a 35 degree morning she had her 7 year old out for a walk. Who the fuck does that? It's probably some nosy, fat, annoying cunt who hates her husband (and by proxy all men) because he's had enough of her nosy, annoying, cunty ways and is about to leave her ass.

EDIT (addition)- whatever happened to live and let live? If he wasn't at the window, swinging his cock at her, who gives a shit? I've walked around my house naked before, but I'm not out exposing myself. There's a BIG difference.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2009 04:46PM by Warhawk.

I used to live near Arley Drive...all the houses are far enough away from the sidewalk that you would have to be trying to look into someone's kitchen to see anything. Every house has a driveway and pretty big front lawn....damn nosey bitch!

If he had been looking through her window, he could have been charged with peeping.

When she looks through his window, why does he get charged?






Brit_gal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Man Charged After Making Coffee Naked
>
> http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/1019...d_fac
> es_charges
> SPRINGFIELD, Va. - A Springfield, Virginia man is
> facing an indecent exposure charge after a
> passerby spotted the man naked in his kitchen and
> reported it to police.
>
> Eric Williamson, 29, is a commercial diver who
> grew up in Hawaii and rents home with several
> co-workers. Williamson told FOX 5's Will Thomas
> his roommates were not home and he walked into the
> kitchen to make coffee about 5:30 a.m. Monday.
>
> "Yes, I wasn't wearing any clothes but I was
> alone, in my own home and just got out of bed. It
> was dark and I had no idea anyone was outside
> looking in at me," Williamson said.
>
> The complaint came from an unidentified woman who
> was walking with a 7-year-old boy. A Fairfax
> County Police spokesman said officers arrested
> Williamson for indecent exposure because they
> believe he wanted to be seen naked by the public.
>
> Officer Bud Walker said officers also consulted
> the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and they were
> given the green light to proceed with the charge.
>
>
> Williamson, who is father of a 5-year old girl,
> said he feels like the victim.
>
> "I am a loving dad. Any of my friends and anyone
> knows that and there is not a chance on this
> planet I would ever, ever, ever do anything like
> that to a kid," he said.
>
> Williamson is meeting with a lawyer to fight the
> charge and may attempt to seek damages from
> Fairfax County Police. If convicted on the
> misdemeanor charge, he would face up to one year
> in jail and a $2,000 fine.

I could see if he strolling out to grab the paper naked but SHE WAS PEEPING INTO HIS HOUSE...

She's the one who should be arrest!

On a side note, where is this house and are there any hot women that make coffee in the morning.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2009 05:04PM by Lurker..

I remember some guy got arrested for literally screwing this table or bench. a neighbor spotted it but it turns out it was inside his home, and even though the neighbor could clearly see him, it was inside his home and the charges were dropped.

Brandon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I remember some guy got arrested for literally
> screwing this table or bench. a neighbor spotted
> it but it turns out it was inside his home, and
> even though the neighbor could clearly see him, it
> was inside his home and the charges were dropped.


??

My question to this man is why was he naked for three hours? The girl and her mother were walking to a third bell school at 8:30 in the morning.
Was he growing the coffee beans himself?


He may say that he was naked at 5:30 AM. The girl was walking to school after 8 AM. HMMMMM

You are allowed to be a nudist inside your own home if you want. She may have spotted him and then lied to say her kid was with her in order to get the police involved. She may have hated the guy because he lets his dog crap in her yard years back or he lets his grass grow long in the summer. This lady sounds like a busybody who has nothing better to do.

Hey,

The report was filed after 8:00 AM. The child and his Mom were walking to school near a crossing guard. The school was contacted.

If school begins at 9:00,why would a Mother be walking her child to school at 5:30 in the morning?

There is something odd with this timeline!

This naked guy, living on Arley, across the street from you
aledgilly (sp) was spotted in front of his window, out in his yard, and then at the door au natural.

That is a little bit more than brewing coffee at some early hour in the AM.


This "innocent" guy should go out and invest in sturdy curtains. How would he like his five year old to see a naked man? Or a house full of nakeds?

Brandon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Considering its not a massive crime, he should go
> on the defensive and tell the police to drop the
> charges or he'll file a multi-million dollar
> lawsuit for malicious prosecution.

isnt that called going on the offensive?


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

It's all Jack Dale's fault. If school was started later (or earlier) than it is currently, this would have never happened.

Also - supposed for shit's sake it occurred at 8:00am. Or even 7:30 am...it's light out, which makes it HARDER to see into a window. So, if that's the case - that cunt had to have been peeping. If it happened at 5:30 or 6:30, why was she out with her 7 year old? It doesn't make sense.

And if it turns out that his charges get dropped, I'd look into charging that women with peeping, false statements to police, etc. etc.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

For Invisable Box Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This naked guy, living on Arley, across the street
> from you
> aledgilly (sp) was spotted in front of his window,
> out in his yard, and then at the door au natural.
>
> That is a little bit more than brewing coffee at
> some early hour in the AM.
>



Looks like you're starting to twist the story around because I didn't see it written anywhere that he went out in the yard and back to the door, all while in the buff.

The house is apparently being rented by multiple people and only since late summer, so I'm just amused by the fact that the first I ever really see of this neighbor is of him being arrested for doing what seems like a very typical thing a guy would do-walk around the house naked.

Maybe he should put up curtains in the future...but really, what's the big deal?



I only got a shady feeling because there appears to be a lot of unrelated people living there and yet I hardly ever see any of them around.

I don' t understand this doesn't indecent exposure have to be public? If you're on private property, especially in your own home it stands to reason you wouldn't have to worry about.

Can I be arrested as a sex offender now for walking from my shower to bedroom naked??? If you look through the windows at the right angle at the right time from the right place I'm sure you can see something indecent.

This is BS and should have never been charged.

I haven't seen the arrest report for this guy. He went to the media to report it on his own.

What is in the arrest report?

I think that Fox5 got the time of morning wrong. Also, he was doing more than making coffee. (Well, based on what the 'unidentified' woman reported to the crossing guard at Sydenstricker and Arley.

The Police Crossing Guard doesn't arrive to the intersection until 8:35. She was there when the woman was walking her son to school. It was daylight out when the naked Man exposed himself 'full frontal' on three separate occasions. In front of a window, outdoors, and then at the front screen.

I haven't seen the report, I doubt Fox 5 has a copy of the detailed arrest report.

Notice the report is gone!

I'm a bit confused as to why the lady just stood there with her precious watching while the guy exposed himself in the window, in the front yard, and at the front screen. That kind of movement takes a bit of time, I imagine... more time than someone would have just casually walking by.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2009 08:53PM by RESton Peace.

No more watching anime porn naked anywhere else in Mom's house other than the basement. Or as I like to call it "a date." With my right hand.

4200cc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Notice the report is gone!


HA! it is!

Quote

Uh oh... that page could not be found.

You wound up here, so obviously something went wrong. Either the page you were looking for does not exist or there was an error processing your request. was deleted because we are fucking morons who dont investigate the news we report and we totally got pwn3d.

Please double-check the URL that brought you here and try again. You can also try using the site navigation or search tool to look for the content you were trying to find.


Click here to go to the home page. E-mail us at webmaster@wttg.com if you still have a problem.

can you tell what part i edited? ;)


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

they changed the url...


http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/101909_man_caught_making_coffee_naked_faces_charges

tricky. well, i think my previous post is still valid. ;)


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Charlie Schmidt's "cool cat" Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > maybe if she wasnt so nosey!
>
> Yeah. It sounds like, if anything, she should be
> charged as a peeping tom.

Last time I checked, it is illegal to look into other people's windows, especially to see them naked.

I would hope that the guy would demand that she be charged with being a peeping tom.

I think he is within his rights to do so.

She's already admitted it in a statement to the police.

PLUS, she can be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, possibly be placed on a sex offender list, and be forced to live a certain distance from parks and schools.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The function of conservatives is not to meet every liberal program or scheme with a denunciation or a destructive counterscheme, but rather to weigh its advantages and defects, supporting the first and challenging the second. A declaration of ideological warfare against liberalism is by its nature profoundly unconservative. It meets perceived radicalism with a counterradicalism of its own.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2009 11:27PM by Thurston Moore.

The only problem with this story is the guy says it was 5:30 in the morning.....wrong. It was more like 8:30. Don't believe just one side of the story without hearing the rest. If you really believe this guy, just wait to see what is said in court.

i dont understand this, was her son offended or scared? he has a cock, im sure he's used to seeing them. What a cunt.

Slapshot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The only problem with this story is the guy says
> it was 5:30 in the morning.....wrong. It was more
> like 8:30. Don't believe just one side of the
> story without hearing the rest. If you really
> believe this guy, just wait to see what is said in
> court.


i doubt this guy would lie about the time.... clearly the correct time (when ever this woman complained) will be in the police report, so there is absolutely no reason for this guy to lie. Even it was 2 PM, you should be able to walk around with your balls hanging out on your own property (given it should be inside) if you want to.

oh ya, but not if youre a dude or fat/ugly/old.... so nevermind, arrest this dude.

So a guy goes to the news and FCPD wont comment beyond "Yeah, we arrested him for indecent exposure" due to ongoing investigation.

Sure sounds like someone is trying to do some damage control. What I find funny is that this probably wouldn't have made the news at all and probably would have passed without incident.

But now, even if charges are dropped, this guy will forever be known as the weirdo who makes coffee naked.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2009 08:42AM by Clobbersaurus.

And if it was a hot chic making coffee in the morning naked, she would have called police about the peeping tom outside and he would be labeled a sex offender. Either that, or TMZ would have been outside shooting video.

I THINK THIS WHOLE THING IS LUDICROUS. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT TIME IT WAS. HE WA IN HIS OWN HOUSE. WHY DIDN'T SHE RUN OFF WITH THE KID IF THIS WAS TRUE. DID SHE STAND THERE AND WATCH?

IF IT WAS A WOMAN MAKING COFFEE NAKED AND A MAN WALKED BY, WE WOULD NOT EVEN BE DICUSSING THIS.

SHE NEEDS TO GET A LIFE!!!

DROP THE CHARGES.

WTOP piece here:

http://www.wtop.com/?nid=722&sid=1790464

I heard the lady cut through his yard

I've said it before and I will say it again, the FCPD need a major budget cut. They are one of the most overpaid, underworked, police forces in this country, If they have the time to spend on BS like this, (this would have never happened in Richmond) it's time we tightened the purse strings on these jokers.

Brit_gal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Williamson, 29, is a commercial diver who
> grew up in Hawaii

Has his citizenship been checked? Maybe this is a ploy to deport him, despite his "American" sounding name. Birth certificate may have been faked, he could be a terrorist.

and yet...

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

AFairfax County Elem.school sent a letter home to parents today

Va. man charged with indecent exposure in home

Associated Press
10/21/09 2:50 PM EDT SPRINGFIELD, VA. — A Springfield man is facing indecent exposure charges after police say he stood naked inside his home as a 7-year-old boy and his mother walked by.

Twenty-nine-year-old Eric Williamson denies any wrongdoing and says any exposure was accidental.

But Fairfax County Police see it differently. Spokeswoman Mary Ann Jennings said the woman and her son first saw Williamson standing naked inside his doorway as they walked along a path outside his home. Police say Williamson then followed the two from inside his home and exposed himself again through a large front window.

Police would not pursue a case based on inadvertent exposure, Jennings said.

The charge is a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail.

Woopsies!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2009 06:19PM by 4200cc.

They were cutting through his lawn they should be charged for trespassing!

edit by Cary: No CSS overlays! User banned for 7 days.



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2009 09:53PM by Cary.

FOX 5 also spoke with some of Williamson's roommates, and they said they believed Eric was drunk on Monday morning when they were all leaving for work around 5 a.m. The alleged exposure happened around 8:30 a.m. Williamson, however, says he was drinking on Sunday night, but was not drunk on Monday morning.

Williamson didn't report to work last week and was fired from his job last Friday. One of his roommates stated that Williamson was behaving oddly when he was leaving for work Monday morning.

I just went down to my kitchen to get a glass of water.

I may or may not have been wearing clothes.

If I wasn't wearing clothes, did I commit a crime?

Or, I guess I should ask, if there was a crazy nutbag woman who likes to peer into people's windows, did I commit a crime?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The function of conservatives is not to meet every liberal program or scheme with a denunciation or a destructive counterscheme, but rather to weigh its advantages and defects, supporting the first and challenging the second. A declaration of ideological warfare against liberalism is by its nature profoundly unconservative. It meets perceived radicalism with a counterradicalism of its own.

As Paul Harvey, RIP, used to say, "Now for the rest of the story...."

For Invisable Box Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This naked guy, living on Arley, across the street
> from you
> aledgilly (sp) was spotted in front of his window,
> out in his yard, and then at the door au natural.
>
> That is a little bit more than brewing coffee at
> some early hour in the AM.
>
>
> This "innocent" guy should go out and invest in
> sturdy curtains. How would he like his five year
> old to see a naked man? Or a house full of
> nakeds?


my kids would not think any more of seeing a naked person than they would a clothed person (generally speaking). Naked is how we all look. Naked is one of the most real things there is. Your young kid is somehow shocked or scared at nudity - wtf?

I saw that report and tend to believe that this dude is just some fuck-up that probably deserves the charge. The news story also said that although he claims he was in the kitchen at 5AM, the woman said he was standing naked right at the front door at 8:30.

The dude loses his job, acts crazy all weekend, is walking around the house naked and drunk off his ass at 8 in the morning- it all sounds suspicious.


Roomate of guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FOX 5 also spoke with some of Williamson's
> roommates, and they said they believed Eric was
> drunk on Monday morning when they were all leaving
> for work around 5 a.m. The alleged exposure
> happened around 8:30 a.m. Williamson, however,
> says he was drinking on Sunday night, but was not
> drunk on Monday morning.
>
> Williamson didn't report to work last week and was
> fired from his job last Friday. One of his
> roommates stated that Williamson was behaving
> oddly when he was leaving for work Monday morning.

dono Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> my kids would not think any more of seeing a naked
> person than they would a clothed person (generally
> speaking). Naked is how we all look. Naked is
> one of the most real things there is. Your young
> kid is somehow shocked or scared at nudity - wtf?

so... you are a nudist?


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

She wasn't cutting across his property; there is a park and path adjacent to his property.

not Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She wasn't cutting across his property; there is a
> park and path adjacent to his property.

Fox news showed the path they took and sure looked to me like they cutting across his front yard. At 8:30am is light outside so how did they see in the house?

What was this pervert doing peeping in his kitchen window?

dono Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> heaven forbid someone was seen naked - arrest
> them.
>
> This society is really fucked up.
_________________________________________
Since when is it wrong to naked in thier own house, the women should arrtested for peeping in. Your statement is wrong cant believe you would say something like that.

I love how this thread has almost no facts, but plenty of conclusions. Way to go guys!

RESton Peace Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I love how this thread has almost no facts, but
> plenty of conclusions. Way to go guys!


LOL.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.
Attachments:

What is the name of the peeping Tom?

..so some folks are saying this woman is the wife of a cop...if true,makes sense that the Peeping Tom/trespasser calls the cops on the person they’re spying on?"

Police wouldn't release the incident report or the name of the mother who filed the complaint. FOX 5 has learned she is a respected member of the community, and just happens to be the wife of a Fairfax County Police officer...


ding-ding

I nearly died on the floor when I found out that I know one of the roommates of
Eric Williamson.

Eric didn't go to work last Thursday & was fired from his job. He has been known to walk around the house wearing only a hat & no clothing.

His behavior could get somewhat bizzare.

I'm not sure if it was intentional or not, but he has had complaints before about his odd behavior outside of the house.

Doesn't surprise me.

There are community tennis courts and a path next to the house. The Markarian family owns the house; I went to school with Sandy Markarian at WSHS. The Markarians rent the house to a Company associated with undersea diving.

The woman and her son were walking on the path from Aquary Ct. to Arley. They were not on his property. They were on the Community path next to the tennis courts.

There is a bus stop across from this guys kitchen window and open screen. He has been seen wandering naked in just 'gazing' out of his house full frontal nude. He was planning on moving prior to this incident.

Know the roomates Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
He has been known to walk around
> the house wearing only a hat & no clothing.


There's a problem with this?

Lurker. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Know the roomates Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> He has been known to walk around
> > the house wearing only a hat & no clothing.
>
>
> There's a problem with this?


Only if it's you doing it, Lurker.

Inquirer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is the name of the peeping Tom?


I don't know, but she's the wife of a Fairfax County police officer....


http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/102109_naked_man_arrested_after_making_coffee_update

"Police wouldn't release the incident report or the name of the mother who filed the complaint. FOX 5 has learned she is a respected member of the community, and just happens to be the wife of a Fairfax County Police officer."

And what does this mean:

"We have heard there may have been others who saw..."
Does that mean you're basically fishing to see if anyone else saw anything?



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/22/2009 07:11PM by trogdor!.

trogdor! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquirer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What is the name of the peeping Tom?
>
>
> I don't know, but she's the wife of a Fairfax
> County police officer....
>
>
> http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/102109_naked
> _man_arrested_after_making_coffee_update
>
> "Police wouldn't release the incident report or
> the name of the mother who filed the complaint.
> FOX 5 has learned she is a respected member of the
> community, and just happens to be the wife of a
> Fairfax County Police officer."
>
> And what does this mean:
>
> "We have heard there may have been others who
> saw..."
> Does that mean you're basically fishing to see if
> anyone else saw anything?



It means that they probably don't have jack shit go on or that they really jumped the gun on this one. But if they can dredge up some vague recollection from a neighbor, then maybe, just maybe, they can make this thing stick and not look like complete idiots.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

life under Obama as reported by FOX



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/22/2009 07:40PM by dono.

I'll bet she wants to know EXACT others have seen. Looks like she probably never gets laid.

His roommates are claiming he appeared drunk that morning when they left, so I'm guessing he was drunk, doing his normal naked coffee routine, and was drunk enough that he didn't realize he was in front of an open door and then an open window.

If I remember correctly, the indecent exposure charge requires intent to be seen by others. If he's drunk and unaware that he's in public view, I don't think they're going to be able to prove intent.

just being charged with something like that can ruin your life, though...

FCP are being trashed in the national media over this..aint looking too good..

If someone is blatantly standing in their front street-facing window, and it can be determined that they are intentionally showing off naked for passersby in doing so, then I can understand such a charge. However, this is obviously not the case here, and the lady should be charged for being a peeping tom, and quite possibly for unlawful trespass upon the suspect's property.

Also, who in the hell is out for a stroll with a seven year old at 5:30 in the morning?

Brit_gal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Police wouldn't release the incident report or the
> name of the mother who filed the complaint. FOX 5
> has learned she is a respected member of the
> community, and just happens to be the wife of a
> Fairfax County Police officer...
>
>
> ding-ding


So being related to a Cop somehow automatically makes you a "Respected member of the community"? What a load of BS. Maybe I should marry a cop, then go shoot-up a 7/11 for the hell of it.

Thurston Moore Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Charlie Schmidt's "cool cat" Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > maybe if she wasnt so nosey!
> >
> > Yeah. It sounds like, if anything, she should
> be
> > charged as a peeping tom.
>
> Last time I checked, it is illegal to look into
> other people's windows, especially to see them
> naked.
>
> I would hope that the guy would demand that she be
> charged with being a peeping tom.
>
> I think he is within his rights to do so.
>
> She's already admitted it in a statement to the
> police.
>
> PLUS, she can be charged with contributing to the
> delinquency of a minor, possibly be placed on a
> sex offender list, and be forced to live a certain
> distance from parks and schools.


What sucks about VA law, is that you cannot "Cross Charge", which means that if someone brings charges against you for an incident, you cannot bring charges against them until your own charges have already been dealt with in the system. I do agree, I believe he is well within his rights, but it's up to the Judicial System now.

Also, by the logic that authorities are going on in this case, I can conceivably walk up to someones window, and so long as I can see something "indecent" through their blinds, I can report it. Maybe while they're at it, they should charge that ESPN Host with "Indecent Exposure" for "allowing" that Peeping Tom to film her through a Peep-Hole.

ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thurston Moore Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MrMephisto Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Charlie Schmidt's "cool cat" Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > maybe if she wasnt so nosey!
> > >
> > > Yeah. It sounds like, if anything, she
> should
> > be
> > > charged as a peeping tom.
> >
> > Last time I checked, it is illegal to look into
> > other people's windows, especially to see them
> > naked.
> >
> > I would hope that the guy would demand that she
> be
> > charged with being a peeping tom.
> >
> > I think he is within his rights to do so.
> >
> > She's already admitted it in a statement to the
> > police.
> >
> > PLUS, she can be charged with contributing to
> the
> > delinquency of a minor, possibly be placed on a
> > sex offender list, and be forced to live a
> certain
> > distance from parks and schools.
>
>
> What sucks about VA law, is that you cannot "Cross
> Charge", which means that if someone brings
> charges against you for an incident, you cannot
> bring charges against them until your own charges
> have already been dealt with in the system. I do
> agree, I believe he is well within his rights, but
> it's up to the Judicial System now.
>
> Also, by the logic that authorities are going on
> in this case, I can conceivably walk up to
> someones window, and so long as I can see
> something "indecent" through their blinds, I can
> report it. Maybe while they're at it, they should
> charge that ESPN Host with "Indecent Exposure" for
> "allowing" that Peeping Tom to film her through a
> Peep-Hole.


Except that they were walking by his house and then on a community path, not peeping into his windows like everyone here seems to be saying she did.

§ 18.2-130. Peeping or spying into dwelling or enclosure.

A. It shall be unlawful for any person to enter upon the property of another and secretly or furtively peep, spy or attempt to peep or spy into or through a window, door or other aperture of any building, structure, or other enclosure of any nature occupied or intended for occupancy as a dwelling, whether or not such building, structure or enclosure is permanently situated or transportable and whether or not such occupancy is permanent or temporary, or to do the same, without just cause, upon property owned by him and leased or rented to another under circumstances that would violate the occupant's reasonable expectation of privacy.

B. It shall be unlawful for any person to use a peephole or other aperture to secretly or furtively peep, spy or attempt to peep or spy into a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or other location or enclosure for the purpose of viewing any nonconsenting person who is totally nude, clad in undergarments, or in a state of undress exposing the genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breast and the circumstances are such that the person would otherwise have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

C. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a lawful criminal investigation or a correctional official or local or regional jail official conducting surveillance for security purposes or during an investigation of alleged misconduct involving a person committed to the Department of Corrections or to a local or regional jail.

D. As used in this section, "peephole" means any hole, crack or other similar opening through which a person can see.

E. A violation of this section is a Class 1 misdemeanor.

(Code 1950, § 18.1-174; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1992, c. 520; 1999, c. 351; 2003, cc. 81, 87.)

§ 18.2-387. Indecent exposure.

Every person who intentionally makes an obscene display or exposure of his person, or the private parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where others are present, or procures another to so expose himself, shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. No person shall be deemed to be in violation of this section for breastfeeding a child in any public place or any place where others are present.

(Code 1950, § 18.1-236; 1960, c. 233; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1994, c. 398.)

All I have to say is the majority of people think he is innocent...I am one of those. I walk around naked in my house all the time. My dog doesn't seem to care, although I think he might have some homo-sexual tendency...he never brings home any bitches, just smells them at south runk. When I walk around naked I can see him staring at my junk but when I turn around and my ass is in his face he doesn't look. Does he have a taste for redrocket??? I personally think that both my money maker and my right hand magnet look fairly awesome. No complaints in that department.

I've done laundry naked. I'll walk downstairs and wait (nakedly) for the dryer to finish. Then bust a quick move and put on my freshly warm clothes...however, zippers, plastic buttons, etc can get a little bit warm and I've burned my self a few times...mainly in the ol' eggbeater.

So this lady is a wife of a FC Cop huh...well I'm sure they are looking for more and more people to come forward so she doesn't look like a dumbass and won't make FC Police look bad either. I like the police (kinda...well only when they help me out) but they are just getting laughed at because this is STUPID! The reason why it's in the news is because it's so outrageously dumb.

In conclusion,

I don't know if this wife bitch is a peeping tom or not but she is nosy (sp?) Someone wrote that windows in your house is for looking out....you don't look into peoples windows unless you want to be a peeping tom. So in a way she is.

Hey lady who started this ordeal....I have something I would like to show you...wanna take a gander at it?? Just kidding....DONT FUCKIN LOOK IN MY WINDOW BITCH!

Clobbersaurus Wrote:

>
> Except that they were walking by his house and
> then on a community path, not peeping into his
> windows like everyone here seems to be saying she
> did.

If that is the case, then Trespassing would not apply, but I am not certain in regards to the "Peeping Tom" code. I would still say that the guy is innocent however, because any location which you would expect privacy under normal circumstances (ie, inside your home), does not, by it's very nature, allow for "Exposure" to be declared in regards to the aforementioned.

ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Clobbersaurus Wrote:
>
> >
> > Except that they were walking by his house and
> > then on a community path, not peeping into his
> > windows like everyone here seems to be saying
> she
> > did.
>
> If that is the case, then Trespassing would not
> apply, but I am not certain in regards to the
> "Peeping Tom" code. I would still say that the guy
> is innocent however, because any location which
> you would expect privacy under normal
> circumstances (ie, inside your home), does not, by
> it's very nature, allow for "Exposure" to be
> declared in regards to the aforementioned.


Would you expect privacy by standing in front of a screen door and then in front of a uncovered window?

Hello everyone, I am a HOMOSEXUAL. Are there any others out there like myself?

----------------------------
I am now in controll of your internets. http://www.ipnow.org/

Would you expect privacy by standing in front of a screen door and then in front of a uncovered window?

Thank you Clobbersaur... for posting this reply.

If I stood naked infront of my screen door or uncovered window, I would assume that people could see me. Especially if there is a school bus stop right across the street from me.

I blame two people for all the hype surrounding this. The media and an ignorant public. The media for first reporting a story based soley on what the guy says and taking it on it's face as truth. I mean, if that dumbass Fox reporter would have just stopped for a moment and asked himself, "Wait, why would a mother and her 7 yr old be walking to school at 5:30 in the morning?", he may have learned his first clue. Now that he has spilled the beans even he is starting to learn more facts about the case, like it happened at 8:30 in the morning, not 5:30 like the bad guy is saying.

Hey, wait a second! Maybe the bad guy is talking about the OTHER person he exposed himself to at 5:30 in the morning. He must of been too drunk to remember the later inicident.

Anyway, I'm glad he said that because he just gave the police reason to believe there was an incident inovlving him that they didn't know about previously. Thank you Fox news.

The second group to blame is the ignorant assholes that have gone on blogs like this one and staunchly defending this guy and calling the woman and her son trespassers and peepers without knowing all of the facts of the case.

And the reason the police can't release all of their facts: because it could potentially destroy the guys chance at a fair trial. Thats right, government can't do that. But nothing is stopping this Williams guy from having the court of public opinion acquit him without having to present a shred of evidence.

So you the judge and jury, stay on top of this story right through court and then comeback and render your verdict.

Why won't the police release the name of the acuser? Seems only fair we know her name!

Eliza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why won't the police release the name of the
> acuser? Seems only fair we know her name!


Because in a sexual assault case the victim's identity is shielded, thereby enabling accusers to feel free to make accusations, unfettered by fears of backlash because they can remain safely anonymous.

Hello everybody. I am a HOMOSEXUAl! Are there any others like myself out there?

---------------------------------
I am now in control of your internets. http://www.ipnow.org/

Clobber, Once again, thanks for telling it like it is!!!

Except that they were walking by his house and then on a community path, not peeping into his windows like everyone here seems to be saying she did.

Roommate needed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Clobber, Once again, thanks for telling it like
> it is!!!
>
> Except that they were walking by his house and
> then on a community path, not peeping into his
> windows like everyone here seems to be saying she
> did.


That doesn't make a bit of difference. So if you happen to be walking naked from your shower to your bedroom in order to clothe yourself, and someone walking by on the sidewalk happens to see you in the buff,that should suddenly give them the right to accuse you and charge you with "Indecent Exposure"?

Clobbersaurus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ThePackLeader Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Clobbersaurus Wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Except that they were walking by his house
> and
> > > then on a community path, not peeping into
> his
> > > windows like everyone here seems to be saying
> > she
> > > did.
> >
> > If that is the case, then Trespassing would not
> > apply, but I am not certain in regards to the
> > "Peeping Tom" code. I would still say that the
> guy
> > is innocent however, because any location which
> > you would expect privacy under normal
> > circumstances (ie, inside your home), does not,
> by
> > it's very nature, allow for "Exposure" to be
> > declared in regards to the aforementioned.
>
>
> Would you expect privacy by standing in front of a
> screen door and then in front of a uncovered
> window?


I expect privacy while I'm in my own home, period. If the law didn't believe the same, then Police would be allowed to have street level surveillance cameras zoomed in to every window and crevice of your home.

Really want to put on a tinfoil hat? Let me help you...

Quote

§ 18.2-344. Fornication.

Any person, not being married, who voluntarily shall have sexual intercourse with any other person, shall be guilty of fornication, punishable as a Class 4 misdemeanor.

(Code 1950, §§ 18.1-188, 18.1-190; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.

Yes, the police can arrest you for having sex while not married.


Sinner.

reader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FCP are being trashed in the national media over
> this..aint looking too good..

Thats good they need national attention I think it's worst police force in the country. Just look how our officers handle things compared to other counties. Our officer are the rudest officer in the country even to civilians, even NYC has nicer officers than we do. it's crazy.