I hope there is no need for this, but I feel it may be necessary as a fail safe. I have an idea for a way to check up on the powers that be.

In my district, 11th, Gerry Connolly is running unopposed. My idea is to demand a write in ballot and to write in a name only know to myself. Then when the online results are published and the name I wrote in does not appear, I will know my ballot was not counted.

I will take a picture of the ballot while in the booth for evidence.

I like it.

Why do you want to troll?

causeican Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why do you want to troll?

No troll.

Want to see if this would be an effective way to make sure my vote is counted.

Please post results on 11/09/16.

Any worthwhile write-in candidate instead of Gerry Connolly, also a 11th districter here?

pretty sure it is illegal to take pictures inside the polling booth

I think most of the voter fraud in Fairfax comes through illegal voter registrations--i.e. non-citizens who are registered to vote. You cannot check that at the polls. That must be done prior to election day.

OP, I wrote in a candidate years ago. The name did not appear in the vote totals because any vote-getter below a certain threshold was not listed separately. Just think about. If they listed everyone, FFXU posters would be writing in Mike Hunt, Ben Dover, Harry Beaver, Dick Long, etc.

If you are serious about voter fraud OP, contact the Republican party about being a poll monitor. A friend of mine has done it.

I believe "Harry" is correct. I don't think they tabulate write in votes unless they meet a certain threshold.

Idiots. Precinct-level data include all write-in votes, and you don't need a special ballot to do it. Meanwhile, VOTER FRAUD DOES NOT EXIST at any remotely significant level. It's all nothing but a vapid right-wing scare tactic. Only the REALLY DUMB people fall for this.

If you are even thinking of a voter fraud conspiracy, you are an IDIOT!

Yes, You! You stupid idiot!

Idiots Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you are even thinking of a voter fraud
> conspiracy, you are an IDIOT!
>
> Yes, You! You stupid idiot!


^^^^^ more lies from the neocom left. We have videos of high ranking democrat officials bragging about how they commit voter fraud and these neocom pinkos tell us it's a lie. We have over a thousand voter registrations submitted in just 8 VA counties by democrat operatives of people who have been dead for over a year, and these neocom shitheads tell us it's a lie. We have almost 14% of illegal immigrants in California who ADMIT they voted in 2012, and these neocom faggots whine that it's all a lie.

Fuck the neocom statist sheep. Vote in Nov and keep your eyes out for fraud. Its' real and the lefties know the truth is being revealed.

It's "neocon", dumbfuck. With an "N". And that's the least of your stupidities.

He had to go with neocom, because neocon left would be an oxymoron.

v74nt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's "neocon", dumbfuck. With an "N". And that's
> the least of your stupidities.


Hey shitforbrains, neocom = neo communist your worthless, uninformed dumbfuck. Stop trying to play with the big boys and go back to the little kid table asshole.

uEJw7 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He had to go with neocom, because neocon left
> would be an oxymoron.


Hillary never voted against any war, military intervention or police action and got us into Syria and Libya and voted for the Iraq War. Hillary = neocon. Is that enough of an oxymoron for you shithead? yeah, I thought so.

v74nt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's "neocon", dumbfuck. With an "N". And that's
> the least of your stupidities.


LOL. Calling someone else stupid without understanding what is written. So liberal.

There is no voter fraud. Lies told by overweight white small dicked males to compensate for their lack of education. You need to die and die quickly.

mjcc1987 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no voter fraud. Lies told by overweight
> white small dicked males to compensate for their
> lack of education. You need to die and die
> quickly.


^^^^^ more lies from the left. Sorry, we're on to you now. You'll be watched. That nig at DOJ ain't gonna save you this time.

Right-wingers! Paranoid assfucks for the ages -- they just don't come any dumber!

Keep it honest Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hope there is no need for this, but I feel it
> may be necessary as a fail safe. I have an idea
> for a way to check up on the powers that be.

Just go down to your poll on Nov. 8th and threaten to beat up anyone who doesn't look like they're an American.

ebpFT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Right-wingers! Paranoid assfucks for the ages --
> they just don't come any dumber!



Voter fraud is more prevalent than black men being shot by cops.

Correct on the threshold. I wrote in Iva Biggun in Frederericksburg.

#deadvotersmatter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Voter fraud is more prevalent than black men being shot by cops.

Wake up, stupid shit. You've been ass-fucked by right-wing propaganda. There is virtually no voter fraud ANYWHERE, and most of the very few examples of it that can be found are committed not by voters, but by crooked election officials. All that your pathetic voter-ID laws can address is voter-impersonation fraud. That's the rarest form there is.

DGVeu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #deadvotersmatter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Voter fraud is more prevalent than black men
> being shot by cops.
>
> Wake up, stupid shit. You've been ass-fucked by
> right-wing propaganda. There is virtually no
> voter fraud ANYWHERE, and most of the very few
> examples of it that can be found are committed not
> by voters, but by crooked election officials. All
> that your pathetic voter-ID laws can address is
> voter-impersonation fraud. That's the rarest form
> there is.

True. Voter suppression is a much bigger issue.

Just another Republican desperation tactic. They know the demographics are inexorably moving against them. The only way they can fight back is to create roadblocks to voting for groups they fear don't like them.

DGVeu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #deadvotersmatter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Voter fraud is more prevalent than black men
> being shot by cops.
>
> Wake up, stupid shit. You've been ass-fucked by
> right-wing propaganda. There is virtually no
> voter fraud ANYWHERE, and most of the very few
> examples of it that can be found are committed not
> by voters, but by crooked election officials. All
> that your pathetic voter-ID laws can address is
> voter-impersonation fraud. That's the rarest form
> there is.


Yet there are even fewer black men shot by cops.

Faces of the fallen...

https://www.buzzfeed.com/nicholasquah/heres-a-timeline-of-unarmed-black-men-killed-by-police-over?utm_term=.fd8E3jLGo#.ui8XgWJEr

YJ7WX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Faces of the fallen...
>
> https://www.buzzfeed.com/nicholasquah/heres-a-time
> line-of-unarmed-black-men-killed-by-police-over?ut
> m_term=.fd8E3jLGo#.ui8XgWJEr


16? That's it?

Wake up, stupid shit. You've been ass-fucked by left-wing propaganda. There are virtually no unarmed black men shot by cops ANYWHERE, and most of the very few examples of it that can be found are committed not by fault of the cops, but by people who are fucking up. All that your pathetic #blacklivesmatters bs can address are white cops shooting blacks. That's the rarest form there is.

http://patch.com/virginia/fairfaxstation/fairfax-county-electoral-board-refers-potential-voter-fraud-cases

Either math is too difficult for the alt-right Powers that Be or they've been willfully lying to y'all. I'm betting on the latter.

Follow along, kids. I'm going to round the numbers some here, but always in favor of helping the alt-right's case.

There are about 330 million people in this country.
Average life expectancy is around 75.
So that's a bit over 4 million Americans, on average, who die every year.
Let's round that down to 3.65 million, which mean that about 10,000 die every day. Given the population of Virginia (8.32 million), that means about 250 Virginians die *every day*. So in the month before the election, about 7,500 Virginians will die.

if 20% of them were registered voters (probably a low percentage), that means there are likely to be 1,500 dead registered voters.

Hint: those people aren't actually voting.

But the alt-right trumpets "THOUSANDS OF DEAD AMERICANS FOUND ON VOTER REGISTRATION LISTS", as if this proves anything.

Pathetic.

You've been had Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Either math is too difficult for the alt-right
> Powers that Be or they've been willfully lying to
> y'all. I'm betting on the latter.
>
> Follow along, kids. I'm going to round the numbers
> some here, but always in favor of helping the
> alt-right's case.
>
> There are about 330 million people in this
> country.
> Average life expectancy is around 75.
> So that's a bit over 4 million Americans, on
> average, who die every year.
> Let's round that down to 3.65 million, which mean
> that about 10,000 die every day. Given the
> population of Virginia (8.32 million), that means
> about 250 Virginians die *every day*. So in the
> month before the election, about 7,500 Virginians
> will die.
>
> if 20% of them were registered voters (probably a
> low percentage), that means there are likely to be
> 1,500 dead registered voters.
>
> Hint: those people aren't actually voting.
>
> But the alt-right trumpets "THOUSANDS OF DEAD
> AMERICANS FOUND ON VOTER REGISTRATION LISTS", as
> if this proves anything.
>
> Pathetic.


Hey shitforbrains, in the VA cases, the dead were registered to vote AFTER they were dead.

Almost 14% of illegals admitted to voting in California in 2012. They asked them and these were the ones stupid enough to admit it. You can probably double that number

http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/poll-13-of-illegal-aliens-admit-they-vote/

A study by GMU after 2008 showed that between 6 and 7% of illegals voted nation-wide. That's almost a million votes right there fucktard.

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/391134/jaw-dropping-study-claims-large-numbers-non-citizens-vote-us-jim-geraghty

Or, we can believe some fool on FFU who doesn't know shit about anything (that would be you).

BOOM!

Nice. I went out of my way to point out that you were simply believing bullshit propaganda, and your response is ad hominem. Well, fine, you're clearly too stupid to understand that there are much more believable studies that show essentially no fraudulent voting, and that the numbers that were found were far too low to be significant.

Also note that illegal immigrants are really, really unlikely to risk being exposed by voting--why would they bother? That's just stupid.

As for registering after death -- where is this alleged study? By whom? Unsupported assertions are not evidence.

You've been had Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nice. I went out of my way to point out that you
> were simply believing bullshit propaganda, and
> your response is ad hominem. Well, fine, you're
> clearly too stupid to understand that there are
> much more believable studies that show essentially
> no fraudulent voting, and that the numbers that
> were found were far too low to be significant.
>
> Also note that illegal immigrants are really,
> really unlikely to risk being exposed by
> voting--why would they bother? That's just
> stupid.
>
> As for registering after death -- where is this
> alleged study? By whom? Unsupported assertions are
> not evidence.


Really really unlikely......


A Mexican who was deported decades ago for drug trafficking pleaded guilty this week to living illegally in Escondido under a false identity and fraudulently voting in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, federal authorities said Friday.

Ricardo Lopez-Munguia, 45, pleaded guilty Thursday to attempted entry to the U.S. after deportation, making a false claim to U.S. citizenship, and voter fraud by an illegal alien, according to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office.

Lopez-Munguia faces a maximum term of 28 years in federal prison, followed by deportation. He is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 19 in San Diego.

In 1986, Lopez-Munguia was convicted of heroin trafficking. A federal judge ordered him to be deported the following year.

Officials said it was unclear when he re-entered the U.S.

Lopez-Munguia assumed the identity of Gustavo Carranza-Madrigal, a U.S. citizen, and obtained a fraudulent California driver's license, a Social Security card and a U.S. passport, according to the statement.

A Border Patrol agent arrested Lopez-Munguia on July 5 as he tried to return from Mexico, the statement said.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-escondido-mexican-man-admits-to-voter-fraud-2012sep07-story.html

Proving my point -- one guy. BFD.

You've been had Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Proving my point -- one guy. BFD.



Mejorada-Lopez, a Mexican citizen, completed several voter
registration applications to register to vote in Alaska and voted in the
2000, 2002, and 2004 general elections. He was charged with three
counts of voting by a non-citizen in violation of 18 U.S.C. 611 and was
sentenced to probation for one year after pleading guilty.

United States v. Rogelio Mejorada-Lopez, No. 05-CR-074

#deadvotersmatter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ebpFT Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Right-wingers! Paranoid assfucks for the ages
> --
> > they just don't come any dumber!
>
>
>
> Voter fraud is more prevalent than black men being
> shot by cops.

+1

You've been had Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nice. I went out of my way to point out that you
> were simply believing bullshit propaganda, and
> your response is ad hominem. Well, fine, you're
> clearly too stupid to understand that there are
> much more believable studies that show essentially
> no fraudulent voting, and that the numbers that
> were found were far too low to be significant.
>
> Also note that illegal immigrants are really,
> really unlikely to risk being exposed by
> voting--why would they bother? That's just
> stupid.
>
> As for registering after death -- where is this
> alleged study? By whom? Unsupported assertions are
> not evidence.


Unbelievable that idiots like you can function in society. You probably believe that the emails from wikileaks aren't real either. Or the Project Veritas tapes where high ranking democrats admit to voter fraud. Your head it deeply buried....

 
Attachments:

yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpQE7dQZ-as

No wonder you post so much shit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Unbelievable that idiots like you can function in
> society. You probably believe that the emails
> from wikileaks aren't real either. Or the Project
> Veritas tapes where high ranking democrats admit
> to voter fraud. Your head it deeply buried....

Dude, you are only advertising how gullibly stupid you are. Voter rolls everywhere have always contained the names of dead and other ineligible voters. This is why worthless clown organizations such as those you cited above make such a fuss over tracking those down, but it's like finding three-leaf clovers. The persistence of such names on voter rolls is due in large part to the fact of anti-social dimbulbs like you routinely fail to approve sufficient funds to keep voter lists as up to date as possible. But the lists are a one-way street in any case. The names of living people who actually show up to vote need to be on the list. The fact that the list itself also includes the names of some dead persons who don;t show up to vote is completely immaterial. Dead people simply never show up to vote.

Of course, there are people who think they could just go pretend to be a dead person and thus vote a second time. They will need to know first that the dead person's name has not yet been removed from voter rolls, and then they must have obtained extra ID confirming that they are in fact the dead person. There are a few people dumb enough to try this from time to time and they routinely get caught. Those second ID's are spotted as fakes. Names already HAVE been purged from voter rolls. Poll-workers or others at local voting places know that their neighbor of that name has passed away. Without the help of some corrupt poll-worker, it is very difficult to carry out fraud by voter-impersonation.

The bottom line is that voter fraud in any form is a statistically non-existent problem. It is not a threat even to dog-catcher elections. Those who are not stupid idiots all know this already. It's just the pliant downscale dumbshits who remain unaware.

Get a grip... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No wonder you post so much shit Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Unbelievable that idiots like you can function
> in
> > society. You probably believe that the emails
> > from wikileaks aren't real either. Or the
> Project
> > Veritas tapes where high ranking democrats
> admit
> > to voter fraud. Your head it deeply buried....
>

> The bottom line is that voter fraud in any form is
> a statistically non-existent problem. It is not a
> threat even to dog-catcher elections. Those who
> are not stupid idiots all know this already. It's
> just the pliant downscale dumbshits who remain
> unaware.


You're so full of shit it's fucking hilarious. The fact is that it is virtually impossible to know the extent of voter fraud in any one election. Your argument is akin to saying nobody is out there littering because the citations for littering are virtually nonexistent.

Lot's of paid KKKillary trolls. Everyone knows voter fraud is rampant in the democrat party. It's been going on since at least the the JFK election. It's not a secret.

Libs just repeat what they hear on TV. I'd say libs are parrots but that would be an insult to parrots.

so full of shit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're so full of shit it's fucking hilarious. The fact is that
> it is virtually impossible to know the extent of voter fraud in
> any one election.

That might be true if assholes as fucking dumb as you were allowed to run the show. Luckily it is quite easy to find people whose talents vastly exceed your own, so research into the extents of actual voter fraud is quite easy to carry out. And that research consistently shows that VOTER FRAUD DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST anywhere at any statistically significant level. It is only the worst among ignorant fried-brain right-wing assholes who fail to understand the point. Then again, those fuckers don't actually seem to understand much of anything at all. Bunch of across-the-board intellectual limp-dicks.

Lol@thelibtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lot's of paid KKKillary trolls. Everyone knows
> voter fraud is rampant in the democrat party. It's
> been going on since at least the the JFK election.
> It's not a secret.

JEB Stuart Class of 2020, I presume?

> Libs just repeat what they hear on TV. I'd say
> libs are parrots but that would be an insult to
> parrots.

LOL! You would be much better off if you were as smart or as handsome as an average parrot. As is, you're just a wind-tossed and useless piece of social dreck and dross. Voter fraud is a phony right-wing legend drummed up to cram into the defenseless minds of the exceptionally stupid. A majority of certified morons out there is laughing at you today for having been so fucking dumb!

Do you get paid per post or are you hourly?

47Ju6 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so full of shit Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You're so full of shit it's fucking hilarious.
> The fact is that
> > it is virtually impossible to know the extent of
> voter fraud in
> > any one election.
>
> That might be true if assholes as fucking dumb as
> you were allowed to run the show. Luckily it is
> quite easy to find people whose talents vastly
> exceed your own, so research into the extents of
> actual voter fraud is quite easy to carry out.
> And that research consistently shows that VOTER
> FRAUD DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST anywhere at any
> statistically significant level. It is only the
> worst among ignorant fried-brain right-wing
> assholes who fail to understand the point. Then
> again, those fuckers don't actually seem to
> understand much of anything at all. Bunch of
> across-the-board intellectual limp-dicks.


Wrong again, faghat. I bet it never gets old for shit fed parroting regurgitator like you.

Blow me, you talentless asshole. You've got an albatross of ignorance hung around your neck. You don't know shit from shinola. You don't see what sits plainly right before you eyes. You don't lift a fucking finger to further your knowledge of a damned thing. You are as the result a total waste and failure as a human being -- just a worthless mess of fucked up stupid-shit nonsense.

7YxpD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blow me, you talentless asshole. You've got an
> albatross of ignorance hung around your neck. You
> don't know shit from shinola. You don't see what
> sits plainly right before you eyes. You don't
> lift a fucking finger to further your knowledge of
> a damned thing. You are as the result a total
> waste and failure as a human being -- just a
> worthless mess of fucked up stupid-shit nonsense.

Protest much, you dimwitted dipshit?

It appears that asshole spotter is back. How is the market for scallops these days?

On a more serious note, voter suppression is much more of a problem than voter fraud.

Even if you are voting for Hillary.

Here's why.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/soros-connected-company-provides-voting-machines-in-16-states/

9xPwp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any worthwhile write-in candidate instead of Gerry
> Connolly, also a 11th districter here?


Sucks but true. There will be no beating him.

If you write in someone who is going to get more than one vote, it will defeat the purpose.

This is like a copyright trap. Using a name only you know to look for allow you to know if your ballot was counted.

Get one of those ink pens used to fight check fraud to fill in the circles of choice on the ballot. It keeps them from changing your choices. Pencils are out--they just erase your choices and replace them with theirs in the cvounting rooms.

Why do people say "ink pen"? As opposed to what? If I just say "pen", you'd assume it contains ink, wouldn't you?

We now return you to your previously scheduled non-discussion.

FvPM9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get one of those ink pens used to fight check
> fraud to fill in the circles of choice on the
> ballot. It keeps them from changing your choices.
> Pencils are out--they just erase your choices and
> replace them with theirs in the cvounting rooms.


I worked at the polls one year, and trust me, what you're saying couldn't happen without a major incident (one that would probably involve the police and official state intervention).

a) there are reps from both parties supervising, including independent people. there's no way someone could grab ballots, take them aside, and start erasing shit with a pencil. that's a ridiculous idea.

b) the machines count the ballots when you scan them. even if someone tried doing what you assert, those ballots have already been counted.

you should volunteer some time, it really gives you a nice perspective on how great our system actually works.

you know that they dont have to publish the indvidual write ins

nerdytransboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you know that they dont have to publish the
> indvidual write ins

I wondered about that. Sounds reasonable; got a cite?

If I recall correctly, we only tabulate individual write-ins if they reach 5%.

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I recall correctly, we only tabulate individual
> write-ins if they reach 5%.

5%, or the number of votes cast for the candidate with the most votes (whichever is less) is the threshold. Otherwise, only the total number of write-ins is counted.
http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title24.2/chapter6/section24.2-675/

And a reminder, write-in votes for President/VP are only counted if the candidates have filed a "joint declaration of intent".
http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title24.2/chapter6/section24.2-644/

Keep it honest Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In my district, 11th, Gerry Connolly is running
> unopposed. My idea is to demand a write in ballot
> and to write in a name only know to myself. Then
> when the online results are published and the name
> I wrote in does not appear, I will know my ballot
> was not counted.

Just do what every other real American living in VA-11 will do on November 8:

Vote for Gerry!