Lock&Load Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ThePackLeader Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > formerhick76 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The NRA would never say anything like, "Hey
> > guys,
> > > good work. Through the efforts of your
> letters,
> > > your contributions, and your votes, we have
> > been
> > > able to beat back the forces of gun control
> > around
> > > the country. President Obama even signed a
> bill
> > > authorizing loaded carry in our national
> parks.
> > > Combine this with the decision in DC v.
> Heller,
> > > and our right to keep and bear arms is the
> > safest
> > > it has been in decades."
> > >
> > > Nope, it's always, "YOUR GUNS ARE ONE STEP
> FROM
> > > BEING TAKEN AWAY!" Why is the gun rights
> lobby
> > any
> > > different from any other lobby? Is it because
> > > conservatives and libertarians agree with it?
> >
> >
> > All it takes is one piece of garbage
> legislation
> > from a Pelosi/Obama run government, for people
> to
> > face severely restricted gun rights. Look at
> how
> > much is "changing" within only seven months of
> a
> > newly minted Executive Branch, and you can
> imagine
> > the concerns which people have for how we might
> > fare three years from now.
>
>
> Precisely. Some of us remember what happened when
> the Brady Bill passed.
> The ink wasnt even dry yet when the Dems trotted
> out "Brady II", a VERY
> draconian and unconstitutional proposal.
> Fortunately, Newt engineered
> a Rep takeover of the House and Brady II was dead.
> Later, the SCOTUS
> declared 1/2 of Brady I unconstitutional.
>
> History has a tendency to repeat itself and if you
> think Pelosi/Obama
> wouldnt try to disarm us all, take a look at H. R.
> 45 as it sits waiting
> for the right moment. Reid, I think knows better
> as he is from Nevada,
> a very pro-gun state, but when you throw in all
> the slobbering N. E.
> Yankee liberals like Hillary, Schumer, et al,
> nobody would be allowed
> firearms if they had their way. (that is except
> their own bodyguards)
>
> Here's H. R. 45
>
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show
I always find it so ironic that some of the most anti-gun liberals are from the NE, yet it's the very place where the Patriots first took up arms against the British during the Revolution. The Peoples Republic of Kalifornia is another problem altogether.