Home•Fairfax General Forum•Arrest/Ticket Search•Wiki new•Pictures/Videos•Chat•Articles•Links•About
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Goto Topic: Previous•Next
Go to: Forum List•Back to Forum•Post New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Jack Cant Cook ()
Date: January 04, 2016 09:49AM

This would not have been my first choice for our playoff opponent. Green Bay is a dangerous team that won't be bothered by possible cold/bad weather. I don't think the Redskins defense can handle Aaron Rogers.

Early prediction: Packers - 28 Redskins - 17

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: OP is a dunce ()
Date: January 04, 2016 10:21AM

OP doesn't actually watch football. Green Bay is 4-6 in the last 10, losing to such heavyweights as the Lions and Bears.

Rodgers has no one really to throw to. GB defense is not all that either. This was the best possible match-up although it still will be a tough game.

Redskins 28 Packers 20

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: HTTR!!! ()
Date: January 04, 2016 11:20AM

I don't think the skins have a chance against the packers defense. I was hoping they'd end up playing Minnesota but the cardinals laid an egg. Nevertheless, it's going to be fun as hell having a home playoff game. 1st one since Danny boy has owned the team.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: TheHamburgilr ()
Date: January 04, 2016 11:46AM

HTTR!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't think the skins have a chance against the
> packers defense. I was hoping they'd end up
> playing Minnesota but the cardinals laid an egg.
> Nevertheless, it's going to be fun as hell having
> a home playoff game. 1st one since Danny boy has
> owned the team.


....2012?

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Oh, and also.. ()
Date: January 04, 2016 11:52AM

1999 season, (Jan.8, 2000 playoff game), Redskins beat Lions 27-13.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: HTTR!!! ()
Date: January 04, 2016 12:23PM

Yeah! I know! Just seeing if anybody was paying attention. I was at those games too!

Hells yeah!

HTTR BABY!!!

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Skins by 10 pts ()
Date: January 04, 2016 12:31PM

Skins win this one easily if Kirk and DeSean are in. Skins by 10 pts

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Choke City? ()
Date: January 04, 2016 12:40PM

Redskins with this one! I thought maybe the Redskins would play the Seahawks but Packer should be an easy win.

UNless the Redskins CHOKE again.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: OMGx ()
Date: January 04, 2016 12:43PM

Oh, and also.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1999 season, (Jan.8, 2000 playoff game), Redskins
> beat Lions 27-13.

He has only been a fan for a few years, when he moved to America.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: UjDYE ()
Date: January 04, 2016 01:38PM

Redskins by 7

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: thinkingthoughts ()
Date: January 06, 2016 10:34AM

Is Kirk Cousins gay?

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Calling It ()
Date: January 06, 2016 10:47AM

Redskins 21 Packers 17

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: deeo! ()
Date: January 06, 2016 12:05PM

Jack Cant Cook Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This would not have been my first choice for our
> playoff opponent. Green Bay is a dangerous team
> that won't be bothered by possible cold/bad
> weather. I don't think the Redskins defense can
> handle Aaron Rogers.
>
> Early prediction: Packers - 28 Redskins - 17


your forget rodgers does not have the weapons to throw too this year, he has struggled most of the season . I give the skins the slight edge, rather play the packers than the seahawks.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Kilton ()
Date: January 10, 2016 08:13PM

Skins by 10 pts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Skins win this one easily if Kirk and DeSean are
> in. Skins by 10 pts

LOL

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Jack can't Cook ()
Date: January 10, 2016 08:17PM

OP was the only one in this thread with a brain. All the other posters must've been those braindead Obama zombie morons. LOL!!

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Typical Redskin moron fan ()
Date: January 10, 2016 08:19PM

Just wait until next year, we're going to the playoffs again!

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Jack Cant Cook ()
Date: January 10, 2016 08:43PM

OP is a dunce Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OP doesn't actually watch football. Green Bay is
> 4-6 in the last 10, losing to such heavyweights as
> the Lions and Bears.
>
> Rodgers has no one really to throw to. GB defense
> is not all that either. This was the best possible
> match-up although it still will be a tough game.
>
> Redskins 28 Packers 20

Didn't work out too well did it?

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm11 ()
Date: January 10, 2016 08:49PM

Jack Cant Cook Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This would not have been my first choice for our
> playoff opponent. Green Bay is a dangerous team
> that won't be bothered by possible cold/bad
> weather. I don't think the Redskins defense can
> handle Aaron Rogers.
>
> Early prediction: Packers - 28 Redskins - 17

Pretty close!

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Romo da Homo ()
Date: January 10, 2016 09:07PM

Jack Cant Cook Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OP is a dunce Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > OP doesn't actually watch football. Green Bay
> is
> > 4-6 in the last 10, losing to such heavyweights
> as
> > the Lions and Bears.
> >
> > Rodgers has no one really to throw to. GB
> defense
> > is not all that either. This was the best
> possible
> > match-up although it still will be a tough
> game.
> >
> > Redskins 28 Packers 20
>
> Didn't work out too well did it?


Much further than your retarded Cowboys.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Redskins -vs- Packers
Posted by: Cartman ()
Date: January 10, 2016 09:13PM

Romo da Homo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jack Cant Cook Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > OP is a dunce Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > OP doesn't actually watch football. Green
> Bay
> > is
> > > 4-6 in the last 10, losing to such
> heavyweights
> > as
> > > the Lions and Bears.
> > >
> > > Rodgers has no one really to throw to. GB
> > defense
> > > is not all that either. This was the best
> > possible
> > > match-up although it still will be a tough
> > game.
> > >
> > > Redskins 28 Packers 20
> >
> > Didn't work out too well did it?
>
>
> Much further than your retarded Cowboys.

Your tears taste so sweet.

Options: Reply•Quote


Go to: Forum List•Back to Forum•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******     ******   ********  ********   **        
 **    **   **    **  **    **  **     **  **    **  
 **         **            **    **     **  **    **  
 **   ****  **           **     **     **  **    **  
 **    **   **          **      **     **  ********* 
 **    **   **    **    **      **     **        **  
  ******     ******     **      ********         **
This forum powered by Phorum.