abelard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >More because Obama bailed on the Syrians and left
> a vacuum there after his "red line" fiasco when
> Putin threw him a bone with the chemical weapons
> red herring which then gave Assad effective
> license to kill +100,000 conventionally.
>
> So you think Obama should get us
more
> involved in this colossal mess? You think we'll
> be greeted as 'liberators' this time around?
> Seems to me that there are only bad options here,
> but some are worse for us than others. And before
> you mention our responsibilities to our fellow
> man, I'd bring up the estimated 500,000 to
> possibly 1
million civilian casualties in
> Iraq during the war and occupation. We may
> actually be precipitating fewer deaths by staying
> out of it, and this time it's not totally on us.
Attachments: