Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
ALSO, many who are doing "dna editing" are fakes - they are removing or adding whole chromosomes which are a super-structure of (millions of dna) that are NOT edited
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Gene Editing
Posted by:
Number One Deplorable
()
Date: January 21, 2019 12:41PM
So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR technology to alter a gene in two born babies and one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
Everyone is denouncing him.
I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably atheist leftists - can articulate any sound reasons consistent with their belief-system as to why what this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we should try to legally prevent folks from using this technology to edit other genes or even fully clone a human being?
TIA!
Making America Great Again! Imprison Trump for Lying about the Wall.
Everyone is denouncing him.
I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably atheist leftists - can articulate any sound reasons consistent with their belief-system as to why what this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we should try to legally prevent folks from using this technology to edit other genes or even fully clone a human being?
TIA!
Making America Great Again! Imprison Trump for Lying about the Wall.
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Total dumbfuck
()
Date: January 21, 2019 01:05PM
That you are stupid enough to conflate gene editing with cloning confirms that widespread suspicions of your brain having been wracked by stupid nonsense are all quite correct.
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Libtarded libtards
()
Date: January 21, 2019 01:48PM
Number One Deplorable Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR
> technology to alter a gene in two born babies and
> one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
>
> Everyone is denouncing him.
>
> I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably atheist
> leftists - can articulate any sound reasons
> consistent with their belief-system as to why what
> this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we
> should try to legally prevent folks from using
> this technology to edit other genes or even fully
> clone a human being?
>
> TIA!
Liberals are all about eugenics.
-------------------------------------------------------
> So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR
> technology to alter a gene in two born babies and
> one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
>
> Everyone is denouncing him.
>
> I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably atheist
> leftists - can articulate any sound reasons
> consistent with their belief-system as to why what
> this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we
> should try to legally prevent folks from using
> this technology to edit other genes or even fully
> clone a human being?
>
> TIA!
Liberals are all about eugenics.
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Such a asshole
()
Date: January 21, 2019 02:23PM
Go fuck yourself, you wasted assfuck moron. You are nothing but a stinking piece of shit.
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
4jl9l
()
Date: January 21, 2019 03:17PM
no wonder you'd fund pelosi projects
what is crisper other than your brain smokign another joint?
CRISPER is using a virus to alter a cell
that's been called innoculation and done in the usa for decades
SHOW ME THE MONEY. SHOW ME THE MACHINE THAT EDITS DNA. PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
point here: you'd be giving PEL'o'Si money for nothing - usa grant money oversees (which pelosi and hillary are experts at: funnelling usa money overseas)
ALSO, many who are doing "dna editing" are fakes - they are removing or adding whole chromosomes which are a super-structure of (millions of dna) that are NOT edited
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
pvjlp
()
Date: January 21, 2019 03:22PM
the complete citric cell cycle is yet to be known
the complete dna sequence : also largely unknown / uncharted territory
the complexity of super structures (proteins) that are part of the metabolic or lyphatic system: largely unknown - their size and complexity are such that they are somewhat indescribable individually and unthinkable complicated as a whole
(your chance of getting a gene fixr on your iphone app anytime soon is: zero. your chance fake research is part of your cell phone bill tax increease is: guaranteed)
the complete dna sequence : also largely unknown / uncharted territory
the complexity of super structures (proteins) that are part of the metabolic or lyphatic system: largely unknown - their size and complexity are such that they are somewhat indescribable individually and unthinkable complicated as a whole
(your chance of getting a gene fixr on your iphone app anytime soon is: zero. your chance fake research is part of your cell phone bill tax increease is: guaranteed)
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
jjvxg
()
Date: January 21, 2019 03:23PM
CRISPR in cancer[edit]
As of 2016 CRISPR had been studied in animal models and cancer cell lines, to learn if it can be used to repair or thwart mutated genes that cause cancer.
(if you don't think that's throwing money out the window your an idiot. usa has spent a trillion on cancer research and it's almost wholey failed. they can identify, they can scoop some out and cross their fingers is what it adds up to)
As of 2016 CRISPR had been studied in animal models and cancer cell lines, to learn if it can be used to repair or thwart mutated genes that cause cancer.
(if you don't think that's throwing money out the window your an idiot. usa has spent a trillion on cancer research and it's almost wholey failed. they can identify, they can scoop some out and cross their fingers is what it adds up to)
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
As of December 2014, patent righ
()
Date: January 21, 2019 03:24PM
As of December 2014, patent rights to CRISPR were contested. 666
you can bet all this adds up to: "the global warming scam of medical science"
you can bet all this adds up to: "the global warming scam of medical science"
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
4gtreww
()
Date: January 21, 2019 03:27PM
Gene editing (and previously: the cure of all cancer research)
are the GLOBAL WARMING of the medical circle - a medical circle thoroughly obama-ized
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Number One Deplorable
()
Date: January 21, 2019 03:43PM
Wow. One irrelevant non-sequitur after another.
This scientific development (illegal both in the US and in China where it occurred) is apparently too much for some folks to grasp and accept. Guess that's why it's illegal.
Making America Great Again! Imprison Trump for Lying about the Wall.
This scientific development (illegal both in the US and in China where it occurred) is apparently too much for some folks to grasp and accept. Guess that's why it's illegal.
Making America Great Again! Imprison Trump for Lying about the Wall.
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Since you asked so nicely
()
Date: January 21, 2019 09:43PM
Number One Deplorable Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR
> technology to alter a gene in two born babies and
> one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
>
> Everyone is denouncing him.
>
> I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably atheist
> leftists - can articulate any sound reasons
> consistent with their belief-system as to why what
> this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we
> should try to legally prevent folks from using
> this technology to edit other genes or even fully
> clone a human being?
>
> TIA!
FTR, I don't consider myself a leftist or an atheist, but I can answer this one, having read about it some.
First, as another poster noted, CRISPR is not cloning. But let's just look at CRISPR.
It's of course appealing as a way of fixing genetic defects, such as cystic fibrosis or retinitis pigmentosa. The concern is this: where do you draw the line?
"Your child will be of below average height, but we can fix that."
"Your child will be of below average intelligence, but we can fix that."
"We want our child to be blue-eyed."
"We want our child to have blond hair."
"We want our child to be athletic."
So the concern is that it feels risky to just say "Sure, go for it, no problem". I don't think anybody thinks that it isn't going to happen: they just don't want it monetized and commercialized.
For a good view of where it COULD go, read Daniel Suarez's book "Change Agent", https://www.amazon.com/Change-Agent-Daniel-Suarez/dp/110198466X
It will be interesting to see how this evolves.
-------------------------------------------------------
> So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR
> technology to alter a gene in two born babies and
> one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
>
> Everyone is denouncing him.
>
> I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably atheist
> leftists - can articulate any sound reasons
> consistent with their belief-system as to why what
> this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we
> should try to legally prevent folks from using
> this technology to edit other genes or even fully
> clone a human being?
>
> TIA!
FTR, I don't consider myself a leftist or an atheist, but I can answer this one, having read about it some.
First, as another poster noted, CRISPR is not cloning. But let's just look at CRISPR.
It's of course appealing as a way of fixing genetic defects, such as cystic fibrosis or retinitis pigmentosa. The concern is this: where do you draw the line?
"Your child will be of below average height, but we can fix that."
"Your child will be of below average intelligence, but we can fix that."
"We want our child to be blue-eyed."
"We want our child to have blond hair."
"We want our child to be athletic."
So the concern is that it feels risky to just say "Sure, go for it, no problem". I don't think anybody thinks that it isn't going to happen: they just don't want it monetized and commercialized.
For a good view of where it COULD go, read Daniel Suarez's book "Change Agent", https://www.amazon.com/Change-Agent-Daniel-Suarez/dp/110198466X
It will be interesting to see how this evolves.
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
gwumx
()
Date: January 22, 2019 01:43AM
IN OTHER WORDS I WAS RIGHT
YOU LOOK BUT YOU CAN FIND NO GENE EDITOR
THERE ISN'T ONE
YOU LOOK BUT YOU CAN FIND NO GENE EDITOR
THERE ISN'T ONE
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
9fmhe
()
Date: January 22, 2019 01:49AM
falling back on his honorable fund seeking words
you cannot verify ANYTHING he said means "correctly edited a target gene"
at best you could verify he made an accident and documented it afterward
at worst - and probably - you can't verify he edited any gene at all
you cannot verify ANYTHING he said means "correctly edited a target gene"
at best you could verify he made an accident and documented it afterward
at worst - and probably - you can't verify he edited any gene at all
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Muller21Q3
()
Date: August 07, 2019 07:37AM
wow, I'm interested in CRISPR. Where can I find articles to read about CRISPR and what for is it used?
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Cam Francis
()
Date: August 07, 2019 07:40AM
Libtarded libtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Number One Deplorable Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR
> > technology to alter a gene in two born babies
> and
> > one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
> >
> > Everyone is denouncing him.
> >
> > I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably
> atheist
> > leftists - can articulate any sound reasons
> > consistent with their belief-system as to why
> what
> > this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we
> > should try to legally prevent folks from using
> > this technology to edit other genes or even
> fully
> > clone a human being?
> >
> > TIA!
>
>
> Liberals are all about eugenics.
Nothing wrong with eugenics..
-------------------------------------------------------
> Number One Deplorable Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So this guy in China has apparently used CRISPR
> > technology to alter a gene in two born babies
> and
> > one fetus to make them more resistant to HIV.
> >
> > Everyone is denouncing him.
> >
> > I'm wondering if any leftists - preferably
> atheist
> > leftists - can articulate any sound reasons
> > consistent with their belief-system as to why
> what
> > this guy did was "wrong" or "bad," and why we
> > should try to legally prevent folks from using
> > this technology to edit other genes or even
> fully
> > clone a human being?
> >
> > TIA!
>
>
> Liberals are all about eugenics.
Nothing wrong with eugenics..
Re: Gene Editing
Posted by:
Samuel90
()
Date: August 07, 2019 07:41AM
Muller21Q3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wow, I'm interested in CRISPR. Where can I find
> articles to read about CRISPR and what for is it
> used?
hey, buddy, there is a good option to read scientific article about CRISPR/Cas9 Vectors at this site https://www.geg-tech.com/lentiviral-vectors/vectors-crispr/, and you know that article about CRISPR made me think about opportunities that can be attained if CRISPR technology will be well researched. By the way, that article is written in scientific language, so I even found out about wide variety of different words and processes that happen when CRISPR work. That article is so attractive especially for you because of the presence of references to the sources where that information was taken :) I hope I helped you :)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2019 07:42AM by Samuel90.
-------------------------------------------------------
> wow, I'm interested in CRISPR. Where can I find
> articles to read about CRISPR and what for is it
> used?
hey, buddy, there is a good option to read scientific article about CRISPR/Cas9 Vectors at this site https://www.geg-tech.com/lentiviral-vectors/vectors-crispr/, and you know that article about CRISPR made me think about opportunities that can be attained if CRISPR technology will be well researched. By the way, that article is written in scientific language, so I even found out about wide variety of different words and processes that happen when CRISPR work. That article is so attractive especially for you because of the presence of references to the sources where that information was taken :) I hope I helped you :)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/07/2019 07:42AM by Samuel90.