I am so tired of the liberals trying to scare women with "threats to women's rights" issues. It is a bunch of bunk.
This woman is voting for Cuccinelli.
I cannot imagine our Commonwealth being governed by the other guy. I have heard nothing positive he will do. Only smears coming from his campaign.
Cuccinelli has the experience to get the job done.

Hi, Alice! I'm glad to see you support your husband's candidacy. One quick note: you probably should have said "WomAn for Cuccinelli," not "WomEn for Cuccinelli," as none of the rest of us will be voting for your darling Ken.

See you at book club!

Women Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi, Alice! I'm glad to see you support your
> husband's candidacy. One quick note: you
> probably should have said "WomAn for Cuccinelli,"
> not "WomEn for Cuccinelli," as none of the rest of
> us will be voting for your darling Ken.
>
> See you at book club!


Ha... nice try. No, actually, it is WomEN. Not only myself, but the other womEn on the street who are showing their support with campaign signs. We are intelligent enough to see through the smear tactics of his opponent. McAuliffe would have been better off trying to articulate policies and practices that he supports, but then again, there is probably nothing there.....
Go Cuccinelli!

Go Cucc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I cannot imagine our Commonwealth being governed
> by the other guy. I have heard nothing positive
> he will do. Only smears coming from his campaign.

What positive things have you heard that Ken will do?

WomEN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Women Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi, Alice! I'm glad to see you support your
> > husband's candidacy. One quick note: you
> > probably should have said "WomAn for
> Cuccinelli,"
> > not "WomEn for Cuccinelli," as none of the rest
> of
> > us will be voting for your darling Ken.
> >
> > See you at book club!
>
>
> Ha... nice try. No, actually, it is WomEN. Not
> only myself, but the other womEn on the street who
> are showing their support with campaign signs. We
> are intelligent enough to see through the smear
> tactics of his opponent. McAuliffe would have
> been better off trying to articulate policies and
> practices that he supports, but then again, there
> is probably nothing there.....
> Go Cuccinelli!

Alice, dear, we didn't know how to tell you this, but...

...those signs were all put up by our husbands.

It made them happy to put the signs up, and we figured, "hey, what the hell? Let hubby put up his signs. It's not worth fighting about - and it's not like anyone would ever believe that a woman would vote for Ken, anyway!"

Sorry to burst your bubble. Ken is a very sweet man, but we don't want him in our vaginas. Say hi to the kids for us!

Woman on the Fence Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Go Cucc Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I cannot imagine our Commonwealth being
> governed
> > by the other guy. I have heard nothing
> positive
> > he will do. Only smears coming from his
> campaign.
>
> What positive things have you heard that Ken will
> do?

The list is here: http://www.cuccinelli.com/issues/

I am strongly supporting his stand on taxes, government reform, healthcare, and honoring our veterans.

The best thing he will be doing is taking a long-overdue vacation as voters put him out to pasture. His political career is over. Good riddance to bad rubbish, He's been nothing but an embarrassment to the Commonwealth.

Hmmmmmm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The best thing he will be doing is taking a
> long-overdue vacation as voters put him out to
> pasture. His political career is over. Good
> riddance to bad rubbish, He's been nothing but an
> embarrassment to the Commonwealth.

Please leave me out of this. I don't want him any more than you do.

Pasture Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hmmmmmm Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The best thing he will be doing is taking a
> > long-overdue vacation as voters put him out to
> > pasture. His political career is over. Good
> > riddance to bad rubbish, He's been nothing but
> an
> > embarrassment to the Commonwealth.
>
> Please leave me out of this. I don't want him any
> more than you do.

It is so transparent when you reply to your first post. Geez.....

Support Cucc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > What positive things have you heard that Ken
> will
> > do?
>
> The list is here:
> http://www.cuccinelli.com/issues/

Terry has a list of his own here: http://terrymcauliffe.com/on-the-issues/

Have you reviewed it? I like Terry's stance on education, woman's health, and veterans.

I am finding that chosing whom to support is quite a challenge.

Posting Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pasture Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hmmmmmm Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The best thing he will be doing is taking a
> > > long-overdue vacation as voters put him out
> to
> > > pasture. His political career is over. Good
> > > riddance to bad rubbish, He's been nothing
> but
> > an
> > > embarrassment to the Commonwealth.
> >
> > Please leave me out of this. I don't want him
> any
> > more than you do.
>
> It is so transparent when you reply to your first
> post. Geez.....

"Pasture" = "Women," not "Hmmmm"

And seriously, don't send Ken out to me.

Woman on the Fence Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Support Cucc Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > What positive things have you heard that Ken
> > will
> > > do?
> >
> > The list is here:
> > http://www.cuccinelli.com/issues/
>
> Terry has a list of his own here:
> http://terrymcauliffe.com/on-the-issues/
>
> Have you reviewed it? I like Terry's stance on
> education, woman's health, and veterans.
>
> I am finding that chosing whom to support is quite
> a challenge.

What I don't like about McAuliffe is his continued support of the ACA - it is proving to be a doomed experiment that is going to end up costing tax payers quite a bit. Cuccinelli will support revamping the program so that Americans will have insurance that they need and want. I am also not happy with McAuliffe's view on bigger government which in my mind, means more taxes. I don't trust him to spend our tax dollars in an appropriate way.

Woman on the Fence Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like Terry's stance on
> education, woman's health, and veterans.
>
> I am finding that chosing whom to support is quite
> a challenge.

If you like Terry's stance on women's health, I bet it's less of a challenge than you think. It's simple: one candidate is a religious extremist who would gladly ban birth control if he could, because he doesn't believe in women taking ownership of their sexuality. The other is Terry, who lives in the twenty-first century.

Oh, and Terry has never sued the University of Virginia because he disagreed with the content of a study published by one of its professors, so the education thing kind of hurts Ken, too.

Women Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Woman on the Fence Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like Terry's stance on
> > education, woman's health, and veterans.
> >
> > I am finding that chosing whom to support is
> quite
> > a challenge.
>
> If you like Terry's stance on women's health, I
> bet it's less of a challenge than you think. It's
> simple: one candidate is a religious extremist
> who would gladly ban birth control if he could,
> because he doesn't believe in women taking
> ownership of their sexuality. The other is Terry,
> who lives in the twenty-first century.
>
> Oh, and Terry has never sued the University of
> Virginia because he disagreed with the content of
> a study published by one of its professors, so the
> education thing kind of hurts Ken, too.

The extremist is the poster. Ban birth control... you have got to be kidding.
"Ken’s position is that government shouldn’t have a role in regulating contraception and he has no intentions of doing so as Governor. He recently stated this at a public forum."
Do your own research instead of just regurgitating the lies of the McAuliffe campaign.

So Terry has held public office, never lied and is really ethical? No one of the above. Ken is the less evil of the two lessers. Terry is a crook, haen't seen anyone on his side even try to argue that one. Better a shnook than a crook. Lets hope for better choices next time! Terry is the more dangerous of the two.

Educate yourself Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Women Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Woman on the Fence Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I like Terry's stance on
> > > education, woman's health, and veterans.
> > >
> > > I am finding that chosing whom to support is
> > quite
> > > a challenge.
> >
> > If you like Terry's stance on women's health, I
> > bet it's less of a challenge than you think.
> It's
> > simple: one candidate is a religious extremist
> > who would gladly ban birth control if he could,
> > because he doesn't believe in women taking
> > ownership of their sexuality. The other is
> Terry,
> > who lives in the twenty-first century.
> >
> > Oh, and Terry has never sued the University of
> > Virginia because he disagreed with the content
> of
> > a study published by one of its professors, so
> the
> > education thing kind of hurts Ken, too.
>
> The extremist is the poster. Ban birth control...
> you have got to be kidding.
> "Ken’s position is that government shouldn’t
> have a role in regulating contraception and he has
> no intentions of doing so as Governor. He recently
> stated this at a public forum."
> Do your own research instead of just regurgitating
> the lies of the McAuliffe campaign.

I said "would if he could."

As for research: What effect do you think the fetal personhood law Ken championed in 2007 would have on the legality of hormonal birth control? He certainly did not advocate for a clause explicitly exempting methods of birth control - like hormonal birth control, which prevents a fertilized egg (a person, according to Ken's preferred legislative definition) from implanting - from the law. Under his proposed definition, any woman who used hormonal birth control to prevent pregnancy would be killing a person.

No, Ken does not have a problem with condoms, because he only has a problem with women picking and choosing when to have babies, not when men do it.

And even IF that's not his intention, someone stupid enough to open the door to that kind of legal problem in his single-minded quest to ban abortion shouldn't be governor.

Until it got serious (well, insofar as it could get serious with Ken on the ticket), best laugh of the day!

McAuliffe will not steal your vaginas, ladies. You get to keep and do what you wish with them. Virginia is for lovers, remember?

Name change proposal: The Commonwealth of Vaginia.

Any woman that votes for the Kooster is misoygnistic, self-hating, submissive, Stepford wife. Other than that, yeah...women should vote for the Kookster...he has chasity belts for sale on his website.

Lindsey Chittenden Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any woman that votes for the Kooster is
> misoygnistic, self-hating, submissive, Stepford
> wife. Other than that, yeah...women should vote
> for the Kookster...he has chasity belts for sale
> on his website.


That's stupid

Stupid is voting for an elected official who actually advocated murdering the former First Lady and Secretary of State.

Come Tuesday, the Kookster will be a sad footnote in the annals of Virginia political history...a nob-nosed, green-eyed, dead fly on the wall.

Can't wait...will vote...and dance on his politcal grave Tuesday night.

Women of Virginia....do you want another man in your bedroom? If you vote for the Kookster, he will be under the covers with you.
Attachments:

The Kookster believes in small government...but not too small...because he wants to be the gestapo police ruling over your uterus.
Attachments:

Baby Jane Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Women of Virginia....do you want another man in
> your bedroom? If you vote for the Kookster, he
> will be under the covers with you.


This must be true cause I read it on FFU. LoLz


 
Attachments:

You cannot honestly believe that the Kookster -- Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs -- has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the election on Tuesday.

It's all over, baby. You can take your apron off, put some shoes on your bare soled feet, and come out of the kitchen. The Commonwealth did not elect the one who desired to send you back to the 17th century and make you wear a chasity belt. FREE AT LAST!
Attachments:

This movie says it all. Even if you loved the Clintons you should think long and hard about voting for Terry McAuliff. He's a joke. Seriously people. If you think Cuccinelli is too conservative think about what damage can be done. He can't outlaw abortion. Let's be serious-- that is just liberal propaganda. Don't be fooled by it. Do some research on McAuliffe's failed business trip to sell VA wine to Cuba. McAuliffe my be a great fund raiser but that's because he's slick, like a used car salesman #nodisrespecttousedcarsalesmen.

http://fastterry.com/?page_id=500&gclid=CI2W-4uuxLoCFU6Y4AodKUwA4Q

This woman is voting for Cucinelli...definitely lesser of two evils. Think about the lies we were told about Obamacare...they think we're stupid! Show them that you don't buy their bs anymore!

^ Um...you ARE stupid.

In the Kookster's world, women are:

Baby-makers
Cradle-shakers
Menu-takers
Cookie-bakers
Sex-fakers

If you desire to be more than the above, don't vote for the Kookster.
If you desire to be the above, vote for the Kookster.

Simple as pie...pass the plate, please mam.

If Obama had a cousin, he'd look like ...... Terry?

Betty Crotch Pot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In the Kookster's world, women are:
>
> Baby-makers
> Cradle-shakers
> Menu-takers
> Cookie-bakers
> Sex-fakers
>
> If you desire to be more than the above, don't
> vote for the Kookster.
> If you desire to be the above, vote for the
> Kookster.
>
> Simple as pie...pass the plate, please mam.


Well, OK as long as it's you who says so.

LoLz....

 
Attachments:

If Kookster had a cousin, she would be his third wife....in KooKKKster World, women are concubined property.

Woman on the Fence Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Support Cucc Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > What positive things have you heard that Ken
> > will
> > > do?
> >
> > The list is here:
> > http://www.cuccinelli.com/issues/
>
> Terry has a list of his own here:
> http://terrymcauliffe.com/on-the-issues/
>
> Have you reviewed it? I like Terry's stance on
> education, woman's health, and veterans.
>
> I am finding that chosing whom to support is quite
> a challenge.

He lies about his support for Veterans just like the Clintonistas. They all loathe the military and are doing everything they can to ruin morale. BOHICA!

Zealot: a person consumed with excessive fanaticism.

Only a zealot would besmirch the STATE SEAL by spending time and money to create a new seal with a full armored breastplate.

VIRGINIA will not, can not, and did not elect a ZEALOT.

First, the Kookster will cover your breast. Guess what's next on his list. Hint, it rhymes with vagina.
Attachments:

sukiung Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Think about the lies we were told about Obamacare...

Yeah, all that death panels and government takeover crap and how the mandate was unconstututional. Republicans are just a bunch of ignorant trash-mouths, I'm afraid. Can't think, but they still talk.

> ...they think we're stupid!

Yeah, there's a really good reason for that. See above.

I think you might be talking about the dead Robert Byrd but I digress.

Your hero Bubba Clintongue who is campaigning for McTool, changed women like tissue, yet we never heard any of the feminasties complain about 'women rights', 'women reproductive rights', 'concubine property', etc etc. How does that incongruency strike you? I bet you are a 'lib' first, and a woman or man second. These libs that are running the democratic party today are not the same libs of the JFK generation. They have totally redefined the word 'liberal'. Now it's a statist fascistic corporate-feudal oligarchy.

They use issues like this to divide and conquer. Left/right paradigm BS.





Sister Wife Rosemary Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If Kookster had a cousin, she would be his third
> wife....in KooKKKster World, women are concubined
> property.

The ironic part about all of this is all those liberal men posting all this bullshit are just exposing how stupid they think women really are. \

They believe theyre too slutty not to have sex all the time with random guys and no protection and to dumb to care about anything but their ability to kill babies so they can keep acting like drunken whores.

Intelligent women would never vote for Terry as he is the poster child of everything thats wrong with politics. No one can even state a single positive thing about him all they can do is keep posting this chicken little end of the world bullshit about Cuccinelli

Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The ironic part about all of this is all those
> liberal men posting all this bullshit are just
> exposing how stupid they think women really are.
> \
>
> They believe theyre too slutty not to have sex all
> the time with random guys and no protection and to
> dumb to care about anything but their ability to
> kill babies so they can keep acting like drunken
> whores.
>
> Intelligent women would never vote for Terry as he
> is the poster child of everything thats wrong with
> politics. No one can even state a single positive
> thing about him all they can do is keep posting
> this chicken little end of the world bullshit
> about Cuccinelli


Exactly!!! If you listened to the Libs, you would think all that women care about is their vaginas..... Idiots.

Hmmmmmm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sukiung Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Think about the lies we were told about
> Obamacare...
>
> Yeah, all that death panels and government
> takeover crap and how the mandate was
> unconstututional. Republicans are just a bunch of
> ignorant trash-mouths, I'm afraid. Can't think,
> but they still talk.
>
> > ...they think we're stupid!
>
> Yeah, there's a really good reason for that. See
> above.


Maybe you should tell that to the democrat apparatchiks who advised Obama on this thing:

Rattner penned an opinion piece in the New York Times titled “Beyond Obamacare” in which he proclaimed “We need death panels” and argued rationing must be instructed to sustain Obama’s health-care plan.


http://stevenrattner.com/article/beyond-obamacare/

Obamacare also set up several committees, all run by government bureaucrats what will decide what care will be covered in the exchanges and another that determines how much money an individual can receive for any particular illness or condition.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/dont-fool-yourself-of-course-there-are-death-panels-in-obamacare/

Why must you lie? Oh yeah, because if you leftist commie scum told the truth, you couldn't get elected dog catcher. Asshole

Global Xing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think you might be talking about the dead Robert
> Byrd but I digress.
>
> Your hero Bubba Clintongue who is campaigning for
> McTool, changed women like tissue, yet we never
> heard any of the feminasties complain about 'women
> rights', 'women reproductive rights', 'concubine
> property', etc etc. How does that incongruency
> strike you? I bet you are a 'lib' first, and a
> woman or man second. These libs that are running
> the democratic party today are not the same libs
> of the JFK generation. They have totally
> redefined the word 'liberal'. Now it's a statist
> fascistic corporate-feudal oligarchy.
>
> They use issues like this to divide and conquer.
> Left/right paradigm BS.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sister Wife Rosemary Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If Kookster had a cousin, she would be his
> third
> > wife....in KooKKKster World, women are
> concubined
> > property.

There is certainly enough evidence that Clinton was a rapist in the Juanita Broderick case. You can still find the Nightline interview she gave. Shocking what a creep Clinton was and what he got away with - all because he was a democrat protected by the press and his hag of a wife.

And there are the women against!
Attachments:

It's pretty obvious why you're voting for Cuccinelli - When your husband comes home and want some average head, you would be able to say no for legal reasons.

Go Cucc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am so tired of the liberals trying to scare
> women with "threats to women's rights" issues. It
> is a bunch of bunk.
> This woman is voting for Cuccinelli.
> I cannot imagine our Commonwealth being governed
> by the other guy. I have heard nothing positive
> he will do. Only smears coming from his campaign.
>
> Cuccinelli has the experience to get the job done.

Voting TMac b/c Cooch is terribl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's pretty obvious why you're voting for
> Cuccinelli - When your husband comes home and want
> some average head, you would be able to say no for
> legal reasons.
>
> Go Cucc Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am so tired of the liberals trying to scare
> > women with "threats to women's rights" issues.
> It
> > is a bunch of bunk.
> > This woman is voting for Cuccinelli.
> > I cannot imagine our Commonwealth being
> governed
> > by the other guy. I have heard nothing
> positive
> > he will do. Only smears coming from his
> campaign.
> >
> > Cuccinelli has the experience to get the job
> done.

Typical Lib - always bringing up what YOU use to THINK WITH. Don't you know... some of us more educated women think there are issues that are more important than what is between your legs.

^ ^ ^

I bet you are an old, bitter, frigid, sexless, Stepford wife...happy with a credit card and tennis club membership.

Don't worry, Governor BubbaMac will bring some joy to you next week.

^ ^ ^ ^

Nice try, but the Kookster would even allow you to birth babies in the hospital. Your sister-midwife would be holding your legs open back in the barn while the Kookster would be penning diatribes in his Compass Manifesto of how to protect our borders from the illegal aliens.

The Kookster will fade into oblivion after next week. He can take all his sister-wives and home-schooled cross-eyed cousin-kids and move to West Virginny.

gerry3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rattner penned an opinion piece in the New York
> Times titled “Beyond Obamacare” in which he
> proclaimed “We need death panels”

Actually, he said, "We need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly,.." But I guess you didn't get that far?

> and argued rationing must be instructed to sustain Obama’s
> health-care plan.

Actually, he talked about smarter allocations of health care resources, which everyone supports, and which are a major theme of PPACA. You know, the law that Rattner called "estimable"? That means admirable and deserving of esteeem, you know.

> Obamacare also set up several committees, all run
> by government bureaucrats what will decide what
> care will be covered in the exchanges and another
> that determines how much money an individual can
> receive for any particular illness or condition.

Seriously? A right-wing nutcase blog is your guiding light? What a basket-case!
"Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom!" Yup, that's the place to go for non-moonbat reporting on PPACA, alright! And why doesn't your asylum-escapee link to his copy of PPACA? Why doesn't he include the actual language he is pretending to interpret? I'll tell you why -- he's a no account worthless asswipe right-wing loser. Much like yourself. Class dismissed.

^ ^ ^

Keep trying.

As of Tuesday, 7 PM, November 5, 2013, Kenneth Nob-nosed Green-eyed Lizard-lipped Cuccinelli will be a defeated candidate, rejected soundly by the majority of right-minded, forward-thinking citizens of the Commonwealth.

Haven't you people learned...evil-spirited, dark-hearted, cold-shouldered, hiding behind the Bible and the Flag cloaksters can not win elections.

I have already started celebrating the New Commonwealth.

Women For Cuccinelli....we searched high and wide but could not find any.

Their husbands won't let them out after 8 PM. Even the Kookster's mother is not voting for him.
Attachments:

Wow, the McTool zombies are sure out on patrol tonight, aren't they???? Did you get your marching orders for the weekend, the last push, maximize the BS-campaign??

The only thing McTool is qualified for is to sit in a cell for stock options fraud!

But I know, he is one of the 'extempt elites', so you are good with that.

I bet you McTool drones are getting several metric tonnes of pre-voted 'missing' ballots ready somewhere in a dungeon as I write this.

By hook and by crook.....

Libs are Pigs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Typical Lib - always bringing up what YOU use to
> THINK WITH. Don't you know... some of us more
> educated women think there are issues that are
> more important than what is between your legs.


So what you're saying is that GOP ladies have more money but are less satisfied? If that's the trade off you made, so be it.

Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The ironic part about all of this is all those
> liberal men posting all this bullshit are just
> exposing how stupid they think women really are.
> \
>
> They believe theyre too slutty not to have sex all
> the time with random guys and no protection and to
> dumb to care about anything but their ability to
> kill babies so they can keep acting like drunken
> whores.

You are one sick fuck. You have a real hatred of women. I'm guessing that you are a 300 pound loser who couldn't even pay to get women to fuck you. You really need to get help before you turn into a serial killer.

I think I am seeing things, but....

if you compare the above photo of McTool and Gerry "King Weasel" Connolly - they both have that rodent-weasel hybrid facial expression, don't they??? Like they could chew through pallettes of 100 dollar bills in 24 hrs and hide them in their burrows. But being part weasels, they react viciously to blood, so watch out....

Libs are Pigs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Typical Lib - always bringing up what YOU use to
> THINK WITH. Don't you know... some of us more
> educated women think there are issues that are
> more important than what is between your legs.


Considering the Cooch's stance on transvaginal ultrasounds, abortion, and birth control, and his current polling with VA women ... I'd argue that what's between your legs is a big-time issue with women. Issues that the Cooch is getting crushed on.

No, he (Liberal Logic 29) is saying that McTool's women voters are vapid 'Womens Studies' majors and mostly act like harlets (because they are and they have daddy issues), and the liberal men posting here either need to grow a pair or go clean their manginas.

Has my answer been helpful to you? 800-EAT-SHIT!



You are Just Sick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The ironic part about all of this is all those
> > liberal men posting all this bullshit are just
> > exposing how stupid they think women really are.
>
> > \
> >
> > They believe theyre too slutty not to have sex
> all
> > the time with random guys and no protection and
> to
> > dumb to care about anything but their ability
> to
> > kill babies so they can keep acting like
> drunken
> > whores.
>
> You are one sick fuck. You have a real hatred of
> women. I'm guessing that you are a 300 pound loser
> who couldn't even pay to get women to fuck you.
> You really need to get help before you turn into a
> serial killer.

Why focus on important issues in an election when one can focus and redefine it on your own terms -- i.e. bodily fluid functions. Typical liberastic idiology and sadly with the 5th column media, it has worked!

Let me say it for the Nth time -- nobody (not Cuccinelli) is going to fuck with your rights to abort your fetii or fuck whoever you want (as long as it's consentual). Why? Because of Roe v. Wade.

You just like the sound of 'trans-vaginal', don't you?

Q.E.D.



I disagree Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs are Pigs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Typical Lib - always bringing up what YOU use
> to
> > THINK WITH. Don't you know... some of us more
> > educated women think there are issues that are
> > more important than what is between your legs.
>
>
> Considering the Cooch's stance on transvaginal
> ultrasounds, abortion, and birth control, and his
> current polling with VA women ... I'd argue that
> what's between your legs is a big-time issue with
> women. Issues that the Cooch is getting crushed
> on.

The Cooch will lose on Tuesday.

Instead of running on jobs, the economy, public education, and transportation, he ran on:

abortion
immigration
climate change
junk science
suing the University of Virginia
stifling investigation into Star Scientific securites fraud
denying anti-discrimination to all citizens

Yep, the Kookster is one smart Kookie. You run on social issues, you lose on social issues. Even GOP-minded corporate executives know that a Kookster administration would be BAD BUSINESS for the COMMONWEALTH. Check back on Tuesday after the Kookster had been relgated to the Macacca waste-bin of Virginia politics.

Where have you been the past three years.

The only Virgina-elected official focused on bodily functions and secretions has been......

THE KOOKSTER

CUCKOO FOR COCOA PUFFS

THE BEADY-EYED, NOB-NOSED GESTAPO BOOTJACK

THE LAUGHINGSTOCK ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES WHO BROUGHT A LAWSUIT AGAINST ITS OWN PUBLIC IVY INSTIUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

Global Xing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think I am seeing things, but....
>
> if you compare the above photo of McTool and Gerry
> "King Weasel" Connolly - they both have that
> rodent-weasel hybrid facial expression, don't
> they??? Like they could chew through pallettes of
> 100 dollar bills in 24 hrs and hide them in their
> burrows. But being part weasels, they react
> viciously to blood, so watch out....


You're not. It's the prototypical Democratic Weasel Face.

In its extreme form:

Nice try. The Kookster is the anti-Christ, Satan, placenta-eating monster. Ask his wife, what did he do with the seven placenti that she birthed? He actually cooked them and ate them. Even his own family is afraid of him. It's time the truth is revealed. After Tuesday, he will retreat from the public eye and check into a mental hospital

Jenny Craig Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nice try. The Kookster is the anti-Christ, Satan,
> placenta-eating monster. Ask his wife, what did
> he do with the seven placenti that she birthed?
> He actually cooked them and ate them. Even his
> own family is afraid of him. It's time the truth
> is revealed. After Tuesday, he will retreat from
> the public eye and check into a mental hospital


Do you guys have anything at all other than anti-Cuccinelli drivel?

I mean surely McAuliffe must have SOME reason to vote FOR him right?

Oh wait... not.

lol

The Kookster wants Virginia to become the next Mississippi. He can't wait to reshape Virginia into his own 18th century view of AmeriKKKa. You people better be aware of his agenda if you vote for him.
Attachments:

On a scale of 1 to 10, McA is a 4. The Kookster is a -5. Easy decision when these are the two candidates.

You vote based on the candidates on the ballot. Both parties failed us. Thus, we as the voting public must not fail the Commonwealth. Electing the Kooster will set Virginia 25 years economically, socially, and politically.

That's the fact Jack.

ULxEV Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you guys have anything at all other than
> anti-Cuccinelli drivel?
>
> I mean surely McAuliffe must have SOME reason to
> vote FOR him right?

Reason #1) He's not Ken Cuccinelli.

If the polls are to be believed, that seems to be reason enough for the voters of Virginia.

It's Simple ... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ULxEV Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Do you guys have anything at all other than
> > anti-Cuccinelli drivel?
> >
> > I mean surely McAuliffe must have SOME reason
> to
> > vote FOR him right?
>
> Reason #1) He's not Ken Cuccinelli.
>
> If the polls are to be believed, that seems to be
> reason enough for the voters of Virginia.


Thanks for confirming that. lmao

You are Just Sick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The ironic part about all of this is all those
> > liberal men posting all this bullshit are just
> > exposing how stupid they think women really are.
>
> > \
> >
> > They believe theyre too slutty not to have sex
> all
> > the time with random guys and no protection and
> to
> > dumb to care about anything but their ability
> to
> > kill babies so they can keep acting like
> drunken
> > whores.
>
> You are one sick fuck. You have a real hatred of
> women. I'm guessing that you are a 300 pound loser
> who couldn't even pay to get women to fuck you.
> You really need to get help before you turn into a
> serial killer.

Obviously that went right over your head and it wasnt even close. Planes fly closer to your head than that one was from your response.

About as simple as I can put it is all the liberal men pushing the bullshit here think women are dumb sluts constantly getting abortions because they are unable to control themselves since apparently the only issue that matters is abortion.

Furthermore they think theyre as dumb as you because they think they will believe the Governor has any say over abortion laws. Cuccinelli has more of a direct impact on abortion laws in his current position than he would in the new one yet all we get is chicken little the sky is falling bullshit. Why let facts get in the way though.

So while morons like you bash Cuccinelli for being anti-women its really you liberals and Terry who are the sexist ones who only care about manipulating less intelligent or overly emotional women to get their vote.

Jeremiach Bemzao Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Kookster wants Virginia to become the next
> Mississippi. He can't wait to reshape Virginia
> into his own 18th century view of AmeriKKKa. You
> people better be aware of his agenda if you vote
> for him.


That cute how you did the KKK. You left out the part though how the KKK was a democratic organization founded by dems and it was the NRA and Republicans who opposed them.

So in reality Tmac would be the one that would be relevant too after all its his party that supported Jim Crow laws.

18th century, 19th century, 21st century -- why do you liberastic evolutionary dead-ends keep harping on what century it is???? man is man. today, 21st century, we still have cannibalism in the Central African Republic, in Papua New Guinea. We still have slavery in India, in Sudan.

It's 21st century, but can you find your liberastic ass with both hands to make an innane argument for McToolius the Terrible??

It just irks me to no end when people bring up the 'century' we are in as if you can take the jungle out of the man. No, you can't. So, drop it!!!!

secret password: trans-vaginal

Liberasts are unable to follow basic logic. You can provide ample proof of KKK's roots in the Democan party and their soul-less eyes will just glaze over and they will change subject.

Why? Because they are liberastic douchenozzle zombies! I am not sure they can be de-programmed.





Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jeremiach Bemzao Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Kookster wants Virginia to become the next
> > Mississippi. He can't wait to reshape Virginia
> > into his own 18th century view of AmeriKKKa.
> You
> > people better be aware of his agenda if you
> vote
> > for him.
>
>
> That cute how you did the KKK. You left out the
> part though how the KKK was a democratic
> organization founded by dems and it was the NRA
> and Republicans who opposed them.
>
> So in reality Tmac would be the one that would be
> relevant too after all its his party that
> supported Jim Crow laws.

And just when you think there can be nobody as stupid and obnoxious as Liberal Logic 28/29, another candidate presents himself...

Conclusive proof that today's Democan Party is a cult and zombie members cannot be deprogrammed.


Spare Me Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And just when you think there can be nobody as
> stupid and obnoxious as Liberal Logic 28/29,
> another candidate presents himself...

Speaking as a practicing Christian woman, I would love to have a transvaginal probe stuffed up my twat. I'm sure all the women in my prayer circle would feel the same. Ken is the only candidate who has promised this as part of his platform.

He has my vote and my complete obedience.

Sincerely,

Mrs. Doubtfire

President of the NoVa Chapter of
Christians United for Nice Transvaginal Sonograms

Mrs Doubtfire Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Speaking as a practicing Christian woman, I would
> love to have a transvaginal probe stuffed up my
> twat. I'm sure all the women in my prayer circle
> would feel the same. Ken is the only candidate who
> has promised this as part of his platform.
>
> He has my vote and my complete obedience.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mrs. Doubtfire
>
> President of the NoVa Chapter of
> Christians United for Nice Transvaginal Sonograms


Only if you're trying to chop your 20 week or older baby into 100 pieces and suck it out of your twat. Amazing how babykillers think it's not an inconvenience to the baby that's about to be ground into hamburger while it's alive and can feel it but a major inconvenience that the woman who's about to do it has to view the baby before hand.

Baby killers for McAuliffe! Gerry the Jew-hater endorses this.

Allah Akbar, whoops I mean Amen!

Old timely religion should guide medical decisions. Female circumcision, male circumcision, blood letting, snake handling and chicken bones are much more reliable than actual science.

Right after we burn all the books, the Doctors are not far behind.

The Kenmeister

You mean, "Go [away] Kookinelli!

This would be accurate and account for the 8 hags that support this loon

mjcc1987 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This would be accurate and account for the 8 hags
> that support this loon

One again, the liberals here make this race come down to one issue. Get a clue - the issues important to women go far beyond what you all have in "your other brain." The issues are why we are voting Cuccinelli.

Seriously? You think this is about jobs or Obamacare? You folks will believe anything
It is about my beliefs, which should be yours. Since it may not be, you should just bend over and take it.
I agree whole-heatedly with E.W., but I would not say it to you out loud. You bet sinners create birth defects. I'd never tell you that to your face. You bet that I believe that women should submit to their husbands. I would never say that, either. Tell Jews and Hindus and Muslims and Sihks that they are worshippers of false religions? I believe it in my heart, but never say it aloud.
Do I wake up every morning and paint a veneer over my real self to make you believe I am all about jobs and stopping this over-reaching government? Yes, I do.
And if elected?
I will honor my pledge to never raise taxes. I signed that in blood. Even if it means schools and more homelessness and poorer health and less repair of infrastructure, I will always pretend that giving people back a few dollars is worth more to everyone that the increased revenue from quality schools, great support for business and a thriving middle class.
I will spend your money on social issues, over and over again, even if you don't want it and it violates your religious beliefs. Your are not as good as mine.

Elect me. The Kook. Sending Virginia back in time to those good old days that frankly weren't so good.

Kook-the real one! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Seriously? You think this is about jobs or
> Obamacare? You folks will believe anything
> It is about my beliefs, which should be yours.
> Since it may not be, you should just bend over and
> take it.
> I agree whole-heatedly with E.W., but I would not
> say it to you out loud. You bet sinners create
> birth defects. I'd never tell you that to your
> face. You bet that I believe that women should
> submit to their husbands. I would never say that,
> either. Tell Jews and Hindus and Muslims and Sihks
> that they are worshippers of false religions? I
> believe it in my heart, but never say it aloud.
> Do I wake up every morning and paint a veneer over
> my real self to make you believe I am all about
> jobs and stopping this over-reaching government?
> Yes, I do.
> And if elected?
> I will honor my pledge to never raise taxes. I
> signed that in blood. Even if it means schools and
> more homelessness and poorer health and less
> repair of infrastructure, I will always pretend
> that giving people back a few dollars is worth
> more to everyone that the increased revenue from
> quality schools, great support for business and a
> thriving middle class.
> I will spend your money on social issues, over and
> over again, even if you don't want it and it
> violates your religious beliefs. Your are not as
> good as mine.
>
> Elect me. The Kook. Sending Virginia back in time
> to those good old days that frankly weren't so
> good.


Sadly this really is the intelligence level of TMac voters. Weve been seeing it for 100+ threads now for months at a time.

Not one can actually discuss a single issue they all just post these melodramatic the world will end rants. The irony of it all is they think their the smart ones yet their posts time and time again revel just what low information partisan voters they really are.

I think the reason that there is no real, substantive discussion of the issues is that Ken has painted himself, along with the media's help, as too far right on many issues.

To get the fiscal conservatism you crave as a Republican you will also have to eat all the religious nuts on your plate as well.

Separate out all the religious crap and perhaps you may find a candidate worthy of widespread consideration. Until then go ahead and live in the dark ages and be marginalised.

Sic Semper (Religious) Tyrannis

Yeah, you are right. On the other hand, if Ken had used the phrase 'trans-manginal' instead of 'trans-vaginal', he'd be leading in the polls 90% to 10% and every main stream media outlet would be celebrating his new rainbow-friendly unicorn-compliant evolved position.

The main stream media is the dissemination vehicle for the Democratic Party. So, what else do you expect from this 5th column except to paint Ken in this way (and yes, he did help them with this innane opinion/position).


Khan!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think the reason that there is no real,
> substantive discussion of the issues is that Ken
> has painted himself, along with the media's help,
> as too far right on many issues.
>
> To get the fiscal conservatism you crave as a
> Republican you will also have to eat all the
> religious nuts on your plate as well.
>
> Separate out all the religious crap and perhaps
> you may find a candidate worthy of widespread
> consideration. Until then go ahead and live in the
> dark ages and be marginalised.
>
> Sic Semper (Religious) Tyrannis

Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kook-the real one! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Seriously? You think this is about jobs or
> > Obamacare? You folks will believe anything
> > It is about my beliefs, which should be yours.
> > Since it may not be, you should just bend over
> and
> > take it.
> > I agree whole-heatedly with E.W., but I would
> not
> > say it to you out loud. You bet sinners create
> > birth defects. I'd never tell you that to your
> > face. You bet that I believe that women should
> > submit to their husbands. I would never say
> that,
> > either. Tell Jews and Hindus and Muslims and
> Sihks
> > that they are worshippers of false religions? I
> > believe it in my heart, but never say it aloud.
>
> > Do I wake up every morning and paint a veneer
> over
> > my real self to make you believe I am all about
> > jobs and stopping this over-reaching
> government?
> > Yes, I do.
> > And if elected?
> > I will honor my pledge to never raise taxes. I
> > signed that in blood. Even if it means schools
> and
> > more homelessness and poorer health and less
> > repair of infrastructure, I will always pretend
> > that giving people back a few dollars is worth
> > more to everyone that the increased revenue
> from
> > quality schools, great support for business and
> a
> > thriving middle class.
> > I will spend your money on social issues, over
> and
> > over again, even if you don't want it and it
> > violates your religious beliefs. Your are not
> as
> > good as mine.
> >
> > Elect me. The Kook. Sending Virginia back in
> time
> > to those good old days that frankly weren't so
> > good.
>
>
> Sadly this really is the intelligence level of
> TMac voters. Weve been seeing it for 100+ threads
> now for months at a time.
>
> Not one can actually discuss a single issue they
> all just post these melodramatic the world will
> end rants. The irony of it all is they think
> their the smart ones yet their posts time and time
> again revel just what low information partisan
> voters they really are.

"I think the reason that there is no real, substantive discussion of the issues is that Ken has painted himself, along with the media's help, as too far right on many issues.

To get the fiscal conservatism you crave as a Republican you will also have to eat all the religious nuts on your plate as well.

Separate out all the religious crap and perhaps you may find a candidate worthy of widespread consideration. Until then go ahead and live in the dark ages and be marginalised.

Sic Semper (Religious) Tyrannis"

The libs are also painting themselves as atheists who find any type of religious belief repugnant. God Bless them. Someone has to.

I'd vote for Terry but I'm dead.

The silence of the Democans to the fact that up to 40% of black babies are aborted is just an inconvenient reality yet blacks continue to overwhelmingly vote Democan -- why???

I think it's by design -- long term plan of Democans on the way to their 'utopia'.



Dead Black Babies for McAuliffe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd vote for Terry but I'm dead.

When the discussion comes down to Global Xing and LL 28/29 one upping each other, then there is just nothing more to say. Neither one of these idiots has the faintest clue as to what women are thinking, especially Democratic women. And they never will. We can talk until we're blue in the face and they will still think all women are uneducated whores just chomping at the bit to have an abortion (except for their 'own kind', of course, who are 'good women' (at least until they get knocked up, at which point abortion starts looking pretty good)).

Sad, Really... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When the discussion comes down to Global Xing and
> LL 28/29 one upping each other, then there is just
> nothing more to say. Neither one of these idiots
> has the faintest clue as to what women are
> thinking, especially Democratic women. And they
> never will. We can talk until we're blue in the
> face and they will still think all women are
> uneducated whores just chomping at the bit to have
> an abortion (except for their 'own kind', of
> course, who are 'good women' (at least until they
> get knocked up, at which point abortion starts
> looking pretty good)).

1). Are you a natural born human female (do you have an XX chromosome)? One can never be sure these days.
2). Are you a Democrat first, and a woman second?
3). What are women thinking especially 'Democratic Women' as you put it?




Sad, Really... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When the discussion comes down to Global Xing and
> LL 28/29 one upping each other, then there is just
> nothing more to say. Neither one of these idiots
> has the faintest clue as to what women are
> thinking, especially Democratic women. And they
> never will. We can talk until we're blue in the
> face and they will still think all women are
> uneducated whores just chomping at the bit to have
> an abortion (except for their 'own kind', of
> course, who are 'good women' (at least until they
> get knocked up, at which point abortion starts
> looking pretty good)).

I expect the ACA web site to ask political affiliation soon. RIght next to "register to Vote" link.

I heard something today that the premium quotes are based on your income (not talking about subsidies). So, the more you make, the more you will pay for the same plan (again, unsubsidized rates here). Is this true or was someone talking out of their ass???

They were saying that if you make $100K, for instance, they want your premiums + deductibles to be about 28-30% of your 1040 pre-tax (or AGI) income?

Random BS or another hidden [C]ACA gem???


SicSemperTyrannis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I expect the ACA web site to ask political
> affiliation soon. RIght next to "register to Vote"
> link.

Dear LiberalLogic29,
Thank you for your recent check. I have to confess that you missed the point of my prior post. Those are my actual issues. The environment? Waste of time discussing. I believe that man has total dominion over everything. The coal, which I love, mysteriously formed in an incredibly short amount of time since I told the kind folks in Wise that I suspect the Earth's age may be vastly over stated. It just suddenly sprung into the earth, sort of like the amazing amount of money that will spring into our pockets after my amazing tax cutting scheme.
I will close down that EPA, as it sounds a lot like ERA, which was fascist plot to give women rights.
I will provide vouchers so that we can send our kids to religious schools where they are untaught all this crap about the climate and women. It makes sense that we start indoctrination as early as possible, so start in preschool. By using Petersburg's economically induced poor performance, I can make anyone believe that private industry can educate better or that the parents, poor and not able to dedicate time or money to their own child's education, will have solutions for schools, because just like climate scientist, educators are full of crap. Think of it, EPA, NEA, ERA. All evil.
See, I have the issues. Yet, they are all for naught. The minute I am elected, I will focus on gays and making sure women are in their place

Global Xing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I heard something today that the premium quotes
> are based on your income (not talking about
> subsidies). So, the more you make, the more you
> will pay for the same plan (again, unsubsidized
> rates here). Is this true or was someone talking
> out of their ass???
>
> They were saying that if you make $100K, for
> instance, they want your premiums + deductibles to
> be about 28-30% of your 1040 pre-tax (or AGI)
> income?
>
> Random BS or another hidden [C]ACA gem???
>


BS. Beyond the policy itself, the costs are based on age, location, smoking, and obviously number of persons on the policy.

Income does factor into subsidies and tax credits.

Sad, Really... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When the discussion comes down to Global Xing and
> LL 28/29 one upping each other, then there is just
> nothing more to say. Neither one of these idiots
> has the faintest clue as to what women are
> thinking, especially Democratic women. And they
> never will. We can talk until we're blue in the
> face and they will still think all women are
> uneducated whores just chomping at the bit to have
> an abortion (except for their 'own kind', of
> course, who are 'good women' (at least until they
> get knocked up, at which point abortion starts
> looking pretty good)).

From the description you liberal men paint of liberal women its pretty safe to say either they arent doing a lot of thinking at all or its just about what guy theyre going to let bareback them next.

According to you liberal men on here the ONLY thing that should matter to women is abortion.

Again the irony of how you expose your hatred of women and how little you actually think of them would be hysterical if it just wasnt so sad that it works on some of them.

Intelligent women would never cast a vote based on abortion alone and would be insulted that that angle keeps getting pushed on them like theyre too much of a whore not to get knocked up and kill a baby.

No one makes women sound more helpless, slutty and dumb than the posts you liberal men keep putting on here

I remember the silly bitches, standing on the corner of 123 and Lewinsville Road like hookers, holding signs for Romney. These people think they are elitists and are honestly surprised when people find them repellant.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2013 10:21PM by Priapus.

Liberal Logic 29 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sad, Really... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > When the discussion comes down to Global Xing
> and
> > LL 28/29 one upping each other, then there is
> just
> > nothing more to say. Neither one of these
> idiots
> > has the faintest clue as to what women are
> > thinking, especially Democratic women. And they
> > never will. We can talk until we're blue in the
> > face and they will still think all women are
> > uneducated whores just chomping at the bit to
> have
> > an abortion (except for their 'own kind', of
> > course, who are 'good women' (at least until
> they
> > get knocked up, at which point abortion starts
> > looking pretty good)).
>
> From the description you liberal men paint of
> liberal women its pretty safe to say either they
> arent doing a lot of thinking at all or its just
> about what guy theyre going to let bareback them
> next.
>
> According to you liberal men on here the ONLY
> thing that should matter to women is abortion.
>
> Again the irony of how you expose your hatred of
> women and how little you actually think of them
> would be hysterical if it just wasnt so sad that
> it works on some of them.
>
> Intelligent women would never cast a vote based on
> abortion alone and would be insulted that that
> angle keeps getting pushed on them like theyre too
> much of a whore not to get knocked up and kill a
> baby.
>
> No one makes women sound more helpless, slutty and
> dumb than the posts you liberal men keep putting
> on here

I'm a woman, you idiot.

Is That So? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm a woman, you idiot.


Congratulations, thats even worse as youre just making yourself look like a moron instead.