Re: Essential v. NonEssential
Posted by:
TnNVC
()
Date: October 07, 2013 02:34PM
LOL! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Websta Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where would "essential" employees be defined
> > asshat? Look hard.
>
> Couldn't fucking find anything, eh there, hapless
> jackass? What a fine example of wimpish stupid
> incompetency. In conjunction with standards and
> guidelines issued by OMB and OPM, each affected
> agency prepares lists of employees deemed
> essential. Those lists are then cleared and
> approved by reviewing offices at the White House.
> On approval, each potentially affected employee is
> apprised of his or her status.
>
> The applicable standards state that essential
> employees are those who are necessary to the
> protection of public health, safety, or property.
> Depending on its nature, public property may, but
> often does not, include government data, ongoing
> research experiments, and other intangible
> property.
>
> Otherwise, political appointees are all exempt
> simply because by law they cannot be furloughed.
> All staff necessary for the President to carry out
> his constitutional responsibilities are similarly
> exempt by law, and all employees whose salaries
> are paid from sources other than annual
> appropriations are exempt by definition.
>
> So there's your fucking homework done for you, you
> lard-ass lazy dumbfuck. You can go back to being
> a clueless asstard now, so crawl back under
> whatever slime-encrusted rock and stop bothering
> serious people with your total dipshit loserness.
I know the answer. Apparently, you don't.
Show where personnel are officially designated as "essential" or "nonessential."