sorry I checked your source Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Plenty already published Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lets see the data Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > For those who real more Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Uhhhh... If you actually do read the
> studies
> > > > regarding Antarctic ice loss then you'd see
> > > that
> > > > it has nothing to do with CO2 or "climate
> > > change"
> > > > and appears primarily related to subsurface
> > > > geology/hydrology.
> > >
> > > Love to see your source - If you can prove
> this
> > > you should send the data and analysis to
> Nature.
> >
> > > You will be very famous very quickly.
> >
> >
> > You just don't read enough...
> >
> >
> > Mysterious geothermal 'mantle plume' under
> > Antarctica is heating its ice sheet, NASA study
> > confirms
> >
> > PUBLISHED: 18:36 EDT, 7 November 2017 |
> UPDATED:
> > 18:49 EDT, 7 November 2017
> >
> >
> > Scientists have uncovered new evidence for an
> > ancient heat source beneath the West Antarctic
> ice
> > sheet.
> >
> > The underground mantle plume is thought to be
> > driving some of the melting seen beneath the
> ice,
> > giving rise to lakes and rivers.
> >
> > It’s thought to have formed 50-110 million
> years
> > ago, long before the ice sheet itself, and has
> > likely played a role in rapid collapses that
> took
> > place during past periods of climate change –
> > and, it could help explain the instability seen
> > today.
> >
> >
> > >
> src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/07/23/
>
> >
> 461DA7D100000578-5060079-The_underground_mantle_pl
>
> >
> ume_is_thought_to_be_driving_some_of_th-m-11_15100
>
> > 97770126.jpg">
> >
> >
> >
>
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=699
>
> > 6
>
> Funny the same people who did your 'study' on the
> mantle plume (I found articles but never found any
> of them citing the exact study). Anyway NASA did
> the study claimed by these articles and you
> -NASA.
>
> You might want to look at their overall
> conclusions about climate change causes - they
> have quite a nifty website here
>
https://climate.nasa.gov/
>
> Im afraid you will be disappointed to find out
> that NASA does not cite 'Mantle plumes' as the
> cause for world wide temperature increase (nor the
> ice melt). Seriously stop reading bullshit that
> states fractions of science overrule the overall
> consensus in a field. I feel like insulting you
> but what would be the point? Alex, or Sean or
> someone will feed you pieces of science without
> you stepping back to think critically about it.
You're an idiot. I gave you a link that references the exact study:
Quote
Their paper, "Influence of a West Antarctic mantle plume on ice sheet basal conditions," was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.
http://austhrutime.com/antarctica_has_huge_mantle_plume_beneath_it%20.htm
We're not talking about "climate change." We're talking specifically about Antarctica and articles like this which incorrectly assume Antarctic ice loss is associated with "global warming." Anthropogenic global warming is not believed at this point to be the primary driver for the effects in Antarctica.
There are many studies addressing this which you can easily find if you weren't reading stupid slanted shit from HuffPo, et. al.