Re: Dad Basl
Posted by:
actually, no, it isn't
()
Date: July 02, 2016 12:26PM
1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> still no denial of child porn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Still not seeing a denial of this. Because it's
> > true, innit? Michael can't face the truth: he is
> a
> > pedophile FOR REAL. Not just tasteless shit
> > written on a forum. Evidence he views child
> porn.
> > It exists. He can't take it. World's biggest
> > hypocrite. What a self-loathing, in denial
> > so-and-so...
>
>
> So when pedo William admits to wanting to rape a
> child, that's not evidence? You are one crazy
> cracker.
No, it isn't. Like a cop told me once regarding things posted by certain people on this site, "he says that, but so what. I can say I can fly."
Forensic computer evidence that proves someone has regularly viewed child porn sites, however, IS DEFINITELY evidence. Just because they won't prosecute it doesn't make it all go away. We now know he's a pedophile, regardless. And it's not based on incredibly tasteless jokes. Computer experts found it.