Yep.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/27/2016 07:57PM by WingNut.

Funny, no?

http://cdn.rollcall.com/news/senate_torpedoes_background_check_deal-224103-1.html?popular=true&zkPrintable=true&cdn_load=true&zkPrintable=1&nopagination=1

Democrats didn't like the bill.

Republican did what they usually do... junked up the bill so nothing would get accomplished. Nothing new.

FUCK BACKGROUND CHECKS!

The mentally ill have the rights to own too! So what is they shot of a mall or school. It's their right!

Mentally ill Win Big Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FUCK BACKGROUND CHECKS!
>
> The mentally ill have the rights to own too! So
> what is they shot of a mall or school. It's their
> right!


Interestingly, every mall or school shooter in recent years passed a background check or stole the guns.

Those damn obstructionist Democraps!!!

Mentally ill Win Big Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FUCK BACKGROUND CHECKS!
>
> The mentally ill have the rights to own too! So
> what is they shot of a mall or school. It's their
> right!
Attachments:

Mentally ill Win Big Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FUCK BACKGROUND CHECKS!
>
> The mentally ill have the rights to own too! So
> what is they shot of a mall or school. It's their
> right!


Ironically from your post someone could say youre being serious campaigning for your own rights.

Score one for the mentally ill shooters!
Attachments:

Thank you republicans, us bitches can are guns easier now, bro.
Attachments:

Criminals Get Guns Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thank you republicans, us bitches can are guns
> easier now, bro.


LOL. They were having such a hard time getting them before. Think before you type, dumbass.

Obama on TV now, what a punk.

Talk to your own party loser, they bailed on you.

This is too bad. The law would have stopped guns from getting into criminals hands. Unless its the federal government selling them to gangs in Mexico that is ok.

Obaba says Republicans lied to win. You mean like how many lies you told about obamacare which the majority of Americans did not want but you forced on them anyway?

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama on TV now, what a punk.
>
> Talk to your own party loser, they bailed on you.

He is crying like a french school girl. Now he is saying how he will pass his own laws to circumvent the separation of powers.

Yes, by all means please continue to let gangs get their guns over the internet, privates sales and gun shows with no background checks.

Basically it just royally fucked over every gun store.

A great day for the United States. A victory for the Constitution.

Mentally ill Win Big Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, by all means please continue to let gangs get
> their guns over the internet, privates sales and
> gun shows with no background checks.
>
> Basically it just royally fucked over every gun
> store.

Nonsense, the law FORCES background checks at gun shows. The premise of a "gun show loophole" is a liberal creation.

sore loser. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Obama on TV now, what a punk.
> >
> > Talk to your own party loser, they bailed on
> you.
>
> Now he is saying how he will pass his own laws to circumvent
> the separation of powers.

Then it's impeachment time! King Barry won't be able to shred the Second Amendment.

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mentally ill Win Big Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yes, by all means please continue to let gangs
> get
> > their guns over the internet, privates sales
> and
> > gun shows with no background checks.
> >
> > Basically it just royally fucked over every gun
> > store.
>
> Nonsense, the law FORCES background checks at gun
> shows. The premise of a "gun show loophole" is a
> liberal creation.

I'm guessing you have never been to gun show??? It's three questions and proof of citizenship. Private sales are the same way.

You might want to lookup your facts next time.

U.S. federal law requires persons engaged in interstate firearm commerce, or those who are "engaged in the business" of dealing firearms, to hold a Federal Firearms License and perform background checks through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System maintained by the FBI prior to transferring a firearm. Under the terms of the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986, however, individuals "not engaged in the business" of dealing firearms, or who only make "occasional" sales within their state of residence, are under no requirement to conduct background checks on purchasers or maintain records of sale (although even private sellers are forbidden under federal law from selling firearms to persons they have reason to believe are felons or otherwise prohibited from purchasing firearms).

Im a gun owner and I have no problem with background checks FOR EVERY TRANSACTION. Listen, I bought a 12 gauge last year and I had to wait 3 days for the approval because the VA State Police were so backed up. It bothered me at the time but I found out it was because they wouldnt spend the money to get proper staffing for the background checks. If I have to go thru, so should everyone else...... PERIOD!

The problem in Congress is too many members have their hands in the pockets of lobbyists and special interest groups. We need to fire every one of those worthless fuckers.

I wasn't aware the Democrats also controlled the House of Representatives. Is Nancy the speaker again?

Hooloo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wasn't aware the Democrats also controlled the
> House of Representatives. Is Nancy the speaker
> again?


It was rejected in the SENATE because it did not have enough DEMOCRAT support.

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama on TV now, what a punk.
>
> Talk to your own party loser, they bailed on you.


Actually you are full of shit. Even with the 4 democrats who didnt vote yes, it would have been 58. 90% of GOP was against this. But go on, tell us how the democrats were against this you fucking tool douche lying hitler youth bitch

GOP is for Hitler Youth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Obama on TV now, what a punk.
> >
> > Talk to your own party loser, they bailed on
> you.
>
>
> Actually you are full of shit. Even with the 4
> democrats who didnt vote yes, it would have been
> 58. 90% of GOP was against this. But go on, tell
> us how the democrats were against this you fucking
> tool douche lying hitler youth bitch


Why this bill needed 60 votes, instead of 51 as is normal (50 actually with Dem in white house) is because of bullshit rules procedures that... SHOCKER the GOP pulled. Again robbing the american people of democracy to support their own pockets from the NRA and gun makers.

YAAAAAY FUCK YOU AMERICA YAAAAAAY

- This message brought to you by 90% of the GOP senate

Stabitha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Im a gun owner and I have no problem with
> background checks FOR EVERY TRANSACTION. Listen, I
> bought a 12 gauge last year and I had to wait 3
> days for the approval because the VA State Police
> were so backed up. It bothered me at the time but
> I found out it was because they wouldnt spend the
> money to get proper staffing for the background
> checks. If I have to go thru, so should everyone
> else...... PERIOD!
>
> The problem in Congress is too many members have
> their hands in the pockets of lobbyists and
> special interest groups. We need to fire every one
> of those worthless fuckers.


Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who voted against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of democrats who voted FOR background checks. Please explain that when you say "congress" you mean the douchebag GOP.

Thanks a bunches

GOP douch bags, not "congress" Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who voted
> against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of
> democrats who voted FOR background checks. Please
> explain that when you say "congress" you mean the
> douchebag GOP.
>
> Thanks a bunches


Hey shithead, if 90% of democrats voted for this (55 x 0.9 = 45.9) and 10% of republicans voted for this (45 x 0.1 = 4.5), if would pass. But it wasn't 90% of democrats and 15 Republicans voted to go ahead and have a vote (tho only a handful would have voted for it). Another lie by another lying liberal douche.

Democrats have to defend 8 seats in states that voted for Romney. That's why this didn't come up for a vote asswipe.

So they are not taking people's guns? All these fucktards be yelling for nothing? This is America bitches... they ain't getting around the constitution. Fox news done fucked ya again.

hysteria Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So they are not taking people's guns? All these
> fucktards be yelling for nothing? This is America
> bitches... they ain't getting around the
> constitution. Fox news done fucked ya again.


They tried and failed when some Dem senators realized theyd lose their next election if they voted for something that had no chance in the House anyway

Lying Liberal Losers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GOP douch bags, not "congress" Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who voted
> > against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of
> > democrats who voted FOR background checks.
> Please
> > explain that when you say "congress" you mean
> the
> > douchebag GOP.
> >
> > Thanks a bunches
>
>
> Hey shithead, if 90% of democrats voted for this
> (55 x 0.9 = 45.9) and 10% of republicans voted for
> this (45 x 0.1 = 4.5), if would pass. But it
> wasn't 90% of democrats and 15 Republicans voted
> to go ahead and have a vote (tho only a handful
> would have voted for it). Another lie by another
> lying liberal douche.
>
> Democrats have to defend 8 seats in states that
> voted for Romney. That's why this didn't come up
> for a vote asswipe.


No you fucking ignorant cunt. It had 54 votes. It didnt pass because the GOP made a rules order that required it to have 60 votes by saying it was a modification to an existing law. You stupid cunt.

It had 54 votes. This is known fact that you can look up if your ignorant cunt ass wasnt such a stupid cunt YOU FUCKING CUNT BITCHED CHODE SUCKING WHORE

But please, keep lying to the people. One day will be your judgement you lying CUNT WHORE

The amendment, offered by Republican Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia, got 54 votes, short of the 60 required. Forty-six senators voted against it.

Your lies will get your people fired in 2014. So please, keep lying, keep obfuscating you little douches. Pretend like the democrats failed america on this when 90%, 90 fucking percent, of the republicans voted against this and 90% of democrats voted for it.

KEEP YOUR SPIN LYING GOING YOU WHORE

Just like how the sequester was Obama, when Boehner got 99% of what he wanted.

YOU FUCKING LYING CUNTS ARE RUINING OUR COUNTRY. GET THE FUCK OUT YOU WHORES, or atleast stop lying to people. If you cant win on the merits of your argument then you LOSE. THATS HOW DEMOCRACY WORKS. YOU ARE TURNING OUR COUNTRY INTO A FUCKING OLIGARCHY CONTROLLED BY MONEY YOU DOUCHES

LYING WHORE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lying Liberal Losers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GOP douch bags, not "congress" Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who voted
> > > against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of
> > > democrats who voted FOR background checks.
> > Please
> > > explain that when you say "congress" you mean
> > the
> > > douchebag GOP.
> > >
> > > Thanks a bunches
> >
> >
> > Hey shithead, if 90% of democrats voted for
> this
> > (55 x 0.9 = 45.9) and 10% of republicans voted
> for
> > this (45 x 0.1 = 4.5), if would pass. But it
> > wasn't 90% of democrats and 15 Republicans
> voted
> > to go ahead and have a vote (tho only a handful
> > would have voted for it). Another lie by
> another
> > lying liberal douche.
> >
> > Democrats have to defend 8 seats in states that
> > voted for Romney. That's why this didn't come
> up
> > for a vote asswipe.
>
>
> No you fucking ignorant cunt. It had 54 votes. It
> didnt pass because the GOP made a rules order that
> required it to have 60 votes by saying it was a
> modification to an existing law. You stupid cunt.
>
> It had 54 votes. This is known fact that you can
> look up if your ignorant cunt ass wasnt such a
> stupid cunt YOU FUCKING CUNT BITCHED CHODE SUCKING
> WHORE
>
> But please, keep lying to the people. One day will
> be your judgement you lying CUNT WHORE


You're an idiot. Keep watching MSNBC.

Reid could have brought it to the floor directly if he'd wanted. He didn't. He still can since he voted no. But he won't.

And Feinstein's AWB amendment didn't even get close.

"The final vote was 54 in favor to 46 opposed with four Republicans joining most Democrats in supporting the compromise. With the outcome obvious, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, cast a "no" vote to secure the ability to bring the measure up again.

Meanwhile, four Democrats from pro-gun states voted with most Republicans in opposition.

On the proposal by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California to update a 1994 ban on semi-automatic weapons that expired in 2004, the vote was 40-60, showing opposition by several Democrats as well as the chamber's Republican minority."

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17

LEARN TO READ AND STOP LISTENING TO GOP LIES

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17

THE GOP IS WILLINGLy LYING TO US AND PEOPLE KEEP VOTING FOR MORE OF IT

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gun-bill-dealt-setback-as-amendment-fails-2013-04-17

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases

LEARN TO READ AND SEE HOW THE GOP LIES AND TELLS US THEY WERENT RESPONSIBLE

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases

LEARN TO READ YOU DOUCHES

LYING WHORE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lying Liberal Losers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GOP douch bags, not "congress" Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who voted
> > > against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of
> > > democrats who voted FOR background checks.
> > Please
> > > explain that when you say "congress" you mean
> > the
> > > douchebag GOP.
> > >
> > > Thanks a bunches
> >
> >
> > Hey shithead, if 90% of democrats voted for
> this
> > (55 x 0.9 = 45.9) and 10% of republicans voted
> for
> > this (45 x 0.1 = 4.5), if would pass. But it
> > wasn't 90% of democrats and 15 Republicans
> voted
> > to go ahead and have a vote (tho only a handful
> > would have voted for it). Another lie by
> another
> > lying liberal douche.
> >
> > Democrats have to defend 8 seats in states that
> > voted for Romney. That's why this didn't come
> up
> > for a vote asswipe.
>
>
> No you fucking ignorant cunt. It had 54 votes. It
> didnt pass because the GOP made a rules order that
> required it to have 60 votes by saying it was a
> modification to an existing law. You stupid cunt.
>
> It had 54 votes. This is known fact that you can
> look up if your ignorant cunt ass wasnt such a
> stupid cunt YOU FUCKING CUNT BITCHED CHODE SUCKING
> WHORE
>
> But please, keep lying to the people. One day will
> be your judgement you lying CUNT WHORE


Look this up asscrack: Democrats have to defend seats in - Colorado, New Mexico, Montana, Alaska, South Dakota, Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri, Lousiana, West Virginia, Michigan and Iowa. All pro-gun states. So, my fucking little bitch, democrats killed this bill because, once again, they want to lie to the American voters about their agenda in red and purple states. So fuck you, fuck that bitch that hatched your fucking douchebagged ass and fuck you again for good measure. And btw, fuck you.

LOOK YOU DOUCHE

4 DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT

So you can say whatever you want, but only 4 did this is known. READ THE FUCKING INFORMATION

Even with those 4 votes the bill would have DIED 58 to 42

Do you understand?

The democrats didnt do shit, it was the GOP who voted 90% against this bill you douche.

It was the 60 vote rule that Mitch McConnell asked for that killed this

And you FUCKING KNOW IT YOU LYING CUNT

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46 http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

Lying Liberal Losers Crying Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LYING WHORE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Lying Liberal Losers Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > GOP douch bags, not "congress" Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who
> voted
> > > > against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of
> > > > democrats who voted FOR background checks.
> > > Please
> > > > explain that when you say "congress" you
> mean
> > > the
> > > > douchebag GOP.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a bunches
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey shithead, if 90% of democrats voted for
> > this
> > > (55 x 0.9 = 45.9) and 10% of republicans
> voted
> > for
> > > this (45 x 0.1 = 4.5), if would pass. But it
> > > wasn't 90% of democrats and 15 Republicans
> > voted
> > > to go ahead and have a vote (tho only a
> handful
> > > would have voted for it). Another lie by
> > another
> > > lying liberal douche.
> > >
> > > Democrats have to defend 8 seats in states
> that
> > > voted for Romney. That's why this didn't
> come
> > up
> > > for a vote asswipe.
> >
> >
> > No you fucking ignorant cunt. It had 54 votes.
> It
> > didnt pass because the GOP made a rules order
> that
> > required it to have 60 votes by saying it was a
> > modification to an existing law. You stupid
> cunt.
> >
> > It had 54 votes. This is known fact that you
> can
> > look up if your ignorant cunt ass wasnt such a
> > stupid cunt YOU FUCKING CUNT BITCHED CHODE
> SUCKING
> > WHORE
> >
> > But please, keep lying to the people. One day
> will
> > be your judgement you lying CUNT WHORE
>
>
> Look this up asscrack: Democrats have to defend
> seats in - Colorado, New Mexico, Montana, Alaska,
> South Dakota, Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri,
> Lousiana, West Virginia, Michigan and Iowa. All
> pro-gun states. So, my fucking little bitch,
> democrats killed this bill because, once again,
> they want to lie to the American voters about
> their agenda in red and purple states. So fuck
> you, fuck that bitch that hatched your fucking
> douchebagged ass and fuck you again for good
> measure. And btw, fuck you.

FUCK YOU DOUCHE

The bill would have passed 54-46 if the

DOUCHE GOP

didnt use a rules call to FORCE a 60 vote super majority to pass it

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

YOU LIE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE YOU GOP DOUCHE. JUST ADMIT IT. ADMIT IT YOU FUCKING CUNT YOU HITLER YOUTH DOUCHE WANNA BE FASCIST PRICK LITTLE DICKED COCK SUCKER

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

54 to 46 GUN BILL FAILS EVEN THOUGH IT HAD MAJORITY OF SENATORS VOTING YES

Look ASSHOLE, the democrats, after their asskicking in 1994, know that gun control is a losing issue for them. You're a bigger fucking loser than they are because at least they know when to tuck tail and run. You're so fucking stupid and blind that you'll let them lose the Senate just so you can dismantle the 2nd Amendment. So once again, fuck you bitch. Now dance for me douche. Dance like the pussy puppet on the end of my strings.

Vince is back. Look how butthurt this stupid lib is.

LEARN TO READ YOU DOUCHE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Just like how the sequester was Obama, when
> Boehner got 99% of what he wanted.


It was Obama who insisted that be part of a previous deal. However only liberals are complaining about the sequester, everyone else realizes it wasnt a big deal despite whatever temper tantrum closing of white house tours want you to believe

54 to 46

EXPLAIN YOU DOUCHE GO AHEAD EXPLAIN YOUR LIES YOU DOUCHE

54 to 46
54 to 4654 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 46
54 to 4654 to 4654 to 46
DEMOCRACY!!!!!!

You will all burn in hell one day I promise you

54 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 46v

54 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 4654 to 46

lmao!

What about it didn't have enough DEMOCRAT support don't you understand?

You're forgetting that a number of Republicans voted for the bill.

It failed because of the DEMOCRATS who voted against it.

Your day will come GOP, you are barely holding on to a party in the first place. You are now defying the will of 90% of americans. Your day will come you are on the wrong side of history.

Kiss the millennial generation good bye from ever voting for conservatives you morons

But by all means, keep thinking you are winning the war, but taking down cheap, rules driven wins by using tricks instead of merit

Poor Butthurt Libtard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lmao!
>
> What about it didn't have enough DEMOCRAT support
> don't you understand?
>
> You're forgetting that a number of Republicans
> voted for the bill.
>
> It failed because of the DEMOCRATS who voted
> against it.

THAT IS JUST A FUCKING LIE YOU DOUCHE

THERE WERE ONLY 4 remaining democrats you FUCKING LYING DOUCHE

why would someone really lie to people what are you gaining by not being honest about something that is public record? YOU FUCKING DOUCHE

4 demorats

the vote had to be 60

it had 54 votes

are you really this fucking dense? Seriously you moron you must be some alabama redneck dumbass who cant do math you douche

What democratic support would have won this?

6 democrats. THERE WERE ONLY 4 WHO VOTED AGAINST IT. So I agree, if 2 douchebag GOP members, as well as their remaining 90% didnt vote against it, then it would have passed.

WHAT KIND OF LYING BULLSHIT, is it to blame a bill that you people ARE PROUD of blocking on democrats. This isnt america you faggots, you people are terrible and I wish you nothing but pain in karma

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

Your day will come

FUCK YOU BITCH

Obamacare passed with 51 votes douchebag. A $8 Trillion drain on the economy that is destroying decent health care in the US passes by 1 vote with democrats buying votes left and right. Start your pussy whining there douche.

God is pro-gun. Hell is for liberals.

~
Attachments:

Lying Liberal Loser Still Cryin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

FUCK YOU BITCH

>
> Obamacare passed with 51 votes douchebag. A $8
> Trillion drain on the economy that is destroying
> decent health care in the US passes by 1 vote with
> democrats buying votes left and right. Start your
> pussy whining there douche.
>
> God is pro-gun. Hell is for liberals.


Yea it did, because 51 is the rules by the constitution required to pass a law. NOT 60 YOU DOUCHE

YOU DOUCHES CANT WIN BY THE RULES SO YOU MAKE UP BULLSHIT SO YOU CAN GREASE YOUR NRA POCKETS YOU DOUCHES

IT DOESNT TAKE 60 to pass something, it should be 50! you douche

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/04/17/senate-defeats-manchin-toomey-gun-bill-54-46

DESPITE MAJORITY GUN CONTROL BILL FAILS IN CONGRESS BECAUSE OF GOP RULES PROCEDURE. ONLY 4 democrats voted against, and even with ALL democrats voting for, it would have failed because there arent 60 democrats in the senate YOU DOUCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your liberal crying makes me very happy. Keep it going. I smile every time I see one of your crybaby posts. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Why all the lying by the GOP. Shouldnt they be proud of their work?

Why are they trying to pretend as if the Democrats stopped this? It is circular logic. The democrats did something that the GOP is proud of? Or is it that they want their cake and to eat it to. They want to get the money from the NRA, but lie to the american people and pretend as if they supported it.

In reality all but 4 GOP members voted against common sense background checks on internet gun sales.

In reality all but 4 democrats voted FOR the measure. so please tell me, geniuses, which party is the lying scum bag douches?

54- 46 is a majority Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Yea it did, because 51 is the rules by the
> constitution required to pass a law. NOT 60 YOU
> DOUCHE

Thank Harry Reid. You should really learn what the fuck youre talking about.

Or is the washington post now a GOP mouth piece too?

"But, to end debate, on even one amendment, requires 60 votes — a process known as invoking cloture. Rallying 60 Senators to any cause is very difficult in such a polarized body. And even if cloture is invoked on an amendment, there can be up to 30 hours of debate on it. That’s a time consuming process for one amendment – let alone nine, which is what the Senate is considering beginning today.


Given that, another route is to require a 60-vote threshold on the final vote for each individual amendment rather than to end debate on each measure. Instead of drawing the process out over days or weeks, the votes then can be taken in quick succession.

The latter scenario is the path Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) chose to take. He asked for the Senate’s unanimous consent to require 60 votes for each of the nine amendments. Since no senators objected, that’s where the bar is set."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/17/the-gun-amendments-need-60-votes-to-pass-but-why/

PS

I dont care if it makes you feel great that I am "butt hurt" about this. This is the central focus that will kill the GOP. This lying that is easy to catch in the act, this manipulation of our founding rights and rules of the constitution while acting as if they are protecting the constitution is what will bring it down.

You fuck with the people, and you will get fucked just like Akin did, proper like.

So take your cheap victory, you are losing the war and you know it, and it makes me so happy every time there is an election that your loser candidates lose.

but yea keep going after that latino vote. Cause pushing the one latino guy is gonna save your party HAHAHAAHAHAHAH

Oh man. you people are pathetic, in 20 years even Texas will be democratic. Enjoy this bullshit procedural horse S while it still works

JUST BE HONEST AND PROUD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>

In reality all but 4 GOP members voted against
> common sense background checks on internet gun
> sales.
>
> In reality all but 4 democrats voted FOR the
> measure. so please tell me, geniuses, which party
> is the lying scum bag douches?


What every party you belong too because internet sales are already subjected to background checks. But hey why let facts get in the way of a good talking points rant.

Because to do that would have opened the bill up to the very likely possibility that amendments favored by gun rights advocates would be added to it. One, for example, would allow gun owners who receive a state-issued permit to carry a concealed weapon to take that weapon into other states that issue such permits.

Ironic you quote a WaPo article while I quote a fox article. You DOUCHE

AGAIN, which people blocked this? the 90% of democrats who voted for it, or the 90% of GOP who voted against it?

I mean if the democrats did this, then all those states should start voting democrat I guess that currently vote GOP. Those democrats are really staunch GUN rights folks right?

JUST COME OUT AND ADMIT THAT YOU GOP DOUCHE BAGS ARE SO HAPPY ABOUT THIS BEING SHUT DOWN. AND FOR WHAT? SO THAT PEOPLE DONT HAVE TO GET BACKGROUND CHECKS ON INTERNET SALES AND GUN SHOWS?

PS internet sales do not need a background check, see 3rd party sites that act like ebay for guns

JUST BE HONEST AND PROUD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why all the lying by the GOP. Shouldnt they be
> proud of their work?
>
> Why are they trying to pretend as if the Democrats
> stopped this? It is circular logic. The democrats
> did something that the GOP is proud of? Or is it
> that they want their cake and to eat it to. They
> want to get the money from the NRA, but lie to the
> american people and pretend as if they supported
> it.
>
> In reality all but 4 GOP members voted against
> common sense background checks on internet gun
> sales.
>
> In reality all but 4 democrats voted FOR the
> measure. so please tell me, geniuses, which party
> is the lying scum bag douches?


Hey dumbfuck, look at the states the Republicans have to defend in 2014. Safe as can be. No worries for the GOP. But the democrats have to defend at least 10 and possibly up to 13 seats that could go to republicans. The GOP won't run away from this vote.

Nobody gives a shit about this but a few leftwing nutcases. And no one gives a shit what they think anyway. Enjoy being a loser douchebag. The GOP wins on guns AGAIN

Harry Reid set the stage for needing 60 votes period.

It didnt get 60 period.

Of course the GOP is happy that the rights of Americans were protected and this stupid bill was stopped.

Your either and idiot or lying about gun shows and internet sales, both of which are already subjected to background checks.

The compromise bill wasn’t even strict as it could be–it’s not universal background checks, which President Obama has pushed for and is favored by 90% of Americans. Failure of the initiative, which is being seen as the most meaningful gun legislation in 20 years—will be seen as a setback for the families of those shot in the Newtown massacre, but a victory for the National Rifle Association. Obama said that Americans who support “commonsense” background checks must let their representatives know that they support this legislation, and that the battle for gun reform is not over. Now it is up to the public to make their views clear, he said.

You ignorant assholes don't even realize you've been played by the NRA. You won today, but your ignorant hillbilly mindset is dying. Right now you're an anachronism - soon you'll be obsolete. And when you are, gun control will be enacted.

Karma's a Bitch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You ignorant assholes don't even realize you've
> been played by the NRA. You won today, but your
> ignorant hillbilly mindset is dying. Right now
> you're an anachronism - soon you'll be obsolete.
> And when you are, gun control will be enacted.


Lol this is good. I hope you post more youre at least entertaining.


I love it the country is somehow controlled by the NRA and Fox News lol.

GOP douch bags, not "congress" Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> Oh you mean the 90% of republicans who voted
> against this? You couldnt mean the 90% of
> democrats who voted FOR background checks. Please
> explain that when you say "congress" you mean the
> douchebag GOP.
>
> Thanks a bunches

I think they all are lazy idiots. Dems and Reps alike. These bozos need term limits like YESTERDAY. Anytime you let the same douchbag keep his job for 4,5,6 terms you are asking for trouble.

.
Attachments:

Karma's a Bitch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You ignorant assholes don't even realize you've
> been played by the NRA. You won today, but your
> ignorant hillbilly mindset is dying. Right now
> you're an anachronism - soon you'll be obsolete.
> And when you are, gun control will be enacted.


LOL. You're butthurt is showing

8=====>
Attachments:

ANY OTHER LIES YOU DOUCHE? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Because to do that would have opened the bill up
> to the very likely possibility that amendments
> favored by gun rights advocates would be added to
> it. One, for example, would allow gun owners who
> receive a state-issued permit to carry a concealed
> weapon to take that weapon into other states that
> issue such permits.
>

Yeah? And? If they had support they would pass. If not, they would fail. You're whining about Republicans using the rules to their favor and ignoring that Reid chose the path. In addition to being the one who pioneered using the exact same rule to his advantage when he was in the minority.


> JUST COME OUT AND ADMIT THAT YOU GOP DOUCHE BAGS
> ARE SO HAPPY ABOUT THIS BEING SHUT DOWN. AND FOR
> WHAT? SO THAT PEOPLE DONT HAVE TO GET BACKGROUND
> CHECKS ON INTERNET SALES AND GUN SHOWS?
>
> PS internet sales do not need a background check,
> see 3rd party sites that act like ebay for guns


You're clueless like most of the rest of you anti-gun nuts.

Internet sales to interstate buyers by dealers or private parties require a background check.

In-person sales by a dealer require background checks, including those at gun shows.

The only sales which do not require background checks, whether they happen at a gun show or otherwise, are private party, in-person, intra-state sales.

The "gun show" loophole mostly is bs.

Bud Hertz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ANY OTHER LIES YOU DOUCHE? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Because to do that would have opened the bill
> up
> > to the very likely possibility that amendments
> > favored by gun rights advocates would be added
> to
> > it. One, for example, would allow gun owners
> who
> > receive a state-issued permit to carry a
> concealed
> > weapon to take that weapon into other states
> that
> > issue such permits.
> >
>
> Yeah? And? If they had support they would pass.
> If not, they would fail. You're whining about
> Republicans using the rules to their favor and
> ignoring that Reid chose the path. In addition to
> being the one who pioneered using the exact same
> rule to his advantage when he was in the
> minority.
>
>
> > JUST COME OUT AND ADMIT THAT YOU GOP DOUCHE
> BAGS
> > ARE SO HAPPY ABOUT THIS BEING SHUT DOWN. AND
> FOR
> > WHAT? SO THAT PEOPLE DONT HAVE TO GET
> BACKGROUND
> > CHECKS ON INTERNET SALES AND GUN SHOWS?
> >
> > PS internet sales do not need a background
> check,
> > see 3rd party sites that act like ebay for guns
>
>
> You're clueless like most of the rest of you
> anti-gun nuts.
>
> Internet sales to interstate buyers by dealers or
> private parties require a background check.
>
> In-person sales by a dealer require background
> checks, including those at gun shows.
>
> The only sales which do not require background
> checks, whether they happen at a gun show or
> otherwise, are private party, in-person,
> intra-state sales.
>
> The "gun show" loophole mostly is bs.


You can't buy a gun over the internet from an FFL dealer. They sell/transfer it to a local FFL dealer, who then sells it to you. That's why Walmart doesn't sell guns over the Internet. It's already the law. This whole thing was a red herring to make it look like someone was doing something.

Undecided about deciding Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bud Hertz Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ANY OTHER LIES YOU DOUCHE? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Because to do that would have opened the bill
> > up
> > > to the very likely possibility that
> amendments
> > > favored by gun rights advocates would be
> added
> > to
> > > it. One, for example, would allow gun owners
> > who
> > > receive a state-issued permit to carry a
> > concealed
> > > weapon to take that weapon into other states
> > that
> > > issue such permits.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah? And? If they had support they would
> pass.
> > If not, they would fail. You're whining about
> > Republicans using the rules to their favor and
> > ignoring that Reid chose the path. In addition
> to
> > being the one who pioneered using the exact
> same
> > rule to his advantage when he was in the
> > minority.
> >
> >
> > > JUST COME OUT AND ADMIT THAT YOU GOP DOUCHE
> > BAGS
> > > ARE SO HAPPY ABOUT THIS BEING SHUT DOWN. AND
> > FOR
> > > WHAT? SO THAT PEOPLE DONT HAVE TO GET
> > BACKGROUND
> > > CHECKS ON INTERNET SALES AND GUN SHOWS?
> > >
> > > PS internet sales do not need a background
> > check,
> > > see 3rd party sites that act like ebay for
> guns
> >
> >
> > You're clueless like most of the rest of you
> > anti-gun nuts.
> >
> > Internet sales to interstate buyers by dealers
> or
> > private parties require a background check.
> >
> > In-person sales by a dealer require background
> > checks, including those at gun shows.
> >
> > The only sales which do not require background
> > checks, whether they happen at a gun show or
> > otherwise, are private party, in-person,
> > intra-state sales.
> >
> > The "gun show" loophole mostly is bs.
>
>
> You can't buy a gun over the internet from an FFL
> dealer. They sell/transfer it to a local FFL
> dealer, who then sells it to you. That's why
> Walmart doesn't sell guns over the Internet. It's
> already the law. This whole thing was a red
> herring to make it look like someone was doing
> something.


Not exactly.

You buy it from whomever, dealer or private party.

It must be transferred to you though an FFL.

The FFL acts as a transfer agent but doesn't "sell" you the gun. They are not party to the business transaction itself, they serve only as a transfer agent.

But the details of that are beyond the point of people thinking that you can buy guns over the Net with no background check.

Well, regardless of what the real implications of the law would have been and whether you are into guns or not, any law NOT PASSED is a victory for the American people.

People do not trust the government.


Skepticism is healthy of you ask me.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, regardless of what the real implications of
> the law would have been and whether you are into
> guns or not, any law NOT PASSED is a victory for
> the American people.
>
> People do not trust the government.
>
>
> Skepticism is healthy of you ask me.

I don't trust the Government either, but I recognize common sense when I see it. I also recognize craven cowardice when I see it, which we all did today.

Not all Laws are Bad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I don't trust the Government either, but I
> recognize common sense when I see it. I also
> recognize craven cowardice when I see it, which we
> all did today.


Then you can also recognize that criminals and psychos don't give a shit whether this or any other law was passed or not.

Stabitha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Im a gun owner and I have no problem with
> background checks FOR EVERY TRANSACTION.

You're a fucking stooge. I bet you line right up and bend over for every goon in a uniform.

Reality Stik Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not all Laws are Bad Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > I don't trust the Government either, but I
> > recognize common sense when I see it. I also
> > recognize craven cowardice when I see it, which
> we
> > all did today.
>
>
> Then you can also recognize that criminals and
> psychos don't give a shit whether this or any
> other law was passed or not.

You're absolutely right. Let's just riscind all laws because criminals won't obey them. This is what you people call logic?

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, regardless of what the real implications of
> the law would have been and whether you are into
> guns or not, any law NOT PASSED is a victory for
> the American people.
>
> People do not trust the government.
>
>
> Skepticism is healthy of you ask me.


HAHAHA, thanks for clarifying you anarchist DOUCHE. Cant wait to see you perpetrate some douche bag bombing of your own you DOUCHE. I hope it blows up in your basement and you die in a horrifying way.

Champ

Republican logic 102 (GAAAAAY) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> HAHAHA, thanks for clarifying you anarchist
> DOUCHE. Cant wait to see you perpetrate some
> douche bag bombing of your own you DOUCHE. I hope
> it blows up in your basement and you die in a
> horrifying way.
>
> Champ


Why are liberals always so angry and wishing death on anyone who doesnt follow their brainwashing?

Not all Laws are Bad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Reality Stik Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not all Laws are Bad Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > I don't trust the Government either, but I
> > > recognize common sense when I see it. I also
> > > recognize craven cowardice when I see it,
> which
> > we
> > > all did today.
> >
> >
> > Then you can also recognize that criminals and
> > psychos don't give a shit whether this or any
> > other law was passed or not.
>
> You're absolutely right. Let's just riscind all
> laws because criminals won't obey them. This is
> what you people call logic?


We already have background checks for the vast majority of gun sales. Likewise, straw purchases also are illegal. Most people don't have any problem with that.

The "gun show loophole" is a contrived effort to extend regulation more generally which grew out of Bloomberg's crew's publicity stunt where they went to gun shows and purchased a bunch of crap at ridiculous prices to make it appear that it was a much larger problem than it is because they wanted to shut down gun shows.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Why are liberals always so angry and wishing death
> on anyone who doesnt follow their brainwashing?


That's why they lost on this issue.

All they have are emotion-driven talking points which don't hold up to any real discussion. When challenged they just yell louder. Doesn't really make for a very effective argument.

HAHAHAHA

Yea liberals are the ones who are brainwashed. Not the backwater rednecks in alabama that vote for the GOP. Yea those guys are the ones in the know

Reality Stik Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Why are liberals always so angry and wishing
> death
> > on anyone who doesnt follow their brainwashing?
>
>
> That's why they lost on this issue.
>
> All they have are emotion-driven talking points
> which don't hold up to any real discussion. When
> challenged they just yell louder. Doesn't really
> make for a very effective argument.

They are driven entirely on emotion which everyone knows is the best way to make decision.

Facts and logic and reason wont ever slow them down but eventually people figure out they were just lying and are full of it.

This boards a perfect example of how they just make things up as they go along.

Obama is taking the wrong approach. Instead of trying to strengthen background checks (a sensible step, but one that arguably does impinge on 2nd amendment rights), he and the Democrats should repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005. This law has nothing to do with protecting constitutional rights, it shields gun manufacturers and dealers from liability for the intentional misuse of their products -- say the deliberate shooting up of an elementary school.

Let the good people of Newtown, Aurora, Blacksburg, etc. seek redress in court for the pain and suffering inflicted on them by manufacturers and dealers who should and do know what their products can do if used incorrectly. We Americans have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms (though perhaps we need to be serving or eligible to serve in some sort of Militia, which the mentally ill are not) BUT the first amendment clearly and unequivocably articulates our right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances -- sue in court. To protect the manufacturers (that is who the NRA represents after all), the Bush administration abrogated our first amendment rights with the PLCA. I for one want them back.

Till the south is asked to remove themselves from the US. And they can stew in their right wing utopia, with the GDP of kenya. Enjoy while the rest of America, the part that actually knows things and does stuff leaves you behind you backwater douches

What ever losers.

You totally rocked our worlds in the 2012 election

Lost the presidency... but that of course was because of Romney being a loser right? I thought it was a lock though, with unemployment so high.

And can you explain why the senate wasn't won by the GOP, and why the house they lost seats?

Im so confused about how the GOP is still relevant considering they are one more argument away from imploding into a crazy right wing religious party and a crazy right wing corporate party.

Oh man, 2014 is gonna be fun. Keep up all the great "grass roots" ground work, cant wait to see what Roves projections are this time.

I quit the NRA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This law has nothing to do with
> protecting constitutional rights, it shields gun
> manufacturers and dealers from liability for the
> intentional misuse of their products -- say the
> deliberate shooting up of an elementary school.
>
> So tell me, when was the last time Ford or GM or Toyota was held liable for injuries or death caused by one of their products INTENTIONALLY MISUSED (i.e drunk driver)?????

That's right......NEVER!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2013 10:20PM by Stabitha.

I quit the NRA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama is taking the wrong approach. Instead of
> trying to strengthen background checks (a sensible
> step, but one that arguably does impinge on 2nd
> amendment rights), he and the Democrats should
> repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms
> Act of 2005. This law has nothing to do with
> protecting constitutional rights, it shields gun
> manufacturers and dealers from liability for the
> intentional misuse of their products -- say the
> deliberate shooting up of an elementary school.


That has everything to do with protecting rights. That would put gun companies out of business creating a band.

By that logic though you would put every company out of business. GM would have to be sued every time someone dies in a car crash or gets hurt, same with knife companies, baseball bats, medical companies, doctors if they dont save someone even if they cant be saved, first responders for not putting out a fire that causes death or a paramedic who has someone die in the back of the ambulance.

The people that committed those acts are the only ones who should be sued. No one else did it, guns didnt cause it them being psychopathic killers caused it.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I quit the NRA Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Obama is taking the wrong approach. Instead of
> > trying to strengthen background checks (a
> sensible
> > step, but one that arguably does impinge on 2nd
> > amendment rights), he and the Democrats should
> > repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in
> Arms
> > Act of 2005. This law has nothing to do with
> > protecting constitutional rights, it shields
> gun
> > manufacturers and dealers from liability for
> the
> > intentional misuse of their products -- say the
> > deliberate shooting up of an elementary school.
>
>
>
> That has everything to do with protecting rights.
> That would put gun companies out of business
> creating a band.
>
> By that logic though you would put every company
> out of business. GM would have to be sued every
> time someone dies in a car crash or gets hurt,
> same with knife companies, baseball bats, medical
> companies, doctors if they dont save someone even
> if they cant be saved, first responders for not
> putting out a fire that causes death or a
> paramedic who has someone die in the back of the
> ambulance.
>
> The people that committed those acts are the only
> ones who should be sued. No one else did it, guns
> didnt cause it them being psychopathic killers
> caused it.


If only there was a background check to ask the same stuff that for instance, a DRIVERS LICENSE requires

you fucking douche

NO ONE IS COMING AFTER YOUR GAY ASS PENIS EXTENDERS. NO ONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT YOUR GUN BECAUSE YOU ARE A SHIT SHOT

THIS WAS A BILL ON BACKGROUND CHECKS YOU FAGGOT. Way to go you guys WON!

Wooooo

You protected us from the tyranny of background checks, something that you douchebags supported 10 years ago.

WOOOOOO!!!

We get it, the black man wants it, so you cant support it. Shits getting old, at some point the GOP is going to have to legislate and do something that america actually wants.

Faggots

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They are driven entirely on emotion which everyone
> knows is the best way to make decision.

You just described how Obama won the election. He didn't win on the issues; he won because he was able to convince people that Romney was a plutocrat.

> Facts and logic and reason wont ever slow them
> down but eventually people figure out they were
> just lying and are full of it.

Margaret Thatcher said it best: "Welfare states are great until you run out of other people's money." The Democrats and Republicans who stood up against this bill are (for the most part) principled.

> This boards a perfect example of how they just
> make things up as they go along.

Absolutely, try getting into a debate with one of the anti-gun zealots. I don't own a gun, and I probably never will. I hate how Obama is trying to infringe upon other people's rights.

Great obfuscation. Wooo!

BTW, shocking now YC is here. Could it be because they are ALL the SAME fucking IP and person

DOUUUUUUUCHES

Young Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Its nice to see a mature adult for once, the idiots or idiot is out in full force tonight angrier than ever.

> You just described how Obama won the election. He
> didn't win on the issues; he won because he was
> able to convince people that Romney was a
> plutocrat.

Thats exactly right. He never ran on his own plans or anything the game plan was always just to attack the other side while never saying anything of substance, much like the idiots on here. Sadly that worked that time.

> Margaret Thatcher said it best: "Welfare states
> are great until you run out of other people's
> money." The Democrats and Republicans who stood up
> against this bill are (for the most part)
> principled.

At least on this issue they were. Thatcher was 100 percent correct. Eventually those that are being used as a blank check dwindle in numbers or get tired of it and leave.

Were fine for now but in a generation or two if we dont change that entitlement attitude they are going to run into a very rude awakening

> Absolutely, try getting into a debate with one of
> the anti-gun zealots. I don't own a gun, and I
> probably never will. I hate how Obama is trying to
> infringe upon other people's rights.

Calling it a debate is an insult to debates. Its just one side stating facts the occasional anti gun nut stating lies and then idiots like gordon and that dude that thinks im yucky spewing off talking points posting stupid memes. More substantive discussions have taken place in pre schools.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:

> Calling it a debate is an insult to debates. Its
> just one side stating facts the occasional anti
> gun nut stating lies and then idiots like gordon
> and that dude that thinks im yucky spewing off
> talking points posting stupid memes. More
> substantive discussions have taken place in pre
> schools.


It's all they got mang - dumb pics and penis cracks.

Not even capable of any creative trolling.

i love how when you dems get your way and stuff gets passed, you bad mouth the republicans. then when your bills dont pass, you act like a bunch of cry babies that got your candy taken from you on the playground. if dems would get their head out of their asses, instead of jumping the gun and trying to pass bills that wont solve anything (take ny for instance), you mght actually do some good. banning high cap mags and asslt rifles was not the answer to these mass shootings. criminals do not buy guns legally, and all these killings were committed by mentally ill people. mmmm..... lets put two and two together now. stay with me. maybe instead of taking things from the good people, we should find a way to treat the bad people who are mentally ill. omg. if we take care of their issues, they would never kill a bunch of innocent kids. hopefully i didnt loose all the dems who only want to ban things instead of dealing with the real problem.

i see some talk about the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005. so should we allow familys to sue the company who makes the vehicle that a drunk driver was driving when they kill someone? its the same thing and dont try to say its not. its just like the stupid idiot who spilled their mcd's coffee in their lap and sued for millions. that was their own fault, but because there wasnt a warning that it was hot (any non retarded person would know that), they became rich. guns dont kill people, just like cars, knives, heavy machinery..... its the people using it that kill others.

Live with it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hooloo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I wasn't aware the Democrats also controlled
> the
> > House of Representatives. Is Nancy the speaker
> > again?
>
>
> It was rejected in the SENATE because it did not
> have enough DEMOCRAT support.


He was referring to the thread title, idiot - "Democrat Controlled CONGRESS".

obfuscate Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Great obfuscation. Wooo!
>
> BTW, shocking now YC is here. Could it be because
> they are ALL the SAME fucking IP and person
>
> DOUUUUUUUCHES

Liberal Logic and I are different people. We do disagree, for example, he hates Obamacare. I think Obamacare can have some benefits.

Yucky24 and I are different people.

If you really want Cary to do an IP trace on all of us, he can. He'll find that we're different people.

u idiots Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i see some talk about the Protection of Lawful
> Commerce in Arms Act of 2005. so should we allow
> familys to sue the company who makes the vehicle
> that a drunk driver was driving when they kill
> someone? its the same thing and dont try to say
> its not. its just like the stupid idiot who
> spilled their mcd's coffee in their lap and sued
> for millions. that was their own fault, but
> because there wasnt a warning that it was hot (any
> non retarded person would know that), they became
> rich. guns dont kill people, just like cars,
> knives, heavy machinery..... its the people using
> it that kill others.

Protection of Lawful Commerce Act is a good thing. If I buy a gun and kill someone, how is it the manufacturer's fault?

DUDE, DON'T FUCKING DEBATE THESE FILTHY TROLLS ON HERE, WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE GET THESE MOTHERFUCKERS OUT OF THE STATEHOUSE SO WE CAN REDISTRICT AND TAKE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BACK. ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL.

WE NEED STATE GOVERNMENT CONTROL AND IT'S IMPORTANT. FUCK TIT FOR TAT FUCKING ARGUEMENTS WITH FILTHY FUCKIN RAT BASTARD DISGUSTING LYING CHEATING DECEIVING REPUBLICANS. WOULD YOU DEBATE POLITICS WITH A THEIF? A CROOK? THAT'S WHAT LIES ARE, THEY ARE THEFT. LOW LIFE THIEVES. STATE GOVERNMENT STARTS OPPOSING CUCCINELLI, VERY IMPORTANT.

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thats exactly right. He never ran on his own
> plans or anything the game plan was always just to
> attack the other side while never saying anything
> of substance, much like the idiots on here. Sadly
> that worked that time.

Elections aren't on the issues anymore. Kerry campaigned on issues and lost. Romney campaigned on issues and lost. People don't give a damn about the actual issues. Instead, they care about social crap like "gay marriage" or abortion. Face it, none of these issues is going to make or break our nation. Now not having a budget? Having a massive debt and a 760 billion dollar deficit? That's going to break our nation.

People complain that taxes are high. For the amount of services the average person gets from his government, he pays too little. Taxes should increase, but we need to cut spending as well.

> Calling it a debate is an insult to debates. Its
> just one side stating facts the occasional anti
> gun nut stating lies and then idiots like gordon
> and that dude that thinks im yucky spewing off
> talking points posting stupid memes. More
> substantive discussions have taken place in pre
> schools.

Talking points vs. Facts

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DUDE, DON'T FUCKING DEBATE THESE FILTHY TROLLS ON
> HERE, WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE GET THESE
> MOTHERFUCKERS OUT OF THE STATEHOUSE SO WE CAN
> REDISTRICT AND TAKE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
> BACK. ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL.

More importantly, just re-take the governorship. Even if you have a slight minority in one house, you can do a lot by holding the governorship.

> WE NEED STATE GOVERNMENT CONTROL AND IT'S
> IMPORTANT. FUCK TIT FOR TAT FUCKING ARGUEMENTS
> WITH FILTHY FUCKIN RAT BASTARD DISGUSTING LYING
> CHEATING DECEIVING REPUBLICANS. WOULD YOU DEBATE
> POLITICS WITH A THEIF? A CROOK? THAT'S WHAT LIES
> ARE, THEY ARE THEFT. LOW LIFE THIEVES. STATE
> GOVERNMENT STARTS OPPOSING CUCCINELLI, VERY
> IMPORTANT.

Obama has lied dozens of times during the whole gun control debate. The NRA hasn't. End of story. Cuccinelli sucks, I agree. McAuliffe is too liberal for most of Virginia.

Fuck Liberal Logic, fuck Curmudgon or cumguzziler whatever his name is, fuck the anonymous Republican trolls on here. Vote, that's what you need to do. 90 percent of you fellow Americans stand with you. You are voting for your rights to representation. The Republican politicians are protecting the gun lobby and don't give a fuck if every one of your fucking children gets shot in incidents like this.

VOTE these fuckers out for good, they need a lesson in democracy.

FUCK THESE FILTHY FUCKIN DIRTY REPUBLICANS TROLLS ON HERE, DON'T BOTHER, VOTE, VOTE HARD, VOTE THEIR ASS'S OUT, VOTE EM OUT NOW, DO ALL YOU CAN AS A CITIZEN AND AS A VIRGINIAN, 90 PERCENT OF AMERICA STANDS UNITED.