Serious answer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> serious question Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I have a question for you anti freedom types.
> > Given the fact that the Clinton AWB was deemed
> > ineffective at best by the governments own
> > research, and with an estimated 300,000,000
> legal
> > firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens,
> > what new realistic law can we enact that would
> > stop mass shootings? Keep in mind it would have
> to
> > be something that isn't already against the
> law.
> > Like murder.
>
> They have. They want to grab your guns. I think
> it is a bad idea, and one that would not work, but
> at least they consider the problem serious enough
> to propose a solution. You obviously don't like
> it. Fine.
>
> What is your solution?
Perhaps you missed the part where I asked for a realistic solution. We could start by enforcing the laws we already have. It was announced that the Aurora IL shooter was permitted to buy a handgun even though he shouldn't have been. Just as in Parkland, the system failed. Yet your unrealistic solution is gun confiscation. Typical.
Nothing is going to change in the immediate future unless we have an honest discussion on why there is such a lack of respect for life in this country. Notice I said honest. Which is the biggest issue because liberals are incapable of such.
...
Attachments: