KeepOnTruckin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> inkahootz Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > KeepOnTruckin Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > inkahootz Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You could actually be charged w/ any or all
> > of
> > > the
> > > > following (depending on what was visibly
> > > witnessed
> > > > by the officer and/or John Q. Public):
> Sodomy
> > (
> > > > non missionary sex in Virginia...for the
> oral
> > > > sex), indecent exposure, public nuisance,
> and
> > > lewd
> > > > and lascivious acts/behavior.
> > >
> > >
> > > When you commit a crime, it is supposedely
> > > inconvinencing all the people of VA. I would
> > > disagree that a public nuisance is being
> > caused.
> >
> >
> > So you think having sex in a park where
> children
> > could possibly view the act is not a public
> > nuisance?
> >
> >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuisance
>
> Its all natural. If kids aren;t driectly viewing
> it, what's the problem? Hell, even if they are
> veiwing it, they just get taught about it from
> their older siblings/friends or at school. If they
> are too young to be learing about it then they
> won't understand it and again there is no problem.
Good luck trying to convince any FCPS elementary school parent of this!