Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's a "slippery slope" angle, the same
> argument
> > libs used when Bush was waterboarding
> terrorists,
> > but NOT when Obama was killing them and their
> > families with drone strikes.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for believing in NOTHING.
>
>
> Seems like you are more concerned with liberal
> hypocrisy than your own. Drone strikes are an
> alternative to expensive ground operations and
> occupations. And in Pakistan they are a direct
> result of Bush's war he left for Obama to clean
> up.
>
> I am actually pretty conflicted on drone use. I
> think it is dangerous for us to set precedent that
> drone use should be considered legal under
> international law concerning the sovereignty of
> nations.
>
> We're not going to be the only nation with
> advanced drone technology for very long. Soon,
> China will be bombing the Ughuir and Turkistan
> populations. Russia will be carrying out drone
> strikes on Chechnya. Frank will be carrying out
> drone strikes in Mali. Saudi Arabia in Yemen.
> Israel in the Palestinian Territories. Pakistan
> in the Northern Frontier. Iraq in Kurdistan.
> Turkey in Kurdistan. North Korean use in South
> Korean airspace.
>
> You can see how quickly drone use or the use of
> any aircraft outside internationally recognized
> laws against the use of such aircraft for military
> operations could proliferate.
>
> We have to be careful because these nations will
> reference U.S. drone use for decades to justify
> their own specific operations.
You're a fag and no one is reading you anymore.
Thanks for trying.
Attachments: