Knowing the supossed victim and her sexual exploits for years, there is no doubt that Craig was wrongly convicted. Good Job, you'll reap what you sow.


COOL COOL
Attachments:

Well said justice seeker! Thank you for giving us THE facts. Bizarre does not even being to describe it. Husbands, sons, brothers and boyfriends... be careful!

I wouldn't hold too much belief in the GRAND JURY. They are the biggest yahoos of all time.

They indict people all the time on bogus charges. If they're conscientious they require more than the spoken word of LE. If they're not, they just issue mass indictments.

I know this because I know they had absolutely no valid evidence at all on a young man in MS, but indicted him for capital murder. I am sure the jury listened to all the BS that went on at trial and thought, "But if the GRAND JURY thought there was enough to indict..." because there was no valid evidence at trial, either.

That's exactly how wrongful convictions happen, and we are still working to save an innocent young man from riding the needle.

I don't know this guy, but my cousin does and believes he was framed.

The whole thing, including the womans story stinks to high heaven, anyway.

Grand Jury is a joke. The officer goes in a tells a story to a panel of citizens. The officer speaks of the investigation and the Grand Jury panel comes back with an indictment. Nobody knows what the officer says. Nobody questions the information. Anybody can get a indictment through a Grand Jury.

A trial is different with rules of evidence. This guy was convicted. Not sure if it was a judge or jury. Yes, the alleged victim's testimony is sketchy. But somebody weighed the facts and convicted this guy. When it boils down to word against word, she won. He lost. Is it right? Who knows. OJ Simpson got away with murder because of a dumb and stupid jury. Did this guy get convicted because of a dumb and stupid jury?

This guy was convicted by a jury. Was it a fair trial? I don't know, but I do know that the rules of evidence can work against a defendant at times.

I don't know what was presented at trial, but the information revealed after the trial tends to cause one to question the jury decision.

Some people do get wrongfully convicted and some people do get off when they should've been convicted.

I would have thought this case would have had difficulty meeting the beyond a reasonable doubt standard.

1446091 James Clyde Summers Jr. Male White 05/12/2014 SWVRJ - Duffield


i he gettint out this weekend?

The convicted forcible sodomite and founder of the Harvest Bible Chapel is James CRAIG Summers, not James CLYDE Summers.

Get the dick out of your ass and think it through before posting. Loser!

This guy and Lawrence Einuis would be quite a pair.

What happened to his appeal?

YES

VA Supreme Court appeal petition denied 5/20/15. It appears Mr Summers is in for the long haul.

It would be a good idea to have James Craig Summers, Laurence Einuis and Randy Pilon in the same cell. The amount of sexual perversion generated would be good for scientific research!

What happened with the female deputy?

wonderingstill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What happened with the female deputy?


She is still working, sued the PD and SO. Low dollar settlements, nobody want's anything to do with her and everyone stays clear of her. Vindictive and scorned after a long relationship with COOL.

Deputy Claims Retaliation From Sheriff’s Office, County

By: Mary Stachyra Lopez | January 2, 2015

A deputy with the Fairfax County Sheriff’s Office claims she faced intimidation, threats and other retaliation after she made a sexual harassment report to Internal Affairs, according to filings in a federal lawsuit.

The plaintiff — at the time a Master Deputy assigned to the Criminal Justice Academy in Chantilly — alleges that around 2009, she confided in a supervisor that she was being stalked and harassed by James Craig Summers, then a patrol officer with the Fairfax County Police Department. The suit claims that the supervisor eventually exploited her vulnerability by making unwanted advances toward her.

A Prince William County jury convicted Summers of forcible sodomy in April 2013. The Independent is not identifying the plaintiff because she is the victim of a sexual assault.

After the plaintiff complained to Internal Affairs about the supervisor, she was “shunned and ostracized by her colleagues and her chain of command in retaliation,” the lawsuit alleges.

“Her colleagues refused to speak to her or go to lunch with her. She was excluded from group activities such as group runs and defensive tactics scenarios. When she would speak during roll call, others would speak over her and laugh out loud at her.”

The lawsuit alleges that another supervisor told a colleague not to speak to the plaintiff because “she would only get her in trouble.” The Sheriff’s Office acknowledges in court filings that this incident did occur, but says the motivation was to have the colleague “maintain a certain level of supervisor-to-subordinate relationship.”

The atmosphere at the Academy became increasingly hostile, the lawsuit claims, with a recruit beating the plaintiff “well beyond the point of excessive force” during a training exercise designed to prevent such behavior during an arrest.

Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that the plaintiff’s performance rating was dropped in the area of working cooperatively with others.

“[Name redacted] is currently the complainant in an ongoing Internal Affairs investigation…This unsettled situation has resulted in tension and distrust among the staff,” the Aug. 19, 2013, performance evaluation states.

The evaluation goes on to say that “The physical and mental stress placed on [name redacted] in these past months is evident. She has attempted to overcome and repair relations with her fellow staff members. However, several of these relations may be damaged beyond repair.”

When the plaintiff complained about the evaluation to the police officer who wrote it, he responded “are you that f***ing righteous?”

The Sheriff’s Office, in its response, acknowledges the comment and the evaluation, but says the reference to the Internal Affairs investigation was “eventually stricken at the direction of Sheriff Mark Sites,” and was not included in her final performance evaluation.

The plaintiff says she was eventually transferred to another role outside the Criminal Justice Academy as part of the ongoing retaliation. The Sheriff’s Office says the move was due to a five-year organizational plan; Sites also thought “the environment at the CJA was unhealthy for her and that he would like to transfer her into another role and asked for her input as to where she would like to go.”

The Sheriff’s Office and Fairfax County denied most of the lawsuit’s account in their separate responses, filed in November and December.

“The Sheriff’s Office’s actions with respect to [the plaintiff] were at all times motivated by legitimate, non-discriminatory, job-related business reasons, and/or were based on reasonable factors, which are authorized under the law and which were without discriminatory intent.”

Fairfax County, sued as a separate defendant, tried unsuccessfully to have the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that the plaintiff was solely employed by the Sheriff’s Office. Since sheriffs in Virginia are technically elected to serve independently of local governments, courts have ruled that local governments cannot be liable for the actions of a sheriff’s office. U.S. District Court Judge James Cacheris ruled Dec. 19 that the police department effectively acted as a co-employer at the Academy, where the two agencies work collaboratively to train law enforcement personnel. Therefore, the plaintiff is seeking to hold Fairfax County separately liable for the the actions of the police department, not the Sheriff’s Office.

The plaintiff is seeking $300,000 against each defendant and reinstatement of her previous role.

http://centrevilleindependent.com/deputy-claims-retaliation-from-sheriffs-office-county/

The drama continues!

no wonder people stay away from her.

This entire fiasco doesn't pass the smell test. I highly suspect Summers was railroaded with false accusations and testimony, and a stupid jury. This chick knows how to manipulate he system for profit.

Guess that means the victim won't be posting no noods?

COOL?

SCV Record # 141606

SCV Case Type: Criminal
Lower Tribunal: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Tribunal Case# 1631-13-4

Appellant: SUMMERS, JAMES CRAIG
Attorney: STORR BURKS, GHISLAINE MONIQUE,(ESQ.)

Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Attorney: ROBINSON, KRISTINA LOUISE, (ESQ.)

Petition Entry Date: 11-07-2014
Record Received Date: 12-09-2014

Disposition Result
Disposition: Refused
Disposition Date: 05-20-2015

Petition for Rehearing
Received Date: 05-29-2015

Result
Decision: ???????
Decision Date: ???????

Was the judge black?

whatthe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> COOL?


Yeah, that's my name. I've fucked more pussy in that department than anyone there. This person was totally messed up after I moved on, I guess my mojo is too strong and her pussy was wore out, busted looking like the Grand Canyon.

His appeal failed. It is on a Facebook page. However, there's lots of forcible sodomy in prison.

Let's stop blaming the victim. This is not Steubenville, Ohio though since FCPS refuses to cut sports funding at the expense of education it may as well be.