These people have truly lost it:



"I, an American small business owner, part of the class that produces the vast majority of real, wealth producing jobs in this country, hereby resolve that I will not hire a single person until this war against business and my country is stopped.

I hereby declare that my job creation potential is now ceased."

http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blog/show?id=3355873%3ABlogPost%3A1566647&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post

I think this is great. This idiot won't have the capacity needed to meet his customers' needs and they will take their business somewhere else. Great way to fuck up a business.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think this is great. This idiot won't have the
> capacity needed to meet his customers' needs and
> they will take their business somewhere else.
> Great way to fuck up a business.


I personally think it's really cool to post in my own threads to make it look like my idea or thread has garnered support, and that others like me.

I an American business owner, invite you my fellow business owner, to go fuck yourself,,,traitor,,,

No real American thinks that way,,,

---------------------------------------------------------

An axe to grind, and a motor to hate,,,

with going on strike (or boycott, or whatever) as a form of political protest.

It's the American way.

You fuckhead Dems say BEND OVER and take every inch of grody cock we're shoving up your ass, and squeal like a pig while you're at.

If someone protests Obama's disastrous economic plans, all of a sudden he's a "traitor."

BEND OVER, or else.

Fuck that shit.

Y'all are a bunch of fucking hypocrites.

Well said. I would not hire in such an uncertain fiscal and regulatory environment either. May Atlas shrug at a greater angle every day.

I am engaging in a similar protest by spending as little as possible and converting surplus fiat dollars into gold.

This is an excerpt from an earlier post:

If I spend $1 with, say, AT&T, they pay some of that in federal tax, the remainder eventually gets spent with another company that must pay tax, paid in salary that incurs income tax, or perhaps disbursed in dividends which are taxed at various rates. This process repeats itself as the second company must do one of the above, and the employee or dividend recipient eventually spends it somewhere and starts the process anew.

Other levels of the regime (states, counties, munis) benefit marginally from consumer spending via sales taxes, fuel taxes, B&O taxes, etc. incurred at various stages of the distribution chain. Them being denied these taxes is likewise a bonum because for every dollar they do not take in, ceteris paribus, the must borrow.

Thus, it is a political act to be frugal in that by doing so, I deny the regime not only tax that is seen, but tax unseen that would have come into being.

Maybe the dumbest post I've seen on this topic,,,

Well, that's not true,,,but it's equally dumb

Just go drink your six pack and surf the porn sites,,,

You're clearly not a job creator and irrelevent to this discussion,,,



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2011 11:42PM by Hatemotor.

No, your post is the dumbest on this topic. Fourth paragraph, first word, go learn the Queen's English and get back to me on this matter.

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe the dumbest post I've seen on this topic,,,
>
> Well, that's not true,,,but it's equally dumb
>
> Just go drink your six pack and surf the porn
> sites,,,
>
> Your clearly not a job creator and irrelevent to
> this discussion,,,

I was actually commenting on Nothing wrong's post,,,

But keep putting politics ahead of people Ellipsis, that's what's gonna save this country, a bunch of entrenched political crybabies,,,

"I hate Obama so I'm taking my ball and going home!"

Fuck all of you traitors,,,

---------------------------------------------------------

An axe to grind, and a motor to hate,,,

I hate Obama, so I'm taking my gold and storing it in Dubai.

Again - I would not hire in such an uncertain fiscal and regulatory environment either. They are correct - it is a war; they are being assaulted on all sides, and I would be making noise about it too. To not hire in such an environment is reasonable; heck, I would be laying off anyone non-essential.

As for the country - what do you mean? The chunk of dirt defined by international borders, the people that inhabit it, or the regime that rules over both? I do not have any business with a chunk of dirt, the people that inhabit it have no claim upon my labour or my wealth, and I detest the regime and am engaging in passive resistance with what legal means I have. This includes revenue denial, and propaganda encouraging the same.

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was actually commenting on Nothing wrong's
> post,,,
>
> But keep putting politics ahead of people
> Ellipsis, that's what's gonna save this country, a
> bunch of entrenched political crybabies,,,
>
> "I hate Obama so I'm taking my ball and going
> home!"
>
> Fuck all of you traitors,,,



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2011 11:56PM by Ellipsis.

I am now, and always have been, on the side of Americans,,,

I don't begrudge anyone their viewpiont,,,

I will not, however, engage in a scorched earth policy against my country because I don't like an ELECTED official,,,

Your rhetoric is doing more to strenghthen the left than defeat it,,,

That is your business that you would not do such a thing. However, that is not why the said business owners are doing this.

"I, an American small business owner, part of the class that produces the vast majority of real, wealth producing jobs in this country, hereby resolve that I will not hire a single person until this war against business and my country is stopped.

They cite a war against business. This is a valid metaphor on account of the regulatory and fiscal burdens being placed upon them.

This issue is not about a single elected appratchnik, this is about thousands of apparatchiks, both elected and appointed.

Finally, you say you are on the side of the American people. That is silly; 300 million people all have their own interests and motives, how can one be on their sides simultaneously?

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am now, and always have been, on the side of
> Americans,,,
>
> I don't begrudge anyone their viewpiont,,,
>
> I will not, however, engage in a scorched earth
> policy against my country because I don't like an
> ELECTED official,,,
>
> Your rhetoric is doing more to strenghthen the
> left than defeat it,,,

"Finally, you say you are on the side of the American people. That is silly; 300 million people all have their own interests and motives, how can one be on their sides simultaneously? "

It is the OBLIGATION of all TRUE Americans to do what is in the common good for the most people,,,

Of course Mao or Stalin would just get rid of anyone they didn't agree with,,,

And quite frankly I don't see anyone who can get the support of all of the people out there,,,so if your side wins I guess you'll understand when half the country doesn't cooperate with the new leadership,,,

But I'm sure you can suggest some way to MAKE them cooperate,,eh comrade?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2011 12:26AM by Hatemotor.

> But I'm sure you can suggest some way to MAKE them cooperate,,eh comrade?

Oh, I dunno, maybe call them traitors, eh, my little fascist friend.

Who reserves the right to go on strike YOURSELF when it suits your needs, but would deny it to OTHERS, and call them "TRAITORS" for doing so.

You fucking hypocritical piece of shit.

whatever traitor,,,

---------------------------------------------------------

An axe to grind, and a motor to hate,,,

Agreed. This shitstain is like the emperor with no clothes, but covers his embarrassing genitalia with that tacky rag they call a flag.

It lacks the elegance of the British and Scandinavian flags and the simplicity of the tricolours of the Continent. Rather, the multitude of stripes and stars reek of design by committee!

Nothing wrong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > But I'm sure you can suggest some way to MAKE
> them cooperate,,eh comrade?
>
> Oh, I dunno, maybe call them traitors, eh, my
> little fascist friend.
>
> Who reserves the right to go on strike YOURSELF
> when it suits your needs, but would deny it to
> OTHERS, and call them "TRAITORS" for doing so.
>
> You fucking hypocritical piece of shit.

Hatemotor goes on strike because he believes it's in his best interest = good and justified.

Businessman who disagrees with Obama's policies goes on strike because he believes it's in his best interest = Traitor.

You're a hypocrite, Hatemotor.

What?

Do you two really think your part of any kind of real solution?

Your a couple of name calling juveniles,,,and your not even good at that,,,

The solution to what? Your functional illiteracy? Your improper use of the comma?

On an unrelated note, what do you think of the US flag? I think it's tacky.

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What?
>
> Do you two really think your part of any kind of
> real solution?
>
> Your a couple of name calling juveniles,,,and your
> not even good at that,,,

Let's just cut through the crap,,,

Who are you two supporting for president of this country?

And the cop out answer "anyboby but Obama" does not qualify,,,


oh, and Ellipses, I have a degree in American history not English so try to struggle through my functional illiteracy you tool,,,
Attachments:

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2011 01:12AM by No Problem.

I'm not changing the subject,

Who you support for president is relevent based on the fact you hate the current one so much you don't want to do business because he's so unfair,,,

I have just noticed over the last few months that all the big mouths won't name a candidate,,,anyone who follows these threads has noticed that too,,

YOU GOT NO SOLUTIONS, JUST COMPAINTS AND NAME CALLING,,,

I am not supporting anyone; I do not vote and encourage others to do the same.

Voting is a sacrament of the regime's civic religion and I for one will not be lending it legitimacy by doing so.

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Who are you two supporting for president of this
> country?

Ok,,,so you prefer to critisize without contributing,,,

That's your right,,,

I guess this discussion has reached it's conclusion,,,

You can go back to policing grammar and typos on the internets,,,
Attachments:

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you don't want to do business because he's so
> unfair,,,

If you don't want to do business because you think someone is treating you unfairly, is that wrong, or traitorous?

Isn't that what you did when you went on strike?

Why is it cool for you to do that, but if someone else does it makes them a traitor?

Since when is going on strike, or engaging in a boycott (which the TP guy is arguably doing) traitorous or anti-American?

It's quite simply not. There is nothing morally or ethically or legally wrong with engaging in either a strike or a boycott, whether for purely financial or for political reasons (with obvious exceptions in the case of boycotts that *are* illegal, by police officers, etc).

You're the one who raised the traitor issue, but you haven't responded to my objections other than accusing me of name-calling, where from my point of view you started the name-calling, and incendiary language ("go fuck yourself...traitor") in your first post.


> I have just noticed over the last few months that
> all the big mouths won't name a candidate,,,anyone
> who follows these threads has noticed that too,,
>
> YOU GOT NO SOLUTIONS, JUST COMPAINTS AND NAME
> CALLING,,,

We've got over a year to go before the next presidential election, and the selection of a sound and politically viable alternative to Obama is obviously in flux.

For you to say, on October 21, 2011, that if you can't name a candidate NOW you FAIL is just nonsense.

It's, in short, a completely separate issue from the one you raised in your first post, which is what raised my hackles, and what I've been arguing about.

Contribute to what? A duopoly that functions as a one-party system?

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok,,,so you prefer to critisize without
> contributing,,,
>
> That's your right,,,
>
> I guess this discussion has reached it's
> conclusion,,,
>
> You can go back to policing grammar and typos on
> the internets,,,

"Contribute to what? A duopoly that functions as a one-party system? "

I actually agree with that sentiment, the two party system in place now is fucked,,,

I just believe helping my fellow Americans is the best policy I can follow, until meaningful change comes,,,if there ever is any

You owe no one anything beyond your immediate family. Individually, what have the other 300 million ever done for you?

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Contribute to what? A duopoly that functions as a
> one-party system? "
>
> I actually agree with that sentiment, the two
> party system in place now is fucked,,,
>
> I just believe helping my fellow Americans is the
> best policy I can follow, until meaningful change
> comes,,,if there ever is any

"No man is an island"

---------------------------------------------------------

An axe to grind, and a motor to hate,,,

Sorry nothing wrong, I didn't mean to ignore you,,,I didn't see your post

In response,,,You can't pick a candidate because they are all flawed,,,
Romney is the only viable candidate, if he gets Christie to be VP, that will be a pretty strong ticket and will create a viable alternative to Obama,,,



And I'm not on strike, I'm a business owner trying to create jobs,,,

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And I'm not on strike, I'm a business owner trying
> to create jobs,,,


But you were on strike when you had reason to be.

Why deny the same right to others?

I've never been on strike,,,what the hell are you talking about

It sure sounds like you were on strike, unless your comments were just some sort of tongue-in-cheek joke.


Re: Fairfax Underground After Dark
Posted by: Hatemotor ()
Date: July 10, 2011 09:56PM

I'm on strike tomorrow,,,if I don't get more money to fix the idiot I work withs disaster, I may never go back,,,

And then I'll need that tent,,,

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/620168.html#msg-620168



Re: Fairfax Underground After Dark
Posted by: Hatemotor ()
Date: July 11, 2011 01:23AM

I'm on strike,,,that means I can drink too much to work tomorrow,,,

There goes number 9...

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/620375.html#msg-620375



Re: Fairfax Underground After Dark
Posted by: Hatemotor ()
Date: July 12, 2011 12:37AM

So anyway,,,my strike worked,,

The guy decided to cough up some more money and get me to fix that bullshit,,,

Now I have to go do the work,,,,

Dammit

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/621772.html#msg-621772

President Obama = One Term President. 'Nuff said.

Again - which of them have a claim upon your wealth or labour?

Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "No man is an island"

Libtard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think this is great. This idiot won't have
> the
> > capacity needed to meet his customers' needs
> and
> > they will take their business somewhere else.
> > Great way to fuck up a business.
>
>
> I personally think it's really cool to post in my
> own threads to make it look like my idea or thread
> has garnered support, and that others like me.

You do that? Sounds kind if pathetic to me.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think this is great. This idiot won't have the
> capacity needed to meet his customers' needs and
> they will take their business somewhere else.
> Great way to fuck up a business.


Rilly?

So tell me WTL, things get bad for you in the (whatever it is) business and you're going to hire more people?

I damn near lost everything I had trying to keep employees employed. I wasn't turning out a bad product. My customers LEFT. Where did they go? To cities that had jobs. They didn't need me anymore because they were GONE.

But life goes on, yanno. And I didn't lay anyone off. And now my business is pulling itself together (because my competitors folded, not because Obama saved me) and guess what? They're all terribly happy to be overworked and don't WANT me to hire them any help.

So.......should I fuck over my hired help by going against their wishes and actually removing some of their burden or should I follow my presidents lead and spend billions of dollars to produce a few extra jobs?

And why does everyone keep talking about a "double-dip"? Is that an ice cream cone or yet another good reason to not hire anyone?

If someone said "I'm going to boycott all American-made products and only hire illegal immigrants, because I don't like Bush", these teabagger shitheads would've thrown a fit.

The guy is one moron and not an industry leader. He got a lot of comments on the post that were negative to what his intent was.


BFD.


The only thing stupider than this story is contention by Obama and his zombified retard following that conservative business people are stonewalling the economy to spite Dingle Barry or that the only thing in the way of economic recovery is some stupid bill that the libs want passed.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The only thing stupider than this story is
> contention by Obama and his zombified retard
> following that conservative business people are
> stonewalling the economy to spite Obama

Well yes, look at the article linked and that is exactly the intent. This isn't a mystery or a surprise, other than to see it actually broadcast in print and on the record. I'm happier they aren't hiding it anymore and now it is obvious to the center and center-right the Tea Party cannot be taken seriously.

Denying that the Tea Party would rather have the country burn down than have Obama serve year 5 is ludicrous after reading that, you can't be taken seriously by denying Republicans are wishing for bad things to happen from now until the election.

It is the T party now, where T stands for Traitor.

----------------------------------------

"She looks pretty good for 12, admit it." - WingNut, 04/24/2012

"I'm racist too. So what?" - Ellipsis 9/16/2011

"If you only knew who I was, and what I was working to do you would...have the decency to tell me I hated my nation and the way of life. I may not agree with...the government...I hate the "government"......" - Firrat 9/1/10

"there seems to be a queer...why? To try and further demean a defeated... dumb Tea party... I think we need more... far left folks on a regular basis - Louis Farakhan, Jesse Jackson...Al Sharpton" - Registered Voter, 8/19/2011

"If your computer is running slow, or you have any other problems, email me at with the problem and i am willing to fix it, for a price of course" - Taylor, spamming FFU on 04/12/2006. "N****rs as slaves again? I think so..." - Taylor, 09/20/2009

So someone in America is so powerful they can forgo profit and growth to stall the entire economy for political purposes?

Don't be stupid.

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think this is great. This idiot won't have the
> capacity needed to meet his customers' needs and
> they will take their business somewhere else.
> Great way to fuck up a business.


This is another reason to disregard anonymous posters

Didn't Boehner say essentially the same thing:

>>> "The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President
>>> Obama to be a one-term President."

Looks like same, old, same old - anything for the win, fuck the country if necessary.

Essentially the equivalent of taking Politics of Hate to the limit.

The Imploding Party has totally lost its way.

"Tea Party Nation sent to their members today a message from activist Melissa Brookstone urging businesspeople to “not hire a single person” to protest the Obama administration’s supposed “war against business and my country.” Brookstone writes that business owners should stop hiring new employees in order to stand up to “this new dictator,” the “global Progressive socialist movement,” Hollywood, the media and Occupy Wall Street."

This is perhaps the most un-American sentiment I have ever read.

You teabaggers should be ashamed of yourselves.

4 more years Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Didn't Boehner say essentially the same thing:
>
> >>> "The single most important thing we want to
> achieve is for President
> >>> Obama to be a one-term President."
>
> Looks like same, old, same old - anything for the
> win, fuck the country if necessary.
>
> Essentially the equivalent of taking Politics of
> Hate to the limit.
>
> The Imploding Party has totally lost its way.


Or, it could be interpreted that the best way to create jobs and get this economy going again is to get the community organizer out of office.

justsayin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
you can't be taken
> seriously by denying Republicans are wishing for
> bad things to happen from now until the election.
>

Yes, and Harry Reid and the Democrats didn't go around saying the war was lost in Iraq for months before the surge. Really, you are a stupid ass. So Harry Reid and the Democrats were all traitors then? Because they certainly didn't wish well for America in how Iraq turned out - not to say it is perfect today, but if they had their way back then it would be in full fledged civil war today with a good chance of having the entire region in conflict.

While I don't agree with the stand, I can see why they are doing it - and if their business still functions under their determination to not hire anyone, then really, who cares - it is THEIR business. That is a much more understandable position to take, rather than standing in the well of the Senate and working to undermine the confidence of the troops that were currently in conflict by saying their cause was lost. Nice morale boost. And wait - you mean those folks who threatened to move to Canada (and didn't btw) when Bush was re-elected should be considered traitors also?

Morons.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

4 more years Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Didn't Boehner say essentially the same thing:
>
> >>> "The single most important thing we want to
> achieve is for President
> >>> Obama to be a one-term President."
>
> Looks like same, old, same old - anything for the
> win, fuck the country if necessary.
>
> Essentially the equivalent of taking Politics of
> Hate to the limit.
>
> The Imploding Party has totally lost its way.


Add yourself to the Moron list. Harry Reid's actions and folks threatening to move to Canada if Bush were elected held the same, if not worse value. One by undermining the troop morale and the others by leaving the country and renouncing their citizenship. THAT is the politics of HATE. This BS being proposed by some in the Tea Party is leagues apart from that in magnitude as far as being called a Traitor, or using the politics of Hate.

Speaking of the "same old, same old".

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

teapartyat11 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> These people have truly lost it:
>
>
>
> "I, an American small business owner, part of the
> class that produces the vast majority of real,
> wealth producing jobs in this country, hereby
> resolve that I will not hire a single person until
> this war against business and my country is
> stopped.
>

Who cares! its his business, if it fails because of a half baked political stance then 'F him. He gets what he deserves.

If i worked for this dude, i'd go find another job because obviously he's not focused on the business.