Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
sansibar
()
Date: October 20, 2011 08:09PM
After the mission is complete and the tyrant is dead they never surrender their weapons. The arms end up in terrorist hands like they did in Afganistan. And these guys have some heavy firepower.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
tomahawk
()
Date: October 20, 2011 08:16PM
sansibar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> After the mission is complete and the tyrant is
> dead they never surrender their weapons.
Yeah I know, right? I mean, I'm really glad that as soon as Americans won the Revolution they turned all their guns over to the government and we squleched that silly idea for a Bill of Rights.
-------------------------------------------------------
> After the mission is complete and the tyrant is
> dead they never surrender their weapons.
Yeah I know, right? I mean, I'm really glad that as soon as Americans won the Revolution they turned all their guns over to the government and we squleched that silly idea for a Bill of Rights.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Gibber
()
Date: October 20, 2011 08:19PM
I havent noticed a shortage of armaments anywhere in the world for any cause that has the money to buy them. You can thank the good old U.S. of A. for that.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Oh shit
()
Date: October 20, 2011 08:27PM
tomahawk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sansibar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > After the mission is complete and the tyrant is
> > dead they never surrender their weapons.
>
> Yeah I know, right? I mean, I'm really glad that
> as soon as Americans won the Revolution they
> turned all their guns over to the government and
> we squleched that silly idea for a Bill of Rights.
How do you compare muskets with recoiless rifles??
-------------------------------------------------------
> sansibar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > After the mission is complete and the tyrant is
> > dead they never surrender their weapons.
>
> Yeah I know, right? I mean, I'm really glad that
> as soon as Americans won the Revolution they
> turned all their guns over to the government and
> we squleched that silly idea for a Bill of Rights.
How do you compare muskets with recoiless rifles??
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
trogdor!
()
Date: October 20, 2011 08:33PM
The problem is being played out in Egypt
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/17/141411371/egyptians-fear-arab-spring-progress-is-slipping-away
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/17/141411371/egyptians-fear-arab-spring-progress-is-slipping-away
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
tomahawk
()
Date: October 20, 2011 08:42PM
Oh shit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tomahawk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > sansibar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > After the mission is complete and the tyrant
> is
> > > dead they never surrender their weapons.
> >
> > Yeah I know, right? I mean, I'm really glad
> that
> > as soon as Americans won the Revolution they
> > turned all their guns over to the government
> and
> > we squleched that silly idea for a Bill of
> Rights.
>
>
> How do you compare muskets with recoiless rifles??
If the King has recoiless rifles then you need them, too.
-------------------------------------------------------
> tomahawk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > sansibar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > After the mission is complete and the tyrant
> is
> > > dead they never surrender their weapons.
> >
> > Yeah I know, right? I mean, I'm really glad
> that
> > as soon as Americans won the Revolution they
> > turned all their guns over to the government
> and
> > we squleched that silly idea for a Bill of
> Rights.
>
>
> How do you compare muskets with recoiless rifles??
If the King has recoiless rifles then you need them, too.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Yucky24.
()
Date: October 20, 2011 09:28PM
Total myth that we armed the taliban.
It's also a total myth that our government and weapon making corporations arm all the evil people in the world.
Sorry leftist fucktards, but that would be YOUR leftist comrades handing out AKs and RPGs all over the fucking world like candy on Halloween.
DEAL WITH IT.
The taliban's primary weapon is buried in the ground.
90% of our causalties are caused by landmines (or "IEDs"), not small arms fire.
Another myth is that we supported al qaeda (well, we are now in the "arab spring") in Afghanistan.'
Al qaeda didn't really exist yet.
The Afghan jihadists and foreign islamic jihadists that we supported (along with several other nations) in the 1980s weren't the same jihadist peeps that we're fighting in Afghanistan now (although some are).
Left-wing socialists came to power in Afghanistan. They tried to pass all kinds of reforms (backwards Democrat type policies but still an improvement over the total 3rd world muslime barbarism that it was replacing).
This enraged the fundamentalist muslimes that dominate Afghanistan and they launched an insurgency against the ruling Afghan progressive liberals.
The progressive liberals in Afghanistan begged our left-wing socialist enemy (and thus the Western Left's butt buddy) the Soviet Union for military aid.
The Soviets agreed to help them and thus the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
The lefties in communist China and the Soviet Union had been providing massive amounts of aid to the North Vietnamese communists/imperialists when we were helping the South Vietnamese to resist their aggression.
So we got back at the Soviets right after by aiding the islamic jihadists in Afghanistan.
And ultimately that was the right thing to do because the left-wing imperialists were/are a much bigger threat to the West than the muslimes will ever will be.
The leftists are White and therefore have brains.
They were capable of developing gigantic military juggernauts that could have conquered the whole world (had it not been for the right-wing, capitalist, Whites in America who stopped them).
All the muslimes have is sheer demographics and a fanatical, violent, fake religion.
So using the muslimes to help defeat our primary left-wing White enemy was more imporant than giving some imbred, low IQ, muslime, savages some small arms.
Also, the jihadist insurgency against the Soviets was much more mainstream than the taliban are.
The Soviets were pretty aggressive in Afghanistan.
They didn't exactly follow a hearts and minds campaign.
They used old school scorch and burn techniques so pretty much 90%+ of Afghan's fucking hated them.
Pretty much everyone in Afghan society opposed them.
The taliban is nowhere near that popular in Afghanistan and we're not as hated.
Also, the idea that we Western Whites have to be behind EVERYTHING is pretty racist if you really think about it (not that I have a problem with that...)
It assumes that brown people aren't capable of creating their own twisted, fucked up ideologies, organizations and movements; that they need some kind of White puppet master telling them what to do.
Islamic jihad springs from islamic scripture, theology and history.
It has very little to do with Western influence.
It's also a total myth that our government and weapon making corporations arm all the evil people in the world.
Sorry leftist fucktards, but that would be YOUR leftist comrades handing out AKs and RPGs all over the fucking world like candy on Halloween.
DEAL WITH IT.
The taliban's primary weapon is buried in the ground.
90% of our causalties are caused by landmines (or "IEDs"), not small arms fire.
Another myth is that we supported al qaeda (well, we are now in the "arab spring") in Afghanistan.'
Al qaeda didn't really exist yet.
The Afghan jihadists and foreign islamic jihadists that we supported (along with several other nations) in the 1980s weren't the same jihadist peeps that we're fighting in Afghanistan now (although some are).
Left-wing socialists came to power in Afghanistan. They tried to pass all kinds of reforms (backwards Democrat type policies but still an improvement over the total 3rd world muslime barbarism that it was replacing).
This enraged the fundamentalist muslimes that dominate Afghanistan and they launched an insurgency against the ruling Afghan progressive liberals.
The progressive liberals in Afghanistan begged our left-wing socialist enemy (and thus the Western Left's butt buddy) the Soviet Union for military aid.
The Soviets agreed to help them and thus the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
The lefties in communist China and the Soviet Union had been providing massive amounts of aid to the North Vietnamese communists/imperialists when we were helping the South Vietnamese to resist their aggression.
So we got back at the Soviets right after by aiding the islamic jihadists in Afghanistan.
And ultimately that was the right thing to do because the left-wing imperialists were/are a much bigger threat to the West than the muslimes will ever will be.
The leftists are White and therefore have brains.
They were capable of developing gigantic military juggernauts that could have conquered the whole world (had it not been for the right-wing, capitalist, Whites in America who stopped them).
All the muslimes have is sheer demographics and a fanatical, violent, fake religion.
So using the muslimes to help defeat our primary left-wing White enemy was more imporant than giving some imbred, low IQ, muslime, savages some small arms.
Also, the jihadist insurgency against the Soviets was much more mainstream than the taliban are.
The Soviets were pretty aggressive in Afghanistan.
They didn't exactly follow a hearts and minds campaign.
They used old school scorch and burn techniques so pretty much 90%+ of Afghan's fucking hated them.
Pretty much everyone in Afghan society opposed them.
The taliban is nowhere near that popular in Afghanistan and we're not as hated.
Also, the idea that we Western Whites have to be behind EVERYTHING is pretty racist if you really think about it (not that I have a problem with that...)
It assumes that brown people aren't capable of creating their own twisted, fucked up ideologies, organizations and movements; that they need some kind of White puppet master telling them what to do.
Islamic jihad springs from islamic scripture, theology and history.
It has very little to do with Western influence.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Yucky24.
()
Date: October 20, 2011 09:50PM
Oop. I forgot one more VERY important thing the islamonazis have going for them:
The Western Left who <3's them.
The Western Left gives them crucial moral legitimacy (e.g. the Left's tireless support for the "poor" and "oppressed" pally monkies; the Left's support for the Afghan and Iraqi "resistance [can you believe that shit?! LOL] through code pink and other similar demented, treasonous and evil leftist islamofascist coddling groups; etc.)
The Western Left also gives them access to our schools, NGOs, government, media, legal system, etc.
And the Western Left gives them the firepower they need (e.g. Libya for example)...
That's why if we want to defeat pisslam, we gotta utterly annihilate the Western Left first.
You know that be some real talk fellow rightists...
The Western Left who <3's them.
The Western Left gives them crucial moral legitimacy (e.g. the Left's tireless support for the "poor" and "oppressed" pally monkies; the Left's support for the Afghan and Iraqi "resistance [can you believe that shit?! LOL] through code pink and other similar demented, treasonous and evil leftist islamofascist coddling groups; etc.)
The Western Left also gives them access to our schools, NGOs, government, media, legal system, etc.
And the Western Left gives them the firepower they need (e.g. Libya for example)...
That's why if we want to defeat pisslam, we gotta utterly annihilate the Western Left first.
You know that be some real talk fellow rightists...
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Bonnie
()
Date: October 20, 2011 10:30PM
How old are you Yucky? You sound like a 16 year who doesnt know what to do with his hard on. Let me give you a clue, shake it.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Most of the weaponry
()
Date: October 21, 2011 01:11PM
All I see are AK-47s.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 21, 2011 01:21PM
Bonnie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How old are you Yucky? You sound like a 16 year
> who doesnt know what to do with his hard on. Let
> me give you a clue, shake it.
No he's an adult who admits that he is too scared to share his beliefs with other people in real life so he comes here to vent his anger.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How old are you Yucky? You sound like a 16 year
> who doesnt know what to do with his hard on. Let
> me give you a clue, shake it.
No he's an adult who admits that he is too scared to share his beliefs with other people in real life so he comes here to vent his anger.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
Never be peace with Arabs.
()
Date: October 21, 2011 04:43PM
Something in the DNA with them. They will never be content with even an ideal peace, they'd fuck up a true Utopia, has to do with the national character of the people, they thrive on miserable circumstances. Desert living for eons will do that.
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
get a clue
()
Date: October 21, 2011 05:24PM
Gibber Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I havent noticed a shortage of armaments anywhere
> in the world for any cause that has the money to
> buy them. You can thank the good old U.S. of A.
> for that.
And by the USA you mean China. The AK 47 is the most prolific weapon in the world by far. The number of those weapons out numbers every other weapon combined or is very close. We dont use those
-------------------------------------------------------
> I havent noticed a shortage of armaments anywhere
> in the world for any cause that has the money to
> buy them. You can thank the good old U.S. of A.
> for that.
And by the USA you mean China. The AK 47 is the most prolific weapon in the world by far. The number of those weapons out numbers every other weapon combined or is very close. We dont use those
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
tomahawk
()
Date: October 21, 2011 10:45PM
Never be peace with Arabs. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Something in the DNA with them. They will never
> be content with even an ideal peace, they'd fuck
> up a true Utopia, has to do with the national
> character of the people, they thrive on miserable
> circumstances.
Are you talking about Arabs or Americans?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Something in the DNA with them. They will never
> be content with even an ideal peace, they'd fuck
> up a true Utopia, has to do with the national
> character of the people, they thrive on miserable
> circumstances.
Are you talking about Arabs or Americans?
Re: The problem with freedom fighters is
Posted by:
SoylentGreen
()
Date: October 22, 2011 05:21AM
Gibber Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I havent noticed a shortage of armaments anywhere
> in the world for any cause that has the money to
> buy them. You can thank the good old U.S. of A.
> for that.
And here I was thinking the AK-47 wasn't made in the US.
Thanks for the tip.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I havent noticed a shortage of armaments anywhere
> in the world for any cause that has the money to
> buy them. You can thank the good old U.S. of A.
> for that.
And here I was thinking the AK-47 wasn't made in the US.
Thanks for the tip.