$140Million for volcano monitoring? What does USGS do again? I am pretty sure they already do quite a bit of this in the US.
Even in this article - the guy got $300K from the stimulus funds - BUT - he noted he would have just proposed a more modest project to the National Science Foundation to get funding.
http://www.wkowtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=12165469
Quote
...
Thurber landed $300,000 to monitor two Alaskan volcanoes.
In the nationally-broadcast Republican response to President Obama's speech to Congress last year, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal singled out "volcano monitoring" as an example of questionable spending in the $800 billion stimulus bill.
"People like Bobby Jindal are not happy about it," Thurber told WKOW27 News. "(But) Volcano hazards are something that does have an impact on our infrastructure."
Thurber said past eruptions from one of the two volcanoes he's studying have closed Anchorage's airport and changed air traffic patterns.
Thurber's previous research funding for volcano monitoring came from the National Science Foundation. Thurber conceded if stimulus funds had been denied, he would have scaled back his research goals and proposed a more modest project to NSF.
...
You all are a bunch of TPM turds. The fact that you don't actually look into an issue and just spout BS based on the soundbite presented to you by the propagandists shows just how shallow you are.
HuffPo made an issue of this last year, because evidently the $140M went to the Interior Department where they used some of it for "flood monitoring technology" in Louisiana. Good for them. The stimulus bill did a lot for State governments in allowing them to get over their budget shortfalls and continue to employ state employees. But for all intents and purposes a large chunk of it ended up as a slush fund (which they still haven't spent). I am sure a large amount of the remaining discretionary amounts will be spent in the run-up to the election.
Honestly, I have to say it is pretty funny all these folks want to live near active volcanoes. Good for them - again, why is it important that the entire country pays additional funds for their decision to live in an area with a known deadly hazard? It seems like their State and others around them should be party to a fund for this stuff. And please, there is already funding in the Federal budget for USGS - these volcanoes would be looked at and monitored anyway.
FY 2009 Budget for USGS
http://www.usgs.gov/budget/2009/docs/2009_budget_tables.pdf
FY 2011 Budget - note in the section under Volcanoes they got more funding in 2009 then proposed, and in 2010 more. But of course, people only heard the Jindal soundbite being criticized so they thought they were losing something that already existed.
http://www.usgs.gov/budget/2011/docs/overview.pdf
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2010 09:57AM by Registered Voter.