Home•Fairfax General Forum•Arrest/Ticket Search•Wiki new•Pictures/Videos•Chat•Articles•Links•About
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Goto Topic: Previous•Next
Go to: Forum List•Back to Forum•Post New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Helter Skelters ()
Date: July 19, 2019 08:55PM

How could Manson want to off this beautiful woman? She didn't deserve it. She could have been in Charlie's Angels










Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Nfmann ()
Date: July 19, 2019 10:38PM

Meh...maybe a 6.5? Been with much better and I ain’t great - just confident.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: /Fixerer Of It For You/ ()
Date: July 19, 2019 11:24PM

Nfmann Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meh...maybe a 6.5?she's a fish Been with much better looking guys and I
> am gayin’t great - just confident.


FIFY

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Are you kidding? ()
Date: July 19, 2019 11:25PM

A 6.5?? Even by Hollywood standards she's on the top level. Her face is perfection. She's a 9. (no one is a 10,btw). She didn't have much bosom, but her body was nice too. Kind of slender, but curvy.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Pointer outer of things ()
Date: July 19, 2019 11:29PM

Are you kidding? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A 6.5?? Even by Hollywood standards she's on the
> top level. Her face is perfection. She's a 9. (no
> one is a 10,btw). She didn't have much bosom, but
> her body was nice too. Kind of slender, but curvy.


don't pay no attention to him. he's gay.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Sum Ting Wong ()
Date: July 20, 2019 12:02AM

Wasn't she married to that pedo that banged Natasia Kinski?

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: She was hot ()
Date: July 20, 2019 12:34AM

,
Attachments:
wb2.gif

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: One of them ()
Date: July 20, 2019 12:58AM

Sum Ting Wong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wasn't she married to that pedo that banged
> Natasia Kinski?


She married one of them, Roman Polanski. Wim Wenders nailed Kinski first when she was 14. Differing reports on whether Werner Herzog porked her.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Pscyhotherapist ()
Date: July 20, 2019 01:34AM

Sharon was a 12. No doubt about that. Manson did not kill her because she wasn’t beautiful. She was simply collateral damage. In Manson’s mind, the nigger was the enemy and he needed a sacrificial lamb to prove that they were a scourge. Too bad he didn’t off pedo Polanski.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Manson was a psychotic libshit ()
Date: July 20, 2019 05:27AM

Pscyhotherapist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon was a 12. No doubt about that. Manson did
> not kill her because she wasn’t beautiful. She
> was simply collateral damage. In Manson’s mind,
> the nigger was the enemy and he needed a
> sacrificial lamb to prove that they were a
> scourge. Too bad he didn’t off pedo Polanski.

Chuck and his minions destroyed everything beautiful, much like modern day Dems.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Cielo Drive ()
Date: July 20, 2019 06:19AM

Pscyhotherapist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon was a 12. No doubt about that. Manson did
> not kill her because she wasn’t beautiful.

Manson didn’t kill her or any of the other people at that house. He wasn’t even there when they did it. They also didn’t know she lived there and didn’t realize she was famous until after the murders made the news.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: President Trump FTW! ()
Date: July 20, 2019 08:13AM

The Manson family was a bunch of libtards. They destroy everything beautiful.

Options: Reply•Quote
Re: Wasn't Sharon Tate a babe?
Posted by: Totally ()
Date: July 20, 2019 09:34AM

So hot!
Attachments:
B26ED003-92D7-4021-9DAC-452FFC748FC7.jpeg
6BD55CB9-2ED2-4867-9CBE-9E841393693C.jpeg
F483642A-1A88-458F-9F61-76F444998F72.jpeg
D74CFE3B-4A67-414D-B02B-31632CDD7516.jpeg

Options: Reply•Quote


Go to: Forum List•Back to Forum•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   ********  **      **  **     **  **     ** 
 **     **  **        **  **  **  **     **  ***   *** 
 **     **  **        **  **  **  **     **  **** **** 
  ********  ******    **  **  **  **     **  ** *** ** 
        **  **        **  **  **  **     **  **     ** 
 **     **  **        **  **  **  **     **  **     ** 
  *******   ********   ***  ***    *******   **     **
This forum powered by Phorum.