Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: September 19, 2018 02:08AM
I just don't get this. You want a rapist judge?
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
GERRY THE RETARD
()
Date: September 19, 2018 02:17AM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just don't get this. You want a rapist judge?
It's not a federal issue.
Now, please kill yourself.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just don't get this. You want a rapist judge?
It's not a federal issue.
Now, please kill yourself.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Yhpmb
()
Date: September 19, 2018 02:35AM
Dont kill yourself, Gerry, or anyone else.
Hes not accused of rape, its just a partisan loon screaming.
We know this by the evidence.
Hes not accused of rape, its just a partisan loon screaming.
We know this by the evidence.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Rjjff
()
Date: September 19, 2018 02:55AM
Yes he Goan rape u liberals in the ass every day!
What happened to the liberal rule of everyone gets a second chance?
It seems liberals only want laws enforced on everyone except their selves
What happened to the liberal rule of everyone gets a second chance?
It seems liberals only want laws enforced on everyone except their selves
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
“The Rite of Passage”
()
Date: September 19, 2018 05:27AM
It wasn’t rape. Kavanugh couldn’t even get a simple rape right with a fifteen year old girl. Trump was supposed to hire only the “best people”. What kind of “Supreme” Court judge would he make when he can’t accomplish a simple Conservative ritual.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: September 19, 2018 07:09AM
Why rape? I had white bitches begging me to fuck them when I was 15. Ugly ass albinos can't get pussy on their merits?
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: September 19, 2018 07:12AM
And what type of 15 year old rapes and forcibly suffocates a girl. I guess one that grows up to be a Republican. You're right sounds like a right of passage for Conservatives.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Hubxk
()
Date: September 19, 2018 07:36AM
simply didnt happen
What kind of people plant evidence, lie, set up innocent people because they must control others and hate freedom of the individual?
What kind of people plant evidence, lie, set up innocent people because they must control others and hate freedom of the individual?
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Hillarity Clintoon
()
Date: September 19, 2018 07:39AM
Hubxk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> simply didnt happen
>
> What kind of people plant evidence, lie, set up
> innocent people because they must control others
> and hate freedom of the individual?
Me
-------------------------------------------------------
> simply didnt happen
>
> What kind of people plant evidence, lie, set up
> innocent people because they must control others
> and hate freedom of the individual?
Me
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
wont magically go away
()
Date: September 19, 2018 08:08AM
Gerry certainly is an asshole. that said, GOP has the choice of investigation or plant a SCOTUS judge who will have the cloud and eventual investigation of/into sexual assault of a 15 year old - it wont magically go away. People are not going to forget the violent and disgusting image of Georgetown Prep rich boy Judge Kavanaugh nearly smothering a 15 year old girl, stumbling drunk while attempting to gang rape her.
Those images wont go away so imagine him ruling on any matters before the court involving women in any way.
Those images wont go away so imagine him ruling on any matters before the court involving women in any way.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Fixer of It for You
()
Date: September 19, 2018 10:16AM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why rape? I hadwhitelittle boys, sheep & ugly diaperass bitches begging me to fuck
> them when I was 15.Ugly ass albinos cacouldn't get
> pussy ontheirmy merits?
FIFY
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why rape? I had
> them when I was 15.
> pussy on
FIFY
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
RealAnswer
()
Date: September 19, 2018 11:06AM
There is a simple reason why the FBI declined to investigate when they were first given the report and the letter.
First, it would normally be outside their jurisdiction, since under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2248 it would have to have occurred on federal property, across state lines, etc. I suppose Trump could order the FBI to investigate it, but first how about we answer this question: Why won't the Maryland State Police investigate it? It happened in Maryland, and that's the appropriate jurisdiction. There is no statute of limitations on time for rape in Maryland.
The answer to that question is the real reason why nobody is going to investigate this case.
Short Answer: It was too long ago.
Police know that there's pretty much no chance of getting a conviction, or even getting the DA to prosecute, a crime that's like this particular one. Witnesses are hard to come by, their recollections are at best faded and hazy and suspect and unreliable. There's no physical evidence. It's all so long ago that nobody can credibly remember what happened.
In this case, the alleged victime does not remember WHAT YEAR it was, HOW OLD she was, has no idea WHERE it happened (somewhere in Maryland is all she thinks she remembers), and her reports on what happened are inconsistent. Sometimes she says there were four people, sometimes she says there were two. There is only one person who might possibly be a witness: a drunk boy who says that he is sure it never happened.
Meanwhile the alleged victim has a history of sexual trauma that probably started in her home, and continues to this day. At the time of the alleged incident, she had a reputation as a slut: specifically, at the time, she was a young high schooler in a competition for "points" to fuck as many boys as possible. Later she went into therapy and eventually became a psychologist. She has always had a troubled relationship with men, including her husband. In marriage counseling, she gave a different version of this rape incident, those facts documented back in 2012 do not agree with her accusations today. Her family got into unrelated legal trouble and hates the judge who ruled against them. That judge was the accused person's mother. The alleged victim has strong political history and motivations to attempt to destroy the accused person's political career.
The accused does not have any history of this kind of behavior, and a large number of women he has closely associated with over the last decades have jumped forward to defend his character.
The timing and circumstances of the accusation is absolutely political.
There is absolutely nothing that the accused can say in his defense that has not already been said: categorical denial. It is impossible that any new facts could be introduced on either side, and there aren't any facts in evidence to begin with.
That's why there will be no investigation.
First, it would normally be outside their jurisdiction, since under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2248 it would have to have occurred on federal property, across state lines, etc. I suppose Trump could order the FBI to investigate it, but first how about we answer this question: Why won't the Maryland State Police investigate it? It happened in Maryland, and that's the appropriate jurisdiction. There is no statute of limitations on time for rape in Maryland.
The answer to that question is the real reason why nobody is going to investigate this case.
Short Answer: It was too long ago.
Police know that there's pretty much no chance of getting a conviction, or even getting the DA to prosecute, a crime that's like this particular one. Witnesses are hard to come by, their recollections are at best faded and hazy and suspect and unreliable. There's no physical evidence. It's all so long ago that nobody can credibly remember what happened.
In this case, the alleged victime does not remember WHAT YEAR it was, HOW OLD she was, has no idea WHERE it happened (somewhere in Maryland is all she thinks she remembers), and her reports on what happened are inconsistent. Sometimes she says there were four people, sometimes she says there were two. There is only one person who might possibly be a witness: a drunk boy who says that he is sure it never happened.
Meanwhile the alleged victim has a history of sexual trauma that probably started in her home, and continues to this day. At the time of the alleged incident, she had a reputation as a slut: specifically, at the time, she was a young high schooler in a competition for "points" to fuck as many boys as possible. Later she went into therapy and eventually became a psychologist. She has always had a troubled relationship with men, including her husband. In marriage counseling, she gave a different version of this rape incident, those facts documented back in 2012 do not agree with her accusations today. Her family got into unrelated legal trouble and hates the judge who ruled against them. That judge was the accused person's mother. The alleged victim has strong political history and motivations to attempt to destroy the accused person's political career.
The accused does not have any history of this kind of behavior, and a large number of women he has closely associated with over the last decades have jumped forward to defend his character.
The timing and circumstances of the accusation is absolutely political.
There is absolutely nothing that the accused can say in his defense that has not already been said: categorical denial. It is impossible that any new facts could be introduced on either side, and there aren't any facts in evidence to begin with.
That's why there will be no investigation.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
President Trump FTW!
()
Date: September 19, 2018 11:40AM
RealAnswer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is a simple reason why the FBI declined to
> investigate when they were first given the report
> and the letter.
>
> First, it would normally be outside their
> jurisdiction, since under 18 U.S.C. §§
> 2241–2248 it would have to have occurred on
> federal property, across state lines, etc. I
> suppose Trump could order the FBI to investigate
> it, but first how about we answer this question:
> Why won't the Maryland State Police investigate
> it? It happened in Maryland, and that's the
> appropriate jurisdiction. There is no statute of
> limitations on time for rape in Maryland.
>
> The answer to that question is the real reason why
> nobody is going to investigate this case.
>
> Short Answer: It was too long ago.
>
> Police know that there's pretty much no chance of
> getting a conviction, or even getting the DA to
> prosecute, a crime that's like this particular
> one. Witnesses are hard to come by, their
> recollections are at best faded and hazy and
> suspect and unreliable. There's no physical
> evidence. It's all so long ago that nobody can
> credibly remember what happened.
>
> In this case, the alleged victime does not
> remember WHAT YEAR it was, HOW OLD she was, has no
> idea WHERE it happened (somewhere in Maryland is
> all she thinks she remembers), and her reports on
> what happened are inconsistent. Sometimes she
> says there were four people, sometimes she says
> there were two. There is only one person who
> might possibly be a witness: a drunk boy who says
> that he is sure it never happened.
>
> Meanwhile the alleged victim has a history of
> sexual trauma that probably started in her home,
> and continues to this day. At the time of the
> alleged incident, she had a reputation as a slut:
> specifically, at the time, she was a young high
> schooler in a competition for "points" to fuck as
> many boys as possible. Later she went into therapy
> and eventually became a psychologist. She has
> always had a troubled relationship with men,
> including her husband. In marriage counseling,
> she gave a different version of this rape
> incident, those facts documented back in 2012 do
> not agree with her accusations today. Her family
> got into unrelated legal trouble and hates the
> judge who ruled against them. That judge was the
> accused person's mother. The alleged victim has
> strong political history and motivations to
> attempt to destroy the accused person's political
> career.
>
> The accused does not have any history of this kind
> of behavior, and a large number of women he has
> closely associated with over the last decades have
> jumped forward to defend his character.
>
> The timing and circumstances of the accusation is
> absolutely political.
>
> There is absolutely nothing that the accused can
> say in his defense that has not already been said:
> categorical denial. It is impossible that any new
> facts could be introduced on either side, and
> there aren't any facts in evidence to begin with.
>
> That's why there will be no investigation.
You typed all that shit? For what? I already said she needs to file a police report in Montgomery county. You also said there is a crime. You're a fucking liar. Kavanaugh is an innocent man. The accuser must provide evidence. No evidence no crime.
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is a simple reason why the FBI declined to
> investigate when they were first given the report
> and the letter.
>
> First, it would normally be outside their
> jurisdiction, since under 18 U.S.C. §§
> 2241–2248 it would have to have occurred on
> federal property, across state lines, etc. I
> suppose Trump could order the FBI to investigate
> it, but first how about we answer this question:
> Why won't the Maryland State Police investigate
> it? It happened in Maryland, and that's the
> appropriate jurisdiction. There is no statute of
> limitations on time for rape in Maryland.
>
> The answer to that question is the real reason why
> nobody is going to investigate this case.
>
> Short Answer: It was too long ago.
>
> Police know that there's pretty much no chance of
> getting a conviction, or even getting the DA to
> prosecute, a crime that's like this particular
> one. Witnesses are hard to come by, their
> recollections are at best faded and hazy and
> suspect and unreliable. There's no physical
> evidence. It's all so long ago that nobody can
> credibly remember what happened.
>
> In this case, the alleged victime does not
> remember WHAT YEAR it was, HOW OLD she was, has no
> idea WHERE it happened (somewhere in Maryland is
> all she thinks she remembers), and her reports on
> what happened are inconsistent. Sometimes she
> says there were four people, sometimes she says
> there were two. There is only one person who
> might possibly be a witness: a drunk boy who says
> that he is sure it never happened.
>
> Meanwhile the alleged victim has a history of
> sexual trauma that probably started in her home,
> and continues to this day. At the time of the
> alleged incident, she had a reputation as a slut:
> specifically, at the time, she was a young high
> schooler in a competition for "points" to fuck as
> many boys as possible. Later she went into therapy
> and eventually became a psychologist. She has
> always had a troubled relationship with men,
> including her husband. In marriage counseling,
> she gave a different version of this rape
> incident, those facts documented back in 2012 do
> not agree with her accusations today. Her family
> got into unrelated legal trouble and hates the
> judge who ruled against them. That judge was the
> accused person's mother. The alleged victim has
> strong political history and motivations to
> attempt to destroy the accused person's political
> career.
>
> The accused does not have any history of this kind
> of behavior, and a large number of women he has
> closely associated with over the last decades have
> jumped forward to defend his character.
>
> The timing and circumstances of the accusation is
> absolutely political.
>
> There is absolutely nothing that the accused can
> say in his defense that has not already been said:
> categorical denial. It is impossible that any new
> facts could be introduced on either side, and
> there aren't any facts in evidence to begin with.
>
> That's why there will be no investigation.
You typed all that shit? For what? I already said she needs to file a police report in Montgomery county. You also said there is a crime. You're a fucking liar. Kavanaugh is an innocent man. The accuser must provide evidence. No evidence no crime.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: September 19, 2018 11:00PM
First of all, the FBI didn't decline to investigate so stop lying you lying sack of shit. In fact it is the responsibility of the FBI to investigate in line with their background investigation of the nominee.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrytardin'
()
Date: September 19, 2018 11:17PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First of all, the FBI didn't decline to
> investigate so stop lying you lying sack of shit.
> In fact it is the responsibility of the FBI to
> investigate in line with their background
> investigation of the nominee.
The FBI has conducted no less than 6 background checks on Kavanaugh.
Cry more, faggot.
-------------------------------------------------------
> First of all, the FBI didn't decline to
> investigate so stop lying you lying sack of shit.
> In fact it is the responsibility of the FBI to
> investigate in line with their background
> investigation of the nominee.
The FBI has conducted no less than 6 background checks on Kavanaugh.
Cry more, faggot.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Fixer of It for You
()
Date: September 19, 2018 11:19PM
Gerrytardin' Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > First of all, the FBI didn't decline to
> > investigate so stop lying you lying sack of
> shit.
> > In fact it is the responsibility of the FBI to
> > investigate in line with their background
> > investigation of the nominee.
>
>
> The FBI has conducted no less than 6 background
> checks on Kavanaugh.
>
> Cry more, pussy bitch faggot.
FIFY
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > First of all, the FBI didn't decline to
> > investigate so stop lying you lying sack of
> shit.
> > In fact it is the responsibility of the FBI to
> > investigate in line with their background
> > investigation of the nominee.
>
>
> The FBI has conducted no less than 6 background
> checks on Kavanaugh.
>
> Cry more, pussy bitch faggot.
FIFY
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Carl "The Truth" Williams
()
Date: September 19, 2018 11:35PM
Dems don't give a fuck about her or any sexual assault. They don't really want or care about any investigation. They just want to try to use it as a way to delay things past the mid-terms and derail the nomination of Kavanaugh or anyone else.
Everyone on both sides knows this. Nobody actually believes any of the other shit that they're saying.
#TruthOut
Everyone on both sides knows this. Nobody actually believes any of the other shit that they're saying.
#TruthOut
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
In Iran Gerrys Way
()
Date: September 20, 2018 12:02AM
Torture first hang next no trials allowed
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Tough It Out Then
()
Date: September 20, 2018 12:05AM
Because he's going to be Justice Kavanaugh soon
You lied about Thomas too I bet
You lied about Thomas too I bet
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: September 20, 2018 12:05AM
Once again you morons. Background investigations aren't ever complete. With new information comes new points of interest that are investigated. Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
NoVa Hater
()
Date: September 20, 2018 04:35PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again you morons. Background investigations
> aren't ever complete. With new information comes
> new points of interest that are investigated.
> Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
They won't investigate because they have nothing to work with. Ford conveniently doesn't remember key elements, hence the FBI has said there is nothing to investigate.
Is that your goat calling, dumbfuck?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again you morons. Background investigations
> aren't ever complete. With new information comes
> new points of interest that are investigated.
> Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
They won't investigate because they have nothing to work with. Ford conveniently doesn't remember key elements, hence the FBI has said there is nothing to investigate.
Is that your goat calling, dumbfuck?
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
tell it to the FBI
()
Date: September 20, 2018 04:47PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again you morons. Background investigations
> aren't ever complete. With new information comes
> new points of interest that are investigated.
> Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
You need to send this to the FBI, maybe they have not thought of this? You need to do this for the party. If you're wrong, well you're wrong!!! But if you're right????? Think about it!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again you morons. Background investigations
> aren't ever complete. With new information comes
> new points of interest that are investigated.
> Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
You need to send this to the FBI, maybe they have not thought of this? You need to do this for the party. If you're wrong, well you're wrong!!! But if you're right????? Think about it!!!
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Traitors among us
()
Date: September 20, 2018 05:11PM
Like liberals, the fbi cant be trusted
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: September 20, 2018 05:36PM
NoVa Hater Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again you morons. Background
> investigations
> > aren't ever complete. With new information
> comes
> > new points of interest that are investigated.
> > Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
>
> They won't investigate because they have nothing
> to work with. Ford conveniently doesn't remember
> key elements, hence the FBI has said there is
> nothing to investigate.
>
> Is that your goat calling, dumbfuck?
Youre an idiot completely talking out of your ass. Its funny though. What else do you think?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again you morons. Background
> investigations
> > aren't ever complete. With new information
> comes
> > new points of interest that are investigated.
> > Especially for a Supreme Court nominee.
>
> They won't investigate because they have nothing
> to work with. Ford conveniently doesn't remember
> key elements, hence the FBI has said there is
> nothing to investigate.
>
> Is that your goat calling, dumbfuck?
Youre an idiot completely talking out of your ass. Its funny though. What else do you think?
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Pc retardz
()
Date: September 20, 2018 05:43PM
Corey Booker admitted sexually assaulting a drunk girl in high school. If it's a crime he should be convicted and sentenced. If it's not then why would the FBI investigate such an event?
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
fbi needs to investigate
()
Date: September 20, 2018 05:48PM
Corey Booker too!
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
PETWJ
()
Date: September 20, 2018 06:36PM
The FBI does background checks on Presidential appointees.
How stupid does someone have to be to actually believe that "it's not a federal issue?"
Clearly, it's not about the delay either... the Anita Hill investigation took three days, and a modern investigation could've been completed already.
It's about "plausible deniability".
The fact is, the GOP doesn't give a damn if he's a rapist, as long as he helps advance their agenda. Knowing the facts might make it harder to appoint him and face the voters in November.
How stupid does someone have to be to actually believe that "it's not a federal issue?"
Clearly, it's not about the delay either... the Anita Hill investigation took three days, and a modern investigation could've been completed already.
It's about "plausible deniability".
The fact is, the GOP doesn't give a damn if he's a rapist, as long as he helps advance their agenda. Knowing the facts might make it harder to appoint him and face the voters in November.
Re: Why won't Republicans let the FBI question the parties involved?
Posted by:
Pc retardz
()
Date: September 20, 2018 06:39PM
PETWJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The FBI does background checks on Presidential
> appointees.
>
> How stupid does someone have to be to actually
> believe that "it's not a federal issue?"
>
> Clearly, it's not about the delay either... the
> Anita Hill investigation took three days, and a
> modern investigation could've been completed
> already.
>
> It's about "plausible deniability".
>
> The fact is, the GOP doesn't give a damn if he's a
> rapist, as long as he helps advance their agenda.
> Knowing the facts might make it harder to appoint
> him and face the voters in November.
The Libz are the party of admitted sex assaulter Corey Booker and current sex assaulter Keith Ellerson.
How are they going to face women in November?
-------------------------------------------------------
> The FBI does background checks on Presidential
> appointees.
>
> How stupid does someone have to be to actually
> believe that "it's not a federal issue?"
>
> Clearly, it's not about the delay either... the
> Anita Hill investigation took three days, and a
> modern investigation could've been completed
> already.
>
> It's about "plausible deniability".
>
> The fact is, the GOP doesn't give a damn if he's a
> rapist, as long as he helps advance their agenda.
> Knowing the facts might make it harder to appoint
> him and face the voters in November.
The Libz are the party of admitted sex assaulter Corey Booker and current sex assaulter Keith Ellerson.
How are they going to face women in November?