Re: For those with access to PACER or Pacermonitor
Posted by:
still correct
()
Date: May 21, 2021 10:17PM
Checker upper of situations Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A person who actually works Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Elephant in the kitchen Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy for Eesh,
> and
> > > think William can eat shit, but everyone
> seems
> > to
> > > be forgetting Eesh still has a criminal
> record
> > and
> > > is almost just as google fucked as the pedo.
> > > That’s gonna be tougher to overcome, unless
> > > someone who knows him can hook him up with a
> > job,
> > > or he can find someone that can overlook that
> > kind
> > > of thing, which is next to know one.
> >
> > It's more easily overlooked than you think.
> First
> > of all, "Google" is not nearly the employment
> > screening tool some of you seem to think it is.
>
> > I've been working and hiring people for a long
> > time, at multiple tech companies and government
> > contractors. Typically the most that is done
> is
> > to check clearance status, date of last
> > investigation, and maybe initiate a National
> > Agency Check. As long a person does not have a
> > felony conviction or multiple convictions for
> > crimes of moral terpitude, there isn't a
> problem.
> >
> > Having a discharged bankruptcy is also not a
> > problem by itself. What trips people up is
> having
> > unpaid bills, being in arrears on child
> support,
> > and serious unresolved financial unresolved
> > problems.
> >
> > Eesh's "criminal record" is a relatively minor
> > misdemeanor for honking a car horn at the
> mentally
> > ill people who had been harassing him and even
> > lured him to the place where he honked the horn.
>
> > That would not stop him from being hired by any
> > means.
> >
> > He will be fine.
>
>
> This turned out to be very wrong lol
No, it is completely accurate.