Re: "But mom, I want to be a self absorbed moron and drive drunk"
Date: December 26, 2006 08:31AM
Talk about missing the point and focusing on minutia in a feeble effort to bust balls...
For the record, I happen to drive an "import", with great gas mileage, excellent crash ratings, and assembled here in the US. The use of the term was not intended to make a, how did you put it, buy 'murcan, flag waving, fightin' terra (somebody else's kid) Dittohead stance. It was one of many statements made to reinforce a point. Geezus, when do the spelling corrections start? Anybody want to critique my grammar and punctuashun?
And thank you for the VIN tidbit, your ability to cut and paste impresses the hell out of me, I have been humbled into submission, you all really showed me.
And one more thing...
>Ok then, why even have them? And if they really are "DWI" Checkpoints, then why >aren't people w/ bad safety inspections just let go.
>And how are the July 2006 laws fair? Driving while asian is preventable, driving >while distracted is preventable, as are driving aggressively, failure to use >turn signals, failure to use your brain, and so is driving while tired. You >don't see these situations being held under the same provisions. Why would DUI >be any different? they are all preventable.
Were you under the influence of phychotropic drugs when you posted this or is this truly how you feel? Based on your logic, since a DWI checkpoint is only designed to interdict impaired drivers, if Bin Laden or someone with a stack of kiddie porn came through a checkpoint, the police should let em pass. How does that make any sense?
As for your suggestion for DWA (driving while Asian) checkpoints, I wont event legitimize that with a response. Targeted enforcement for the other violations you presented DO exist, however a checkpoint would not be practical to enforce them, it wouldnt work.
Anxiously awaiting your inevitable response.