Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Behind the curtain, another liar
()
Date: June 29, 2017 07:15PM
They are going to keep running and running, watch them.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
XMHEE
()
Date: June 29, 2017 07:17PM
Only those four? Well, mustn't be true then.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
tjvdk
()
Date: June 29, 2017 07:19PM
XMHEE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Only those four? Well, mustn't be true then.
Do you know what they've actually tied to Trump?
That's right, homo- NOTHING.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Only those four? Well, mustn't be true then.
Do you know what they've actually tied to Trump?
That's right, homo- NOTHING.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 07:32PM
Name a differing assessment dumb ass. 4 is as good as 17 when there isn't any opposing assessment.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 07:33PM
Rightards are such a waste of time and energy. And they're traitors now too so it doesn't get any worse than this.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
xxz4
()
Date: June 29, 2017 07:37PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rightards are such a waste of time and energy. And
> they're traitors now too so it doesn't get any
> worse than this.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rightards are such a waste of time and energy. And
> they're traitors now too so it doesn't get any
> worse than this.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
nggvn
()
Date: June 29, 2017 09:52PM
they are fearing loosing a $100 million lawsuit is likely why they retracted
democrats wouldn't retract unless it was about money
democrats wouldn't retract unless it was about money
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
UXNDB
()
Date: June 29, 2017 10:09PM
The New York slimes buried it as low in the article as they could.
"Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community."
"Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community."
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
KNHT
()
Date: June 29, 2017 10:57PM
Oh but this time they got it right. from a reliable source.
funny thing is this has been a pillar of faith for the russia-tards. 17 agencies.
but yeah, I'm sure they only told you a partial lie... lol
funny thing is this has been a pillar of faith for the russia-tards. 17 agencies.
but yeah, I'm sure they only told you a partial lie... lol
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:02PM
ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA. The rest don't have information to make a differing assessment you idiot. They simply agree with the assessment of their peer agencies.
You see when the main agencies reach a conclusion and no other agency reaches a differing conclusion, that means all the agencies, all 17 are operating under the same assessment.
You see when the main agencies reach a conclusion and no other agency reaches a differing conclusion, that means all the agencies, all 17 are operating under the same assessment.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:03PM
Anyways, you're fucking traitors. WTF is wrong with you? Kill yourselves.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Ivar
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:06PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyways, you're fucking traitors. WTF is wrong
> with you? Kill yourselves.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyways, you're fucking traitors. WTF is wrong
> with you? Kill yourselves.
Attachments:
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Truth Revolt
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:12PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA. The rest don't have
> information to make a differing assessment you
> idiot. They simply agree with the assessment of
> their peer agencies.
>
> You see when the main agencies reach a conclusion
> and no other agency reaches a differing
> conclusion, that means all the agencies, all 17
> are operating under the same assessment.
Bullshit. You dumb talking point was wrong. Period.
As I told your stupid ass long ago, the way that it came about is that ODNI oversees 17 various agencies. So libtards took that to twist it into the "17 intelligence agencies" bullshit. The fact is that most all of them were not involved at all other than being in the org chart and weren't in any position to agree or disagee with any assessment.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA. The rest don't have
> information to make a differing assessment you
> idiot. They simply agree with the assessment of
> their peer agencies.
>
> You see when the main agencies reach a conclusion
> and no other agency reaches a differing
> conclusion, that means all the agencies, all 17
> are operating under the same assessment.
Bullshit. You dumb talking point was wrong. Period.
As I told your stupid ass long ago, the way that it came about is that ODNI oversees 17 various agencies. So libtards took that to twist it into the "17 intelligence agencies" bullshit. The fact is that most all of them were not involved at all other than being in the org chart and weren't in any position to agree or disagee with any assessment.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:13PM
Name an agency that doesn't agree. You God forsaken traitor. Stop wasting peoples time with nonsense. All 17 agencies are in agreement.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
veekd
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:17PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Name an agency that doesn't agree. You God
> forsaken traitor. Stop wasting peoples time with
> nonsense. All 17 agencies are in agreement.
How do you like the travel ban so far?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Name an agency that doesn't agree. You God
> forsaken traitor. Stop wasting peoples time with
> nonsense. All 17 agencies are in agreement.
How do you like the travel ban so far?
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Cluelesserer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:22PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Name an agency that doesn't agree. You God
> forsaken traitor. Stop wasting peoples time with
> nonsense. All 17 agencies are in agreement.
You fail again.
FACT CHECK: Did 17 Intel Agencies ‘All Agree’ Russia Influenced The Presidential Election?
DAVID SIVAK
1:35 PM 06/01/2017
During an interview Wednesday with the tech news outlet Recode, former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton discussed at length her belief that Russian interference in the 2016 election harmed her chances of winning.
“Read the declassified report by the intelligence community that came out in early January,” said Clinton. “Seventeen agencies, all in agreement – which I know from my experience as a senator and secretary of state is hard to get – they concluded with ‘high confidence’ that the Russians ran an extensive information war against my campaign to influence voters in the election.”
Verdict: False
While the intelligence report she mentions does express ‘high confidence’ that Russia sought to undermine her campaign, it only represents the views of three agencies – the FBI, CIA and NSA. Clinton incorrectly claims this report shows consensus among 17 intelligence agencies.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper himself appeared in front of Congress and explicitly pushed back on the idea that “17 intelligence agencies agreed,” stating flatly that it was just three.
The intelligence community is comprised of 17 civilian and military agencies including the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). Another of these agencies – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) – speaks on behalf of the intelligence community and orchestrated the January report.
“The [intelligence community assessment] was a coordinated product from three agencies: CIA, NSA and the FBI, not all 17 components of the intelligence community,” said former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a congressional hearing in May. “Those three under the aegis of my former office.”
A handful of experienced analysts were chosen from the three agencies to investigate and draw independent conclusions. Each agency reached the same verdict about Russian interference.
So while the DNI published the report as an intelligence community assessment, Clapper clarified at the hearing that the report reflects the views of those three agencies alone. In fact, when questioned by Democratic Senator Al Franken, Clapper resisted the notion that all 17 agencies had reached a consensus.
Franken: The intelligence communities have concluded, all 17 of them, that Russia interfered with this election. And we all know how that’s right.
Clapper: Senator, as I pointed out in my statement, Senator Franken, it was- there were only three agencies that directly involved in this assessment plus my office.
Franken: But all 17 signed on to that?
Clapper: Well, we didn’t go through that process. This was a special situation because of the time limits and […] the sensitivity of the information, we decided – it was a conscious judgment – to restrict it to those three.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Name an agency that doesn't agree. You God
> forsaken traitor. Stop wasting peoples time with
> nonsense. All 17 agencies are in agreement.
You fail again.
FACT CHECK: Did 17 Intel Agencies ‘All Agree’ Russia Influenced The Presidential Election?
DAVID SIVAK
1:35 PM 06/01/2017
During an interview Wednesday with the tech news outlet Recode, former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton discussed at length her belief that Russian interference in the 2016 election harmed her chances of winning.
“Read the declassified report by the intelligence community that came out in early January,” said Clinton. “Seventeen agencies, all in agreement – which I know from my experience as a senator and secretary of state is hard to get – they concluded with ‘high confidence’ that the Russians ran an extensive information war against my campaign to influence voters in the election.”
Verdict: False
While the intelligence report she mentions does express ‘high confidence’ that Russia sought to undermine her campaign, it only represents the views of three agencies – the FBI, CIA and NSA. Clinton incorrectly claims this report shows consensus among 17 intelligence agencies.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper himself appeared in front of Congress and explicitly pushed back on the idea that “17 intelligence agencies agreed,” stating flatly that it was just three.
The intelligence community is comprised of 17 civilian and military agencies including the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). Another of these agencies – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) – speaks on behalf of the intelligence community and orchestrated the January report.
“The [intelligence community assessment] was a coordinated product from three agencies: CIA, NSA and the FBI, not all 17 components of the intelligence community,” said former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a congressional hearing in May. “Those three under the aegis of my former office.”
A handful of experienced analysts were chosen from the three agencies to investigate and draw independent conclusions. Each agency reached the same verdict about Russian interference.
So while the DNI published the report as an intelligence community assessment, Clapper clarified at the hearing that the report reflects the views of those three agencies alone. In fact, when questioned by Democratic Senator Al Franken, Clapper resisted the notion that all 17 agencies had reached a consensus.
Franken: The intelligence communities have concluded, all 17 of them, that Russia interfered with this election. And we all know how that’s right.
Clapper: Senator, as I pointed out in my statement, Senator Franken, it was- there were only three agencies that directly involved in this assessment plus my office.
Franken: But all 17 signed on to that?
Clapper: Well, we didn’t go through that process. This was a special situation because of the time limits and […] the sensitivity of the information, we decided – it was a conscious judgment – to restrict it to those three.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:26PM
What a disgrace you traitors are. This isn't rocket science. Unless an agency comes out and disagrees with the ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA they agree with the assessment.
Agencies aren't traitors like you. They trust and believe each others assessments unless they have a reason not to.
Agencies aren't traitors like you. They trust and believe each others assessments unless they have a reason not to.
Re: New York Times retracts bogus story about 17 intelligence organizations agreeing Russia hacked the election
Posted by:
Read it stupid
()
Date: June 29, 2017 11:31PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What a disgrace you traitors are. This isn't
> rocket science. Unless an agency comes out and
> disagrees with the ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA they
> agree with the assessment.
>
> Agencies aren't traitors like you. They trust and
> believe each others assessments unless they have a
> reason not to.
“The [intelligence community assessment] was a coordinated product from three agencies: CIA, NSA and the FBI, not all 17 components of the intelligence community,” said former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a congressional hearing in May. “Those three under the aegis of my former office.”
Clapper: Senator, as I pointed out in my statement, Senator Franken, it was- there were only three agencies that directly involved in this assessment plus my office.
Franken: But all 17 signed on to that?
Clapper: Well, we didn’t go through that process. This was a special situation because of the time limits and […] the sensitivity of the information, we decided – it was a conscious judgment – to restrict it to those three.
-------------------------------------------------------
> What a disgrace you traitors are. This isn't
> rocket science. Unless an agency comes out and
> disagrees with the ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA they
> agree with the assessment.
>
> Agencies aren't traitors like you. They trust and
> believe each others assessments unless they have a
> reason not to.
“The [intelligence community assessment] was a coordinated product from three agencies: CIA, NSA and the FBI, not all 17 components of the intelligence community,” said former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a congressional hearing in May. “Those three under the aegis of my former office.”
Clapper: Senator, as I pointed out in my statement, Senator Franken, it was- there were only three agencies that directly involved in this assessment plus my office.
Franken: But all 17 signed on to that?
Clapper: Well, we didn’t go through that process. This was a special situation because of the time limits and […] the sensitivity of the information, we decided – it was a conscious judgment – to restrict it to those three.