Unbelievable how incredibly wrong and stupid they are. And they want to elect The Donald to the highest office in the land.

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/88000/88607/monthlyanoms_gis_201607.gif

I have my boat ready to go. Not worried.

It's because they choose political party over science. They actually believe dopes like Ted Cruz and James Inhofe instead of Neil Degrasse Tyson, Carl Sagan, Bill Nye and all the other brilliant scientists.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/21/2016 12:30PM by Numbers.

Libs can't understand simple science and facts.
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-hottest-earths-ever-been

Modern human civilization, with its permanent agriculture and settlements, has developed over just the past 10,000 years or so. The period has generally been one of low temperatures and relative global (if not regional) climate stability.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's because they choose political party over
> science. They actually believe dopes like Ted Cruz
> and James Inhofe instead of Neil Degrasse Tyson,
> Carl Sagan, Bill Nye and all the other brilliant
> scientists.


And you dopes think that Bill Nye is a "brilliant scientist." lol

Given that he strongly promoted the idea of being skeptical about everything within science, Sagan would be repulsed by the religion of climate change.

Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs can't understand simple science and facts.
> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/w
> hats-hottest-earths-ever-been


Sorry, but it's you who don't understand.

The period in Earths history that you're referring to,(the PETM period) was caused by huge amounts of methane from the seabed, creating a greenhouse effect of a different sort than what we are experiencing now. Today, methane is NOT the main cause of the warming. It's c02. More particularly, it's man-made c02, which is heavier than naturally occurring c02.

There is absolutely no doubt that the human species is killing itself as we speak. Sure, the Earth will survive, as it always has, just without us.

FMVYp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> And you dopes think that Bill Nye is a "brilliant
> scientist." lol
>

And you think Ted Cruz is a brilliant scientist. lol

trump trailerpark1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FMVYp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > And you dopes think that Bill Nye is a
> "brilliant
> > scientist." lol
> >
>
> And you think Ted Cruz is a brilliant scientist.
> lol


Uh, no...

But having multiple hard science degrees myself, I know how to distingush actual science from bullshit, entertainment, political misdirection, and dogma.

FMVYp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> And you dopes think that Bill Nye is a "brilliant
> scientist." lol


So essentially what you're saying is that YOU are smarter than Bill Nye and that you're explanation of climate is more feasible.


> Given that he strongly promoted the idea of being
> skeptical about everything within science, Sagan
> would be repulsed by the religion of climate
> change.


Sagan warned about Climate change long before Al Gore ever heard of it. You dummies insist it's Al Gores creation, when scientists have known about it since the 30's.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs can't understand simple science and facts.
> >
> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/w
>
> > hats-hottest-earths-ever-been
>
>
> Sorry, but it's you who don't understand.
>
> The period in Earths history that you're referring
> to,(the PETM period) was caused by huge amounts of
> methane from the seabed, creating a greenhouse
> effect of a different sort than what we are
> experiencing now. Today, methane is NOT the main
> cause of the warming. It's c02. More particularly,
> it's man-made c02, which is heavier than naturally
> occurring c02.
>
> There is absolutely no doubt that the human
> species is killing itself as we speak. Sure, the
> Earth will survive, as it always has, just without
> us.


Heavier? lol

No.

Stop trying to pretend that you have any sort of science background or understanding. You're a parrot.

47FwL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Libs can't understand simple science and
> facts.
> > >
> >
> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/w
>
> >
> > > hats-hottest-earths-ever-been
> >
> >
> > Sorry, but it's you who don't understand.
> >
> > The period in Earths history that you're
> referring
> > to,(the PETM period) was caused by huge amounts
> of
> > methane from the seabed, creating a greenhouse
> > effect of a different sort than what we are
> > experiencing now. Today, methane is NOT the
> main
> > cause of the warming. It's c02. More
> particularly,
> > it's man-made c02, which is heavier than
> naturally
> > occurring c02.
> >
> > There is absolutely no doubt that the human
> > species is killing itself as we speak. Sure,
> the
> > Earth will survive, as it always has, just
> without
> > us.
>
>
> Heavier? lol
>
> No.
>
> Stop trying to pretend that you have any sort of
> science background or understanding. You're a
> parrot.


Heavier, yes. Ever heard of isotopes? The guy who posted this about heavier co2 didn't stated it particularly well, but what he was talking about was that one of the reasons scientists can tell that the ongoing increase in co2 in the atmosphere is because of human activity is the isotopic ratio of the co2. The increases comes from coal and oil use (mainly), not volcanos and other natural activity. You might try learning something about science too, rather than being a parrot for right wing denier websites.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FMVYp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > And you dopes think that Bill Nye is a
> "brilliant
> > scientist." lol
>
>
> So essentially what you're saying is that YOU are
> smarter than Bill Nye and that you're explanation
> of climate is more feasible.

First, you have no clue what my explanation might be. So you fail there from the get.

Nye is an entertainer and routinely misrepresents science.

And I also understand the difference between "your" vs "you're."

>
>
> > Given that he strongly promoted the idea of
> being
> > skeptical about everything within science,
> Sagan
> > would be repulsed by the religion of climate
> > change.
>
>
> Sagan warned about Climate change long before Al
> Gore ever heard of it. You dummies insist it's Al
> Gores creation, when scientists have known about
> it since the 30's.


BS. That's a simplistic reading of an excerpt from an intro to one of his books. Which is about the extent of your understanding.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs can't understand simple science and facts.
> >
> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/w
>
> > hats-hottest-earths-ever-been
>
>
> Sorry, but it's you who don't understand.
>
> The period in Earths history that you're referring
> to,(the PETM period) was caused by huge amounts of
> methane from the seabed, creating a greenhouse
> effect of a different sort than what we are
> experiencing now. Today, methane is NOT the main
> cause of the warming. It's c02. More particularly,
> it's man-made c02, which is heavier than naturally
> occurring c02.
>
> There is absolutely no doubt that the human
> species is killing itself as we speak. Sure, the
> Earth will survive, as it always has, just without
> us.


Fuck you're a stupid fucker. Water vapor is the number one greenhouse gas. Ban water. Man isn't doing shit. The earth changes. Why do you deny scientific fact?

NuhdP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> BS. That's a simplistic reading of an excerpt
> from an intro to one of his books. Which is about
> the extent of your understanding.


Really?

From 1990
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ5u-l9Je0s

Lol!
Attachments:

MGHcF Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 47FwL Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Numbers Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Libs can't understand simple science and
> > facts.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/w
>
> >
> > >
> > > > hats-hottest-earths-ever-been
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, but it's you who don't understand.
> > >
> > > The period in Earths history that you're
> > referring
> > > to,(the PETM period) was caused by huge
> amounts
> > of
> > > methane from the seabed, creating a
> greenhouse
> > > effect of a different sort than what we are
> > > experiencing now. Today, methane is NOT the
> > main
> > > cause of the warming. It's c02. More
> > particularly,
> > > it's man-made c02, which is heavier than
> > naturally
> > > occurring c02.
> > >
> > > There is absolutely no doubt that the human
> > > species is killing itself as we speak. Sure,
> > the
> > > Earth will survive, as it always has, just
> > without
> > > us.
> >
> >
> > Heavier? lol
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Stop trying to pretend that you have any sort
> of
> > science background or understanding. You're a
> > parrot.
>
>
> Heavier, yes. Ever heard of isotopes? The guy who
> posted this about heavier co2 didn't stated it
> particularly well, but what he was talking about
> was that one of the reasons scientists can tell
> that the ongoing increase in co2 in the atmosphere
> is because of human activity is the isotopic ratio
> of the co2. The increases comes from coal and
> oil use (mainly), not volcanos and other natural
> activity. You might try learning something about
> science too, rather than being a parrot for right
> wing denier websites.


I know very well what isotopes are. As well as isomers, allotropes, and other types of chemical/physical variants. And you're misrepresenting how such are used and what that means. Few question that human activity has increased CO2 levels.

I've already embarrassed Numbers over this several times now but I guess it's hard for him to let go of the religious fables that he's been told.

YMLWJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know very well what isotopes are. As well as
> isomers, allotropes, and other types of
> chemical/physical variants. And you're
> misrepresenting how such are used and what that
> means. Few question that human activity has
> increased CO2 levels.
>
> I've already embarrassed Numbers over this several
> times now but I guess it's hard for him to let go
> of the religious fables that he's been told.

You guys seem to know what you're talking about and are on opposing sides. Can you both post some links to back up your assertions so some of us can follow along?

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NuhdP Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > BS. That's a simplistic reading of an excerpt
> > from an intro to one of his books. Which is
> about
> > the extent of your understanding.
>
>
> Really?
>
> From 1990
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ5u-l9Je0s


That is much later than what I was talking about.

The IPCC already was in place by 1990 so, no, he was not some thought leader on the matter.

Regarding the difference in isotopes in c02, here is a good explanation.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/4/3/849239/-

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs can't understand simple science and facts.
> >
> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/w
>
> > hats-hottest-earths-ever-been
>
>
> Sorry, but it's you who don't understand.
>
> The period in Earths history that you're referring
> to,(the PETM period) was caused by huge amounts of
> methane from the seabed, creating a greenhouse
> effect of a different sort than what we are
> experiencing now. Today, methane is NOT the main
> cause of the warming. It's c02. More particularly,
> it's man-made c02, which is heavier than naturally
> occurring c02.
>
> There is absolutely no doubt that the human
> species is killing itself as we speak. Sure, the
> Earth will survive, as it always has, just without
> us.


As long as it kills you, I'm OK with it. Scum like you deserve no life.

Not Carl Sagan, but another scientist warning of Global Warming in 1958.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-AXBbuDxRY&list=FL2xi9obf3SuLmSL2tzPavOQ&index=2

YMLWJ Wrote:

> > >
> > > Heavier? lol
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > Stop trying to pretend that you have any sort
> > of
> > > science background or understanding. You're
> a
> > > parrot.
> >
> >
> > Heavier, yes. Ever heard of isotopes? The guy
> who
> > posted this about heavier co2 didn't stated it
> > particularly well, but what he was talking
> about
> > was that one of the reasons scientists can tell
> > that the ongoing increase in co2 in the
> atmosphere
> > is because of human activity is the isotopic
> ratio
> > of the co2. The increases comes from coal and
> > oil use (mainly), not volcanos and other
> natural
> > activity. You might try learning something
> about
> > science too, rather than being a parrot for
> right
> > wing denier websites.
>
>
> I know very well what isotopes are. As well as
> isomers, allotropes, and other types of
> chemical/physical variants. And you're
> misrepresenting how such are used and what that
> means. Few question that human activity has
> increased CO2 levels.
>
>
Plenty of deniers question this. The same people think the universe is 6000 years old and that ID is science. You don't think so? Just look at republicans in congress. Or Mike Pence.

These threads are always good for a laugh at libtards.

blunders Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> YMLWJ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I know very well what isotopes are. As well as
> > isomers, allotropes, and other types of
> > chemical/physical variants. And you're
> > misrepresenting how such are used and what that
> > means. Few question that human activity has
> > increased CO2 levels.
> >
> > I've already embarrassed Numbers over this
> several
> > times now but I guess it's hard for him to let
> go
> > of the religious fables that he's been told.
>
> You guys seem to know what you're talking about
> and are on opposing sides. Can you both post some
> links to back up your assertions so some of us can
> follow along?


There's no need for links for this. Virtually nobody questions that humans have added CO2 to the atmosphere. But that's not how such isotopic measures are employed. The use of isotopic ratios have been proposed for use in more localized mapping of emmissions, given the nature and lifetimes of isotopes, not for some "proof" of climate change. The people here citing them as such don't understand how they are used or what this means.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Regarding the difference in isotopes in c02, here
> is a good explanation.
>
> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/4/3/849239/-


Dude, that you're referencing Daily Kos as some authority on this is laughable on its face.

lol

It was snowing in Wyoming the other day. Don't care either way.

I'll just leave it at this,
If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble breathing, do you take him to
a) a politician
b) a preist
c) a doctor
d) a psychic


If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor would you see?
a) a foot doctor
b) a brain surgeon
c) a respiratory specialist
d) a witch doctor


This is how silly climate deniers approach climate change. They look to politicians first, then witch doctors, then social services has to come and take the kid away to save his life.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll just leave it at this,
> If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble
> breathing, do you take him to
> a) a politician
> b) a preist
> c) a doctor
> d) a psychic
>
>
> If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor would
> you see?
> a) a foot doctor
> b) a brain surgeon
> c) a respiratory specialist
> d) a witch doctor
>
>
> This is how silly climate deniers approach climate
> change. They look to politicians first, then witch
> doctors, then social services has to come and take
> the kid away to save his life.


Awww, is this what happened to the fragile snowflake numbers? Poor baby.
Lol!

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not Carl Sagan, but another scientist warning of
> Global Warming in 1958.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-AXBbuDxRY&list=F
> L2xi9obf3SuLmSL2tzPavOQ&index=2


Which just demonstrates your own confusion.

Let me try one more time to get through the religious programming that you've been subjected to.

That humans are adding CO2 to the atmosphere and that CO2 *may* act as a greenhouse gas aren't really the questions.

That temperatures may be rising, though debateable in terms of significance, cause, timeframe, and a variety of other bases, isn't really the question.

You have an simplistic view of the matter and your posts reflect that.

The substantive questions (yes, there are significant questions which actually are the subject of substantial scientific disagreement, not some unified consensus as it tends to be represented), relate to timeframes, rates, extent of effects, etc., without the context of which the former above are relatively meaningless.

Furthermore, the entire scientific debate has become so polluted by politics and cult-like dogma to the extent that what all means in terms of any real effects/response has become completely distorted. As the ultimate evidence of that you can look to the Paris and Coppenhagen accords where the only real hard number is the $100 billion/year which is to be transfered to undeveloped nations who are the driving force behind the religious movement and for purposes not even tied directly in any way to "climate change."

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll just leave it at this,
> If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble
> breathing, do you take him to
> a) a politician
> b) a preist
> c) a doctor
> d) a psychic
>
>
> If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor would
> you see?
> a) a foot doctor
> b) a brain surgeon
> c) a respiratory specialist
> d) a witch doctor
>
>
> This is how silly climate deniers approach climate
> change. They look to politicians first, then witch
> doctors, then social services has to come and take
> the kid away to save his life.


^ This is how people who don't really understand science approach climate change.

lol

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll just leave it at this,
> If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble
> breathing, do you take him to
> a) a politician
> b) a preist
> c) a doctor
> d) a psychic
>
>
> If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor would
> you see?
> a) a foot doctor
> b) a brain surgeon
> c) a respiratory specialist
> d) a witch doctor
>
>
> This is how silly climate deniers approach climate
> change. They look to politicians first, then witch
> doctors, then social services has to come and take
> the kid away to save his life.


The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

Libtards...Lolz!

Chicken little Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'll just leave it at this,
> > If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble
> > breathing, do you take him to
> > a) a politician
> > b) a preist
> > c) a doctor
> > d) a psychic
> >
> >
> > If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor
> would
> > you see?
> > a) a foot doctor
> > b) a brain surgeon
> > c) a respiratory specialist
> > d) a witch doctor
> >
> >
> > This is how silly climate deniers approach
> climate
> > change. They look to politicians first, then
> witch
> > doctors, then social services has to come and
> take
> > the kid away to save his life.
>
>
> The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
>
> Libtards...Lolz!

If only libtards could've taxed dinosaurs they'd still be alive.

Libturdz!

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll just leave it at this,
> If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble
> breathing, do you take him to
> a) a politician
> b) a preist
> c) a doctor
> d) a psychic
>
>
> If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor would
> you see?
> a) a foot doctor
> b) a brain surgeon
> c) a respiratory specialist
> d) a witch doctor
>
>
> This is how silly climate deniers approach climate
> change. They look to politicians first, then witch
> doctors, then social services has to come and take
> the kid away to save his life.


Damn, there's 5 seconds of my life I'll never get back. One of the more stupid posts on this forum, and that's saying something. Try harder Numbers. You're getting more retarded with every post old man.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not Carl Sagan, but another scientist warning of
> Global Warming in 1958.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-AXBbuDxRY&list=F
> L2xi9obf3SuLmSL2tzPavOQ&index=2


Yeah, and in the 1970's we were told we were entering an ice age. You are easily fooled.

While the rightards continue to deny climate change, the numbers keep telling a different tales. As I read through this thread, there's a lot of LOL, "sky is falling", idiot responses but not much in the way of facts. Irrespective, the OVERWHELMING majority of scientists say climate change is real and is man made.

I'm scratching my head trying to think the last time the rightards were correct about anything policy related.

rainbows2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> While the rightards continue to deny climate
> change, the numbers keep telling a different
> tales. As I read through this thread, there's a
> lot of LOL, "sky is falling", idiot responses but
> not much in the way of facts. Irrespective, the
> OVERWHELMING majority of scientists say climate
> change is real and is man made.
>
> I'm scratching my head trying to think the last
> time the rightards were correct about anything
> policy related.

Reading comprehension is hard for the libtards.

Modern human civilization, with its permanent agriculture and settlements, has developed over just the past 10,000 years or so. The period has generally been one of low temperatures and relative global (if not regional) climate stability.

It's a matter of trust. The scientific community has foolishly allowed the politicians to get so involved in the climate issue, that many do not trust your intentions. If co2 is such a problem, why was China allowed to continue on and sell their pollution levels to other countries because they were a "developing nation". Are you kidding? Nobody believes that. And Al Gore torpedoed the climate change boat while raking in over $10,000,00 for himself. And what happened to our imminent demise from the deteriorating ozone that you inundated us with throughout the 80s? Did you fix that when we weren't looking? Or did the climate change problem due the co2 increase seal it up? Yes, I'm afraid that you used up our unquestioned trust in what you say, and so you now need to offer a reasonable explanation, and some solutions equil for all minus political shenanigans that give money to some countries at the expense of others. And, oh yes, you may want to find a better spokesmen than Al Gore. At $10 million dollars, he is rather expensive considering he substantial credibility issues he has. Even Tipper didn't believe him and left his ass.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's because they choose political party over
> science. They actually believe dopes like Ted Cruz
> and James Inhofe instead of Neil Degrasse Tyson,
> Carl Sagan, Bill Nye and all the other brilliant
> scientists.


Are you saying Tyson brought Carl back from the dead and made Bill a scientist?

Damn...........he is good.


We should all listen to his each and every word as if it were the word of god.

Except you don't like God do you numbers?

Fuck off, lemming. The cliff is that way. ----------------->

Lol@thelibtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> rainbows2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > While the rightards continue to deny climate
> > change, the numbers keep telling a different
> > tales. As I read through this thread, there's
> a
> > lot of LOL, "sky is falling", idiot responses
> but
> > not much in the way of facts. Irrespective, the
> > OVERWHELMING majority of scientists say climate
> > change is real and is man made.
> >
> > I'm scratching my head trying to think the last
> > time the rightards were correct about anything
> > policy related.
>
> Reading comprehension is hard for the libtards.
>
> Modern human civilization, with its permanent
> agriculture and settlements, has developed over
> just the past 10,000 years or so. The period has
> generally been one of low temperatures and
> relative global (if not regional) climate
> stability.

Did you look at the original chart from NASA nitwit? Overy 10k years is a very different picture then the trend over the last 50 when fossil fuels and industry has taken off. Hell why don't we look over the last 4B years when the earth was formed.

You want to know why you guys are considered dumbasses of the human race? Look no further than this thread.

Does anyone really care about global warming anymore?
Im sure there are more current issues on others minds that global warning

rainbows3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lol@thelibtards Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > rainbows2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > While the rightards continue to deny climate
> > > change, the numbers keep telling a different
> > > tales. As I read through this thread,
> there's
> > a
> > > lot of LOL, "sky is falling", idiot responses
> > but
> > > not much in the way of facts. Irrespective,
> the
> > > OVERWHELMING majority of scientists say
> climate
> > > change is real and is man made.
> > >
> > > I'm scratching my head trying to think the
> last
> > > time the rightards were correct about
> anything
> > > policy related.
> >
> > Reading comprehension is hard for the libtards.
> >
> > Modern human civilization, with its permanent
> > agriculture and settlements, has developed over
> > just the past 10,000 years or so. The period
> has
> > generally been one of low temperatures and
> > relative global (if not regional) climate
> > stability.
>
> Did you look at the original chart from NASA
> nitwit? Overy 10k years is a very different
> picture then the trend over the last 50 when
> fossil fuels and industry has taken off. Hell why
> don't we look over the last 4B years when the
> earth was formed.
>
> You want to know why you guys are considered
> dumbasses of the human race? Look no further than
> this thread.


Earth was formed in 48 years? Wow! Is that what Al Gore is telling you to think now?
Fucking idiot.

That's a 'B' like 4Billion douchebag. LOL

Stop with the weed and meth rightard. Perhaps you'll save enough to move from the Trailer Park and get your GED

Everybody believes in climate change

... Just not man made global warming .

groovim Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone really care about global warming
> anymore?
> Im sure there are more current issues on others
> minds that global warning


Only dumbass liberal politicians spew those lies in order to push their agenda to create a CO2 tax so they can steal more money from citizens.

Hussein is a muslim name. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chicken little Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Numbers Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I'll just leave it at this,
> > > If your kid gets sick, he's having trouble
> > > breathing, do you take him to
> > > a) a politician
> > > b) a preist
> > > c) a doctor
> > > d) a psychic
> > >
> > >
> > > If you chose a doctor, which type of doctor
> > would
> > > you see?
> > > a) a foot doctor
> > > b) a brain surgeon
> > > c) a respiratory specialist
> > > d) a witch doctor
> > >
> > >
> > > This is how silly climate deniers approach
> > climate
> > > change. They look to politicians first, then
> > witch
> > > doctors, then social services has to come and
> > take
> > > the kid away to save his life.
> >
> >
> > The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
> >
> > Libtards...Lolz!
>
> If only libtards could've taxed dinosaurs they'd
> still be alive.
>
> Libturdz!

Haha! U think they got word the liberals were coming

PC retards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everybody believes in climate change
>
> ... Just not man made global warming .

S/He probably means Everybody that matters (e.g. not Rightards that constantly high and drunk on Budweiser)

libs are really fucking dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Earth was formed in 48 years? Wow! Is that what Al
> Gore is telling you to think now?
> Fucking idiot.

Errr. That reads 4B (as 4Billion). Dropping out of highschool was probably not your best move.

libs are really fucking dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Earth was formed in 48 years? Wow! Is that what Al
> Gore is telling you to think now?
> Fucking idiot.

What? That's 4B as in 4 Billion. I can see why you support Trump you fucking retard.

libs are really fucking dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Earth was formed in 48 years? Wow! Is that what Al
> Gore is telling you to think now?
> Fucking idiot.

That's a 'B' idiot.

> Are you saying Tyson brought Carl back from the
> dead and made Bill a scientist?
>
> Damn...........he is good.


Vexxed, I knew you were an idiot, but you're better as your alias.


> We should all listen to his each and every word as
> if it were the word of god.


No Vexxed, you go ahead and listen to your party as the word of God. The God of your income.


> Except you don't like God do you numbers?


There is no God, so how could I like or dislike something that never existed?


> Fuck off, lemming. The cliff is that way.
> ----------------->

Where? No cliffs around here. But then you wouldn't know, being cooped up inside on a steady drinking binge.

slim shady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> libs are really fucking dumb Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> >
> > Earth was formed in 48 years? Wow! Is that what
> Al
> > Gore is telling you to think now?
> > Fucking idiot.
>
> That's a 'B' idiot.


Illiterate twit.

If u told a libturd the reason for global warming was smoke fron weed, they wouldnt care.

tranny cheeks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If u told a libturd the reason for global warming
> was smoke fron weed, they wouldnt care.

Plants use CO2 to grow. I use CO2 tanks and pump extra into my grow rooms.

You've got to be a special kind of stupid to think CO2 from humans is causing the earth to heat up.