HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Security monitor ()
Date: July 03, 2016 02:26PM

Sharon K. Moreno has violated at least four of the Adjudicative Guidelines for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Information

http://www.state.gov/m/ds/clearances/60321.htm

Holding a government security clearance is a privilege, not a right. The adjudicative guidelines are established for all U.S. government civilian and military personnel, consultants, contractors, employees of contractors, licensees, certificate holders or grantees and their employees and other individuals who require access to classified information. They apply to persons being considered for initial or continued eligibility for access to classified information, to include sensitive compartmented information and special access programs, and are to be used by government departments and agencies in all final clearance determinations.

Guideline E:
Personal Conduct
16. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying also include:
(1) untrustworthy or unreliable behavior to include breach of client confidentiality, release of proprietary information, unauthorized release of sensitive corporate or other government protected information;

** Sharon Moreno breached the confidentiality of protected legal evidence and information obtained during forensic discovery of computer equipment.

(3) a pattern of dishonesty or rule violations;

** Sharon Moreno has made sworn allegations to police, documented on police reports, about phone calls from Michael Basl. Sharon later changed her story and claimed the calls were from TJ Sadler.

** Sharon violated the rules of Fairfax Underground and was banned by the site administrator. She also condones her son's multiple repeated violation of his own ban.

Guideline I:
Psychological Conditions

27. The Concern. Certain emotional, mental, and personality conditions can impair judgment, reliability, or trustworthiness. A formal diagnosis of a disorder is not required for there to be a concern under this guideline. A duly qualified mental health professional (e.g., clinical psychologist or psychiatrist) employed by, or acceptable to and approved by the U.S. Government, should be consulted when evaluating potentially disqualifying and mitigating information under this guideline. No negative inference concerning the standards in this Guideline may be raised solely on the basis of seeking mental health counseling.

28. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:

(a) behavior that casts doubt on an individual's judgment, reliability, or trustworthiness that is not covered under any other guideline, including but not limited to emotionally unstable, irresponsible, dysfunctional, violent, paranoid, or bizarre behavior;

** Sharon Moreno traveled from her home in Loudoun into another county to stalk a young woman. Arriving uninvited and unannounced, Sharon Moreno sat on the curb for over an hour. When asked to leave, she refused and insisted that the person she was stalking was in fact harassing her.

Guideline J:
Criminal Conduct

30. The Concern. Criminal activity creates doubt about a person's judgment, reliability and trustworthiness. By its very nature, it calls into question a person's ability or willingness to comply with laws, rules and regulations.

31. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:
(c) allegation or admission of criminal conduct, regardless of whether the person was formally charged, formally prosecuted or convicted;

** Sharon Moreno instructed the Leiser Law firm to send a fraudulent bill in an attempt to collect money from someone who was under no obligation to pay.

Guideline M:
Use of Information Technology Systems

39. The Concern. Noncompliance with rules, procedures, guidelines or regulations pertaining to information technology systems may raise security concerns about an individual's reliability and trustworthiness, calling into question the willingness or ability to properly protect sensitive systems, networks, and information. Information Technology Systems include all related computer hardware, software, firmware, and data used for the communication, transmission, processing, manipulation, storage, or protection of information.
40. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:
(a) illegal or unauthorized entry into any information technology system or component thereof;

** Sharon Moreno was banned from Fairfax Underground but continued to access the site from her cell phone. Sharon also condones her son's multiple repeated violation of his own ban.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: cleared ()
Date: July 03, 2016 03:37PM

Sharon would have some problems explaining a couple of those things.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Reference ()
Date: November 29, 2016 07:41AM

There is plenty of evidence for the fraudulent billing conspiracy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: more evidence ()
Date: November 29, 2016 03:13PM

Sharon made libelous false claims about eesh in the following threads. The first thread also contains an email from William in which he admits continuing to visit Fairfax Underground.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/2272277.html
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/2279077.html

It is important to note that Sharon Moreno did not keep her communications with the police and courts confidential, but posted them on the Internet, for her own financial and personal gain. Sharon Moreno should not be entrusted with a security clearance.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: H. Clinton ()
Date: November 29, 2016 03:30PM

Are those (c) -- confidential or (c) -- paragraph markings. I can't tell?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Who cares eesh ()
Date: November 30, 2016 03:13AM

Me again. Stop being such a fake social justice warrior. You are worse than those libs protesting. You do nothing all day. You are a parasite. Fuck off

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: UTEyu ()
Date: December 08, 2016 11:32PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Sharon Moreno is dishonest ()
Date: January 11, 2017 07:30PM

see above.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Qwertyuiop ()
Date: January 11, 2017 07:46PM

U don't know what you're talking about.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Olivier ()
Date: January 11, 2017 07:57PM

I'm starting to think Sharon was responsible for the kiddie porn in order to frame eesh

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: FfxU Soap Opera ()
Date: January 11, 2017 08:09PM

...is this accusation true?

Was it Sharon posting? Or William? Either way neither were supposed to be posting!!

What will happen next????

Find out on the next episode of "As the FfxU Turns!"


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Miz is your guy ()
Date: January 12, 2017 03:00PM

Bump

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Y4d6G ()
Date: March 24, 2017 02:38PM

Sharon has no business in any position of trust.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Sharin Share alike ()
Date: March 24, 2017 02:42PM

What a fucking joke.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Date: March 24, 2017 04:45PM

more evidence Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon made libelous false claims about eesh in
> the following threads. The first thread also
> contains an email from William in which he admits
> continuing to visit Fairfax Underground.
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/22
> 72277.html
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/22
> 79077.html
>
> It is important to note that Sharon Moreno did not
> keep her communications with the police and courts
> confidential, but posted them on the Internet, for
> her own financial and personal gain. Sharon
> Moreno should not be entrusted with a security
> clearance.
Back to the top with you

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Thread bumper ()
Date: March 27, 2017 07:47PM

MORONO RAPES CHILDREN

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Cu93h ()
Date: April 13, 2017 08:54PM

Cu93h

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: really...Sharon? ()
Date: April 14, 2017 09:36AM

Hear anything from work?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: hold Sharon in contempt ()
Date: June 09, 2017 03:06PM

more evidence Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon made libelous false claims about eesh in
> the following threads. The first thread also
> contains an email from William in which he admits
> continuing to visit Fairfax Underground.
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/22
> 72277.html
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/22
> 79077.html
>
> It is important to note that Sharon Moreno did not
> keep her communications with the police and courts
> confidential, but posted them on the Internet, for
> her own financial and personal gain. Sharon
> Moreno should not be entrusted with a security
> clearance.

Sharon Moreno "leaked" information which was under a non-disclosure agreement and could be held in contempt of court. She even implicated herself to the police, while attempting to frame eesh for non-existent child porn.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: this is part of the plan... ()
Date: June 10, 2017 04:29PM

hold Sharon in contempt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sharon Moreno "leaked" information which was under
> a non-disclosure agreement and could be held in
> contempt of court. She even implicated herself to
> the police, while attempting to frame eesh for
> non-existent child porn.


lizzie is going to have Sharon arrested, and miz as well. While tootguy is out trying to raise bail, eesh will break in to their house, flood the basement, plant kiddie porn on miz's comupter, and then call the cops.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: I don't eat at fucking McDonalds ()
Date: June 10, 2017 08:29PM

hold Sharon in contempt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> more evidence Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Sharon made libelous false claims about eesh in
> > the following threads. The first thread also
> > contains an email from William in which he
> admits
> > continuing to visit Fairfax Underground.
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/22
>
> > 72277.html
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/22
>
> > 79077.html
> >
> > It is important to note that Sharon Moreno did
> not
> > keep her communications with the police and
> courts
> > confidential, but posted them on the Internet,
> for
> > her own financial and personal gain. Sharon
> > Moreno should not be entrusted with a security
> > clearance.
>
> Sharon Moreno "leaked" information which was under
> a non-disclosure agreement and could be held in
> contempt of court. She even implicated herself to
> the police, while attempting to frame eesh for
> non-existent child porn.

Sharon did know the names of some child porn sites.

She could have gotten those from Miz.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: The sister ()
Date: June 10, 2017 08:38PM

-
Attachments:
IMG_5615.JPG
IMG_5613.JPG

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: keep in mind ()
Date: June 10, 2017 08:47PM

During the 80s, Miz, his brother and sister were photographed for kiddy porn.
Sharon is just keeping track to see if those photos ever show up at on those sites.


She says even though they are 30 years old, she is still due a royalty fee for taking those photos from those who are profiting from them.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Willing to contact her HR dept ()
Date: June 12, 2017 04:52PM

Who does she work for now General Dynamics? I would be glad to call her HR department.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Live from Stirling Virginia ()
Date: June 12, 2017 05:04PM

Willing to contact her HR dept Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who does she work for now General Dynamics? I
> would be glad to call her HR department.


Don't forget to include Photos from Sharon's webcam.

Personally, I don't understand why people pay to watch the antics of these deviates.
Attachments:
black_guy_with_big_dick_fuck_and_suck_a_fat_white_woman-4_tmb.jpg
sh.jpg
conga line.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Caring is sharon ()
Date: June 17, 2017 02:55PM

whot?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: This doctor makes housecalls. ()
Date: July 12, 2017 08:43PM

Caring is sharon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> whot?

Look who finally got on the webcam.

His 'combover' isn't fooling anyone.
Attachments:
dr bob.jpg
dr. bob.gif

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: eew that smell ()
Date: July 13, 2017 11:25AM

In reference to the pic above, if the smell is so bad the dude has to hold his nose, perhaps he should keep his sphincter closed shut and not prod up in his bowels with foreign objects. That is a very odd-looking package too by the way.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: The whole place spells like shit ()
Date: July 13, 2017 11:53AM

eew that smell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In reference to the pic above, if the smell is so
> bad the dude has to hold his nose, perhaps he
> should keep his sphincter closed shut and not prod
> up in his bowels with foreign objects. That is a
> very odd-looking package too by the way.

That is the smelliest house on all of Riverview Court.
They use more Febreeze than personal lubricant.
And it still smells like sauerkraut and Ass.
Attachments:
ssssss.jpg
Granny+The+Tranny+Scene+1-.jpg
anal_dreamfuck_with_granny-4_tmb.jpg
feb.jpeg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: really...Sharon? ()
Date: July 14, 2017 11:08AM

what's the news?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Butt Stuff Stephen ()
Date: July 14, 2017 01:35PM

Quit being a prude.

There is more butt action in that household than the rest of Sterling combined.

It is a good thing.

It just isn't going to smell like a rose garden
Attachments:
anybody fuck their mom.png
miz.gif
tumblr_njix7fudCK1u9e1poo1_500.gif
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg
aaaaaaff.gif

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: WFLLA ()
Date: September 18, 2017 06:11PM

What happened to Sharon? Not working any more or did she go back to the CIA?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Moreno Madness. ()
Date: May 31, 2018 09:38PM

Quote
Code of Virginia
ยง 18.2-178. Obtaining money or signature, etc., by false pretense.
A. If any person obtain, by any false pretense or token, from any person, with intent to defraud, money, a gift certificate or other property that may be the subject of larceny, he shall be deemed guilty of larceny thereof; or if he obtain, by any false pretense or token, with such intent, the signature of any person to a writing, the false making whereof would be forgery, he shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony.

Attachments:
2015-09-10_21-28-01-1.jpg
phpCmlOdL.jpg
phpWFKgGb.jpg
phpsmyyh2.jpg
phpAnruLL.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: question? ()
Date: July 06, 2018 04:47PM

How does slimy Sharon still have a security clearance?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Fucking Mexican ()
Date: July 06, 2018 05:17PM

Beaners

https://youtu.be/51veCRLN9hc
Attachments:
IMG_1039.JPG
IMG_1244.JPG

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: security risk ()
Date: July 06, 2018 06:41PM

The bitch should not have a clearance. Period.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Sharon Moreno security clearance concerns
Posted by: Sharon is a stalker ()
Date: August 03, 2018 05:21PM

Sharon Moreno was caught stalking dead-to-rights by security cameras. She refused to leave when asked, and skulked around for over an hour, only to leave and return again.
Attachments:
2015-07-26_18-10-52-1.jpg
2015-07-30_05-56-21-1.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **  ********  **     **        ** 
    **     **     **     **      **   **         ** 
    **     **     **     **       ** **          ** 
    **     **     **     **        ***           ** 
    **     **     **     **       ** **    **    ** 
    **     **     **     **      **   **   **    ** 
    **      *******      **     **     **   ******  
This forum powered by Phorum.