Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
How the Left Lies
()
Date: May 26, 2016 01:12AM
Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
BY: Stephen Gutowski
May 25, 2016 12:10 pm
The makers of a new Katie Couric documentary on gun violence deceptively edited an interview between Couric and a group of gun rights activists in an apparent attempt to embarrass the activists, an audio recording of the full interview shows.
At the 21:48 mark of Under the Gun a scene of Katie Couric interviewing members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun rights organization, is shown.
Couric can be heard in the interview asking activists from the group, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?”
The documentary then shows the activists sitting silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene. The moment can be watched here:
https://youtu.be/V6_9q8K2VK8
However, raw audio of the interview between Katie Couric and the activists provided to the Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s question is met immediately with answers from the activists. A back and forth between a number of the league’s members and Couric over the issue of background checks proceeds for more than four minutes after the original question is asked.
https://soundcloud.com/washington-free-beacon/raw-audio-of-katie-couric-interview-with-vcdl-members
Under the Gun bills itself as a documentary that “examines the events and people who have kept the gun debate fierce and the progress slow, even as gun deaths and mass shootings continue to increase.”
It follows a number of gun violence victims and those who have lost family members to gun violence as they advocate for stricter gun control laws. The 1 hour and 45 minute film was executive produced and narrated by Katie Couric.
Under the Gun has been labeled “dishonest politicking in the guise of media coverage,” “loose with the facts,” and “a full-length assault on guns and the Second Amendment” by those in the gun community since its debut on May 15.
The Virginia Citizens Defense League labeled the deceptively edited segment featured in the film “unbelievable and extremely unprofessional.” Philip Van Cleave, the organization’s president, said the editing was done deliberately to make it appear that league members didn’t have a response to Couric’s question.
“Katie Couric asked a key question during an interview of some members of our organization,” he said. “She then intentionally removed their answers and spliced in nine seconds of some prior video of our members sitting quietly and not responding. Viewers are left with the misunderstanding that the members had no answer to her question.”
Requests for comment from Couric and the film’s director, Stephanie Soechtig, have not been returned, though they did speak to The Washington Post.
BY: Stephen Gutowski
May 25, 2016 12:10 pm
The makers of a new Katie Couric documentary on gun violence deceptively edited an interview between Couric and a group of gun rights activists in an apparent attempt to embarrass the activists, an audio recording of the full interview shows.
At the 21:48 mark of Under the Gun a scene of Katie Couric interviewing members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun rights organization, is shown.
Couric can be heard in the interview asking activists from the group, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?”
The documentary then shows the activists sitting silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene. The moment can be watched here:
https://youtu.be/V6_9q8K2VK8
However, raw audio of the interview between Katie Couric and the activists provided to the Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s question is met immediately with answers from the activists. A back and forth between a number of the league’s members and Couric over the issue of background checks proceeds for more than four minutes after the original question is asked.
https://soundcloud.com/washington-free-beacon/raw-audio-of-katie-couric-interview-with-vcdl-members
Under the Gun bills itself as a documentary that “examines the events and people who have kept the gun debate fierce and the progress slow, even as gun deaths and mass shootings continue to increase.”
It follows a number of gun violence victims and those who have lost family members to gun violence as they advocate for stricter gun control laws. The 1 hour and 45 minute film was executive produced and narrated by Katie Couric.
Under the Gun has been labeled “dishonest politicking in the guise of media coverage,” “loose with the facts,” and “a full-length assault on guns and the Second Amendment” by those in the gun community since its debut on May 15.
The Virginia Citizens Defense League labeled the deceptively edited segment featured in the film “unbelievable and extremely unprofessional.” Philip Van Cleave, the organization’s president, said the editing was done deliberately to make it appear that league members didn’t have a response to Couric’s question.
“Katie Couric asked a key question during an interview of some members of our organization,” he said. “She then intentionally removed their answers and spliced in nine seconds of some prior video of our members sitting quietly and not responding. Viewers are left with the misunderstanding that the members had no answer to her question.”
Requests for comment from Couric and the film’s director, Stephanie Soechtig, have not been returned, though they did speak to The Washington Post.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
Katy Isa Cword
()
Date: May 27, 2016 09:04AM
This weekend YouTube is going to be awash with videos of Katy C. doing something for nine seconds that is at odds with the voice-over question that some wag has added in.
(For an example of source material, navigate here: h-ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvrFkrC2JIg)
Scene ... beginning at 9 seconds in ... (see the above video)
Voice-over Guy asks: So Katy, in your threesome with Mister Tee, who got to abuse your stink ... and who had to settle for pink?
... nine seconds of silence so that the public can think about the response ...
and then fade to black.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The C's bleating about taking guns is too ham-handed for someone aspiring to lie like Goebbels. But she tried to do propaganda in that classic style. And it failed. Miserably.
(For an example of source material, navigate here: h-ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvrFkrC2JIg)
Scene ... beginning at 9 seconds in ... (see the above video)
Voice-over Guy asks: So Katy, in your threesome with Mister Tee, who got to abuse your stink ... and who had to settle for pink?
... nine seconds of silence so that the public can think about the response ...
and then fade to black.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The C's bleating about taking guns is too ham-handed for someone aspiring to lie like Goebbels. But she tried to do propaganda in that classic style. And it failed. Miserably.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
Dishonest Libtards
()
Date: May 27, 2016 09:07AM
Dishonesty is the cornerstone of leftist ideology.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
James O'Quief
()
Date: May 27, 2016 09:14AM
Deceptively edited? Never heard of that.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
hhNjb
()
Date: May 27, 2016 09:47AM
How the Left Lies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Couric can be heard in the interview asking
> activists from the group, “If there are no
> background checks for gun purchasers, how do you
> prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a
> gun?”
>
> The documentary then shows the activists sitting
> silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to
> provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene.
> The moment can be watched here:
>
> However, raw audio of the interview between Katie
> Couric and the activists provided to the
> Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was
> deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s
> question is met immediately with answers from the
> activists. A back and forth between a number of
> the league’s members and Couric over the issue
> of background checks proceeds for more than four
> minutes after the original question is asked.
I sincerely doubt that the guntard's responses were any more meaningful or persuasive than was the silence.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Couric can be heard in the interview asking
> activists from the group, “If there are no
> background checks for gun purchasers, how do you
> prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a
> gun?”
>
> The documentary then shows the activists sitting
> silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to
> provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene.
> The moment can be watched here:
>
> However, raw audio of the interview between Katie
> Couric and the activists provided to the
> Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was
> deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s
> question is met immediately with answers from the
> activists. A back and forth between a number of
> the league’s members and Couric over the issue
> of background checks proceeds for more than four
> minutes after the original question is asked.
I sincerely doubt that the guntard's responses were any more meaningful or persuasive than was the silence.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: May 27, 2016 09:48AM
Katy Isa Cword Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The C's bleating about taking guns is too
> ham-handed for someone aspiring to lie like
> Goebbels. But she tried to do propaganda in that
> classic style. And it failed. Miserably.
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> The C's bleating about taking guns is too
> ham-handed for someone aspiring to lie like
> Goebbels. But she tried to do propaganda in that
> classic style. And it failed. Miserably.
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
frdts
()
Date: May 27, 2016 10:07AM
hhNjb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How the Left Lies Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Couric can be heard in the interview asking
> > activists from the group, “If there are no
> > background checks for gun purchasers, how do
> you
> > prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a
> > gun?”
> >
> > The documentary then shows the activists
> sittingv
> > silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to
> > provide an answer. It then cuts to the next
> scene.
> > The moment can be watched here:
> >
> > However, raw audio of the interview between
> Katie
> > Couric and the activists provided to the
> > Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was
> > deceptively edited. Instead of silence,
> Couric’s
> > question is met immediately with answers from
> the
> > activists. A back and forth between a number of
> > the league’s members and Couric over the
> issue
> > of background checks proceeds for more than
> four
> > minutes after the original question is asked.
>
> I sincerely doubt that the guntard's responses
> were any more meaningful or persuasive than was
> the silence.
^ What libtards say when they can't defend libtards being busted being libtards.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How the Left Lies Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Couric can be heard in the interview asking
> > activists from the group, “If there are no
> > background checks for gun purchasers, how do
> you
> > prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a
> > gun?”
> >
> > The documentary then shows the activists
> sittingv
> > silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to
> > provide an answer. It then cuts to the next
> scene.
> > The moment can be watched here:
> >
> > However, raw audio of the interview between
> Katie
> > Couric and the activists provided to the
> > Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was
> > deceptively edited. Instead of silence,
> Couric’s
> > question is met immediately with answers from
> the
> > activists. A back and forth between a number of
> > the league’s members and Couric over the
> issue
> > of background checks proceeds for more than
> four
> > minutes after the original question is asked.
>
> I sincerely doubt that the guntard's responses
> were any more meaningful or persuasive than was
> the silence.
^ What libtards say when they can't defend libtards being busted being libtards.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: May 27, 2016 10:12AM
frdts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> libtards being busted being libtards.
Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being conserva-tards.
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> libtards being busted being libtards.
Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being conserva-tards.
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
FrankR.
()
Date: May 27, 2016 10:20AM
Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> frdts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> > libtards being busted being libtards.
>
> Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being
> conserva-tards.
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Certified Libtarded!
-------------------------------------------------------
> frdts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> > libtards being busted being libtards.
>
> Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being
> conserva-tards.
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Certified Libtarded!
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
vufmo
()
Date: May 27, 2016 10:40AM
FrankR. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conserva-tards! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > frdts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> > > libtards being busted being libtards.
> >
> > Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being
> > conserva-tards.
> >
> > Conserva-tards!
> >
> > LoLz!
>
>
> Certified Libtarded!
It's all he's got.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conserva-tards! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > frdts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> > > libtards being busted being libtards.
> >
> > Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being
> > conserva-tards.
> >
> > Conserva-tards!
> >
> > LoLz!
>
>
> Certified Libtarded!
It's all he's got.
Re: Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists
Posted by:
Ralph Pootawn
()
Date: May 27, 2016 10:41AM
Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> frdts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> > libtards being busted being libtards.
>
> Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being
> conserva-tards.
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Stupid
-------------------------------------------------------
> frdts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^ What libtards say when they can't defend
> > libtards being busted being libtards.
>
> Or, you know, when conserva-tards are being
> conserva-tards.
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Stupid