Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
Defender of Freedom and Liberty
()
Date: June 15, 2015 05:46PM
I can sense the Founders spinning in their graves.
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
DuYxW
()
Date: June 15, 2015 05:55PM
that worries me but not as much as a democrat who hires mexico to invade to keep counterfeiting ...
$9 trillion is counterfeiting - 9x that of bush or reagan
though your talking about the head of military and official country representative of foreign affairs - the president is the exterior
obama oversteps that , ie appointing people in agencies. also obama and congress have refused to enforce any laws concerning illegitimacy meaning
anyone can steal in a foreign country, walk in here, and apply for aid - taking both countries as suckers. why? becasue DC is corrupt is why.
$9 trillion is counterfeiting - 9x that of bush or reagan
though your talking about the head of military and official country representative of foreign affairs - the president is the exterior
obama oversteps that , ie appointing people in agencies. also obama and congress have refused to enforce any laws concerning illegitimacy meaning
anyone can steal in a foreign country, walk in here, and apply for aid - taking both countries as suckers. why? becasue DC is corrupt is why.
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
uNj4P
()
Date: June 15, 2015 05:57PM
i feel CONFIDENT anyone who is good looking or (affable), has money, and has the will to run for office and be blamed for the world falling apart: can do so
many wont - why not complaint at the people who should do a thing and wont?
many wont - why not complaint at the people who should do a thing and wont?
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
so are you saying
()
Date: June 15, 2015 05:58PM
we should vote for a liar like Hillary?
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
xwilly
()
Date: June 15, 2015 06:24PM
isn't he the one in FL who exposed al gone as not the real inventor of the internet ?
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
FtuCC
()
Date: June 15, 2015 06:25PM
yes so your saying there should be 40 years of Clintons to even the score ?
you are what you eat - you seem to be eating everything they shovel at you
you are what you eat - you seem to be eating everything they shovel at you
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
NippleChuck
()
Date: June 15, 2015 06:29PM
No Clintons
No Bushes
Rand Paul for a change.
Nip
No Bushes
Rand Paul for a change.
Nip
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
Illuminati election
()
Date: June 16, 2015 01:21AM
NippleChuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No Clintons
>
> No Bushes
>
> Rand Paul for a change.
>
> Nip
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> No Clintons
>
> No Bushes
>
> Rand Paul for a change.
>
> Nip
+1
Re: In seven of the past 10 national election cycles (that's 40 years!), a Bush has been an incumbent president ('92, '04), an incumbent vice-president ('84, '88), or a presidential candidate ('80, '00, '16). That's 40 years!
Posted by:
Defender of Freedom and Liberty
()
Date: June 16, 2015 07:54AM
DuYxW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> that worries me but not as much as a democrat who
> hires mexico to invade to keep counterfeiting ...
Huh?
> $9 trillion is counterfeiting - 9x that of bush or
> reagan
"Every president inherits a debt from the previous one, making it virtually certain that the pile of debt is going to grow. So raw numbers don’t tell you much; what’s important is the percentage change in the time period being measured. Under Obama, the debt has increased 70 percent after nearly six years. But let’s look at what happened under Republican hero Ronald Reagan, using the fiscal year numbers in the White House’s historical budget tables.
Size of national debt when Reagan took office: $1 trillion
Size after six years: $2.3 trillion (130 percent increase)
Size at the end of his presidency: $2.9 trillion (190 percent increase)
In other words, when the numbers are placed in context, the national debt grew faster under Reagan than it has under Obama."
> though your talking about the head of military and
> official country representative of foreign affairs
> - the president is the exterior
>
> obama oversteps that , ie appointing people in
> agencies. also obama and congress have refused to
> enforce any laws concerning illegitimacy meaning
>
> anyone can steal in a foreign country, walk in
> here, and apply for aid - taking both countries as
> suckers. why? becasue DC is corrupt is why.
Whut?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/16/2015 07:55AM by Defender of Freedom and Liberty.
-------------------------------------------------------
> that worries me but not as much as a democrat who
> hires mexico to invade to keep counterfeiting ...
Huh?
> $9 trillion is counterfeiting - 9x that of bush or
> reagan
"Every president inherits a debt from the previous one, making it virtually certain that the pile of debt is going to grow. So raw numbers don’t tell you much; what’s important is the percentage change in the time period being measured. Under Obama, the debt has increased 70 percent after nearly six years. But let’s look at what happened under Republican hero Ronald Reagan, using the fiscal year numbers in the White House’s historical budget tables.
Size of national debt when Reagan took office: $1 trillion
Size after six years: $2.3 trillion (130 percent increase)
Size at the end of his presidency: $2.9 trillion (190 percent increase)
In other words, when the numbers are placed in context, the national debt grew faster under Reagan than it has under Obama."
> though your talking about the head of military and
> official country representative of foreign affairs
> - the president is the exterior
>
> obama oversteps that , ie appointing people in
> agencies. also obama and congress have refused to
> enforce any laws concerning illegitimacy meaning
>
> anyone can steal in a foreign country, walk in
> here, and apply for aid - taking both countries as
> suckers. why? becasue DC is corrupt is why.
Whut?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/16/2015 07:55AM by Defender of Freedom and Liberty.