he'll need austerity measures after tons of "committees that vote on their own pay"

but he'll need something new also and so does Trump: a wariness that it is no longer safe to not insure "conservatives" aren't in a position to win office if they so decide or need to

"committees that vote on their own pay"

are violent, counterfeit, and violently attempt to prevent others from taking away their power to "stay on top and live well" while doing little. they did and can be expected to in the future (with china helping) act to create barricades that weaponize government to keep themselves at the top of the feeding chain

the obvious problem: gov is organized for civil purposes. nobody needs loosers at the top. they need people who collect tax and actually do things at the top.

liberal versus conservative i do not deny. but self decided pay: i will never surrender to

since Clinton (and people brazen about cheating) it's been clear - bank robbery is not below government

the voting system assumed very bad people or very bad policy could be voted out - or perhaps it assumed to punish those who allowed the bad to be voted in

unfortunately - the current rule puts both wage and weapons behind those counting the vote

and they are cheating the counting and both the other things to breed "in style" while others have failing families, on the gov dime

it's too much power any fool would know that

BUT REMEMBER, FOR USA ANYWAY, THAT ISN'T HOW THINGS WERE WHEN THE FOUNDIGN FATHERS WERE DISCUSSING AND PLANNIGN

for one thing - they didn't have county gov armed to the teeth when they were discussing ideas behind "gov v. citizen rights responsibilities"

little red riding hood

they DID have foreign countries breathing down their throat and some they knew still loyal

(i'm appauled they sided to have no import tariff - however i still maintain president had negotiation treaty power and that "no tariff" applied in non-wartime to countries that were not technically stealing from the USA)

spain who WAS stealing from USA. the founding fathers didn't put on a tariff

THEY ERECTED A NAVY AND BOMBED THEIR PORT SUNK SHIPS

i don't believe the "no import" was intended to allow a atheisting stealing rat who weaponizes things to profit from USA's destruction

i believe the "framers" intended that, simply, once a foreign country mis-behaves - laws would penalize those countries to pay up and or we'd bomb them

((now as far as UK's right to mineral resources mother nature has - and the fact that other nation states prevent them from access - certainly law and tariff won't handle Iran which has been proven. certainly the BP Gulf deepsea fiasco was very unfortunate - while UK was backing OBAMA btw. there is no current solution for resources but to be resourceful and trade or else do without or else take. right now i think it's more important to separate powers of government further while weaponizign government AGAINST foreign agents and weaponized imports and keep eye on weapons buildups in, say china or cuba, or rather: as usual keep the navy do not rob the army's boots.))

All that needs to be done is kill all jews. Every last one of them.

foreign nation relations are more complicated by many developed weaponed nations who have developed NO SEPARATION OF POWERS

it means they may be unwilling to sell resources for a reasonable price or let another it to use their own labor to access the natural resource

they may have so much corruption that the resource becomes unavailable at any negotiable price

it may be your own country - if there aren't separation of powers and conservatism - is also so corrupt it has NOTHING TO TRADE for resources

and since every country has urban sprawl and weapons - it becomes a thorough mess to navigate because "corrupt officials must be appeased" BUT THEY CAN NEVER BE APPEASED becuase: they are corrupt

they are corrupt and stupid and likely will have intent to destroy others in negotation over materials rather than "to buy and sell normally natural resources people need access to and to maintain a moderate view of what that means" and they have weapons

this makes matters very complicated

corrupt stupid nations will be broke and counterfeiting yet armed and take to policies that anyone with trade relations will be treated as an enemy they will seed weapons into the commerce of and attack

Niel, all you can do is warn them well.

SO NOTE I DID NOT PROMOTE FREE FOR ALL BATTLE ON NATURAL RESOURCES - i said reasonable trade of goods. it's just i said highly corrupt countries ((due to not separating powers, stupidity, corruption)) could make that impossible

MEANWHILE - ON BREITBART NEWS - THEY'VE LISTED BEST MEMORIAL DAY MOVIES TO WATCH - THE DAY AFTER MEMORIAL DAY

TYPICAL TOTAL LACK OF ORGANIZATION, CARE AND OFFERING OF THINGS THEY KNOW OTHERS NO LONGER (AT THE MOMENT) NEED. FAKE WORK.

((do i watch charlie brown chrismas after chrismas? no - but they know that. it is a chinese fuck you, is what it is))

.

in my area you end up with "warp bubbles" formed by long counterfeiting (fed money) and entrenchments of that, due to lack of separate of power and money is also power

you have

* government deciding own pay

* failed industry government owning deciding: Energy electricity, water, roads, who is hired for most construction ongoing - making really everyone a gov employee since most buildings are gov or medical or subsidized housing or bought by gov workers

* ROAD BUILDING (VA history used to be private owned btw) - gets built where construction wants roads - and construction is buildign what gov wants built

it's all a circle jerk where government is really buying everything and nothing (in sight) isn't in one way or another on the government payroll - nothing is made for export to another state or foreign country - there's no business other than supporting "the expanding family tree of the shit that floated to the top". there are workers but again - their jobs rely on companies who: receive most money from government grants and political party loans. all that big tech is profusely lodged in federal grants keeping them in power: microsoft lost on the market they would be closed doors w/o gov contracts and instead they are extremely powerful depsite being awful cheating loosers who consumers uncovered and boycotted

it's a circle jerk