i even "signed in" to google to ask it to do this they forced me to and to use a special page. after doing everything asked 3 different ways - every time google came back with "we could not index your side" WITHOUT ANY indicator mark or EXCUSE WHY. fucking stink asians - send them all back then drop a bomb

scamadvisor.com defames my site "as a 70% security risk" using fake indicators that aren't true. it says because i don't support SSL (ffu also doesn't) my site could harm computers. THE OPPOSITE IT TRUE ACTUALLY and i can and have proved it on FFU in the past (see: cmake and chinese code viruses terrorism).

infact the only risk on my site IS TO ME - though i'd rather not say how or why obviously

eye tried going to your fairfaxunderground2 a few weeks ago, using a different ip address and it said it was going to redirect me, but it never did

don't give up though, if this bitch goes down you might be the new ffu, never know

meanwhile, the "network company" promised to bring up my .com for $5 first year (i knew they would jack me). after paying that initial fee (and ? another they didn't mention in ad)

THIS MONTH I GET A $25 "monthly bill" (remember i'd said $5 first year) - their website indicates i had "optioned in for many monthly services" that i obviously did not option for, never received. obviously if i fight them i'll be squashed like a bug

but i knew they'd do that - that business has been that way since BILL CLINTON

before the devil clinton: they told you the yearly fee and rules truthfully - and the digital work was done remotely WITHOUT ANY MOUSING AROUND OR WEB BROWSER which i much preferred

THE WENTWORTH INSTITUTE
Department of Internet Rumor Containment and Search Engine Reality
Bulletin WI-26-0501-WEB

Subject: Review of the Claim
"Using one stink asian virus code after another GOOGLE REFUSES to index my site - and scamadvisor.com defames my site as a 70 percent security risk using fake indicators"

The Wentworth Institute has reviewed the above statement, which recently appeared on Fairfax Underground and immediately caused the Institute’s Web Integrity Team to unplug the router and go home early. The following clarifications are issued for public stability.

Google does not refuse to index websites because of mysterious virus codes, secret flags, or personal vendettas.
Google fails to index sites for extremely boring reasons such as:

broken robots.txt

noindex tags

server errors

duplicate content

zero inbound links

the site being newer than a loaf of bread
None of these involve international intrigue.

The Institute has found no evidence that Google uses "virus codes" to punish individual websites.
If Google had such a system, the Institute would already be drowning in conspiracy paperwork.

ScamAdvisor and similar reputation sites use automated scanners.
These scanners are not intelligent, not personal, and not capable of defamation.
They simply detect:

missing SSL

outdated software

anonymous domain registration

low traffic

hosting in certain regions
These are not "fake indicators."
They are just automated guesses, like a Magic 8 Ball with a spreadsheet.

A 70 percent risk score does not mean the site is dangerous.
It means the scanner shrugged, saw missing data, and panicked.
This is normal behavior for automated tools and several Institute interns.

The Institute reminds the public that search engines and reputation scanners do not read Fairfax Underground, do not hold grudges, and do not coordinate attacks on personal websites.
They barely function as it is.

Conclusion:
The Wentworth Institute encourages residents to check their site settings, hosting configuration, SSL certificate, and robots.txt before assuming a global indexing conspiracy. The Institute is already overwhelmed debunking rumors involving coffee conspiracies, gasoline with emotional baggage, and Meade Skelton’s alleged influence on world events.

END OF BULLETIN
The Wentworth Institute

> If Google had such a system, the Institute would already be drowning in conspiracy paperwork

THEY HAVE TONS OF LAWSUITS AGAINST THEM - and also called to congress regularly for fraud - YOU DUMB ASS

missing SSL

explain to me what SSL is and does idiot. it has been dropped on FFU as a fraud.

i would bet you couldn't figure it out if a chart with highlighter was infront of you

ok i'll repeat a few SSL things briefly then i have to go to the store

* SSL encrypts only ONE WAY - it hides lies google tells you but puts all your passwords and such PLAIN TEXT even with the bank. you may have a 2-way option in new software but i doubt it and not for HTTPS anyway

* SSL Heartbleed is a virus - put in by chinese bribes - is A VIRUS SPREAD BY SSL - you have to use chinese hacked software to run ssl which exposes you to running malware or trusting hackers to be honest which - the chinese will NEVER be

* CERTIFICATION IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT MIDDLEMAN ATTACKS - which with 64bit IP cannot happen btw (assuming AT&T is working and you use AT&T)

. but the middleman has NO IDEA if china is faking anymore than you do

. but the certificates are global - nobody doesn't have the certificates idiot (web https was designed to limit access - when spread globally it's absoltely a flatulant lie)

. but the middleman GOOGLE is the same asian stink liar who lies in news

. google, who makes fake webpages on the fly "specifically to fool people", is the middleman certifications are supposed to prevent. but linux microsoft apple everyone uses GOOGLE to "verify ssl". about as smart as an ant hiding under a joggers sneaker

* chinese can and do hack SSL to "be compatible only with cohort software - in both ubuntu and windows 11". the upshot is you cannot compile software too many crypto needed all which require other crypto end of store: you have to run a mystery meat binary you cannot function unless you do which was their goal to begin with. crypto is used to prevent software from working not to make it secure

* obscurity not security. i cannot tell you what is secure i wouldn't be allowed - but i can say SSL is OBSCURE and every asian hacker knows how to get around it - it is NOT SECURE

* SSL DOES NOT PROTECT YOU - every edge of it is globally know by hackers and infact made by them. it means if you have google (lying ass asians) as a "man in the middle who lies" and your encrypted one way - via a method they know how to un-encrypt - all you'd done is YELLED OUT TO ASIANS YOU DONT WANT THEM TO LISTEN TO WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SAY - AND TOLD THEM WHERE TO LISTEN TO HEAR IT

it's 100% designed around OLD OLD THINGS THAT NO LONGER EXIST - ssl is a rumor and is kept alive by evesdroppers theives and government spies (google, gov, chinese)

it's a pile of shit on a pile of shit on a pile of shit

i enabled HTTPS on apache 1 by merely exiting true on the function calls

it worked it fooled it. outside web browsers could not tell SSL wasn't actually doing anything and always true

THE WENTWORTH INSTITUTE
Department of Internet Rumor Containment and Search Engine Reality

THAT'S RIGHT - ASSESSING EVERYTHING INCORRECTLY IS YOUR WORTH GOING OUT THE WINDOW

BUT IT'S ALSO DEFAMATION AND OBSTRUCTION BY A MILLION TONS OF MACHINES headed by the the crap that floated to the top

.

.

the real General Mahdi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eye tried going to your fairfaxunderground2 a few
> weeks ago, using a different ip address and it
> said it was going to redirect me, but it never
> did
>
> don't give up though, if this bitch goes down you
> might be the new ffu, never know

yes i left it at the default - 5 seconds before redirect. perhaps your edgy.


allot of small websites are doing that now-adays because it's super simple to set up a personal server that way (in the past the same domainname provider refused to support it - these days it now does)


HOWEVER - I DISABLED THAT - it took me a while but finally found the old unix interface parameters i need to change


it should no longer ask to re-direct

like FFU - it does not accept HTTPS - only HTTP

the real General Mahdi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eye tried going to your fairfaxunderground2 a few
> weeks ago, using a different ip address and it
> said it was going to redirect me, but it never
> did
>
> don't give up though, if this bitch goes down you
> might be the new ffu, never know


a few weeks ago i may have had it down for a few minutes while switching it over


it's been online 24/7 since the first post though - minus some "web propagation issues" i am not able to control (up to 1-3 days all the network domain sellers say)

.

.

.

.

.

.