Philandering Phil's rise to fame Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> main question of it all remains Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Section 230 Repeal Test Case Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Enjoy the Meade Laughs Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > " Fairfax Underground is a site famous
> around
> > > the world"
> > >
> > > Yep. Often compared to 4chan and a
> "cesspool",
> > > local/national/worldwide media have covered
> > > Fairfax Underground stories numerous times.
> > The
> > > WSHS Sex Scandal made the national network TV
> > > news, and other prominent FFXU stories have
> > been
> > > repeated on sites around the world. The Miz
> v.
> > > Eesh case was written up in journals and
> taught
> > in
> > > law schools nationally and internationally. A
> > > quick search on LexisNexis returns stories
> that
> > > have drawn major attention across the
> country,
> > the
> > > UK, Australia, etc.:
> > >
> > > Fairfax County grades dump
> > > West Springfield High School Sex Scandal
> > > Death of Nicole Mittendorf
> > > Miz ill-fated lawlsuit
> > > Ashley Madison membership list dump
> > >
> > > The biggest fame may be yet to come.
> Although
> > > years ago the site was moderated and
> > > illegal/malicious/offending content was often
> > > removed, for the past several years there has
> > been
> > > no moderation. Literally anything can be
> > > anonymously posted with total impunity and
> > allowed
> > > to remain forever. That makes the site a
> > poster
> > > child for a test case to repeal Section 230.
> > >
Quote
In the United States, companies that
> > offer
> > > web hosting services are shielded from
> > liability
> > > for most
> > > content that customers or malicious users
> place
> > on
> > > the websites they host. Section 230 of the
> > > Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230
> > > ("Section 230"). protects hosting providers
> > from
> > > liability for content placed on these
> websites
> > by
> > > their customers or other parties. The statute
> > > states
> > > that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive
> > > computer service shall be treated as the
> > publisher
> > > or
> > > speaker of any information provided by
> another
> > > information content provider."
> > > Anyone advocating for repeal of Section 230
> > would
> > > merely need to cite a few strategic "example"
> > > posts here to support a court test case.
> That
> > > could upend Internet freedom as we know it in
> > the
> > > US.
> >
> >
> > Did miz or eesh actually make any money out of
> > this suit? I mean this isn't Russia where they
> > just give you a medal, in this country it is
> > always and always be, the dollar.
>
> In the Miz v. eesh, TheNorthman, and John Doe
> matter, the original case was discharged and
> rendered moot; whereas eesh won a monetary
> judgment against the Morenos' investigation firm
> in a separate suit. The case was noteworthy for
> disproving the old adage about "only the lawyers
> coming out ahead" when the Leisers went bankrupt,
> had their home foreclosed, and Trinnes had his
> famous alcoholic cock sucking photos posted. To be
> fair, Leiser was an active topic here years before
> Miz came along.
>
> The Ashley Madison Cheater Site suit was more
> significant financially and you can do your own
> research who won and lost how much. Ironically
> Phil Leiser himself was revealed to be on the
> Ashley Madison membership rolls.
Just lots of cheap sensationalism and juvenile antics you'd expect from someone Meade's age.