"Safety Check"

UK news reported this as "a safety check", that they had "reasons for concern", and they were doing a "safety check" on the house

UK has anti-gun laws and has raped society of all guns. the reason for using a military war-time assult rifle will also never be explained

https://www.the-sun.com/news/4426281/armed-cops-swoop-home-man-chilld/

LOOKS LIKE UK HAS DEVOLVED INTO A SUBURB OF CHINA

rumors this was a COVID related seizure of home and child - should not be dispelled

"The street in Earlsdon, West Mids, has been closed off by armed police"

#1 those aren't police, that is A HOSTILE MILITARY SEIZURE

#2 they aren't armed, they are fitted for war time operations

#3 the occupant WAS NOT ARMED - never claimed to be

https://www.the-sun.com/news/4426281/armed-cops-swoop-home-man-chilld/
https://www.west-midlands.police.uk/news/earlsdon-avenue-north-incident-update

the reason for the swat was "some concerns for safety"

(they say he refused to leave the home - they didnt' say if they were evictim him to replace him with an illegal alien family or a royal friend. they didn't say: if he refused to leave because democrats there should be hung for treason and they were attempting to steal his home. IT'S LIKE A SUB-URB OF CHINA)

" "We're sorry for the inconvenience" (but communism comes first)

ASSURED FACIST REGIME ASSAULT:

* names not given

* reason they'd force him to leave home (ie eviction) not given

* whether the man is being held or released to lawyer not given

* cause of "concern" not given

* use of HIGHLY WEAPONIZED MILITARY to "check safety" absolutely rot

* no evidence the victim was armed

* no photo of the victim doing anything suspicious - nor any criminal record - not even a name

(they could look through windows, the idea they didn't know if the child was safe is COMPLETELY UNTRUE, simple logic says they could not have been unable to know if the child was ok)

* it's obvious they didn't care for the 8yr old's safety

(if they did they'd have used FLIR cameras to locate him and get him out of the house)

IT'S extremely obvious the objective DISREGUARDED the boy's safety and WAS TO USE MILITARY TO SEIZE THE HOME, so that imported muslims "hired", or parliament's sex partner, could live there instead

456565 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> * it's obvious they didn't care for the 8yr old's
> safety
>
> (if they did they'd have used FLIR cameras to
> locate him and get him out of the house)
>
> IT'S extremely obvious the objective DISREGUARDED
> the boy's safety and WAS TO USE MILITARY TO SEIZE
> THE HOME, so that imported muslims "hired", or
> parliament's sex partner, could live there instead

I'm licensed in thermal imaging (thermography) flir cameras cannot see people through walls, they see heat signatures, they would see lack of insulation or water in walls, but not the people inside. Coincidentally it's Aldo bullshit that they cN image a fart leaving the body (just fyi)

456565 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> * it's obvious they didn't care for the 8yr old's
> safety
>
> (if they did they'd have used FLIR cameras to
> locate him and get him out of the house)
>
> IT'S extremely obvious the objective DISREGUARDED
> the boy's safety and WAS TO USE MILITARY TO SEIZE
> THE HOME, so that imported muslims "hired", or
> parliament's sex partner, could live there instead

Thermal cameras can't even see people through windows and somehow this jackass thinks it can see people through walls. Lol.

.

some shit went down in ENGLAND and you got your wedgie all jammed up in your crack

.

BY DOING THIS BBC ALSO HAS THE "OPTION" OF DOING ANOTHER SWAT ON SOMEONE THAT DOES DESERVE IT

WHEN MEDIA ATTACKS THEM, THEY USE THE FAULTY LOGIC OF MIS-COONECTION TO SAY SINCE THIS TIME THEY WERE RIGHTEOUS THAT LAST TIME THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ALSO