Am I wrong?

Pre-supposes criminal activity, individuals, actions, motivations, means, methods, facts, timing, circumstances and intent which are not in evidence, that have not been analyzed by a professional or subject matter expert, and have not been deemed by investigating authorities as worthy of consideration for referral to a prosecutor or jurisdictional authority.

No determination has been made on jurisdiction for a complaint. No formal charges have been brought.

The evidence is classified and Executive privilege applies. It will never see the light of day.

Move along people nothing to see here.

I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and watched Mind Hunter re-runs, so I'm like a legal expert.

Just A Fact Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Am I wrong?


What law would someone be charged with breaking? If you can cite it, then you're not wrong. If you can't, then you are either ignorant or wrong.

Let us know what you find. Most of us don't give a shit.

If the $250M is US Aid Funds were legally entrusted to the President (say by winning enough votes to be elected President of the United States of America, and taking the oath of Office as President of the USA, and occupying the White House Office and executing the powers thereof, and using the official communications thereof for 2 years and at the time he was discussing the disposition of those funds, and those funds being legally entrusted to the President by acts of Congress) - it is Embezzlement not Misappropriation.

Trump attached conditions to the $250M in foreign aid 8 times.
Trump asked for a quid quo pro of personal, political, and monetary value.
Trump withheld aid because he did not get what he wanted.
There was no net benefit to the US National Interest(s).

Not More of Same Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If the $250M is US Aid Funds were legally
> entrusted to the President (say by winning enough
> votes to be elected President of the United States
> of America, and taking the oath of Office as
> President of the USA, and occupying the White
> House Office and executing the powers thereof,
> and using the official communications thereof for
> 2 years and at the time he was discussing the
> disposition of those funds, and those funds being
> legally entrusted to the President by acts of
> Congress) - it is Embezzlement not
> Misappropriation.


IF? lol. Anything following IF is noise.

Just A Fact Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Am I wrong?



Where is your evidence? Hearsay doesn't count.

Some key points: According to the WSJ, there was no quid-pro-quo attached to this suggestion about investigating Biden's son. Thus there was nothing illegal or even inappropriate, unless something else comes out later, about this. Second, according to John Yu, who has not always been a Trump-supporter, the statute on informing Congress about this clearly stipulates that the law only applies to cases directly under the DNI. This may come as news to Adam Schiff, but the President does NOT report to the DNI; the DNI works for the President. Therefore, the statute Schiff is citing is not relevant. Third, the Constitution, which Schiff has apparently not read, specifically names the President as the authorized representative of the USA on foreign policy to speak for and listen on behalf of the USA; it is NOT Congress. So unless the President is clearly requesting something illegal of another country, what the President says to another leader is, for better or for worse, close to unlimited from a legal standpoint. Obviously there can be things that may be politically unwise, but according to the Constitution the President has that legal authority, not Schiff.

Just A Fact Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Am I wrong?

Why should anyone listen to you idiot fucks when everyday you hatch a new scheme and cry wolf? You don't even come up for air.

Sorry your gal lost; gonna be a long five years for you.

Now fuck off and die.

if it was a felony, why isn't Hillary in prison

is turn about fair play?

drop dead G2

this is like the bully stealing school lunches complaining about "clerk of court fees"

09dfkj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> this is like the bully stealing school lunches
> complaining about "clerk of court fees"

meaning Obama and Hillary did huge crimes (billions) and used courts and FBI and deals with mexico (illegal aliens) to try to steal an election

and they got caught

didn't pay a damn thing in jail time or fines in the end

now they think they deserve "equality"

.

gerrymanderer2 (OP) posts several lies on ffu daily - many\.10think he's a fx co gov worker who is getting paid to do it for false DNC democrat "advertising". he floods ffu with useless posts to bump down major news, posts fecal matter, mutilated bodies, child porn, foreign drug ads and sneaker ads, tells people to kill themselves and government should seize them and put them on psych pills in prison - decided by democrat gov of course, promotes kangaroo courthouse trials, gives anti-religious rants, gives satanic ritual rants, posts black males with large dicks on white young females, portends white low birth rate and fall of USA, food tampering/poisoning, and anything possible to DEMORALIZE white people on ffu. (perhaps a chinese prisoner or isis member - but definitely knowledgeable of fx co gov from the inside at times). the website operator has told him "not to post or return" which are still posted - not removed, by the sysop: not because of a political leaning but for continual illegal and gross spam along with messages that are only to demoralize if not kill others. he/she plays at financial terrorism as well: continuall reporting false financial data, and fake emergency please from (fake members of the community he makes up)

Trump has not used taxpayer money for his 2020 campaign, especially not 250 million

G2 MAKES FALSE CLAIMS CONTINUALLY ON FFU HOPING TEENS OR OTHERS WILL BECOME TERRORISTS COMMUNIST followers believing his lies

G2 never substanciates these claims

G2 logs in as "other users" making comments to support his lies must be assume to be a real news event