.
Attachments:

They don't and haven't. Look at Roy Moore.

Most of the special elections are due to corrupt Republicans being convicted. Let's look at the Arizona race from yesterday. That seat has been Republican for the last 30 years. Frank would of keep the job easily if he wasn't so corrupt. He tried to proposition a staffer to have sex for $1 million dollars. She said "Ew! Fuck no!"

What's scary and has republicans really worried is that Trump won the area with a 33 point lead, but yesterday a Democrat named "Hiral Tiprinini" got 48% of the votes. That's a huge swing in one the strongest Republican districts and that was after Republicans dumped a shitload of money on the Republican candidate. Outspending Tiprinini by 4 to 1. Yet she still got 47% of vote?

Not a Good Sign for GOP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They don't and haven't. Look at Roy Moore.
>
> Most of the special elections are due to corrupt
> Republicans being convicted. Let's look at the
> Arizona race from yesterday. That seat has been
> Republican for the last 30 years. Frank would of
> keep the job easily if he wasn't so corrupt. He
> tried to proposition a staffer to have sex for $1
> million dollars. She said "Ew! Fuck no!"
>
> What's scary and has republicans really worried is
> that Trump won the area with a 33 point lead, but
> yesterday a Democrat named "Hiral Tiprinini" got
> 48% of the votes. That's a huge swing in one the
> strongest Republican districts and that was after
> Republicans dumped a shitload of money on the
> Republican candidate. Outspending Tiprinini by 4
> to 1. Yet she still got 47% of vote?


Let me get this straight. The democrats thought they had this in the bag but the Republicans won yet another special election. Ok, got it.

Not a Good Sign for GOP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They don't and haven't. Look at Roy Moore.
>
> Most of the special elections are due to corrupt
> Republicans being convicted. Let's look at the
> Arizona race from yesterday. That seat has been
> Republican for the last 30 years. Frank would of
> keep the job easily if he wasn't so corrupt. He
> tried to proposition a staffer to have sex for $1
> million dollars. She said "Ew! Fuck no!"
>
> What's scary and has republicans really worried is
> that Trump won the area with a 33 point lead, but
> yesterday a Democrat named "Hiral Tiprinini" got
> 48% of the votes. That's a huge swing in one the
> strongest Republican districts and that was after
> Republicans dumped a shitload of money on the
> Republican candidate. Outspending Tiprinini by 4
> to 1. Yet she still got 47% of vote?

Reading this post along with other similar posts the writer is definitely the goat fucking Gerry!

Not a Good Sign for GOP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They don't and haven't. Look at Roy Moore.
>
> Most of the special elections are due to corrupt
> Republicans being convicted. Let's look at the
> Arizona race from yesterday. That seat has been
> Republican for the last 30 years. Frank would of
> keep the job easily if he wasn't so corrupt. He
> tried to proposition a staffer to have sex for $1
> million dollars. She said "Ew! Fuck no!"
>
> What's scary and has republicans really worried is
> that Trump won the area with a 33 point lead, but
> yesterday a Democrat named "Hiral Tiprinini" got
> 48% of the votes. That's a huge swing in one the
> strongest Republican districts and that was after
> Republicans dumped a shitload of money on the
> Republican candidate. Outspending Tiprinini by 4
> to 1. Yet she still got 47% of vote?


What's even scarier is that Trump won the 'area' by 21 points, NOT 33. Only off by 50%. Nice!

Not a Good Sign for GOP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> What's scary and has republicans really worried is
> that Trump won the area with a 33 point lead, but
> yesterday a Democrat named "Hiral Tiprinini" got
> 48% of the votes. That's a huge swing in one the
> strongest Republican districts and that was after
> Republicans dumped a shitload of money on the
> Republican candidate. Outspending Tiprinini by 4
> to 1. Yet she still got 47% of vote?


No, actually that's just bullshit coming from Demtards trying to push the dumb "Blue Wave" narrative. The reality is that the large point spread for Trump was an aberration. People voted for Trump specifically not for a Republican or Democrat.

The more realistic way to look at it for anyone who's not a dumb partisan fucktard would be to look at the longer-term past results. Which would show that this district that's now being painted as being uber-Red actually was (Democrat) Gabby Gifford's district. Which she won in 2006 and 2008 with +12 point margins and a smaller margin in 2010. Franks (Republican) won after her by large margins mostly because he was a known player who was an incumbent as a result of some redistricting running against nobodies. Over time, the district has swung back and forth.

yck3c Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not a Good Sign for GOP Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > They don't and haven't. Look at Roy Moore.
> >
> > Most of the special elections are due to
> corrupt
> > Republicans being convicted. Let's look at the
> > Arizona race from yesterday. That seat has
> been
> > Republican for the last 30 years. Frank would
> of
> > keep the job easily if he wasn't so corrupt.
> He
> > tried to proposition a staffer to have sex for
> $1
> > million dollars. She said "Ew! Fuck no!"
> >
> > What's scary and has republicans really worried
> is
> > that Trump won the area with a 33 point lead,
> but
> > yesterday a Democrat named "Hiral Tiprinini"
> got
> > 48% of the votes. That's a huge swing in one
> the
> > strongest Republican districts and that was
> after
> > Republicans dumped a shitload of money on the
> > Republican candidate. Outspending Tiprinini by
> 4
> > to 1. Yet she still got 47% of vote?
>
> Reading this post along with other similar posts
> the writer is definitely the goat fucking Gerry!

Nope, and you have no life. Now go get a job, you worthless welfare moocher!

yck3c Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Reading this post along with other similar posts
> the writer is definitely the goat fucking Gerry!


I know, he's trying to sound intelligent and reasoned; he miserably fails at both.

It's almost as sad as it is stupid.

Let me tell you about these rightards. They know they're fucked, we know they're fucked. Are we going to spend all summer disputing the fact that they're fucked? On a NoVa forum which swings at least twenty points Democratic as it is? I think the best thing is not to try to explain why last nights results were devastating more so than Alabama or even Pennsylvania which they lost. I think it's best to just smile and wait for the upcoming inevitable.

This is the long game to dominate the 20's. Lets just hope we don't have an economic or foreign policy crisis because Trump is a complete disgrace and an embarrassing clown incapable of tying his shoe laces.

That's why Bernie Sanders is freaking out rightards. He's already got think tanks plotting out the revolution to come in the near future.

Gerrymandering by Republicans - only way they could ever win majorities.

like this

You think that's bad, check out DEM controlled Maryland.



1, 5, and 6 are the only ones that look even close to normal and 6 was recently redrawn to pull in more libtards from MoCo to oust Bartlett. So don't sit there and suggest that Republicans are the only ones doing that gerrymandering shit.