Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and worki
Posted by:
uncle sam
()
Date: March 05, 2018 09:40AM
Bill Clinton happened and following Republicans have not undone the horrific policies he allowed or enacted. Here's what they are:
* making schools systems a kinda "all powerful entity" with an blank check (which it ABSOLUTELY WAS NOT before Clinton), with government authority over students, authority to decide who can be schooled (money), authority to decide what can be certified (telling big business they cannot train their own employees)
* golden parachutes allowed. this means the company owner and creator dies, an immoral employee (often a new one) suddenly becomes CEO: ships factory equipment made in usa OVERSEES and other bad policy until company LOSSES profit - then quits the company with a "severence" package of up to hundreds of millions (all corrupt, of course). Wallstreet was involved too: THEY BULLSHITTED AND THREATENED INVESTORS not to take action. Some investors actually hunted down a golden parachuter and killed them. But "DEMOCRAT NEWS NBC ET AL" showed stories that this was "illegal", hunting them down. I would say it was FAKE NEWS and IT IS LEGAL to hunt down golden parachuters: bill clinton being the chief of them.
* zero regulation on imports/exports (noting the "it's not my company" above). laws prohibit a dictatorship (command economy) like china to use governernment to attack usa industry by selling government made product in store BELOW cost to make: killing the competitor in usa. it's a weapon. BILL CLINTON DID NOT PREVENT IT. NY,NY AND CALIFORNIA participated with the chinese: for example: Walmarts were built during Clinton, towns sued to keep out walmart, suits ignored. Walmart 'FORCED AMERICA' TO BUY CHINA IMPORTS by insuring made-in-usa products were NOT EVEN A CHOICE.
* zero regulation on Wallstreet. they did junk bonds and bad real-estate loans: infact Clinton was directly involved in it. wall street can make money simply by intently making stocks go up and down wildly: the are ON TRADE COMMISSION, NOT UPON gain or loos of the market.
* zero regulation on Microsoft, Microsoft (and other picked winners) were allowed to hold trials where the Judge had been a previous employee of Microsoft: obviously %100 corrupt
* gutting of FCC; internet can attack the poor by signal blocking (ie, blocking port 80, over-charging for access to VISA billing for sales, etc), innuendo allowed on TV, incest allowed in japan cartoons showed to children, more words, etc
* they said in the 90's that investment in china was a self fulfilling prophecy of American crisis and Chinese becoming what America was: successful. BUT it wasn't simply that: it was Clinton banks IRS refusing to loan money to USA factories to expand and modernize, Walmart, things like that which were the problem. it was ILLEGAL INVESTMENT in china that was the problem, not investors interested in good business loans to good businesses (obviously those interested in good business would do so in a balanced manner, safe to their own country).
---------------------
ANY CITIZEN WITH A BRAIN FOUGHT IN SOME WAY AGAINST THESE AND BELIEVED REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS WERE SUING AND FIGHTING THEM: THEY WERE ALL IN THE NEWS PAPERS AND DISCUSSED.
DEMOCRATS, OBVIOUSLY, INTENTLY ATTACKED USA FROM WITHIN
little red riding hood
* making schools systems a kinda "all powerful entity" with an blank check (which it ABSOLUTELY WAS NOT before Clinton), with government authority over students, authority to decide who can be schooled (money), authority to decide what can be certified (telling big business they cannot train their own employees)
* golden parachutes allowed. this means the company owner and creator dies, an immoral employee (often a new one) suddenly becomes CEO: ships factory equipment made in usa OVERSEES and other bad policy until company LOSSES profit - then quits the company with a "severence" package of up to hundreds of millions (all corrupt, of course). Wallstreet was involved too: THEY BULLSHITTED AND THREATENED INVESTORS not to take action. Some investors actually hunted down a golden parachuter and killed them. But "DEMOCRAT NEWS NBC ET AL" showed stories that this was "illegal", hunting them down. I would say it was FAKE NEWS and IT IS LEGAL to hunt down golden parachuters: bill clinton being the chief of them.
* zero regulation on imports/exports (noting the "it's not my company" above). laws prohibit a dictatorship (command economy) like china to use governernment to attack usa industry by selling government made product in store BELOW cost to make: killing the competitor in usa. it's a weapon. BILL CLINTON DID NOT PREVENT IT. NY,NY AND CALIFORNIA participated with the chinese: for example: Walmarts were built during Clinton, towns sued to keep out walmart, suits ignored. Walmart 'FORCED AMERICA' TO BUY CHINA IMPORTS by insuring made-in-usa products were NOT EVEN A CHOICE.
* zero regulation on Wallstreet. they did junk bonds and bad real-estate loans: infact Clinton was directly involved in it. wall street can make money simply by intently making stocks go up and down wildly: the are ON TRADE COMMISSION, NOT UPON gain or loos of the market.
* zero regulation on Microsoft, Microsoft (and other picked winners) were allowed to hold trials where the Judge had been a previous employee of Microsoft: obviously %100 corrupt
* gutting of FCC; internet can attack the poor by signal blocking (ie, blocking port 80, over-charging for access to VISA billing for sales, etc), innuendo allowed on TV, incest allowed in japan cartoons showed to children, more words, etc
* they said in the 90's that investment in china was a self fulfilling prophecy of American crisis and Chinese becoming what America was: successful. BUT it wasn't simply that: it was Clinton banks IRS refusing to loan money to USA factories to expand and modernize, Walmart, things like that which were the problem. it was ILLEGAL INVESTMENT in china that was the problem, not investors interested in good business loans to good businesses (obviously those interested in good business would do so in a balanced manner, safe to their own country).
---------------------
ANY CITIZEN WITH A BRAIN FOUGHT IN SOME WAY AGAINST THESE AND BELIEVED REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS WERE SUING AND FIGHTING THEM: THEY WERE ALL IN THE NEWS PAPERS AND DISCUSSED.
DEMOCRATS, OBVIOUSLY, INTENTLY ATTACKED USA FROM WITHIN
The fact is "Americans" didn't do it.
The Clintons and Clinton Democrats did it. And it's time they paid their bill, 2x the bill for skirting the laws and using corrupt courts to dissuade those prosecuting.
The fact is republicans worked across the isle with democrats when it became clear that "A BLANK CHECK HANDED TO GOVERNMENT WORKERS FOR PAYCHECKS" could not, by corrupt politicians and government workers, be set down
little red riding hood
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
77kvd
()
Date: March 05, 2018 09:50AM
* women flocked to Clinton because he was a "sex machine" BUT MORESO BECAUSE he was promising "feminine rights", that women could attack men and become the gender that leads companies and the country. they didn't vote for jose fucking maria and getting her pregnant 7x in USA though they were "on vacation" in USA and overstayed. they didn't know that part. they didn't know about making schools a communist outpost (blank check, hiring illegals and usa haters), that clinton would attack all regulations (banking, trading, imports) that protected the USA.
* blacks and immigrants voted for him, i'll just say "obama" and you should understand
* blacks and immigrants voted for him, i'll just say "obama" and you should understand
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
mnj6g
()
Date: March 05, 2018 09:55AM
Having said all that I have to say: Senior Editor-at-Large Rebecca Mansour, of Breitbart, is helping hide the problem by blaming "America business" for the problems that Democrat Politicians ABSOLUTELY DID CAUSE THESE PROBLEMS, and republicans (except possibly george bush senior) participated in the "government bank check" by not fighting it, by using the blank checks themselves.
She doesn't know what she's talking about.
This was not an "American" problem: this was a problem of people were suing and the lawsuits died UNFAIRLY, this was a problem of Clinton have gutted the Court system, replacing University Law (equity law, ie the united states supreme court still uses the title of being an equity court) - replacing that with INQUISITION LAW (dictatorship law used by spain - who STILL TO THIS DAY has a king)
She doesn't know what she's talking about.
This was not an "American" problem: this was a problem of people were suing and the lawsuits died UNFAIRLY, this was a problem of Clinton have gutted the Court system, replacing University Law (equity law, ie the united states supreme court still uses the title of being an equity court) - replacing that with INQUISITION LAW (dictatorship law used by spain - who STILL TO THIS DAY has a king)
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
dv3xe
()
Date: March 05, 2018 09:55AM
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
uuvv7
()
Date: March 05, 2018 09:58AM
Mansour then relates her broad thesis of decades to Trump's steel tariff (which was debated infact over decades in congress, it is NOT trump's idea not a new tariff: that's fake news, it's not new at all).
it's rediculous because tariffs were only one of many things Clinton un-regulated, it's rediculous because there are 10,000 USA tariffs: who would throw a stone at Trump - the chief of the USA Military - for making a pro-Military tariff as "MORE IMPORTANT" that other tariffs that could "go away"
it's rediculous because tariffs were only one of many things Clinton un-regulated, it's rediculous because there are 10,000 USA tariffs: who would throw a stone at Trump - the chief of the USA Military - for making a pro-Military tariff as "MORE IMPORTANT" that other tariffs that could "go away"
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 05, 2018 09:59AM
What Democrats? Democrats have no power. Where are your initiatives? What is your policy agenda? You can't even come up with a budget. You're running trillion dollar deficits because you're nothing but an absolute fraud in every sense of the term.
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
dndme
()
Date: March 05, 2018 10:07AM
The problem behind the problem is these POLITICIANS, like Lincoln himself, put fine homes, large families, and delivered pizza and restraunt bills on their CREDIT CARDS, have huge debts to pay: and un-scrupolously used their position in government to use "police state" to insist AMERICA'S POOR pay for it. Taxing the poor. Ripping off America.
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
cj4cd
()
Date: March 05, 2018 10:11AM
The policies predate Clinton by at least a generation. Republicans as well as Democrats bought into those policies. NAFTA was negotiated by GHW Bush. That superseded a Canadian-American free trade agreement negotiated by Reagan, which itself grew out of a trade agreement signed by Johnson.
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
mn4gd
()
Date: March 05, 2018 10:17AM
dndme Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The problem behind the problem is these
> POLITICIANS, ...
The sister problem is THE COURTS, i'll repeat. The Courts refused to make politicians responsible for lawsuits against them: the COURTS were getting high pay due the BLANK CHECKS - they were part of the "feeding frenzy". Judges also were threatened by DOJ to rules quickly in favor of what ever "the government" prosecuted, never the defense. Judges had been too close to county/state/fed officials: picked by them. When politicians became corrupt they picked their winners: corrupt Judges - to protect the politicians.
America can sue Clinton democrats to get recovery, "LOCK HER UP", clawback, IF AND WHEN the Courts allow law to be responsible (meaning, even a poor person can sue a big official if they can prove their case: which is NOT currently possible. possible today is the H can pay to survey Trump campaign, get caught, and not even be punished. it's continual: accusations followed by fake news responses: no sentencing)
-------------------------------------------------------
> The problem behind the problem is these
> POLITICIANS, ...
The sister problem is THE COURTS, i'll repeat. The Courts refused to make politicians responsible for lawsuits against them: the COURTS were getting high pay due the BLANK CHECKS - they were part of the "feeding frenzy". Judges also were threatened by DOJ to rules quickly in favor of what ever "the government" prosecuted, never the defense. Judges had been too close to county/state/fed officials: picked by them. When politicians became corrupt they picked their winners: corrupt Judges - to protect the politicians.
America can sue Clinton democrats to get recovery, "LOCK HER UP", clawback, IF AND WHEN the Courts allow law to be responsible (meaning, even a poor person can sue a big official if they can prove their case: which is NOT currently possible. possible today is the H can pay to survey Trump campaign, get caught, and not even be punished. it's continual: accusations followed by fake news responses: no sentencing)
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
uhvku
()
Date: March 05, 2018 10:27AM
there is a counter WARNING here though: America (usa) had nothing protecting it from the above happening. it was ASSUMED that the presence of courts and law abiding people - along with the Constitution, DOI, etc would prevent USA politicians from become a dictator's parliament. attacks from within (by politicians) were thought of and protected against in the Constitution but NOT STRONGLY ENOUGH. they could not imagine the (loopholes) that could make their work, the Constitution completely in-effective at protecting the public at large
the Constitution does not allow citizens to vote out or pick judges on the basis they refuse to follow THE CONSTITUTION. it leaves politicians in charge of this. THAT IS A GAPING HOLE. the gaping hole is that USA laws allow (illegal aliens, corrupt politicians) to attack USA from within. FOR EXAMPLE: allowing sanctuary states to hate the usa: using imported tools and products, illegal alien dispatchers, illegal aliens, to produce and maintain USA schools (that's only one example: an attack from within)
the Constitution does not allow citizens to vote out or pick judges on the basis they refuse to follow THE CONSTITUTION. it leaves politicians in charge of this. THAT IS A GAPING HOLE. the gaping hole is that USA laws allow (illegal aliens, corrupt politicians) to attack USA from within. FOR EXAMPLE: allowing sanctuary states to hate the usa: using imported tools and products, illegal alien dispatchers, illegal aliens, to produce and maintain USA schools (that's only one example: an attack from within)
USA LAW as it currently is, ALLOWS GOVERNMENT ATTACK citizens who do INSIST that the law be done in all perpetuity. it's been modified like it was a Wordpad file passed around like a party condiments need sheet.
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
bckmk
()
Date: March 05, 2018 10:36AM
the fact USA is weak to attacks from within (framers were so God fearing they didn't really conceive attackers would "become in charge" in this way)
THIS IS NOT THE CAUSE: CLINTON AND CORRUPT IS THE CAUSE.
however: it does stand to reason that USA can be systematically attacked from within and policy, regulation, perhaps the Constitution: needs amendment to prevent it
the core of this problem is the Courts, that Judges are chosen and paid by politicians (also threatened by through DOJ), that Judges are free to ignore perfect arguments and fact (equity law).
The laws should be amended to insure Courts are liable.
2,000 YEARS AGO, ROMAN LAW, Judge could get a death penalty if they took bribes from politicians.
Today: Judges get awarded and up in DOJ if they are friendly with politicians.
WHAT THAT IS, IS WAY TOO MUCH DIFFERENCE and no in-between
THIS IS NOT THE CAUSE: CLINTON AND CORRUPT IS THE CAUSE.
however: it does stand to reason that USA can be systematically attacked from within and policy, regulation, perhaps the Constitution: needs amendment to prevent it
the core of this problem is the Courts, that Judges are chosen and paid by politicians (also threatened by through DOJ), that Judges are free to ignore perfect arguments and fact (equity law).
The laws should be amended to insure Courts are liable.
2,000 YEARS AGO, ROMAN LAW, Judge could get a death penalty if they took bribes from politicians.
Today: Judges get awarded and up in DOJ if they are friendly with politicians.
WHAT THAT IS, IS WAY TOO MUCH DIFFERENCE and no in-between
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
kxe4h
()
Date: March 05, 2018 10:38AM
"you can't take profit your company went in debt"
"YES WE CAN", #winners
"lock her up!"
but `she's not in prison, the tradition of "in your face corruption" continues
"YES WE CAN", #winners
"lock her up!"
but `she's not in prison, the tradition of "in your face corruption" continues
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
kmkwj
()
Date: March 05, 2018 11:08AM
it was NOT "america", not the poor being attacked with no-pro-bono law and taxing the poor
IT WAS SPECIFIC PEOPLE, SPECIFIC ACTS, WHO HAVE REAL PROPERTY THAT CAN BE SOLD
FOR EXAMPLE: (SOME OF) FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT SUPERVISORS (ie SHARON BULOVA) AND MANY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN KEEPING WAGES ARTIFICIALLY HIGH, USING ILLEGAL ALIENS TO DO CORRUPT (unqualified) WORK ON THEIR HOMES
the facts are on the accounting books
IT WAS SPECIFIC PEOPLE, SPECIFIC ACTS, WHO HAVE REAL PROPERTY THAT CAN BE SOLD
FOR EXAMPLE: (SOME OF) FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT SUPERVISORS (ie SHARON BULOVA) AND MANY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN KEEPING WAGES ARTIFICIALLY HIGH, USING ILLEGAL ALIENS TO DO CORRUPT (unqualified) WORK ON THEIR HOMES
the facts are on the accounting books
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
correction
()
Date: March 05, 2018 11:10AM
it was NOT "america", the poor were being attacked with no-pro-bono law and taxing the poor by specific people who are now rich, who used the poor's money (or those with "no government authority") to attack them
Re: Decades of “free trade absolutism” by America’s elites, “where we unilaterally disarm while our opponent commits economic warfare against us,” have undermined American national security, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base, and betrayed middle and w
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 05, 2018 11:23AM
The only thing left to try is complete Democratic control. Which usually historically ends up in surpluses an economic prosperity. The opposite of course is true under Republicans or when Republicans control congress.