Re: Trump's pal bails out Weinstein
Posted by:
you missed
()
Date: October 18, 2017 06:55PM
Yeah Right Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you missed Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yeah Right Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > OK, I am the OP. You Trumpers, of course,
> > missed
> > > the point of the post. If YOU heard that
> Soros
> > or
> > > Clinton were bailing out Weinstein (and it's
> > > really not arguable that Barrack is doing
> that)
> > > what would your reaction be? Would it be:
> "Oh,
> > OK,
> > > it's really just a financial thing, and I'm
> not
> > > going to attribute anything untoward to
> Soros,
> > > he's just trying to make money; he's not
> > > supporting a sex abuser?" Yeah, bullshit
> that
> > > would have been your response. You'd have
> gone
> > > batshit over it.
> > >
> > > I realize this is an intellectual strain for
> > all
> > > of you Trumpers. You have to put yourself in
> a
> > > hypothetical place mentally, and that has to
> be
> > > difficult for you. But try. And then look
> up
> > the
> > > work hypocrite in a dictionary. Maybe then
> > you'll
> > > get the point of the post.
> >
> > We got the point. You wanted to try and say
> that
> > if the shoe was on the other foot, blah blah
> blah.
> > And, you might be right. The only problem,
> > however, is that in doing so, you exposed
> yourself
> > as no better than the people you attempted to
> > insult. You're just as hypocritical as those
> you
> > are claiming are hypocrites. You're just too
> > stupid to see it.
>
>
> Also, I was thinking about the right wing media,
> especially FoxNews, which would have gone batshit.
> I mean, they'll do 8 stories a day over something
> innocuous that Jimmy Kimmel said. I can't imagine
> what they would have done if "the shoe was on the
> other foot". What do you think they would have
> done? I know. FWIW, FOX hasn't mentioned the
> Barrack investment. No surprise Neither has CNN
> as far as I'm aware, which is probably right,
> since what Barrack did IS no big deal and not much
> of a story. Again, what would the right wing
> media have done, though, if it had been Soros.
Yeah, genius, the left leaning media NEVER does innocuous stories on Trump. You know, like how many scoops of ice cream he gets or other stupid shit, right? The only difference is you eat that shit up.