Trumps dream scenario that would have saved so many more people at the nightclub shooting.

Eddy Current hits another home run here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0bGs6GyLLo

!
Attachments:

Interesting observation
Attachments:

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trumps dream scenario that would have saved so
> many more people at the nightclub shooting.
>
> Eddy Current hits another home run here.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0bGs6GyLLo


Fuck off, freak.

.
Attachments:

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting observation


Hardly. The difference between a felon and a non-felon is seconds. The tool used to get there doesn't make a difference.

Also, if you don't like it, leave. Find some outher country more to your liking. There are plenty of people that would like to come to America and take your place.

I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal protection. No way I would pull the trigger unless my life was being threatened. My first instinct would be to get myself to safety. If you think I'm going to confront a shooter to save your life, think again. Learn to protect yourself.

cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal
> protection. No way I would pull the trigger unless
> my life was being threatened. My first instinct
> would be to get myself to safety. If you think I'm
> going to confront a shooter to save your life,
> think again. Learn to protect yourself.

What are you so afraid of? Did you fuck some other guys wife. Did you testify against the mob?

Aren't you worried that another good guy with a gun will see you firing and think you're a bad gun with a gun and shoot you? Or would you then turn to shoot him too?

when seconds count, the police are just minutes away. thanks, but I'll take care of myself.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cbaa Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal
> > protection. No way I would pull the trigger
> unless
> > my life was being threatened. My first instinct
> > would be to get myself to safety. If you think
> I'm
> > going to confront a shooter to save your life,
> > think again. Learn to protect yourself.
>
> What are you so afraid of? Did you fuck some other
> guys wife. Did you testify against the mob?
>
> Aren't you worried that another good guy with a
> gun will see you firing and think you're a bad gun
> with a gun and shoot you? Or would you then turn
> to shoot him too?

Numbers--the limp-wristed cuck.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cbaa Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal
> > protection. No way I would pull the trigger
> unless
> > my life was being threatened. My first instinct
> > would be to get myself to safety. If you think
> I'm
> > going to confront a shooter to save your life,
> > think again. Learn to protect yourself.
>
> What are you so afraid of? Did you fuck some other
> guys wife. Did you testify against the mob?
>
> Aren't you worried that another good guy with a
> gun will see you firing and think you're a bad gun
> with a gun and shoot you? Or would you then turn
> to shoot him too?

Shut the fuck up you limp waisted little bitch. You would turn over and offer up your ass to keep from dying. At least I'd go out with some dignity.

Limp-wristed

cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal
> protection. No way I would pull the trigger unless
> my life was being threatened. My first instinct
> would be to get myself to safety. If you think I'm
> going to confront a shooter to save your life,
> think again. Learn to protect yourself.

You coward. So it's each man, woman, or child for themselves. I'm sure babies, the elderly, and the handicapped appreciate that. Maybe we'll get lucky and you'll shoot your tiny dick off one day.

Fuck you cunt. If I pull my gun and shoot, I'm likely facing a mound of legal consequences because of Liberal faggots like you. I carry for my own protection, not for yours. If you want protection, supply it yourself. Not even the Police have a duty to protect you. Ignorant fucks like you don't even understand that.

.
Attachments:

The cuck who made the video is even stupider than the cuck OP here.


No would ever suggest that a concealed carry holder should just pop off randomly in a crowd to get the shooter. Every situation is different and requires judgment and maturity. What may work in one scenario is not good for another.

If someone did have a handgun at Pulse and had the opportunity to blast the shooter, it would have been a happy ending. I understand that this is something that cucks like Numbers could never imagine. Deal with yourself boy, because someone else will always have to protect you and you are going to have to eat a lot of shit in this life as you probably have been already.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

Since you are a mouthy little ignorant bitch, here's the law. Even the Police have no duty to protect you, you sniveling little bitch.

MGdjT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> when seconds count, the police are just minutes
> away. thanks, but I'll take care of myself.


That figures. When the shit hits the fan, you're gonna shoot your way through the crowd just to get your chicken shit ass out.

It's always these self-proclaimed alpha males that either end up being the first one shot or the first one to run.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MGdjT Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > when seconds count, the police are just minutes
> > away. thanks, but I'll take care of myself.
>
>
> That figures. When the shit hits the fan, you're
> gonna shoot your way through the crowd just to get
> your chicken shit ass out.
>
> It's always these self-proclaimed alpha males that
> either end up being the first one shot or the
> first one to run.


Your problem obviously is not with guns, but with machismo and gun owners. A fair thing to criticize but you are really out of your league trying to talk firearms.

Goodnight, tinkerbelle.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MGdjT Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > when seconds count, the police are just minutes
> > away. thanks, but I'll take care of myself.
>
>
> That figures. When the shit hits the fan, you're
> gonna shoot your way through the crowd just to get
> your chicken shit ass out.
>
> It's always these self-proclaimed alpha males that
> either end up being the first one shot or the
> first one to run.


thats not what I said at all, but you are obviously too ignorant to bother explaining the finer points of self-reliance.

MGdjT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MGdjT Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > when seconds count, the police are just
> minutes
> > > away. thanks, but I'll take care of myself.
> >
> >
> > That figures. When the shit hits the fan,
> you're
> > gonna shoot your way through the crowd just to
> get
> > your chicken shit ass out.
> >
> > It's always these self-proclaimed alpha males
> that
> > either end up being the first one shot or the
> > first one to run.
>
>
> thats not what I said at all, but you are
> obviously too ignorant to bother explaining the
> finer points of self-reliance.

That's what little Snowflake liberal cunts always do. Twist your words and the prance away like a bitch.

Cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District
> _of_Columbia
>
> Since you are a mouthy little ignorant bitch,
> here's the law. Even the Police have no duty to
> protect you, you sniveling little bitch.

Let's see....cunt, faggot, ignorant fuck, mouthy ignorant bitch, sniveling bitch. Just what I thought. Nasty, stupid, bully coward. How often do you beat your wife?

Coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cbaa Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District
>
> > _of_Columbia
> >
> > Since you are a mouthy little ignorant bitch,
> > here's the law. Even the Police have no duty to
> > protect you, you sniveling little bitch.
>
> Let's see....cunt, faggot, ignorant fuck, mouthy
> ignorant bitch, sniveling bitch. Just what I
> thought. Nasty, stupid, bully coward. How often do
> you beat your wife?

Act like an ignorant little cunt and that's the way you'll get treated Snowflake. What's the matter sweetie, surprised nobody, even the Police have no obligation to protect your Whitney little ass? Better grow up and start taking responsibility for your own safety. Mouthy little bitch behind that keyboard aren't you?

wtHkX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
you are really out of your league trying to
> talk firearms.


Haha. I'm pretty sure that I know more about firearms and have more experience with them than you.

You're just another chickenhawk that can't leave home without being scared someone is gonna getcha. I guess the terrorists win.

Ignorant little cunt, snowflake, sweetie, mouthy little bitch. You clearly hate women who question your authority. People like you have no business owning guns, let alone concealed carry. I bet you're slouching in your BarcaLounger right now well into your second six pack hoping the wife has gone to bed so you can masturbate to porn.

Carrying a gun for me is no different than grabbing my car keys or my wallet. I don't even think about it during the day and I certainly don't walk around thinking I'm some kind of bad ass because I have a weapon. It's a tool that I don't expect to have to use, but if I need it, it's there.

Coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ignorant little cunt, snowflake, sweetie, mouthy
> little bitch. You clearly hate women who question
> your authority. People like you have no business
> owning guns, let alone concealed carry. I bet
> you're slouching in your BarcaLounger right now
> well into your second six pack hoping the wife has
> gone to bed so you can masturbate to porn.
Attachments:

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wtHkX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> you are really out of your league trying to
> > talk firearms.
>
>
> Haha. I'm pretty sure that I know more about
> firearms and have more experience with them than
> you.
>
> You're just another chickenhawk that can't leave
> home without being scared someone is gonna getcha.
> I guess the terrorists win.


You base your opinion on a stupid Youtube video that assumes the good guy will just start firing off into the crowd randomly. That is never anyone's game plan or best option. If you are watching videos like that and thinking you are seeing something intelligent, you are feeding into the partisan bullshit that exaggerates every scenario to the worst possible. Trying using your brain instead of emotion.

The truth is, someone there with a gun, a good guy, may have saved lives and even your homo buddies are starting to realize than and purchase weapons.

cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .
This is good information. I am not in a gang and I am not a criminal so I have a 0.000008564102564% of death by firearm. This is credible proof that only a ignorant fool would carry a firearm.
Attachments:

Medical treatment, criminal justice proceedings, new security precautions, and reductions in quality of life are estimated to cost U.S. citizens $100 billion annually.

(Cook, Philip J, and Jens Ludwig, Gun Violence: The Real Costs, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014.)


Guntards cost this country far more than illegal immigration and welfare combined. This is why we need HUGE taxes on guns and ammunition. It should be a yearly tax too, kind of like Virginia's property tax on homes, cars, boats etc.

PPE9J Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You base your opinion on a stupid Youtube video
> that assumes the good guy will just start firing
> off into the crowd randomly.

No, the video just points out what could happen, especially if someone with little or no training in these situations decides to start shooting. Be real. Most of the people going around these days with ccp's are idiots that aren't directly threatened by anyone and just want to look cool.


> That is never
> anyone's game plan or best option.


There is no game plan at all, other than the one pointed out in this thread, which was to run away as fast as you can and fuck everyone else.


> watching videos like that and thinking you are
> seeing something intelligent, you are feeding into
> the partisan bullshit that exaggerates every
> scenario to the worst possible. Trying using your
> brain instead of emotion.


Really. Trump used this notion that good guys with guns would have easily solved the Orlando tragedy. Maybe, maybe not, but it's far more likely that some idiot with a ccp would have missed the shooter and hit innocent people and/or been mistaken as the bad guy and peppered with swat team bullets, especially where booze is involved.



> The truth is, someone there with a gun, a good
> guy, may have saved lives and even your homo
> buddies are starting to realize than and purchase
> weapons.


Maybe, maybe not. The video here is simply pointing out that it's not as simple as the romantic image in so many people's mind.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cbaa Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal
> > protection. No way I would pull the trigger
> unless
> > my life was being threatened. My first instinct
> > would be to get myself to safety. If you think
> I'm
> > going to confront a shooter to save your life,
> > think again. Learn to protect yourself.
>
> What are you so afraid of? Did you fuck some other
> guys wife. Did you testify against the mob?
>
> Aren't you worried that another good guy with a
> gun will see you firing and think you're a bad gun
> with a gun and shoot you? Or would you then turn
> to shoot him too?

You have an innate ability to fail to understand what a real world shooting scenario looks like. When a nigger is robbing a convenience store and shoots the clerk and then turns and points the gun at cbaa - and cbaa wastes him, you think someone - having witnessed all this shit, would shoot cbaa? Perhaps a faggot liberal would do this, but they are too scared of guns in the first place, so they will sit there and suffer whatever fate the robber decides is appropriate for them. They have no options, cbaa has options.

And he's right to let everyone else work it our for themselves. Because the liberals will be lined up to sue anyone with a dollar, even if cbaa just saved them. You wanna piss on gun owners, you fucking sit there and tell the nigger that you love him and support his cause while he's robbing the store and beg him not kill you. See how that works for ya.

Coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cbaa Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I carry a concealed weapon for my own personal
> > protection. No way I would pull the trigger
> unless
> > my life was being threatened. My first instinct
> > would be to get myself to safety. If you think
> I'm
> > going to confront a shooter to save your life,
> > think again. Learn to protect yourself.
>
> You coward. So it's each man, woman, or child for
> themselves. I'm sure babies, the elderly, and the
> handicapped appreciate that. Maybe we'll get lucky
> and you'll shoot your tiny dick off one day.

So you liberals don't want anyone to have guns, then call them cowards when they don't protect you?

Standard liberal logic.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PPE9J Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > You base your opinion on a stupid Youtube video
> > that assumes the good guy will just start
> firing
> > off into the crowd randomly.
>
> No, the video just points out what could happen,
> especially if someone with little or no training
> in these situations decides to start shooting. Be
> real. Most of the people going around these days
> with ccp's are idiots that aren't directly
> threatened by anyone and just want to look cool.
>
>
> > That is never
> > anyone's game plan or best option.
>
>
> There is no game plan at all, other than the one
> pointed out in this thread, which was to run away
> as fast as you can and fuck everyone else.
>
>
> > watching videos like that and thinking you are
> > seeing something intelligent, you are feeding
> into
> > the partisan bullshit that exaggerates every
> > scenario to the worst possible. Trying using
> your
> > brain instead of emotion.
>
>
> Really. Trump used this notion that good guys with
> guns would have easily solved the Orlando tragedy.
> Maybe, maybe not, but it's far more likely that
> some idiot with a ccp would have missed the
> shooter and hit innocent people and/or been
> mistaken as the bad guy and peppered with swat
> team bullets, especially where booze is involved.
>
>
>
> > The truth is, someone there with a gun, a good
> > guy, may have saved lives and even your homo
> > buddies are starting to realize than and
> purchase
> > weapons.
>
>
> Maybe, maybe not. The video here is simply
> pointing out that it's not as simple as the
> romantic image in so many people's mind.


And your biased buddy who made the video is using an exaggerated image that the club will be so crowded that any counter offensive with a firearm will result in friendly fire casualties, larger body count.

"And your biased buddy who made the video is using an exaggerated image that the club will be so crowded that any counter offensive with a firearm will result in friendly fire casualties, larger body count."


Everything a Liberal needs to know about life, they learn from YouTube Videos. They have no idea how stupid they sound to those of us who live in reality.

cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "And your biased buddy who made the video is using
> an exaggerated image that the club will be so
> crowded that any counter offensive with a firearm
> will result in friendly fire casualties, larger
> body count."
>
>
> Everything a Liberal needs to know about life,
> they learn from YouTube Videos. They have no idea
> how stupid they sound to those of us who live in
> reality.


I don't think guns are for everyone and I would never recommend gun ownership to some random idiots on the internet. But safe gun ownership and use does save lives. The nightclub shooter could have been stopped sooner by a responsible gun owner, not the kind of moron the OP seems to think all gun owners are.

I have seen the OP post over the years and I think because of his sexual leanings he has an ax to grind with straights, gun owners, conservatives whatever.

Agree. There is no reason a law abiding citizen with no history of violence should not be permitted to own a gun for personal protection as well as sport. As far as I'm concerned, there shouldn't be many restrictions on what a person with no criminal history should be allowed to own. If I want to toss grenades on my own property just because I like to blow shit up, what's the problem?

Liberals think you solve problems by banning things. This has proven to be as ineffective as Prohibition and our current laws against drugs.

The problem is with our culture. Until we start to address the tough questions of how our society has evolved into it's current state, you can ban anything you want and it will only cause more violence, drug use, and terrorism.

cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Agree. There is no reason a law abiding citizen
> with no history of violence should not be
> permitted to own a gun for personal protection as
> well as sport.


No one is proposing that. What most normal people want is protection from felons, domestic abusers, anti-depressant and anti-psychotic pill poppers and terror watchlisters. If you have none of these issues, feel free to buy all the guns you want.





> As far as I'm concerned, there
> shouldn't be many restrictions on what a person
> with no criminal history should be allowed to own.


Including people on the list above?


> If I want to toss grenades on my own property just
> because I like to blow shit up, what's the
> problem?


What about nukes? Should anyone be able to set one off?


> Liberals think you solve problems by banning
> things. This has proven to be as ineffective as
> Prohibition and our current laws against drugs.


Not banning, restricting. Big difference.







wrong once again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I have seen the OP post over the years and I think
> because of his sexual leanings he has an ax to
> grind with straights, gun owners, conservatives
> whatever.


Yeah, you know me inside and out, and I love Islam too, right?

"No one is proposing that. What most normal people want is protection from felons, domestic abusers, anti-depressant and anti-psychotic pill poppers and terror watchlisters. If you have none of these issues, feel free to buy all the guns you want."


But you support the Governor of Virginia when he releases 200,000 felons back onto the streets and restores their voting right. As stated, I do not want those with a history of violence, drug abuse. or those on terror watch lists to have easy access to guns. OTOH, there is currently and inadequate process to have ones name removed from no fly lists and terror watch lists. Plus, there doesn't seem to be any due process. If an FBI Agent wants to put you on the list, you get put on it.


"What about nukes? Should anyone be able to set one off?"

If you want to have a serious discussion, then stop tossing out inane questions. Nobody is suggesting people be allowed to own nukes. Frankly, I'd like to see a World completely Nuke Free.


"Not banning, restricting. Big difference."


Except that your ilk has demonstrated incrementalism too many times to be trusted. This is why groups like the NRA fight so hard. Your ilk will not gain any ground until you stop the lying and ulterior motives. You also need to stop the knee-jerk reactions to every incident. Us vs Them is never a good strategy.

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> Haha. I'm pretty sure that I know more about
> firearms and have more experience with them than
> you.
>



HaHa. You're posts say otherwise.

Official FFU Truth Teller Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Haha. I'm pretty sure that I know more about
> > firearms and have more experience with them
> than
> > you.
> >
>
>
>
> HaHa. You're posts say otherwise.


your

cbaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> But you support the Governor of Virginia when he
> releases 200,000 felons back onto the streets and
> restores their voting right.


WHAT?


> As stated, I do not
> want those with a history of violence, drug abuse.
> or those on terror watch lists to have easy access
> to guns. OTOH, there is currently and inadequate
> process to have ones name removed from no fly
> lists and terror watch lists. Plus, there doesn't
> seem to be any due process. If an FBI Agent wants
> to put you on the list, you get put on it.


True, but until that time when they get that sorted out, no one currently on the watchlist should be able to purchase a gun.


> "What about nukes? Should anyone be able to set
> one off?"
>
> If you want to have a serious discussion, then
> stop tossing out inane questions. Nobody is
> suggesting people be allowed to own nukes.
> Frankly, I'd like to see a World completely Nuke
> Free.



You mentioned having the right to blow off grenades in your backyard. How big an explosion should you have the right to set off?




> "Not banning, restricting. Big difference."
>
>
> Except that your ilk has demonstrated
> incrementalism too many times to be trusted.


Such as? Who deserves the right to purchase firearms that is now prohibited?




> is why groups like the NRA fight so hard. Your ilk
> will not gain any ground until you stop the lying
> and ulterior motives. You also need to stop the
> knee-jerk reactions to every incident. Us vs Them
> is never a good strategy.


My "ilk" just wants to keep guns away from idiots like many of the ones on this site, that clearly have mental stability issues and some who are already being observed by law enforcement agents.

Re-read this thread and some of the reactions and tell me truly if you trust them to carry a firearm around. Just imagine what someone who can't maintain composure on a web forum would be like if someone verbally offended them in real life.


Unlike your "ilk", when I'm in public, I choose to use my mind and my own hands to survive.

This is what you get when your whole reality is based on YouTube Videos, TV and the Internet. I do not expect you to understand. Your ilk doesn't have the capacity nor the reality based structure. Good example is I said grenades on my own property, you twist it in your mind to mean I said my back yard. Not even close to what I said.

Love to see your mind and hands stop someone with a gun. Seriously, who do you think you are? The Flash.?

Most of the posturing on this site, is just that. I'd be willing to bet if you met most of these people in person, you would not be as afraid of them as you obviously are. I'd bet most of the gun owners are pretty decent and don't have a history of violence.

I carry a gun for my own personal self protection. I am a female and if someone tries to rape me I will shoot their nuts off.

Nearly all my closest friends, including myself, have been assaulted. We have to protect outselves. Sorry numbers, I normally like what you have to say, but this time I disagree.

cdc2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cbaa Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > .
> This is good information. I am not in a gang and I
> am not a criminal so I have a 0.000008564102564%
> of death by firearm. This is credible proof that
> only a ignorant fool would carry a firearm.


Exactly! That is exactly why people who carry are cowardly fools.

gun grabber Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cdc2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > cbaa Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > .
> > This is good information. I am not in a gang and
> I
> > am not a criminal so I have a
> 0.000008564102564%
> > of death by firearm. This is credible proof
> that
> > only a ignorant fool would carry a firearm.
>
>
> Exactly! That is exactly why people who carry are
> cowardly fools.


I guess you don't have auto insurance because of the super low odds of you getting in a crash? That's why your insurance company forces you to buy it...because THEY have to pay. Nobody gives a fuck if some nigger wastes you one night, so yeah...really good idea for you not to be carrying.

Those "coward" areas where lots of people carry won't ever be targets. If you're having trouble locating those areas - refer to your last electoral map - they will be the RED areas. The targets will always be the liberal faggot zones where all those "manly men" don't need guns. Ask 49 fags in Orlando how that worked for them.

Well actually Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Nearly all my closest friends, including myself,
> have been assaulted. We have to protect outselves.
> Sorry numbers, I normally like what you have to
> say, but this time I disagree.


Well, the fact that you and nearly all your closest friends have been assaulted points to a larger and separate problem that needs to be addressed. My fear for you is if someone assaults you again and you both fumble for the gun, that his balls are blown off and not your head. You also better be able to prove that he/she attacked you and were a mortal threat or you may be charged with homicide yourself. You might want to try a good pepper spray before shooting someone.

I also hope you've taken gun safety classes and visit the range on a semi regular basis to know your weapon.

As I've pointed out before, if you can show that you live with circumstances wherein your life or your families lives are threatened, than I am okay with someone getting a ccp. However, many dummies just want to carry because they can (see dummies above).

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well actually Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Nearly all my closest friends, including
> myself,
> > have been assaulted. We have to protect
> outselves.
> > Sorry numbers, I normally like what you have to
> > say, but this time I disagree.
>
>
> Well, the fact that you and nearly all your
> closest friends have been assaulted points to a
> larger and separate problem that needs to be
> addressed. My fear for you is if someone assaults
> you again and you both fumble for the gun, that
> his balls are blown off and not your head. You
> also better be able to prove that he/she attacked
> you and were a mortal threat or you may be charged
> with homicide yourself. You might want to try a
> good pepper spray before shooting someone.
>
> I also hope you've taken gun safety classes and
> visit the range on a semi regular basis to know
> your weapon.
>
> As I've pointed out before, if you can show that
> you live with circumstances wherein your life or
> your families lives are threatened, than I am okay
> with someone getting a ccp. However, many dummies
> just want to carry because they can (see dummies
> above).


As a gay transexual, why do you support a religion who hates you and a political party which wants to take away your ability to protect yourself?

Numbers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well actually Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Nearly all my closest friends, including
> myself,
> > have been assaulted. We have to protect
> outselves.
> > Sorry numbers, I normally like what you have to
> > say, but this time I disagree.
>
>
> Well, the fact that you and nearly all your
> closest friends have been assaulted points to a
> larger and separate problem that needs to be
> addressed. My fear for you is if someone assaults
> you again and you both fumble for the gun, that
> his balls are blown off and not your head. You
> also better be able to prove that he/she attacked
> you and were a mortal threat or you may be charged
> with homicide yourself. You might want to try a
> good pepper spray before shooting someone.
>
> I also hope you've taken gun safety classes and
> visit the range on a semi regular basis to know
> your weapon.
>
> As I've pointed out before, if you can show that
> you live with circumstances wherein your life or
> your families lives are threatened, than I am okay
> with someone getting a ccp. However, many dummies
> just want to carry because they can (see dummies
> above).


Who made you and your Left-Wing Cronies the arbitrators of how I should best protect myself?

The other problem with Liberals who want to ban guns is they want to take them away from law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong and have not committed a crime.

Or do you somehow think that if you ban all guns, that criminals will not be able to get them? How's that working out with banning drugs and immigrants coming in on our Southern Border?

>How's that working out with banning drugs and immigrants coming in on our Southern Border?


It isn't.. and never will.Under another Democrat president.. .Unless Trump is elected...as he will close off most Illegal entry. Nothing can stop them all..
Just take the gloves of the US Agents down that way.. some more Border Patrol agents.. Some Military help.. Lawfull to Protect the US Border against Foreign Invaders..Not so much as troops, but with planes, helos, satellite views..to observe and let the FEd take care of it .And State Police ,Sheriffs Deputies all can be deputized as Federal Special Deputy US Marshals.. to catch um..

Liberals don't know how easy it would be for gangsters to get a mill, a lathe and make their own .. Full Auto guns from scratch. A Full Auto Only is easier to make then a semi auto.. Any gunsmith knows this.. I predict that if Libs get a "Assault Weapons Ban" there will be a 10 fold increase in Machine shops.. To launder money as well as make mobsters firearms.. and that's 85 % of all gun crimes..Such Stupooid Libs..

DAJAX

.
Attachments:

Banning guns just gives the S.A Cartels another product to smuggle in. Wonder if Gun-O-Phobes will eventually call for legalizing guns since there would be so many people in prison for owning a small handgun.


LOL