In another win for the NRA, a Guntard who owned 100 guns (only for self defense, of course) killed his new wife and then himself on their wedding night. A two-for-one Guntard special!

http://nypost.com/2014/10/09/couple-dead-hours-after-wedding-in-murder-suicide/

Had to search to make sure you had a white one this time huh? lmao

The OP's hatred of firearms stems from his own phobias and insecurities over weapons. He pisses his pants when he goes into REI for some new shoes and sees the knife counter.

That's what the Constitution protects, your right to lose your nerve and shoot others.

Donny Frisco was here.
Attachments:

Gun laws were more lax under the Reich than the Weimar Republic.

ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gun laws were more lax under the Reich than the
> Weimar Republic.


As long as you weren't a Jew, Pole, gypsy, negro...

Sure Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gun laws were more lax under the Reich than the
> > Weimar Republic.
>
>
> As long as you weren't a Jew, Pole, gypsy,
> negro...


Thank god those that could own guns rose up against that oppressive government.

ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sure Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Gun laws were more lax under the Reich than
> the
> > > Weimar Republic.
> >
> >
> > As long as you weren't a Jew, Pole, gypsy,
> > negro...
>
>
> Thank god those that could own guns rose up
> against that oppressive government.


Not quite on point there Sparky lol

But you gave it a try.

Spot on point. The oppressive government argument is exactly the argument gun nuts use to justify zero gun control.

ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spot on point. The oppressive government argument
> is exactly the argument gun nuts use to justify
> zero gun control.


Uhhh... not really oppressive to those who are part of the oppression now is it.

I don't have the patience to argue with your dumb ass for an hour tonight so knock yourself out from here.

And that's how easy it is to sway people from owning firearms to prevent oppression to owning firearms to participate in oppression. What makes you think the same couldn't occur here?

Please do run off, like most other gun nuts without a leg to stand on.

ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And that's how easy it is to sway people from
> owning firearms to prevent oppression to owning
> firearms to participate in oppression. What makes
> you think the same couldn't occur here?
>

It might. If the gun nuts were the ones seizing control.


> Please do run off, like most other gun nuts
> without a leg to stand on.


I'm done. As they say. "It's not me, it's you." lol

You can have your rabbit hole all to yourself.

Yet you're still here, avoiding the subject...

An American gun owner kills him or herself every 4 hours or so. Shit happens, get over it and move on.

ColumnNo.4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spot on point. The oppressive government argument
> is exactly the argument gun nuts use to justify
> zero gun control.

Didn't take Government 101 or read the Federalist Papers did you?

The Federalist Papers are not law. Moreover, all the Founders are dead. What some dead white landowner from the 18th Century thought has nothing to do with anything. Hamilton had never even heard of a Guntard. If such gun fetishists existed back then the Constitution would be different.

They are all dead Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Federalist Papers are not law. Moreover, all
> the Founders are dead. What some dead white
> landowner from the 18th Century thought has
> nothing to do with anything. Hamilton had never
> even heard of a Guntard. If such gun fetishists
> existed back then the Constitution would be
> different.

You really need to take Government 101. The Federalist Papers are the primary documents Supreme Court Justices use to interpret the Constitution. Yes, the Constitution is the law whether you like it or not. Come back when you've done your homework Junior.

Jimmy Madison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They are all dead Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Federalist Papers are not law. Moreover,
> all
> > the Founders are dead. What some dead white
> > landowner from the 18th Century thought has
> > nothing to do with anything. Hamilton had
> never
> > even heard of a Guntard. If such gun
> fetishists
> > existed back then the Constitution would be
> > different.
>
> You really need to take Government 101. The
> Federalist Papers are the primary documents
> Supreme Court Justices use to interpret the
> Constitution. Yes, the Constitution is the law
> whether you like it or not. Come back when you've
> done your homework Junior.

The Supreme Court applies the Constitution, not the Federalist Papers. Sheesh, I hope you can get a refund from that Government 101 course you purportedly took.

I beg to differ. I've actually read the Federalist Papers. No, the SCOTUS
interprets the Constitution. Your 8th grade level doesn't work here.

You should never raise money issues on a wedding day. You wait at least one day.

Never Run Out of Ammo

Guns Don't Kill People. People Kill People

Them or You

The two most important days in your life are the day your were born and and the day you find out why



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/10/2014 07:46AM by Gunlover.

Jimmy Madison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I beg to differ. I've actually read the Federalist
> Papers. No, the SCOTUS
> interprets the Constitution. Your 8th grade level
> doesn't work here.
>
> src=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pyZhB0oeHEo/URJ2t2sn
> TeI/AAAAAAAAFzc/FiXTYVzxi4E/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013
> -02-06+at++Wednesday,+February+6,+10.25+AM.png>

What does this have to do with the Constitution? A great example of the ared Herring fallacy. I'm not surprised. Come back when you have read a couple Supreme Court Decisions.

By the way, the Federalist Papers rejected the idea of a Bill of Rights. Oh, and the Second Amendment is in the Bill of Rights. So the Federalist Papers rejected the idea of the Second Amendment altogether. Good thing the Supreme Court doesn't put much weight on them.

Publius Maximus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jimmy Madison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I beg to differ. I've actually read the
> Federalist
> > Papers. No, the SCOTUS
> > interprets the Constitution. Your 8th grade
> level
> > doesn't work here.
> >
> > >
> src=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pyZhB0oeHEo/URJ2t2sn
>
> >
> TeI/AAAAAAAAFzc/FiXTYVzxi4E/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013
>
> > -02-06+at++Wednesday,+February+6,+10.25+AM.png>
>
> What does this have to do with the Constitution?
> A great example of the ared Herring fallacy. I'm
> not surprised. Come back when you have read a
> couple Supreme Court Decisions.
>
> By the way, the Federalist Papers rejected the
> idea of a Bill of Rights. Oh, and the Second
> Amendment is in the Bill of Rights. So the
> Federalist Papers rejected the idea of the Second
> Amendment altogether. Good thing the Supreme
> Court doesn't put much weight on them.

You are obviously making things up to support your own fantasies.

Supreme Court rules 2nd Amendment provides individual right to keep and bear arms.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/28/AR2010062802134.html

Why so faggot, bro? U Mad?

OP = More Butthurt. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why so faggot, bro? U Mad?

OP must have spent a lot of money on the Brady Bunch argument that the 2nd Amendment only applies to police and military. The SCOTUS handed them their
asses on a silver platter.