Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Brainiac
()
Date: August 21, 2014 01:55PM
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/170048-star-witness-michael-brown-shooting-charged-theft-filing-false-police-report/
So Dorian Johnson, Michael Brown's star witness, is a wanted criminal and a liar.
Anybody surprised by this revelation? He should also be charged with inciting a riot.
******************************************************************************************************
"During the summer after his first semester at Lincoln, Johnson was charged with a misdemeanor after giving police a false first name after he was arrested on suspicion of theft. He later pleaded guilty.
He was accused of stealing a package containing a backpack belonging to someone else from an apartment complex. When he was arrested in that case, he identified himself as Derrick Johnson and said he was 16.
He is wanted for failing to appear in Jefferson City municipal court to answer to the theft charge, court officials said."
So Dorian Johnson, Michael Brown's star witness, is a wanted criminal and a liar.
Anybody surprised by this revelation? He should also be charged with inciting a riot.
******************************************************************************************************
"During the summer after his first semester at Lincoln, Johnson was charged with a misdemeanor after giving police a false first name after he was arrested on suspicion of theft. He later pleaded guilty.
He was accused of stealing a package containing a backpack belonging to someone else from an apartment complex. When he was arrested in that case, he identified himself as Derrick Johnson and said he was 16.
He is wanted for failing to appear in Jefferson City municipal court to answer to the theft charge, court officials said."
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Crapp
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:00PM
Please put all this Brown crap in one thread. Most of us don't give a shit about it. Just more media bullshit hype to sell commercials.
Already posted in three four other Brown threads.
Already posted in three four other Brown threads.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Big Dick Black
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:03PM
Crapp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please put all this Brown crap in one thread. Most
> of us don't give a shit about it. Just more media
> bullshit hype to sell commercials.
>
> Already posted in three four other Brown threads.
When did Cary appoint you the fucking moderator you fucktard?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please put all this Brown crap in one thread. Most
> of us don't give a shit about it. Just more media
> bullshit hype to sell commercials.
>
> Already posted in three four other Brown threads.
When did Cary appoint you the fucking moderator you fucktard?
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Huh???
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:10PM
Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot bear witness to a crime?
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Xjxjc
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:14PM
Huh??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot
> bear witness to a crime?
They can, but their credibility is questionable and often suspect. But that's for a jury to decide.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot
> bear witness to a crime?
They can, but their credibility is questionable and often suspect. But that's for a jury to decide.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Decrapitated
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:19PM
Huh??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot
> bear witness to a crime?
No one is saying that you dimwit. But who's going to believe him? I would give him a little more latitude if he wasnt one of Brown's homies. It was obvious from the first time he spoke he was coached and lying. Since when does a fucking witness need a lawyer anyway?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot
> bear witness to a crime?
No one is saying that you dimwit. But who's going to believe him? I would give him a little more latitude if he wasnt one of Brown's homies. It was obvious from the first time he spoke he was coached and lying. Since when does a fucking witness need a lawyer anyway?
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Scenarioerizer
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:34PM
I was riding in my wife's car...she was driving and we got struck from behind as we were changing lanes. The guy clearly failed to stop in time as was evidenced by the contact point...the REAR of her bumper. He tried to contend that she cut him off and sideswiped him but the evidence did not support that. I gave a statement to the police officer who was called to the scene but, I really just shrugged and said, "I'm her husband so...is it really legally valid what I say about what happened? Isn't the other driver just going to argue in court that I wouldn't say anything to incriminate my wife?" The officer took my statement anyway and told me it would be best to appear in court on my wife's assigned date.
Despite the fact that we had photos of the damage and the accident scene which we blew up and presented to the judge...the judge STILL wanted to hear my testimony which I emphasized was a sensation of the car being struck from behind with no side-to-side motion. The judge dismissed the charges against my wife for "failing to pay attention" and we were on our way. Unfortunately, the other driver who was clearly at fault was not formally charged so, there was no legal due process there.
If the courts permit the testimony of a spouse...then they're going to let a "crony" testify as well. Again...in a criminal case, it'll be up to the jury to decide if the testimony given is truthful, relevant and or reliable.
Despite the fact that we had photos of the damage and the accident scene which we blew up and presented to the judge...the judge STILL wanted to hear my testimony which I emphasized was a sensation of the car being struck from behind with no side-to-side motion. The judge dismissed the charges against my wife for "failing to pay attention" and we were on our way. Unfortunately, the other driver who was clearly at fault was not formally charged so, there was no legal due process there.
If the courts permit the testimony of a spouse...then they're going to let a "crony" testify as well. Again...in a criminal case, it'll be up to the jury to decide if the testimony given is truthful, relevant and or reliable.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Money for Nothing
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:43PM
Scenarioerizer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was riding in my wife's car...she was driving
> and we got struck from behind as we were changing
> lanes. The guy clearly failed to stop in time as
> was evidenced by the contact point...the REAR of
> her bumper. He tried to contend that she cut him
> off and sideswiped him but the evidence did not
> support that. I gave a statement to the police
> officer who was called to the scene but, I really
> just shrugged and said, "I'm her husband so...is
> it really legally valid what I say about what
> happened? Isn't the other driver just going to
> argue in court that I wouldn't say anything to
> incriminate my wife?" The officer took my
> statement anyway and told me it would be best to
> appear in court on my wife's assigned date.
>
> Despite the fact that we had photos of the damage
> and the accident scene which we blew up and
> presented to the judge...the judge STILL wanted to
> hear my testimony which I emphasized was a
> sensation of the car being struck from behind with
> no side-to-side motion. The judge dismissed the
> charges against my wife for "failing to pay
> attention" and we were on our way. Unfortunately,
> the other driver who was clearly at fault was not
> formally charged so, there was no legal due
> process there.
>
> If the courts permit the testimony of a
> spouse...then they're going to let a "crony"
> testify as well. Again...in a criminal case, it'll
> be up to the jury to decide if the testimony given
> is truthful, relevant and or reliable.
You are overlooking a couple important points. There is a term "Independent Witness" that is recognized in many courts. This means the witness has no affiliation or realtionship with the person for whom they are testifying.
Also, not all Judges and Courts operate the same way. Apples and Oranges. Especially when you are talking about two different jurisdictions.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was riding in my wife's car...she was driving
> and we got struck from behind as we were changing
> lanes. The guy clearly failed to stop in time as
> was evidenced by the contact point...the REAR of
> her bumper. He tried to contend that she cut him
> off and sideswiped him but the evidence did not
> support that. I gave a statement to the police
> officer who was called to the scene but, I really
> just shrugged and said, "I'm her husband so...is
> it really legally valid what I say about what
> happened? Isn't the other driver just going to
> argue in court that I wouldn't say anything to
> incriminate my wife?" The officer took my
> statement anyway and told me it would be best to
> appear in court on my wife's assigned date.
>
> Despite the fact that we had photos of the damage
> and the accident scene which we blew up and
> presented to the judge...the judge STILL wanted to
> hear my testimony which I emphasized was a
> sensation of the car being struck from behind with
> no side-to-side motion. The judge dismissed the
> charges against my wife for "failing to pay
> attention" and we were on our way. Unfortunately,
> the other driver who was clearly at fault was not
> formally charged so, there was no legal due
> process there.
>
> If the courts permit the testimony of a
> spouse...then they're going to let a "crony"
> testify as well. Again...in a criminal case, it'll
> be up to the jury to decide if the testimony given
> is truthful, relevant and or reliable.
You are overlooking a couple important points. There is a term "Independent Witness" that is recognized in many courts. This means the witness has no affiliation or realtionship with the person for whom they are testifying.
Also, not all Judges and Courts operate the same way. Apples and Oranges. Especially when you are talking about two different jurisdictions.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
of course not
()
Date: August 21, 2014 02:43PM
In criminal science and the fundamentals of criminology and jurisprudence it is called: Birds of a feather theory.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
uRtheProblem
()
Date: August 21, 2014 04:40PM
Crapp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please put all this Brown crap in one thread. Most
> of us don't give a shit about it. Just more media
> bullshit hype to sell commercials.
>
> Already posted in three four other Brown threads.
Sounds like someone is very upset that the gentle giant was a giant piece of waste material.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please put all this Brown crap in one thread. Most
> of us don't give a shit about it. Just more media
> bullshit hype to sell commercials.
>
> Already posted in three four other Brown threads.
Sounds like someone is very upset that the gentle giant was a giant piece of waste material.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
slkjf
()
Date: August 21, 2014 05:06PM
Huh??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot
> bear witness to a crime?
umm, sure they can.... but criminals lie and lie and lie and lie and lie....
Just like that greasy little black fuck, swearing up and down that he and his gentle giant college-bound friend were simply walking down the middle of the street, minding their own business. Two choir boys walking home to grandma.
Minutes earlier, that ugly turd had walked out of a convenience store with the gentle giant who had just committed a strong-hold robbery.
Two loser criminals, brought to you courtesy of the welfare system.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait...so...wanted criminals as a group cannot
> bear witness to a crime?
umm, sure they can.... but criminals lie and lie and lie and lie and lie....
Just like that greasy little black fuck, swearing up and down that he and his gentle giant college-bound friend were simply walking down the middle of the street, minding their own business. Two choir boys walking home to grandma.
Minutes earlier, that ugly turd had walked out of a convenience store with the gentle giant who had just committed a strong-hold robbery.
Two loser criminals, brought to you courtesy of the welfare system.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
funky juvenile delinquents
()
Date: August 21, 2014 05:16PM
I'm shocked that they walked in the streets, the usual method is to walk "over" any parked cars from back, over the roof, to the front end, can't tell you how many times I've seen them doing that, why they do it I know not why. Typical delinquent type of reasoning. Maybe just robbing a store they did not want to bring attention to themselves.
Re: The "inconvenient" truth is starting to emerge in Ferguson
Posted by:
Haa
()
Date: August 21, 2014 05:30PM
funky juvenile delinquents Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe just robbing a store
> they did not want to bring attention to
> themselves.
LOL!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe just robbing a store
> they did not want to bring attention to
> themselves.
LOL!!