Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
According to a law passed in 2002, within three years of a smart gun being available for consumer purchase anywhere in the nation, only smart guns will be allowed to be sold in New Jersey.
Smart guns are now sold in California, so the clock is ticking in New Jersey.
What is a smart gun? It will only fire if a computer recognizes an authorized fingerprint or palm print.
Re: Only Smart Guns to Be Sold in New Jersey starting 2017
Posted by:
Liberal Logic 005
()
Date: February 19, 2014 02:35PM
AKA gun sales will be very strong for the next 3 years so it wont make a difference, other than getting some people killed for not sleeping with their watch on of course.
New Jersey Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg has written a letter to N.J. Attorney General John Jay Hoffman asking him to start the doomsday clock for "dumb gun" sales. If he follows the letter of the law, Hoffman will ignite a firestorm of protest from already beleaguered N.J. gun owners.
New Jersey gun owners don't want to lose access to, trade or face the confiscation of tried-and-true non-electronic firearms. They view electronic firearms as inherently unreliable. What if your finger's covered with dirt or blood? What if the electronic "smart gun" runs out of power? What if you need to use someone else's "smart gun" in an emergency?
Re: Only Smart Guns to Be Sold in New Jersey starting 2017
Posted by:
The Finer Points
()
Date: February 26, 2014 10:42PM
Eesh, under current definitions a smart gun is not only a gun that recognizes an authorized users fingerprints or palm print.
There are also smart guns like the one in your picture that come with a watch. If that watch is not within the proper range of the gun, it won't fire. The idea is you must be wearing the watch while shooting.
I've also heard of smart guns that learn the "hand pressure" of the authorized user. Evidently, with the right technology the nuances of a person's grip can be used to unlock a gun's capabilities. This sounds unreliable...You're telling me that you hold a gun exactly the same at the range as you do at 2am when some brown, savage, illegal mud person breaks into your home to rape your dog?
Re: Only Smart Guns to Be Sold in New Jersey starting 2017
Posted by:
suburban white folks
()
Date: February 26, 2014 11:22PM
Suburban middle-class folks who live in a good neighborhood should not even be allowed to buy guns. You will probably never need a gun. If you live in a bad neighborhood, you can buy a gun. America's gun problem solved.
Re: Only Smart Guns to Be Sold in New Jersey starting 2017
Posted by:
LCx4x
()
Date: February 27, 2014 07:27AM
>Suburban middle-class folks who live in a good neighborhood should not even be allowed to buy guns. You will probably never need a gun. If you live in a bad neighborhood, you can buy a gun.
Re: Only Smart Guns to Be Sold in New Jersey starting 2017
Posted by:
Taj
()
Date: February 27, 2014 08:35AM
suburban white folks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Suburban middle-class folks who live in a good
> neighborhood should not even be allowed to buy
> guns. You will probably never need a gun. If you
> live in a bad neighborhood, you can buy a gun.
> America's gun problem solved.
Re: Only Smart Guns to Be Sold in New Jersey starting 2017
Posted by:
Yup
()
Date: February 27, 2014 09:24AM
hFVcX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will convert if/when police are required to
> carry smart guns. If the government won't adopt
> the technology, why am I being forced to do so?
This. I'm not a gun enthusiast. (I'm not a gun hater either...) The government enjoys its share of accidental shootings and/or intentional shootings that could have been prevented, etc...they should be using smart guns, too. Hell, even James Bond uses a smart gun now and it has saved his life.
Chief among those worries: the safety mechanism will fail when it's needed most. If you're relying on a weapon for defense, the last thing you want is another point of failure. Electronics aren't perfect. Sometimes cameras can't autofocus. Cable boxes freeze up when browsing the channel guide. The equivalent, seemingly small glitch in a smart gun could be the difference between life and death.
And then there are specific technical limitations. Smart guns rely on batteries to power their various safety systems. Should that battery die, the gun could fail to fire. In fact, most models designed for civilian use are designed to fail if the battery dies. It's been suggested that smart guns designed for law enforcement should automatically disable the safety if the battery dies.
There are similar issues with biometric scanners, which have serious trouble reading fingerprints if your hands are wet (with panicked sweat as you grapple with an armed attacker, for instance). Many of these systems claim they can read a fingerprint or other biometric and properly unlock the firearm 99.9 percent of the time -- but when it comes to matters of life and death, even 0.1 percent chance of failure is considered too high. And then there's always the worry that these weapons could be hacked or jammed remotely. Which is terrifying.