It's not even that he disagrees with the GOP, but that they fuck around and waste everyone's time instead of legitimately defending their points of view and using their minds.

"Hey, lets do everything we can to prevent Obama from passing bills, and then blame Obama for not getting anything done."

That is the modern-day Republican party's strategy. It helps nobody but the Republican party. It doesn't help America in any way.

He needs to chill out.
He argues it well though.

excellent.

Anything the Dems try to pass, the GOP blocks. It doesn’t matter if they’re “for” the issue or not–they’ll find a way to vote against any bill pushed by Obama or Dems. Even a no-brainer issue like providing care for 9/11 responders.

(something off-topic and stupid)

You forgot 'Gay'.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Do you even know what the argument was about? Seriously, if you did, you would be outraged? You say Republicans have no ideas, right? If the Rules Committee doesn't allow GOP ideas to be brought to the floor and even be discussed, you are OK with that? One way to silence opposition is to shut them out of the process. Weiner and his fellow Democrats want to see this continue. I always hear about this Reoublican party of "no" but what everyone fails to understand is that the Rules Committee never allows Republican amendments.

realist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> fails to understand is that the
> Rules Committee never allows Republican amendments.

The GOP needs to grow up and realize they're not in charge. If they don't like it that their ideas are being ignored, boo fucking hoo. Vote for what you think is right instead of casting some passive/aggressive anti-vote because you can't stop whining.

Actually, that's what caused the problem. The Republicans inserted a controversial--and unrelated--amendment about immigration into and otherwise popular bill.

realist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> but what everyone fails to understand is that the
> Rules Committee never allows Republican
> amendments.

...and yet, the Democrats are STILL in the majority correct? So why is this a problem again? Right - the real problem is the Democrats are fighting amongst themselves - but it always looks good to try and paint the Republicans as the REAL problem.

FAIL on the Democrats head this time. The Congressman's faux rage would be better directed at his compatriots who seem to be having issues of their own. Looks like a good time to burn folks at the stake like Rangel and Waters huh?

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/01/2010 09:56AM by Registered Voter.

More then a simple majority was needed to stop republikans from loading the bill with radical right amendments.

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More then a simple majority was needed to stop
> republikans from loading the bill with radical
> right amendments.

this

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...and yet, the Democrats are STILL in the
> majority correct? So why is this a problem again?

because they are politicians.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

I don't know if the guy is more of a Wiener, or a Whiner. Either way, he belongs in a bun, on the grill, and buried under mounds of his own unrelished sour krautedness.



==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

The Republicans better wake up or they are going to have a tough time in November. Democrats are going to slam them with ads detailing Republican votes over the last two year. That combined with Tea Party candidates and it's not looking pretty.

Qwest Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Republicans better wake up or they are going
> to have a tough time in November. Democrats are
> going to slam them with ads detailing Republican
> votes over the last two year. That combined with
> Tea Party candidates and it's not looking pretty.

If unemployment remains at close to 10% - no, they won't.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Qwest Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Republicans better wake up or they are
> going
> > to have a tough time in November. Democrats are
> > going to slam them with ads detailing
> Republican
> > votes over the last two year. That combined
> with
> > Tea Party candidates and it's not looking
> pretty.
>
> If unemployment remains at close to 10% - no, they
> won't.


Perhaps when its pointed out that one party beleives they are unemployed because the Govt is giving them unemployment benefits...maybe..just maybe, they'll wake up

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps when its pointed out that one party
> beleives they are unemployed because the Govt is
> giving them unemployment benefits...maybe..just
> maybe, they'll wake up

Yes, that is your dream isn't it (R)V - having the welfare state dependent masses voting in the folks who continue to give them everyone else's money.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Win Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> It's not even that he disagrees with the GOP, but
> that they fuck around and waste everyone's time
> instead of legitimately defending their points of
> view and using their minds.
I'm sorry I just can't take anyone with the last name of "Weiner" seriously.I mean come on! Look at this dork!

Give me a fucking break.

A little more on this clown;

"Weiner married Huma Abedin, a longtime personal aide of Hillary Clinton, on July 10, 2010. Former president Bill Clinton officiated the wedding. Weiner proposed to Abedin on May 23, 2009. Weiner is a friend of Ben Affleck, whom he met while Affleck was researching the role of a young and ambitious politician on Capitol Hill in 2008.[33] "We got into a chest-to-chest shouting match over Obama–Clinton within about four minutes. Literally, people were outside the office wondering if they should go in and separate us," Weiner has said about one of their first encounters." (from wikipedia)

What kind of a girl marries a Weiner you ask?


And how about that Weiner/Affleck showdown.



Dream team, brain trust powerhouse? You tell me.


This guy is another example of someone who couldn't make it in the real world if it was to save his soul.
A graduate of SUNY Plattsburgh, Weiner was an aide to then-U.S. Representative Charles Schumer (1985–91) before serving as a member of the New York City Council from 1992 to 1998.

He has consistently won his district by wide margins and is sure to be on the public dole for years to come.
All he makes me think of is What The Fuck is wrong with the people that live in New Yorks 9th Congressional District.

His wife doesn't look bad at all. And he knows some celebrities. SCANDALOUS! Wiki says he was roommates with Jon Stewart. This information should prove to everyone without a doubt that this guy somethingsomething.

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> His wife doesn't look bad at all.


I guess...except for maybe her lazy eye and the urge I get to throw her some sugar cubes. And the fact she sleeps standing up in a stable.


> And he knows some celebrities. SCANDALOUS! Wiki says he was
> roommates with Jon Stewart. This information
> should prove to everyone without a doubt that this
> guy somethingsomething.

Johnny you're being very charitable here. Oh I forgot! he roomated with Stewart. That for sure makes him well qualified to construct rules for us all to live by. The guy is a dink. And Bubba officiated at his wedding? What do you bet he knocked the bottom outta that thing before Weiner tapped it......


See this is the level of discourse inspired by the Democrats social level.....Truly Cosmopolitan!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/02/2010 12:33PM by mcsmack.

mcsmack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Johnny you're being very charitable here. Oh I
> forgot! he roomated with Stewart. That for sure
> makes him well qualified to construct rules for us
> all to live by.


I never said he was or wasn't, I'm not making that argument. In fact, I knew nothing of the man before today and never heard or saw him before I watched that video. You appear to be attempting to make such an argument, but you have yet to say one single thing that indicates he's not qualified to be a representative. In fact, you have yet to mention an issue you even simply disagree with him on.

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mcsmack Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Johnny you're being very charitable here. Oh I
> > forgot! he roomated with Stewart. That for sure
> > makes him well qualified to construct rules for
> us
> > all to live by.
>
>
> I never said he was or wasn't, I'm not making that
> argument. In fact, I knew nothing of the man
> before today and never heard or saw him before I
> watched that video. You appear to be attempting to
> make such an argument, but you have yet to say one
> single thing that indicates he's not qualified to
> be a representative. In fact, you have yet to
> mention an issue you even simply disagree with him
> on.


I don't care. His name is Weiner. Thats all it takes for me not to like the guy. That and of course he's another scrawny little weak Lib that cries like a bitch about everything. He was picked on and bullied frequently while growing up. But watch out now!! Weiner has a microphone!

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------


In fact, you have yet to
> mention an issue you even simply disagree with him
> on.

I frown on goat abuse also. Fucking Weiner!

Goat Attacks Weiner and has its way!


We’re not kidding. Weiner was having another one of his self-important-look-at-me-I’m-Weiner press conferences and he was attacked by a goat–which he brought along to illustrate some point that no one paid attention to*. The prop comic of congress was actually “speared” by one of the goats “pointy, foot-long horns, hard enough to draw blood.”



We wish Weiner a speedy recovery.

My thought while watching the video was:

"Okay it appears I'm listening to some Liberal bozo, but I just can't watch the rest'.

- because I STOP LISTENING to people, when they START throwing TEMPER TANTRUMS.




.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/02/2010 01:54PM by Troll@AOL.

Because his MESSAGE is weak, he feels the need to make you to feel his RAGE and PASSION about it at least.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Because his MESSAGE is weak, he feels the need to
> make you to feel his RAGE and PASSION about it at
> least.

u r ghey

Not as GAY as YOU are for using the werd; 'ghey', FAGGOT.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

mcsmack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I frown on goat abuse also. Fucking Weiner!
>
> Goat Attacks Weiner and has its way!
>
>
> We’re not kidding. Weiner was having another one
> of his self-important-look-at-me-I’m-Weiner press
> conferences and he was attacked by a goat–which he
> brought along to illustrate some point that no one
> paid attention to*. The prop comic of congress
> was actually “speared” by one of the goats
> “pointy, foot-long horns, hard enough to draw
> blood.”
>
>
>
> We wish Weiner a speedy recovery.


According to a statement from Weiner's office, the mohair goat farming industry received nearly $1 million in subsidies last year. After a handful of bad wool-and-goat related puns, the two lawmakers decried the subsidies as wasteful government spending.

"Jason and I may not agree on very much," Weiner said of his GOP colleague, "but we're united against this waste."


So he shouldn't have press conferences with members of the opposing party to try to bring attention to wasteful spending in Washington?

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mcsmack Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > I frown on goat abuse also. Fucking Weiner!
> >
> > Goat Attacks Weiner and has its way!
> >
> >
> > We’re not kidding. Weiner was having another
> one
> > of his self-important-look-at-me-I’m-Weiner
> press
> > conferences and he was attacked by a goat–which
> he
> > brought along to illustrate some point that no
> one
> > paid attention to*. The prop comic of congress
> > was actually “speared” by one of the goats
> > “pointy, foot-long horns, hard enough to draw
> > blood.”
> >
> >
> >
> > We wish Weiner a speedy recovery.
>
>
> According to a statement from Weiner's office, the
> mohair goat farming industry received nearly $1
> million in subsidies last year. After a handful of
> bad wool-and-goat related puns, the two lawmakers
> decried the subsidies as wasteful government
> spending.
>
> "Jason and I may not agree on very much," Weiner
> said of his GOP colleague, "but we're united
> against this waste."
>
>
> So he shouldn't have press conferences with
> members of the opposing party to try to bring
> attention to wasteful spending in Washington?

No. I agree with canceling subsidies for everything including farmers. But the goat was the innocent victim here and you can't blame it for not trusting Weiner.