a reader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Below_Me Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Waples Mill Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 92% of NRA members oppose gun confiscation
> via
> > > mandatory buy-back laws.
> > >
> > > 92% oppose a federal law banning the sale of
> > > firearms between private citizens.
> >
> > Funny, I haven't heard anyone seriously propose
> > either of those things. Nice to see that the
> NRA
> > doesn't let the truth get in the way of it's
> > ginning-up the gun nut base.
>
> You must not read the news. NY governor Cuomo
> said confiscation and/or mandatory buybacks of
> "assault weapons" were on the table before they
> actually passed much of that into law. If a state
> governor says that, it is a serious proposal. If
> it is now law, it isn't even a proposal anymore.
> From the New York Times:
>
> "Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale
> to the state could be an option."
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/nyregion/cuomo-s
> ays-he-will-outline-gun-measures-next-month.html?_
> r=0
>
> Additionally, the new NY law passed this year bans
> private sales of "assault weapons" unless it is to
> direct family members, and confiscates some
> weapons and weapon components that were legal a
> month ago.
>
> "Magazines with a capacity of more than 10 rounds
> and manufactured before 1994, which are currently
> legal, would have to be turned over to authorities
> or sold out of state within one year."
>
> "The new laws provide for an immediate ban on
> semi-automatic rifles, shotguns and pistols with a
> "military-style feature," such as a flash
> suppressor or a bayonet mount. Guns that had been
> legal but are being banned would be grandfathered
> in, but their owners must register their firearms
> with the state or sell them out of state within
> one year." - USA Today
>
> So you blame the NRA for lying? Doesn't look good
> for your arguments if you are poisoning the debate
> with childish lies.
Banning firearms with bayonet mounts is a perfect example of how ignorant some people can be. I can find no record of a mounted bayonet being used in the commission of a crime. Criminals would use a screw clamp to attach a butcher knife if they really wanted to.