Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
withtoday
()
Date: January 11, 2013 10:08AM
better or worse?
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
()
Date: January 11, 2013 10:35AM
Less hairy
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Forest Hump
()
Date: January 11, 2013 10:59AM
You don't see many environmental porn these days. It's tree this, shrub that, and please no weeds.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
70's Child
()
Date: January 11, 2013 02:09PM
I see the merits of both...
I like the looks of the 70's chicks getting it on but once Jenna Jameson got on the scene, performances and production values throughout the industry went through the roof.
As far as I'm concerned the finest pre-Jenna porn film ever made was "Insatiable" from 1980...yeah, yeah not the 70's. To see Marilyn Chambers take John Holmes anally is still a feat unequalled.
I like the looks of the 70's chicks getting it on but once Jenna Jameson got on the scene, performances and production values throughout the industry went through the roof.
As far as I'm concerned the finest pre-Jenna porn film ever made was "Insatiable" from 1980...yeah, yeah not the 70's. To see Marilyn Chambers take John Holmes anally is still a feat unequalled.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
ex-Lester
()
Date: January 11, 2013 04:04PM
Everyone is ripped these days. Men and women. You can't get away with looking like the Gerbil or Hamster, whatever the guy's nickname is. The fat little porn guy who's on the LMFAO video.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
kchikiewoowoo
()
Date: January 11, 2013 04:17PM
ex-Lester Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone is ripped these days. Men and women.
> You can't get away with looking like the Gerbil or
> Hamster, whatever the guy's nickname is. The fat
> little porn guy who's on the LMFAO video.
Did you see the one porn video of the one older bald male that
looked like he should have been aborted his skeletal body was so malformed and he was on public display having sex with a porn star! HAhahaha I was about to puke!
If I was drunk I would have laughed my ass off.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone is ripped these days. Men and women.
> You can't get away with looking like the Gerbil or
> Hamster, whatever the guy's nickname is. The fat
> little porn guy who's on the LMFAO video.
Did you see the one porn video of the one older bald male that
looked like he should have been aborted his skeletal body was so malformed and he was on public display having sex with a porn star! HAhahaha I was about to puke!
If I was drunk I would have laughed my ass off.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Ron Jeremy
()
Date: January 11, 2013 05:08PM
ex-Lester Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone is ripped these days. Men and women.
> You can't get away with looking like the Gerbil or
> Hamster, whatever the guy's nickname is. The fat
> little porn guy who's on the LMFAO video.
It's "The Hedgehog".
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone is ripped these days. Men and women.
> You can't get away with looking like the Gerbil or
> Hamster, whatever the guy's nickname is. The fat
> little porn guy who's on the LMFAO video.
It's "The Hedgehog".
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Coke and Broke
()
Date: January 11, 2013 06:28PM
70's Child Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I see the merits of both...
>
> I like the looks of the 70's chicks getting it on
> but once Jenna Jameson got on the scene,
> performances and production values throughout the
> industry went through the roof.
>
> As far as I'm concerned the finest pre-Jenna porn
> film ever made was "Insatiable" from 1980...yeah,
> yeah not the 70's. To see Marilyn Chambers take
> John Holmes anally is still a feat unequalled.
Marilyn Chambers was hot but "the wad" was coked out. Insatiable was made 6 months before the Wonderland murders occurred.
Johnny Was a very bad boy.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I see the merits of both...
>
> I like the looks of the 70's chicks getting it on
> but once Jenna Jameson got on the scene,
> performances and production values throughout the
> industry went through the roof.
>
> As far as I'm concerned the finest pre-Jenna porn
> film ever made was "Insatiable" from 1980...yeah,
> yeah not the 70's. To see Marilyn Chambers take
> John Holmes anally is still a feat unequalled.
Marilyn Chambers was hot but "the wad" was coked out. Insatiable was made 6 months before the Wonderland murders occurred.
Johnny Was a very bad boy.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
oh yeah!
()
Date: January 11, 2013 08:28PM
go to your fav porn search and type in "bridgette monet".
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
The Shaggy Seventies
()
Date: January 12, 2013 04:13PM
Hair.
Hair everywhere.
The women have long hair. The men have long hair.
The men have body hair. The men have facial hair (hence the term "porn star mustache").
The men (and some women) have ass-crack hair.
If you watched European porn, between half and three quarters of the women had hairy armpits.
And of course, everyone has a thick forest of pubic hair.
It was the Shaggy Seventies.
Hair everywhere.
The women have long hair. The men have long hair.
The men have body hair. The men have facial hair (hence the term "porn star mustache").
The men (and some women) have ass-crack hair.
If you watched European porn, between half and three quarters of the women had hairy armpits.
And of course, everyone has a thick forest of pubic hair.
It was the Shaggy Seventies.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Todays Perms
()
Date: January 12, 2013 10:47PM
The seventies was the decade of the perm.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
slick w ee n
()
Date: March 06, 2014 08:51PM
most straight porn is good porn
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
WingNut
()
Date: March 06, 2014 08:52PM
Porn is DEAD.
idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam
Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.
Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
bareback
()
Date: March 06, 2014 08:53PM
Too many tattoos today.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Furry
()
Date: March 06, 2014 09:48PM
Ron Jeremy- the only porn star with back hair. That wouldnt happen nowadays. Wax that shit brother.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Priapus
()
Date: March 06, 2014 09:56PM
The chicks in the 70's had real tits. Green Door,Candy, Candy Goes To Hollywood, Devil in Miss Jones, American Taboo, Deep Throat
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Mr.reality
()
Date: March 06, 2014 10:08PM
The 70s porn stars were always coked up! I saw Ron Jeremy suck his own dick in a movie one time! I would never get married if i could do that!?
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
WingNut
()
Date: March 06, 2014 10:11PM
Mr.reality Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 70s porn stars were always coked up! I saw Ron
> Jeremy suck his own dick in a movie one time! I
> would never get married if i could do that!?
If you could blow yourself---
1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
If YES, would it be because-
a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
or
b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
HUh man?!
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 70s porn stars were always coked up! I saw Ron
> Jeremy suck his own dick in a movie one time! I
> would never get married if i could do that!?
If you could blow yourself---
1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
If YES, would it be because-
a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
or
b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
HUh man?!
idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam
Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.
Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
Stabitha
()
Date: March 06, 2014 10:21PM
WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> If you could blow yourself---
>
>
> 1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
>
> If YES, would it be because-
>
> a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
> or
> b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
>
> HUh man?!
Are you saying you wouldnt trust yourself to tell yourself when youre about to blow your load?
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> If you could blow yourself---
>
>
> 1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
>
> If YES, would it be because-
>
> a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
> or
> b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
>
> HUh man?!
Are you saying you wouldnt trust yourself to tell yourself when youre about to blow your load?
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
WingNut
()
Date: March 06, 2014 10:28PM
Stabitha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> > If you could blow yourself---
> >
> >
> > 1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
> >
> > If YES, would it be because-
> >
> > a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
> > or
> > b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
> >
> > HUh man?!
>
> Are you saying you wouldnt trust yourself to tell
> yourself when youre about to blow your load?
It's all part of me, but I don't trust that little fucker down there. Gawd fucking knows where he's been.
-------------------------------------------------------
> WingNut Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> > If you could blow yourself---
> >
> >
> > 1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
> >
> > If YES, would it be because-
> >
> > a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
> > or
> > b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
> >
> > HUh man?!
>
> Are you saying you wouldnt trust yourself to tell
> yourself when youre about to blow your load?
It's all part of me, but I don't trust that little fucker down there. Gawd fucking knows where he's been.
idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam
Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.
Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
abelard
()
Date: March 06, 2014 11:44PM
I think that there's something to be said for vintage porn. It had a more theatrical quality and variety to it that current videos lack. I'm not talking about the thin veneer of 'plot' they bothered to add (which always sucked), I'm talking about the fucking itself. They at least seemed to actually be enjoying themselves or, at minimum, paying attention. Many of the porn stars these days seem ... kinda bored. Everyone is better looking these days (with a few exceptions) and the production and editing are pretty tight, but the sex itself is so formulaic (within their genres) that all the videos seem pretty much the same.
>It's "The Hedgehog".
My shameful secret: a couple of years ago Ron Jeremy was signing copies of his autobiography at Mandalay Bay, and I failed to get a copy. I was in Mandalay Bay, I knew he'd be there from 2 to 4 and I planned to go, but I got on a hot streak at the tables and totally spaced it. I still get choked up sometimes, seeing that gap in my library.
>It's "The Hedgehog".
My shameful secret: a couple of years ago Ron Jeremy was signing copies of his autobiography at Mandalay Bay, and I failed to get a copy. I was in Mandalay Bay, I knew he'd be there from 2 to 4 and I planned to go, but I got on a hot streak at the tables and totally spaced it. I still get choked up sometimes, seeing that gap in my library.
Re: Todays porn vs 1970's porn
Posted by:
The nut has wings
()
Date: March 07, 2014 07:49AM
WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stabitha Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WingNut Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > >
> > > If you could blow yourself---
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
> > >
> > > If YES, would it be because-
> > >
> > > a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
> > > or
> > > b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
> > >
> > > HUh man?!
> >
> > Are you saying you wouldnt trust yourself to
> tell
> > yourself when youre about to blow your load?
>
> It's all part of me, but I don't trust that little
> fucker down there. Gawd fucking knows where he's
> been.
Little fucker? Probably the most honest statement you've posted.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stabitha Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WingNut Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > >
> > > If you could blow yourself---
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) WOULD you wear a rubber?
> > >
> > > If YES, would it be because-
> > >
> > > a) Your mouth doesn't trust your cock?
> > > or
> > > b) Your cock doesn't trust your mouth?
> > >
> > > HUh man?!
> >
> > Are you saying you wouldnt trust yourself to
> tell
> > yourself when youre about to blow your load?
>
> It's all part of me, but I don't trust that little
> fucker down there. Gawd fucking knows where he's
> been.
Little fucker? Probably the most honest statement you've posted.