inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Art Bell Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WashingToneLocian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > inkahootz Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Hitler was the answer to the query posed.
> The
> > > > others were examples of large nations
> losing
> > > > conflicts against guerrilla fighters. The
> > U.S.
> > > is
> > > > involved in both types of situations;
> > fighting
> > > a
> > > > two front war against guerrilla fighters.
> > >
> > >
> > > If Israel has its way, it will soon be a
> three
> > > front war. When the Israelis start bombing
> Iran
> > on
> > > the eve of the 2008 election in a misguided
> > effort
> > > to get McCain elected, oil will be $300 a
> > barrel
> > > and our troops will be fighting hundreds of
> > > thousands of Iranian troops swarming across
> the
> > > border into southern Iraq.
> >
> > And people say only far right wing nutjobs can
> > come up with conspiracy theories. Looks like
> the
> > loony left has its share of tin hatters as well.
>
> > And will the Bilderburg finance the war?
>
>
> Not so far fetched, considering the Joint Chiefs
> of Staff were addressing members of the media in
> regards to this exact same scenario at the
> Penatagon today.
>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic
> le/2008/07/02/AR2008070202798.html?hpid=topnews
So, the Joint Chiefs were addressing the notion that the motive to strike Iran would be to get John McCain elected? And I suppose they said Michael Riconosciuto would be leading the first airstrike?