The timing would be about right - enough to generate really bad press, not enough to have a valid reply impact.

The surprise has to be aimed at women, I'd bet, so easily could be something along the line of the Clinton Saga, huh? Something to attempt to tarnish Obama's rep with women.

Maybe with a drug DEALING angle? That could be somewhat effective.

But whatever it turns out to be will have to have more than one non-Obama party involved to give it stronger effect.

Note - the Late October Surprise cannot, of course, be something positive about Romney so it will HAVE to be something negative about Obama instead.

And any "witnesses" to whatever The Surprise is will be surrounded by lawyers right up front so no Me-Too Media questioning will get meaningful answers.

Hundreds of millions of dollars of SuperPaC money will be more than sufficient to persuade those witnesses to "come forward".

This is gonna be entertaining.

Waiting with baited breath (no, NOT bated breath!).

lawyer Gloria Allred is promising a Romney female scandal.

4 less years, III Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lawyer Gloria Allred is promising a Romney female
> scandal.

I certainly could believe THAT apriori! Lol! Romney is a spoiled spoon-in-mouth literal-people-hurting bully who has made a living out of NOT caring about his fellow humans - wouldn't surprise me at ALL that he has cheated on his wife. He's self-evidentally entitled to it, huh!

But I doubt something like that's coming - we already know what's wrong with Romney so I would expect the Obama campaign to strongly start pumping up Obama's rep with mentions of actual results he's achieving.

We'll see though - should be lots to talk about!

"spoiled spoon-in-mouth literal-people-hurting bully who has made a living out of NOT caring about his fellow humans"

And how much of your enormous wealth have you given to others? I puke when I hear people like you whose mindset is others owe you a living, for what reason I have no idea.

4 more years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 4 less years, III Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lawyer Gloria Allred is promising a Romney
> female
> > scandal.
>
> I certainly could believe THAT apriori! Lol!
> Romney is a spoiled spoon-in-mouth
> literal-people-hurting bully who has made a living
> out of NOT caring about his fellow humans -
> wouldn't surprise me at ALL that he has cheated on
> his wife. He's self-evidentally entitled to it,
> huh!
>
> But I doubt something like that's coming - we
> already know what's wrong with Romney so I would
> expect the Obama campaign to strongly start
> pumping up Obama's rep with mentions of actual
> results he's achieving.
>
> We'll see though - should be lots to talk about!


I certainly could believe it too given that she's about the most disingenuous bitch on the planet who attempts to exploit and extort people based on complete bullshit. And an Obama supporter.

Why people continue to even give her airtime I'll never know.

4 more years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The timing would be about right - enough to
> generate really bad press, not enough to have a
> valid reply impact.
>
> The surprise has to be aimed at women, I'd bet, so
> easily could be something along the line of the
> Clinton Saga, huh? Something to attempt to tarnish
> Obama's rep with women.
>
> Maybe with a drug DEALING angle? That could be
> somewhat effective.
>
> But whatever it turns out to be will have to have
> more than one non-Obama party involved to give it
> stronger effect.
>
> Note - the Late October Surprise cannot, of
> course, be something positive about Romney so it
> will HAVE to be something negative about Obama
> instead.
>
> And any "witnesses" to whatever The Surprise is
> will be surrounded by lawyers right up front so no
> Me-Too Media questioning will get meaningful
> answers.
>
> Hundreds of millions of dollars of SuperPaC money
> will be more than sufficient to persuade those
> witnesses to "come forward".
>
> This is gonna be entertaining.
>
> Waiting with baited breath (no, NOT bated
> breath!).


So...........you're throwing in the towel?

Making excuses already?

No, not at all - I think Obama's gonna win by a landslide of supreme proportion - politics of hate won't work.

But...I also believe the Insane Party oF Hatred (and No) truly doesn't understand that - when things are going "not that bad" they HAVE to tell the voters why the voters shuld throw out the current bum and replace him with their bum - and that certainly hasn't happened yet! And the voters get it - thye'll say, too, "Uh, why throw him out?"

And they won't.

But the SuperPCS certainly will keep trying to tarnish Obama rather than pump up Romney. That's all they know.

4 more years, II Wrote:
> But the SuperPCS certainly will keep trying to
> tarnish Obama rather than pump up Romney. That's
> all they know.


That's the only thing you've contributed here in the last year. Tarnish for anyone that would dare to run against Obama.

Granted, you did point out when the unemployment rate dropped 3/10s of a percent.

It's got to be tough on you propping up a guy that's all but a complete failure.

Tell me, do you have a job? Work outside the home? Actually talk to people?

"Granted, you did point out when the unemployment rate dropped 3/10s of a percent."

and it only cost us five trillion dollars, Foreward

do it yourself Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "spoiled spoon-in-mouth literal-people-hurting
> bully who has made a living out of NOT caring
> about his fellow humans"
>
> And how much of your enormous wealth have you
> given to others? I puke when I hear people like
> you whose mindset is others owe you a living, for
> what reason I have no idea.


If someone accuses Romney of feeling entitled to privilege, you automatically assume they feel entitled to be the caricature portrayed on Fox News?

I'm not the one who made the remark you commented on, but I take issue with the idea that in order for someone to have a problem with the mindset of elite privilege, they have to be lazy people who expect others to provide for them.

I don't have "enormous wealth" so I can't give a 20 million dollar tithe to my church. But if I could, I wouldn't consider that charitable, since it is considered an obligation of faith. I do, however, spend considerable amount of MY time helping friends and family when they are in need. I help my neighbors. I don't believe in charity, I believe in positive actions. When my elderly neighbor can't shovel 3 feet of snow from her driveway, I do it for her. When a friend almost lost his business because he became disabled after an accident, I drove him all over god's creation so he could continue to produce income.

So, next time you are about to accuse someone of being the caricature in your head, stop and think. Quit reacting as if the whole world is out to take your hard earned money. That bunker mentality is just plain dumb.

Looks like they decided to release it already - too early, IMHO - I think this early is a mistake because the Me-Too Media will tire of it too quickly.

We'll see on Wednesday, huh?

4 more years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Looks like they decided to release it already -
> too early, IMHO - I think this early is a mistake
> because the Me-Too Media will tire of it too
> quickly.
>
> We'll see on Wednesday, huh?


Ya think?

Whatever it is gets released on Wednesday. The main stream media does what they do best, ignore it for a week before burying it on the back page. Talk radio and Fox News covers it ad nauseum until their most steadfast viewers/listeners (namely YOU) bitch and moan and cry about it on this forum and others around the world. The timing is perfect. You and your friends wont be able to stop blathering about whatever it is just a day or two before the election.

Landslide, yes. But now for who you think it'll be for.