HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Re: more CLINTON era scandals: the Clinton CATV networks all said "front wheel drive was more fuel efficient and better driving"
Posted by: Uncle Sam 107d ()
Date: May 11, 2024 10:39PM

opponents said "this is an asian auto maker lie: the only purpose these serve is LIGHTER SHIPPING WEIGHT for china at the same price as better USA ones"

ads told consumers they were more fuel efficient (lie, drive axels did not waste fuel). they were more resilient (lie - they broke easier). they were better in snow (mostly a lie: a rear wheel vehicle with weight in the back is just as good - but really chains and snow tires and ground clearance are more important - not FWD)

problem? hell yes. mechanics immediately hated them and their fears would all come true:

4) lying to consumer that "they are more fuel efficient and better and anything asian is better than american old poo"

as it turned out they were NOT more fuel efficient and their repair schedules were far worse

1) ALLOT less room to work on things. they were terrible for mechanics.

2) having to pull both transmission and engine when only 1 is needed

3) impossible to get repair parts. all of these were "make them once throw away the key". impossible to do repair procedures. (you need a new one)

5) after gaining "footing" and investment cash from that false market - the asians changed their story and BEGAN MAKING REAR WHEEL DRIVE - which previously they couldn't do. DANA. drive shafts and gear boxes - which USA STOPPED MAKING AND OUTSOURCED TO CHINA coincidentally - when asians began "the switch".

more details of CLINTON era auto lies:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/4148732/4148786.html#msg-4148786


but it's not about a design "so called mistake" by china

IT'S ABOUT THE LIES AND ABOUT CLINTON CABLE TV NETWORKS ALL HELPING THE LIE SPREAD WITH METHODICAL PREEISION pervasive in all hollywood media commercials and news



you never saw a news broadcaster say, "front wheel drive is a lie"

you never saw anything on tv except that "FWD is the future of all cars"

but it wasn't and isn't: it's a lie

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: more CLINTON era scandals: the Clinton CATV networks all said "front wheel drive was more fuel efficient and better driving"
Posted by: 324rt ()
Date: May 11, 2024 10:51PM

elements-transmission-power-train-engine

that little grey part has to take all the stress of driving. all that stress in a little box could only be handled by high tech metals and superior machining: THAT'S A JOKE it's made in china they didn't do any of that

it then also has to have ALL THE UP GEARS necessary for efficiency (ie, 1,2,3,+overdrive). but they often didn't: didn't fit in the little box.

it also takes up a huge amount of space mechanics need to work - kills it

Transmission-system.jpg

it sits in-between passengers not in the engine compartment. a good place to be.

* this trans obviously is longer and, not unbelievably, can handle more stress over a longer period of time without failure. the "gasoline loss of the drive shaft" is actuall NEGLIGABLE. the reason why is THE SHAFT to rear wheels spins relatively slowly


Again: it's not about bad design. IT'S ABOUT THE LIES and how the democrat party strategically HELPED CHINA LIE while quieting the right.


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: more CLINTON era scandals: the Clinton CATV networks all said "front wheel drive was more fuel efficient and better driving"
Posted by: 4587., ()
Date: May 11, 2024 10:55PM

little red riding hood

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: more CLINTON era scandals: the Clinton CATV networks all said "front wheel drive was more fuel efficient and better driving"
Posted by: 35g4nj6t ()
Date: May 13, 2024 03:59PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **   *******   ********  **    **  ********  
  **  **   **     **     **     **   **   **     ** 
   ****           **     **     **  **    **     ** 
    **      *******      **     *****     **     ** 
    **            **     **     **  **    **     ** 
    **     **     **     **     **   **   **     ** 
    **      *******      **     **    **  ********  
This forum powered by Phorum.