Re: more CLINTON era scandals: the Clinton CATV networks all said "front wheel drive was more fuel efficient and better driving"
opponents said "this is an asian auto maker lie: the only purpose these serve is LIGHTER SHIPPING WEIGHT for china at the same price as better USA ones"
ads told consumers they were more fuel efficient (lie, drive axels did not waste fuel). they were more resilient (lie - they broke easier). they were better in snow (mostly a lie: a rear wheel vehicle with weight in the back is just as good - but really chains and snow tires and ground clearance are more important - not FWD)
problem? hell yes. mechanics immediately hated them and their fears would all come true:
4) lying to consumer that "they are more fuel efficient and better and anything asian is better than american old poo"
as it turned out they were NOT more fuel efficient and their repair schedules were far worse
1) ALLOT less room to work on things. they were terrible for mechanics.
2) having to pull both transmission and engine when only 1 is needed
3) impossible to get repair parts. all of these were "make them once throw away the key". impossible to do repair procedures. (you need a new one)
5) after gaining "footing" and investment cash from that false market - the asians changed their story and BEGAN MAKING REAR WHEEL DRIVE - which previously they couldn't do. DANA. drive shafts and gear boxes - which USA STOPPED MAKING AND OUTSOURCED TO CHINA coincidentally - when asians began "the switch".
more details of CLINTON era auto lies:
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/4148732/4148786.html#msg-4148786
but it's not about a design "so called mistake" by china
IT'S ABOUT THE LIES AND ABOUT CLINTON CABLE TV NETWORKS ALL HELPING THE LIE SPREAD WITH METHODICAL PREEISION pervasive in all hollywood media commercials and news
you never saw a news broadcaster say, "front wheel drive is a lie"
you never saw anything on tv except that "FWD is the future of all cars"
but it wasn't and isn't: it's a lie